Skip to content

Brown Board Mock Draft 2017

The Browns Board
182 19 8.1k
  • So I have falcons and pats officially then I guess. I can get to work, researching with previously unheard of versatile defensive nobody Bill will be drafting...

    @gftchris said:

    So I have falcons and pats officially then I guess. I can get to work, researching with previously unheard of versatile defensive nobody Bill will be drafting...

    Not quite... unless one of our Steeler visitors steps up, I can slide you up to them and the SB loser and I'll take the SB wiener so we each get 2-in-a-row.

  • And darren has reset the "Best Answer" to the post with the running assignments for ease of following along.

  • @gftchris said:

    So I have falcons and pats officially then I guess. I can get to work, researching with previously unheard of versatile defensive nobody Bill will be drafting...

    Not quite... unless one of our Steeler visitors steps up, I can slide you up to them and the SB loser and I'll take the SB wiener so we each get 2-in-a-row.

    @tour2ma said:

    Not quite... unless one of our Steeler visitors steps up, I can slide you up to them and the SB loser and I'll take the SB wiener so we each get 2-in-a-row.

    I guess so. It probably makes more sense for me to have two in a row than you, given that I'll be online from 4am EST, so if I can make two picks in a row, gravy, otherwise it's less great.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Not quite... unless one of our Steeler visitors steps up, I can slide you up to them and the SB loser and I'll take the SB wiener so we each get 2-in-a-row.

    I guess so. It probably makes more sense for me to have two in a row than you, given that I'll be online from 4am EST, so if I can make two picks in a row, gravy, otherwise it's less great.

    @gftchris said:

    I guess so. It probably makes more sense for me to have two in a row than you, given that I'll be online from 4am EST, so if I can make two picks in a row, gravy, otherwise it's less great.

    You'll get two in a row either way... if anyone is going to be timely with split picks, it better'd be me...

    Stay tuned...

  • @gftchris said:

    I guess so. It probably makes more sense for me to have two in a row than you, given that I'll be online from 4am EST, so if I can make two picks in a row, gravy, otherwise it's less great.

    You'll get two in a row either way... if anyone is going to be timely with split picks, it better'd be me...

    Stay tuned...

    @tour2ma said:

    You'll get two in a row either way... if anyone is going to be timely with split picks, it better'd be me...

    Stay tuned...

    Yeah fair enough - two of Steelers, Falcons and Pats, right? Either way I get SB loser?

  • @tour2ma said:

    You'll get two in a row either way... if anyone is going to be timely with split picks, it better'd be me...

    Stay tuned...

    Yeah fair enough - two of Steelers, Falcons and Pats, right? Either way I get SB loser?

    @gftchris said:

    Yeah fair enough - two of Steelers, Falcons and Pats, right? Either way I get SB loser?

    Yes... either Pats-ATL or PTG-SB Loser...

  • I'll take Baltimore [and Wash] since I lived there for 5.5 years

  • I could go for Jacksonville and Kansas City. Not taken yet, right? I know, not together, but Jax was sitting there at the top all alone.

  • I'll take Baltimore [and Wash] since I lived there for 5.5 years

    @unsympathetic said:

    I'll take Baltimore [and Wash] since I lived there for 5.5 years

    Done...

  • I could go for Jacksonville and Kansas City. Not taken yet, right? I know, not together, but Jax was sitting there at the top all alone.

    @the-gipper said:

    I could go for Jacksonville and Kansas City. Not taken yet, right? I know, not together, but Jax was sitting there at the top all alone.

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

  • @the-gipper said:

    I could go for Jacksonville and Kansas City. Not taken yet, right? I know, not together, but Jax was sitting there at the top all alone.

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    @tour2ma said:

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    Jax, KC will do fine. Rams don't have a 1st rounder, do they.

  • @the-gipper said:

    I could go for Jacksonville and Kansas City. Not taken yet, right? I know, not together, but Jax was sitting there at the top all alone.

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    @tour2ma said:

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

  • @tour2ma said:

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

    @taco918 said:

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

    OK. That was not noted in to OP. Which apparently needs updated.

  • @tour2ma said:

    JAX and LAR??? Only reason JAX looks alone is Rams traded their #1.

    Or you could go SEA - KC...

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

    @taco918 said:

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

    And so you did... I failed to note it in an attempted triple-update... my apologies.

    NOW.... it's "done"...

  • @taco918 said:

    Hey I took the Chefs and was given the Seahawks last week

    OK. That was not noted in to OP. Which apparently needs updated.

    @the-gipper said:

    OK. That was not noted in to OP. Which apparently needs updated.

    And it is.... now.

    Can I interest you in a JAX-LAR? Or perhaps something in a Double D? Say DNV-DET?

  • @the-gipper said:

    OK. That was not noted in to OP. Which apparently needs updated.

    And it is.... now.

    Can I interest you in a JAX-LAR? Or perhaps something in a Double D? Say DNV-DET?

    @tour2ma said:

    And it is.... now.

    Can I interest you in a JAX-LAR? Or perhaps something in a Double D? Say DNV-DET?

    Yea, why not. Jags and Rams. Though Rams don't have a 1st rounder right? That's OK.

  • @tour2ma said:

    And it is.... now.

    Can I interest you in a JAX-LAR? Or perhaps something in a Double D? Say DNV-DET?

    Yea, why not. Jags and Rams. Though Rams don't have a 1st rounder right? That's OK.

    @the-gipper said:

    Yea, why not. Jags and Rams. Though Rams don't have a 1st rounder right? That's OK.

    Correct and done and double-checked... but I'd have bet you'd taken the Double D's...

  • I think it helped to do a couple of different pages.....Players taken by position and players taken by team...made it easy to follow last year as well as the actual draft thread

  • I think it helped to do a couple of different pages.....Players taken by position and players taken by team...made it easy to follow last year as well as the actual draft thread

    @darren15 said:

    I think it helped to do a couple of different pages.....Players taken by position and players taken by team...made it easy to follow last year as well as the actual draft thread

    Yes... looked at your work last year when Z dredged up the old thread and both lists were a nice additions to past efforts.

    I was thinking I would update the players taken list every time I look in and update the team list daily. Reasonable?

  • @the-gipper said:

    Yea, why not. Jags and Rams. Though Rams don't have a 1st rounder right? That's OK.

    Correct and done and double-checked... but I'd have bet you'd taken the Double D's...

    @tour2ma said:

    Correct and done and double-checked... but I'd have bet you'd taken the Double D's...

    No, fuck Denver. That is almost as bad as asking me to take the Steelers or Ravens. At least I don't hate the Jags or Rams.