2017 Offseason
-
The only way I can rationalize it is by the line of thought that they want to spread out our positional spending as evenly as possible at this stage (something I heard on NPR or ESPN Radio a few months ago when they interviewed a statistician who has been working on finding dynastic commonalities).
This could be switching cause and effect. A team that consistently picks BPA will end up picking a random spread of positions. I doubt teams are making it priority one to go for positional spread just for the sake of the spread.
This could be switching cause and effect. A team that consistently picks BPA will end up picking a random spread of positions. I doubt teams are making it priority one to go for positional spread just for the sake of the spread.
It could be, but it's highly unlikely that BPA just happened to be constantly spread out among different positions.
-
This could be switching cause and effect. A team that consistently picks BPA will end up picking a random spread of positions. I doubt teams are making it priority one to go for positional spread just for the sake of the spread.
It could be, but it's highly unlikely that BPA just happened to be constantly spread out among different positions.
It could be, but it's highly unlikely that BPA just happened to be constantly spread out among different positions.
If you want to believe everyone and his Uncle, Garrett is far and away the #1 talent in this draft. To trade down, It would greatly depend on how much we would get offered, and how far down we would have to move. If everyone is thinking we're taking Myles, I doubt there would be much interest in a trade up. If a another team has the hots for a qb, it's game on. The draft is rich in edge rushers, so I'm not worried about that. You know by now I have a qb fixation on a certain guy.
If the 49ers and Bears really believe Kizer- Watson- Garropolo are superior to Trubisky, I'd be as happy as a pig in mud, and trade up from #12 to make sure we get Mitch. But that would be at the cost of missing out on Foster who might not be there at #12 either.If we go defense in the first round- I won't object to Mahomes @ #33- assuming he's still there. MHO is Trubisky, Kizer, and probably Watson (yuck) won't make it out of the first round. Depending on how the draft falls, I could see the #12 and #33 being up for sale for future first round picks.
-
I don't see how the Browns can pass up Patrick Mahomes II. He was the best Qb in college football last year. He has an NFL body and the best arm in the 2017 class. He is currently 2nd on Mel Kipers qb prospect list and should be a top 10 pick following the NFL combine.
"We are Americans. We don't quit doing something because it's wrong. We just keep doing the wrong thing till it turns out right." Browns maybe the most American Football team ever. -
I don't see how the Browns can pass up Patrick Mahomes II. He was the best Qb in college football last year. He has an NFL body and the best arm in the 2017 class. He is currently 2nd on Mel Kipers qb prospect list and should be a top 10 pick following the NFL combine.
I don't see how the Browns can pass up Patrick Mahomes II. He was the best Qb in college football last year. He has an NFL body and the best arm in the 2017 class. He is currently 2nd on Mel Kipers qb prospect list and should be a top 10 pick following the NFL combine.
He's certainly not worth a top 10 pick.
-
I don't see how the Browns can pass up Patrick Mahomes II. He was the best Qb in college football last year. He has an NFL body and the best arm in the 2017 class. He is currently 2nd on Mel Kipers qb prospect list and should be a top 10 pick following the NFL combine.
I don't see how the Browns can pass up Patrick Mahomes II. He was the best Qb in college football last year. He has an NFL body and the best arm in the 2017 class. He is currently 2nd on Mel Kipers qb prospect list and should be a top 10 pick following the NFL combine.
Yea, he could be a young...guy on your avatar. Wouldn't that be wonderful!
-
True, but what QB? Seeing more mocks with Kizer going high... as in top 10 high...
Speaking of QBs... have you seen much of Josh Dobbs? He was killing it today in Sr. Bowl practice.
True, but what QB? Seeing more mocks with Kizer going high... as in top 10 high...
Speaking of QBs... have you seen much of Josh Dobbs? He was killing it today in Sr. Bowl practice.
Just watched one of his videos on draftbreakdown.com and wasn't overly impressed. Everything was basically first read - clap,snap,throw, in rhythm. Decent athlete but most QBs are these days.
Watched one of Mahomes as well, that kid has an effortless throwing motion, and throwing feathery ropes if there is such a thing. Never seems like there's too much heat on it but always flies to the receiver. Downside, he trusts that too much and is always looking for the big play. One thing''s for sure, if people are bothered Kessler/Griffin aren't willing or able to throw deep balls with accuracy, Mahomes would solve that. Then there's just the other 99 aspects of being a QB to worry about.
-
It could be, but it's highly unlikely that BPA just happened to be constantly spread out among different positions.
If you want to believe everyone and his Uncle, Garrett is far and away the #1 talent in this draft. To trade down, It would greatly depend on how much we would get offered, and how far down we would have to move. If everyone is thinking we're taking Myles, I doubt there would be much interest in a trade up. If a another team has the hots for a qb, it's game on. The draft is rich in edge rushers, so I'm not worried about that. You know by now I have a qb fixation on a certain guy.
If the 49ers and Bears really believe Kizer- Watson- Garropolo are superior to Trubisky, I'd be as happy as a pig in mud, and trade up from #12 to make sure we get Mitch. But that would be at the cost of missing out on Foster who might not be there at #12 either.If we go defense in the first round- I won't object to Mahomes @ #33- assuming he's still there. MHO is Trubisky, Kizer, and probably Watson (yuck) won't make it out of the first round. Depending on how the draft falls, I could see the #12 and #33 being up for sale for future first round picks.
The draft is rich in edge rushers, so I'm not worried about that.
Depending on how the draft falls, I could see the #12 and #33 being up for sale for future first round picks.
Edge rushers perhaps, but not elite edge rushers.
Future #1'a are devalued by one round per year removed from the current draft.
Just watched one of his videos on draftbreakdown.com and wasn't overly impressed. Everything was basically first read - clap,snap,throw, in rhythm. Decent athlete but most QBs are these days.
Nothing wrong with getting the ball to a first read in rhythm... if he's open. Don't know what game you watched, but I urge you to look at some 2015 tape.
-
vs Louisiana Tech. I agree there's a lot to be said for getting the ball out quickly and accurately - but Kessler does that, so I'm looking for *more*.
Nobody has hit me yet as a can't miss guy. Mahomes has a great arm but makes poor decisions.
-
... and trade for Garoppolo and we can be the Cleveland Patriots...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login