Draft Talk
-
Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....
-
Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....
Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....
If we don't take a QB with one of our first rounders, there's no point taking a QB to be honest.
But imagine a draft looking like Myles Garrett, Malik Hooker, Adoree' Jackson, Pat Elflein...I could live with it.
-
Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down...
... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
It's kinda fun having #1 and #12.
-
Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down...
... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.
Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down...
... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.
Notre Dame Homer?
WSS
-
Notre Dame Homer?
Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Word is that Josh Allen QB from Wyoming may be declaring. From what I watched of him, he has the physical tools but is another project.
-
Notre Dame Homer?
Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.
Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.
Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.
His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.
-
Far from it, Sir Kilts-a-Lot. I have never been a fan of the Domers... just like Kizer's chances enough to spend the 33 on him.
Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.
His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.
Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.
His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.
Do you think he will last till 33?
-
Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.
His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.
Do you think he will last till 33?
Do you think he will last till 33?
I don't think so, but it sure would be nice. The Browns picking up 2 difference makers on defense in the first, and a prospect like Kizer at the top of the second would be titties.
-
Kizer is going to make 31 teams upset they passed on him, IMO. Not a ND fan in the least, save for the fact that I'm Catholic so I have to be.
His flaws are manageable and his strengths are franchise-material. There is something to be said for a guy who can drop dimes anywhere on the field while under pressure, which there is no denying Kizer can do. It's working out the kinks in the rest of his game that's the concern. Perfect pick for #33.
Do you think he will last till 33?
Do you think he will last till 33?
I don't. I could see a team like Arizona trading out to #20 or later and nabbing him there. Especially if Peppers or another top 5 guy slides down to 11 and a team like NY or Oakland thinks they are one playmaker away from making a run.
Kizer would fit in pretty well in an Arians offense.
-
Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....
If we don't take a QB with one of our first rounders, there's no point taking a QB to be honest.
But imagine a draft looking like Myles Garrett, Malik Hooker, Adoree' Jackson, Pat Elflein...I could live with it.
-
Yeah, no kidding about Hooker. He'd fill a huge need, and I heard someone say he's the best pure free safety prospect since Ed Reid. The problem with picking Hooker is...who do we get to be our damn QB? Can we really pass on Garrett? Do we really want another second or third round rookie QB prospect? Ugh....
If we don't take a QB with one of our first rounders, there's no point taking a QB to be honest.
But imagine a draft looking like Myles Garrett, Malik Hooker, Adoree' Jackson, Pat Elflein...I could live with it.
If we don't take a QB with one of our first rounders, there's no point taking a QB to be honest.
But imagine a draft looking like Myles Garrett, Malik Hooker, Adoree' Jackson, Pat Elflein...I could live with it.
I wholeheartedly disagree - I think there's a number of talented project QB's that can be had in the second or third rounds that offer franchise potential if given time to sit.
I could very easily see us continuing with the RG3 experiment and having Kessler serve as backup while we groom a guy like Allen, Mahomes or Kizer (if he falls).
Allen would be my first choice if we go the route of project, as it would enable us to get difference makers with our first four picks. However, I still would prefer a Garrett/Trubisky 1/2 over anything else.
-
Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down...
... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.
Hooker entering the picture helps push Foster down...
... but I would not mind Hooker being the pick.QB-wise... I really like Kizer at #33.
You can pretty much post for me at this point.
Allen, Hooker, Kizer, then Oline depth and secondary.
I'm not opposed to trading down our 2nd first rounder because some people will be learly of taking a safety near top.10. 13-15 range.
-
My point is that we essentially selected Kessler to be that project, and he hasn't looked awful. If we get a stud instant franchise guy then great, but we already have a third round project guy.
Alternatively, we also have a guy with a big arm and athleticism in RG3.
I don't want more projects started, I want to actually finish a product or get a finished article.
-
My point is that we essentially selected Kessler to be that project, and he hasn't looked awful. If we get a stud instant franchise guy then great, but we already have a third round project guy.
Alternatively, we also have a guy with a big arm and athleticism in RG3.
I don't want more projects started, I want to actually finish a product or get a finished article.
But RG3 is a project, albeit with a salvage title.My point is that we essentially selected Kessler to be that project, and he hasn't looked awful. If we get a stud instant franchise guy then great, but we already have a third round project guy.
Alternatively, we also have a guy with a big arm and athleticism in RG3.
I don't want more projects started, I want to actually finish a product or get a finished article.
None of the three top quarterbacks have been NFL failures yet.
No idea how accurate this list of prospects might be when push comes to shove. Others have rated MT as the best QB prospect of the three.
Most seem to have Garrett over Allen.
If the first pic is not a quarterback I'll expect him to start and make a difference day one.
WSS
-
It's hard to say when QB's may be taken, considering the draft order of QB's between now and draft time can change drastically. I wouldn't be surprised to see this draft end up like whatever year EJ Manuel went #16 overall as the first QB off the board. There are just so many question marks about some of these QB's. I just think that without a doubt, baring some crazy pre draft injury, that Garrett is the guy. Wouldn't be mad with Allen either at #1. Both would make an immediate impact and have the potential to be consistent pro bowlers. Hooker at #12 would be a steal as well. He does have some injury concerns, and he was only a 1 year starter, but he has shown to have elite level instincts.
I honestly wouldn't be mad to see us not draft a QB, but I also wouldn't be mad if we did. Just so many questions marks. Honestly I think taking a shot at Tyrod Taylor (assuming that he gets cut) would be a good option.
-
Mahomes declared for the draft today.
-
It's hard to say when QB's may be taken, considering the draft order of QB's between now and draft time can change drastically. I wouldn't be surprised to see this draft end up like whatever year EJ Manuel went #16 overall as the first QB off the board. There are just so many question marks about some of these QB's. I just think that without a doubt, baring some crazy pre draft injury, that Garrett is the guy. Wouldn't be mad with Allen either at #1. Both would make an immediate impact and have the potential to be consistent pro bowlers. Hooker at #12 would be a steal as well. He does have some injury concerns, and he was only a 1 year starter, but he has shown to have elite level instincts.
I honestly wouldn't be mad to see us not draft a QB, but I also wouldn't be mad if we did. Just so many questions marks. Honestly I think taking a shot at Tyrod Taylor (assuming that he gets cut) would be a good option.
It's hard to say when QB's may be taken, considering the draft order of QB's between now and draft time can change drastically. I wouldn't be surprised to see this draft end up like whatever year EJ Manuel went #16 overall as the first QB off the board. There are just so many question marks about some of these QB's. I just think that without a doubt, baring some crazy pre draft injury, that Garrett is the guy. Wouldn't be mad with Allen either at #1. Both would make an immediate impact and have the potential to be consistent pro bowlers. Hooker at #12 would be a steal as well. He does have some injury concerns, and he was only a 1 year starter, but he has shown to have elite level instincts.
I honestly wouldn't be mad to see us not draft a QB, but I also wouldn't be mad if we did. Just so many questions marks. Honestly I think taking a shot at Tyrod Taylor (assuming that he gets cut) would be a good option.
I was thinking the same thing with Tyrod but the last I heard he was trying to get surgery in order the guarantee his contract. Granted I've slept since reading that article so I could be off on that. Regardless, he's a guy worth monitoring.
-
Not a fan of going after Tyrod... nice QB, but I don't think "" when I see him.
Agree with those not seeing Kizer last to #33, but should he fall there, then Imma take'n him. If he's not, then I'll find one later... maybe even Day 3. Chad Kelly should be there then... he'd do until I do more work.
Remember my motto: You always have to be looking for your next QB.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login