Skip to content

DNC goes to war with white people

Political Discussion
15 5 688
  • As usual ur letting a natrative be spun for you instead of listening to the womans actual words, but we're on planet CALbertron so its ok

  • Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.

    In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"

  • Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.

    In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"

    @gftchris said:

    Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.

    In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"

    Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?

    🙂

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    Cal, I'm pretty sure you were a headline writer in a previous life. Meaning, the article you link to has quotes, then twists it in a negative way to make a headline to fit the narrative, then you take just the headline, and twist it to make a new headline to fit a narrative.

    In this case: "there aren't enough minorities involved in government" -> "DNC bashes white people" -> DNC goes to war with white people"

    Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?

    🙂

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?

    🙂

    WSS

    Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.

    'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Would that be a good headline if the story were there are too damn many Negroes in government?

    🙂

    WSS

    Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.

    'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.

    @gftchris said:

    Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.

    'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.

    Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.

    WSS

  • @gftchris said:

    Get back to me when anything other than straight white males are over-represented in government.

    'too damn many negroes' is also something more associated with the kind of states that are, shall we say, 'safe republican seats'.

    Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.

    WSS

    Not even close to the same thing and you know it isn't.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Actually get back to me when straight white men vote 98% for one political party.

    WSS

    Not even close to the same thing and you know it isn't.

    @gftchris said:

    Not even close to the same thing and you know it isn't.

    So you think the DNC is completely unaware that more African-Americans means more Democrat votes?

    WSS

  • Left spin as usual.

  • Chris, read the statements by the leftwing nutjobs.

    then stop and think about what they mean.

    and my headlines are often my conclusions from what I've read.

    It isn't anybody else's fault if you don't read the content and don't

    get the headline...cept yours.

  • Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.

    WSS

  • Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Chris and Woody are on record as at least being concerned that our two countries are run primarily by white men.

    WSS

    I'm concerned that there is not sufficient representation of other demographics involved in running the countries.

    For example menstrual products are subject to 'luxury tax' in the UK, when clearly it's not a luxury. How the rule came about I don't know, but you have to think that if there were more women it wouldn't be the case.

    It isn't that white men aren't capable, but they do not necessarily understand the positions of other people and so are not in the best position to legislate in that regard.

  • One would hope that the process wouldn't be set up and so it was guaranteed to be adversarial. But...

    WSS

  • Because black guys understand the majority whites much better.......