Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Cap Space

Cap Space

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
12 Posts 8 Posters 502 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Zombo Z
    • 8k Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Tons to play with. We can re-sign Pryor, go after Collins (franchise if needed), and throw a decent offer at Paz.

    Sign all of our draft picks. Sign role players.

    And then still have the cash to go after 3-4 starters 26 and under.

    If we don't like the draft and we want to make a splash at QB we can do that too, but I think Cousins stays in Wash and Romo too old for us, so the only real target might be Garrapolo who we would trade for and lock up with a deal.

    Zombo

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • gftChris gftChrisG
      • 13k Posts
      • 428 Reputation
      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by gftChris
      #4

      Guys up for renewal in 2018:

      Bitonio

      Kirksey

      Davis

      Greco

      RG3

      Plus others, who might become worth resigning, like Ed Reynolds and Jamie Meder.

      At least two big contracts there for Bitonio and Kirksey, so need to plan for the following year when signing players this offseason.

      darren15D 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • gftChrisG gftChris

        Guys up for renewal in 2018:

        Bitonio

        Kirksey

        Davis

        Greco

        RG3

        Plus others, who might become worth resigning, like Ed Reynolds and Jamie Meder.

        At least two big contracts there for Bitonio and Kirksey, so need to plan for the following year when signing players this offseason.

        darren15 darren15D Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 4k Posts
        • 959 Reputation
        darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
        #5

        @gftchris said:

        Guys up for renewal in 2014:

        Bitonio

        Kirksey

        Davis

        Greco

        RG3

        Plus others, who might become worth resigning, like Ed Reynolds and Jamie Meder.

        At least two big contracts there for Bitonio and Kirksey, so need to plan for the following year when signing players this offseason.

        I am more interested in those up for renewal next year .....

        gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • darren15D darren15

          @gftchris said:

          Guys up for renewal in 2014:

          Bitonio

          Kirksey

          Davis

          Greco

          RG3

          Plus others, who might become worth resigning, like Ed Reynolds and Jamie Meder.

          At least two big contracts there for Bitonio and Kirksey, so need to plan for the following year when signing players this offseason.

          I am more interested in those up for renewal next year .....

          gftChris gftChrisG
          • 13k Posts
          • 428 Reputation
          gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @darren15 said:

          I am more interested in those up for renewal next year .....

          lulz...yeah I was looking at our 2014 draft I guess?

          Also up for renewal in 2018 - Josh Gordon.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
            #7

            We're pretty much going to have to spend SOMETHING if we plan on keeping some of the little talent we have on the roster. Both Pryor and Collins will demand big bucks, and it's unknown how they will play out. I have a sneaking suspicion that Collins only plays for us again if we franchise him. I just can't see a guy coming from New England (where you always win), and going to Cleveland where you never win. That's such a huge transition...and it's not like the Browns would be the only team to offer Collins huge bucks. To ensure we DO franchise him, we have to get Pryor's deal done immediately, and I would hope it's sooner than later. Like...now. We haven't heard any developments regarding Pryor's contract, but that's normal. This is a guy we found, that other teams like New England didn't WANT, and we put forth the time and the effort to develop him. We simply CAN'T let another franchise reap those rewards. Overpay the guy, who cares. He's EXACTLY the kind of guy we want on this football team. Btw, can you IMAGINE the Patriots' offense if they had Terrell Pryor?? Yeesh.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
              • 30k Posts
              • 6k Reputation
              Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Actually I am not sure I can imagine the Pats coveting TP. He does not fit their WR general profile of smaller, cat-quick, precise route-runners. And as yet he's not displayed a full route tree.

              In recent memory the Pats have signed two, big-name, WR FAs: Moss and Chad Johnson... at least those are the only two I remember. One worked out.

              That said... back to the main point. If our QB plans are made clear to TP, then that plus his gratitude for us giving him a shot and his apparent love of Hue, may get a deal done. His visible frustration with out passing attack/QB play makes sharing this plan important. Also, as I've posted before, an incentive laden plan with injury guarantees will go a long way to securing him.

              And the above is step one is retaining Collins where the tag may be the only way to keep him around long enough to see the franchise begin its turn. Is he worth tagging?

              Average top-five, 2017 money for 3-4 OLBs will be ~$17.8mm. That'd be his price tag. His production would not seem to warrant that pay, but there may be enough in the tape plus intangibles to close any gap. And opposite the right draftee his numbers might well rise to the pay grade.

              "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
              flyingfooldougF 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                Actually I am not sure I can imagine the Pats coveting TP. He does not fit their WR general profile of smaller, cat-quick, precise route-runners. And as yet he's not displayed a full route tree.

                In recent memory the Pats have signed two, big-name, WR FAs: Moss and Chad Johnson... at least those are the only two I remember. One worked out.

                That said... back to the main point. If our QB plans are made clear to TP, then that plus his gratitude for us giving him a shot and his apparent love of Hue, may get a deal done. His visible frustration with out passing attack/QB play makes sharing this plan important. Also, as I've posted before, an incentive laden plan with injury guarantees will go a long way to securing him.

                And the above is step one is retaining Collins where the tag may be the only way to keep him around long enough to see the franchise begin its turn. Is he worth tagging?

                Average top-five, 2017 money for 3-4 OLBs will be ~$17.8mm. That'd be his price tag. His production would not seem to warrant that pay, but there may be enough in the tape plus intangibles to close any gap. And opposite the right draftee his numbers might well rise to the pay grade.

                flyingfooldoug flyingfooldougF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 4k Posts
                • 728 Reputation
                flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by flyingfooldoug
                #9

                @tour2ma said:

                Actually I am not sure I can imagine the Pats coveting TP. He does not fit their WR general profile of smaller, cat-quick, precise route-runners. And as yet he's not displayed a full route tree.

                In recent memory the Pats have signed two, big-name, WR FAs: Moss and Chad Johnson... at least those are the only two I remember. One worked out.

                That said... back to the main point. If our QB plans are made clear to TP, then that plus his gratitude for us giving him a shot and his apparent love of Hue, may get a deal done. His visible frustration with out passing attack/QB play makes sharing this plan important. Also, as I've posted before, an incentive laden plan with injury guarantees will go a long way to securing him.

                And the above is step one is retaining Collins where the tag may be the only way to keep him around long enough to see the franchise begin its turn. Is he worth tagging?

                Average top-five, 2017 money for 3-4 OLBs will be ~$17.8mm. That'd be his price tag. His production would not seem to warrant that pay, but there may be enough in the tape plus intangibles to close any gap. And opposite the right draftee his numbers might well rise to the pay grade.

                I have read it more than once that the Pack has their sights set on Pryor. I was hoping to get a long term deal with him at the trade deadline to keep him here. The big bucks have been known to sway loyalty more than once
                gumby73G 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug

                  @tour2ma said:

                  Actually I am not sure I can imagine the Pats coveting TP. He does not fit their WR general profile of smaller, cat-quick, precise route-runners. And as yet he's not displayed a full route tree.

                  In recent memory the Pats have signed two, big-name, WR FAs: Moss and Chad Johnson... at least those are the only two I remember. One worked out.

                  That said... back to the main point. If our QB plans are made clear to TP, then that plus his gratitude for us giving him a shot and his apparent love of Hue, may get a deal done. His visible frustration with out passing attack/QB play makes sharing this plan important. Also, as I've posted before, an incentive laden plan with injury guarantees will go a long way to securing him.

                  And the above is step one is retaining Collins where the tag may be the only way to keep him around long enough to see the franchise begin its turn. Is he worth tagging?

                  Average top-five, 2017 money for 3-4 OLBs will be ~$17.8mm. That'd be his price tag. His production would not seem to warrant that pay, but there may be enough in the tape plus intangibles to close any gap. And opposite the right draftee his numbers might well rise to the pay grade.

                  I have read it more than once that the Pack has their sights set on Pryor. I was hoping to get a long term deal with him at the trade deadline to keep him here. The big bucks have been known to sway loyalty more than once
                  gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 11k Posts
                  • 4k Reputation
                  gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
                  #10

                  @flyingfooldoug said:

                  I have read it more than once that the Pack has their sights set on Pryor. I was hoping to get a long term deal with him at the trade deadline to keep him here.

                  Alot of the extensions get done during a bye week. Especially late byes, if player/agent are willing to talk during season. Drew Dough$ n House will certainly treat SB as a rookie GM..Now is the time..Get eeerrr Done!! Collins more like the tag & run to highest bidder player. I see No Keugley deal yet with Collins

                  Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • flyingfooldoug flyingfooldougF One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 728 Reputation
                    flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    I guess if our FAs bolt, that will be a good indicator of how the build is progressing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 5k Posts
                      • 363 Reputation
                      W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Just what Green Bay needs. Another receiver.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate