Possible Next Browns QB
-
I'd take bridgewater in general but it depends on his recovery. If he misses most of camp then it isn't worth it.
I'd take bridgewater in general but it depends on his recovery. If he misses most of camp then it isn't worth it.
Is Bridgewater on the block in Minnesota?
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
In any case I don't think he'd be a good fit
-
Is Bridgewater on the block in Minnesota?
Zimmer said that Bradford is the likely starter next year and thus Bridgewater will be the backup. Opens the door for the Vikes possibly wanting to move him.
-
Is Bridgewater on the block in Minnesota?
Zimmer said that Bradford is the likely starter next year and thus Bridgewater will be the backup. Opens the door for the Vikes possibly wanting to move him.
Zimmer said that Bradford is the likely starter next year and thus Bridgewater will be the backup. Opens the door for the Vikes possibly wanting to move him.
He's cheap - rookie contract - but also going into his last year of it I think, same draft as Bortles, Carr, Garoppolo, McCarron etc. He's also shown the ability to play in this league, so essentially they have two potential franchise QBs. If the price is right, I'm all on board.
-
Zimmer said that Bradford is the likely starter next year and thus Bridgewater will be the backup. Opens the door for the Vikes possibly wanting to move him.
He's cheap - rookie contract - but also going into his last year of it I think, same draft as Bortles, Carr, Garoppolo, McCarron etc. He's also shown the ability to play in this league, so essentially they have two potential franchise QBs. If the price is right, I'm all on board.
He's cheap - rookie contract - but also going into his last year of it I think, same draft as Bortles, Carr, Garoppolo, McCarron etc. He's also shown the ability to play in this league, so essentially they have two potential franchise QBs. If the price is right, I'm all on board.
Or conversely no potential franchise quarterbacks.
WSS
-
The Browns will have a starting QB in 2017......BOOK IT!!
Mike
The Browns will have a starting QB in 2017......BOOK IT!!
Also... a starting LT... a starting LG... a starting C... a starting...
Zimmer said that Bradford is the likely starter next year and thus Bridgewater will be the backup. Opens the door for the Vikes possibly wanting to move him.
Teddy is looking at a recovery that extends in the 2017 regular season. And then there's no telling what he'll be like on the field.
His value won't be high enough to trade in 2017. Plus it wasn't like Bradford was the answer to their prayers...
-
Browns next QB???......I cant believe no one has figured this out or even mentioned it yet......
It will be Tyrod Taylor..........book it!!!
-
The Browns will have a starting QB in 2017......BOOK IT!!
Mike
The Browns will have a starting QB in 2017......BOOK IT!!
Mike
If past history is any indication they could have 3-4 of them!
-
I'd take bridgewater in general but it depends on his recovery. If he misses most of camp then it isn't worth it.
Bridgewater made it abundantly clear he didn't want to play here during the draft. We don't need gimpy here if he never wanted to be here in the 1st place.
I'm definitely warming up to A.J. though. Very credible reports are coming that he will be actively available and he looked pretty solid there in relief of Dalton. I also like (just like Jimmy G.) that's he's got a year left on his contract so if he doesn't pan out we wouldn't end up in an Osweiler situation. This also gives the Browns A LOT of flexibility in the draft which I greatly am in favor for.
Bridgewater made it abundantly clear he didn't want to play here during the draft. We don't need gimpy here if he never wanted to be here in the 1st place.
I'm definitely warming up to A.J. though. Very credible reports are coming that he will be actively available and he looked pretty solid there in relief of Dalton. I also like (just like Jimmy G.) that's he's got a year left on his contract so if he doesn't pan out we wouldn't end up in an Osweiler situation. This also gives the Browns A LOT of flexibility in the draft which I greatly am in favor for.
Fuck the Twat.
-
I'd take bridgewater in general but it depends on his recovery. If he misses most of camp then it isn't worth it.
Bridgewater made it abundantly clear he didn't want to play here during the draft. We don't need gimpy here if he never wanted to be here in the 1st place.
I'm definitely warming up to A.J. though. Very credible reports are coming that he will be actively available and he looked pretty solid there in relief of Dalton. I also like (just like Jimmy G.) that's he's got a year left on his contract so if he doesn't pan out we wouldn't end up in an Osweiler situation. This also gives the Browns A LOT of flexibility in the draft which I greatly am in favor for.
Bridgewater made it abundantly clear he didn't want to play here during the draft. We don't need gimpy here if he never wanted to be here in the 1st place.
I'm definitely warming up to A.J. though. Very credible reports are coming that he will be actively available and he looked pretty solid there in relief of Dalton. I also like (just like Jimmy G.) that's he's got a year left on his contract so if he doesn't pan out we wouldn't end up in an Osweiler situation. This also gives the Browns A LOT of flexibility in the draft which I greatly am in favor for.
My interest in Garropolo is inversely proportional to how much New England wants for him. For those of you who flunked math, the more the Patriots want, the less I'm interested. We'd still be out a high pick if he bombs, so I'll ask you- What would be the difference if we pick a qb in the first round this year and he bombs?
Bridgewater is coming off the surgery, so I pass on that idea.
I'm not sold on McCarron either FWIW.
-
Bridgewater made it abundantly clear he didn't want to play here during the draft. We don't need gimpy here if he never wanted to be here in the 1st place.
I'm definitely warming up to A.J. though. Very credible reports are coming that he will be actively available and he looked pretty solid there in relief of Dalton. I also like (just like Jimmy G.) that's he's got a year left on his contract so if he doesn't pan out we wouldn't end up in an Osweiler situation. This also gives the Browns A LOT of flexibility in the draft which I greatly am in favor for.
My interest in Garropolo is inversely proportional to how much New England wants for him. For those of you who flunked math, the more the Patriots want, the less I'm interested. We'd still be out a high pick if he bombs, so I'll ask you- What would be the difference if we pick a qb in the first round this year and he bombs?
Bridgewater is coming off the surgery, so I pass on that idea.
I'm not sold on McCarron either FWIW.
My interest in Garropolo is inversely proportional to how much New England wants for him. For those of you who flunked math, the more the Patriots want, the less I'm interested. We'd still be out a high pick if he bombs, so I'll ask you- What would be the difference if we pick a qb in the first round this year and he bombs?
Bridgewater is coming off the surgery, so I pass on that idea.
I'm not sold on McCarron either FWIW.
I've noted that I would be fine with using the Titans 2nd round pick and a future 3rd to get Jimmy G. if the Pats would take it. These reports of a 1st and a 4th are nonsense because no one is going to pay that.
I get what you're saying, but Tom Brady is a fucking enigma of a situation for the Patriots. The guy seemingly could play at an elite level for even 3-4 more years let's say. Jimmy G. has another year on his contract and he'll become a UFA after that. Say they feel Tom Brady today has the giddyup for three more seasons-do you pay Jimmy what it would take and have a high priced back-up for two seasons on the bench? If you look at it that way, I don't think it's absurd to think they know they are losing a good prospect but would still trade him away.
The reason I'm interested at all is because Jimmy is certainly the most interesting back-up in the Patriots chain since Matt Cassell.
-
On NFL Insiders yesterday A.J. being traded was discussed.
In his assessment of how interested teams should be in A.J., Bill Polian, the guy many her lust after to be our "football guy", said:
"Very. If you are a team in need of a starter, and several teams are, A.J. should be #1 on your list and that includes the current crop of QBs in the draft."
So there's that...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
And there's this...
Bengal mouthpiece Dave Lapham claims the Bengals turned down a 2nd and 4th round draft picks in exchange for McCarron last year. Said the Bengals were adamant about getting a 1st rounder for him. No word who the team was interested in making a trade, but Cleveland was named as one of the usual suspects. That said, McCarron started and played well against two other QB needy teams, San Francisco and Denver.
FWIW most think the Bengals are more interested in trading McCarron this year than last. Whether that means they'd take less is anyones guess. Also of note, McCarron has only a year left on his contract, but because he was injured when drafted didn't accrue a season towards free agency. Thus, any team trading for him could control his rights for a 2nd season simply by making a tender offer.
-
On NFL Insiders yesterday A.J. being traded was discussed.
In his assessment of how interested teams should be in A.J., Bill Polian, the guy many her lust after to be our "football guy", said:
"Very. If you are a team in need of a starter, and several teams are, A.J. should be #1 on your list and that includes the current crop of QBs in the draft."
So there's that...
On NFL Insiders yesterday A.J. being traded was discussed.
In his assessment of how interested teams should be in A.J., Bill Polian, the guy many her lust after to be our "football guy", said:
"Very. If you are a team in need of a starter, and several teams are, A.J. should be #1 on your list and that includes the current crop of QBs in the draft."
So there's that...
Polian knows his shit. More than any of us around here so if he thinks he's worth going after, then I'm all in.
-
Not a bad idea but I don't think Cincy would trade a QB within the division.
Also, it's been leaked the Browns are going to make a strong push for Garoppolo, and if he doesn't end up coming here we have Trubisky #1 on our draft board.
-
And there's this...
Bengal mouthpiece Dave Lapham claims the Bengals turned down a 2nd and 4th round draft picks in exchange for McCarron last year. Said the Bengals were adamant about getting a 1st rounder for him. No word who the team was interested in making a trade, but Cleveland was named as one of the usual suspects. That said, McCarron started and played well against two other QB needy teams, San Francisco and Denver.
FWIW most think the Bengals are more interested in trading McCarron this year than last. Whether that means they'd take less is anyones guess. Also of note, McCarron has only a year left on his contract, but because he was injured when drafted didn't accrue a season towards free agency. Thus, any team trading for him could control his rights for a 2nd season simply by making a tender offer.
And there's this...
Bengal mouthpiece Dave Lapham claims the Bengals turned down a 2nd and 4th round draft picks in exchange for McCarron last year. Said the Bengals were adamant about getting a 1st rounder for him. No word who the team was interested in making a trade, but Cleveland was named as one of the usual suspects. That said, McCarron started and played well against two other QB needy teams, San Francisco and Denver.
FWIW most think the Bengals are more interested in trading McCarron this year than last. Whether that means they'd take less is anyones guess. Also of note, McCarron has only a year left on his contract, but because he was injured when drafted didn't accrue a season towards free agency. Thus, any team trading for him could control his rights for a 2nd season simply by making a tender offer.
Yo Uma, long time no hear from. We were worried about you. Fer sure, the Browns won't offer a first rounder for him. Would the Bengals trade him to a division rival if they value him that highly? Other thing is come draft day- every vet who has trade value sees that drop dramatically. The Browns are in a position to wait anyone out. If no one swoops in for Jimmy G or AJ, their trade value draft day is going to drop like a rock.
-
And there's this...
Bengal mouthpiece Dave Lapham claims the Bengals turned down a 2nd and 4th round draft picks in exchange for McCarron last year. Said the Bengals were adamant about getting a 1st rounder for him. No word who the team was interested in making a trade, but Cleveland was named as one of the usual suspects. That said, McCarron started and played well against two other QB needy teams, San Francisco and Denver.
FWIW most think the Bengals are more interested in trading McCarron this year than last. Whether that means they'd take less is anyones guess. Also of note, McCarron has only a year left on his contract, but because he was injured when drafted didn't accrue a season towards free agency. Thus, any team trading for him could control his rights for a 2nd season simply by making a tender offer.
And there's this...
Bengal mouthpiece Dave Lapham claims the Bengals turned down a 2nd and 4th round draft picks in exchange for McCarron last year. Said the Bengals were adamant about getting a 1st rounder for him. No word who the team was interested in making a trade, but Cleveland was named as one of the usual suspects. That said, McCarron started and played well against two other QB needy teams, San Francisco and Denver.
FWIW most think the Bengals are more interested in trading McCarron this year than last. Whether that means they'd take less is anyones guess. Also of note, McCarron has only a year left on his contract, but because he was injured when drafted didn't accrue a season towards free agency. Thus, any team trading for him could control his rights for a 2nd season simply by making a tender offer.
Damn, we shine the blue light special welcome back beacon mass email and look what comes strolling into town! Good to see ya Umadogg!
I'd be surprised if we gave up a first round pick for McCarron and even bigger surprised if the deal was done within the division, let alone State.
-
Yeah, the blue light special e-mail. Cracked me up. Made me wonder how lonely you guys must be to invite old trolls back.
Then I read how you invited Ghoulie back for the umpteenth time and I realized I wasn't so special after all.
-
Yeah, the blue light special e-mail. Cracked me up. Made me wonder how lonely you guys must be to invite old trolls back.
Then I read how you invited Ghoulie back for the umpteenth time and I realized I wasn't so special after all.
Yeah, the blue light special e-mail. Cracked me up. Made me wonder how lonely you guys must be to invite old trolls back.
Then I read how you invited Ghoulie back for the umpteenth time and I realized I wasn't so special after all.
We just want the whole gang back together when we finally win that Super Bowl ... since we are so close, we thought we'd send out the bat signal.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login