Skip to content

Trump to sign executive order tomorrow restricting immigration from Muslim countries

Political Discussion
123 15 2.2k
  • the tweets from intelligent people make your post look ignorant.

  • @osiris said:

    I think the point is going way over your head. Did you actually read the link? The TLDR is ISIL likes Trump because they use the stuff he says and does to support the arguments they use to both justify their actions and recruit more people to their cause.

    This isn't "bullhockey" or fiction. It's happening and it is fact. Read the article. It's authored by a former chief of theNational Counterterrorism Center.

    Who cares? do you know who appoints that former chief? the president. So you can take

    obamao's lackeys in our gov and shove their "opinions"

    On 911, we were hit, NOT because Trump said stuff. So your point is most correctly

    to be considered bullhockey. Let's see, not saying anything about the obamao-favored terrorists

    didn't help with Benghazi, did it? Your obamao wouldn't ever even say "radical ilamic terrorist" and

    Benghazi STILL happened. So, I call bs. Or, are you going to say Benghazi happened

    because obamao and higgardly said mean things to them. Which is it?

    @calfoxwc said:

    Who cares? do you know who appoints that former chief? the president. So you can take

    obamao's lackeys in our gov and shove their "opinions"

    On 911, we were hit, NOT because Trump said stuff. So your point is most correctly

    to be considered bullhockey. Let's see, not saying anything about the obamao-favored terrorists

    didn't help with Benghazi, did it? Your obamao wouldn't ever even say "radical ilamic terrorist" and

    Benghazi STILL happened. So, I call bs. Or, are you going to say Benghazi happened

    because obamao and higgardly said mean things to them. Which is it?

    Who cares? Anyone who cares about defeating ISIL cares. We should be fighting them physically while UNDERMINING their ideology. I'll take the word of a national security expert over yours in these matters any day of the week.

    My point, which is his point too, isn't 'bullhockey' it's sound strategy. As long as they can keep recruiting people, they can replace anyone we kill. Benghazi? Benghazi wasn't even the same group that carried out 911. One was Ansar Al-Sharia, a shi'ite group that only operates in Libya, and the other was Al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. The fact that you are conflating the two, however, shows how little you've actually tried to understand the situations.

  • That tweet from Pence December of last year makes this all that much more funny.

    @tiamat63 said:

    That tweet from Pence December of last year makes this all that much more funny.

    What tweets are you talking about?

  • @boo-radley said:

    The moderate Muslim wants the radical Muslim to cut your head off.

    He holds your feet while the radical does it

  • President Trump: Obama’s Muslim Preference is Ending [VIDEO]

    In an exclusive one-on-one interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), President Donald Trump told CBN’s David Brody of The Brody File that he will be reversing the Obama regime’s preference of Muslims over Christians when it comes to allowing refugees to enter the United States from foreign countries.

    Obama’s Muslim roots, having been raised as a Muslim although he claimed a conversion to Christianity, showed in his actions, as not only were Muslim refugees from Syria and other Muslim countries given priority over Christians trying to escape Islamic tyranny, but Obama also deported Christian refugees in America while allowing criminal illegal aliens to stay.

    In a speech in 2015, Obama defended his preference for Muslim migration to America, comparing Muslim refugees to “Catholic immigration of a century ago.”

    Despite historical fact and demographics to the contrary, Obama declared in Turkey — a Muslim country — during his 2009 “American apology tour” that America is not a Christian nation. Then he governed for eight years in a manner that would make it so.

    Obama, who referred to ISIS as a “JV team” and was — for some reason — unable and unwilling to utter the words “radical Islamic terrorism” and mourned over an American journalist being beheaded by immediately playing golf, failed to “fundamentally transform” America as he desired, although he did deliver serious damage.

    On Friday, President Trump signed an executive order that will limit immigration from countries that are hotbeds of Islamic terrorism and promised “extreme vetting,” as he promised during the presidential campaign.

    House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul told CNN on Friday that the Trump executive order includes a 30-day suspension of visa applications from countries considered “high-threat areas.”

    Speaking at the Pentagon flanked by General James “Mad Dog” Mattis, the newly confirmed Secretary of Defense, President Trump said, “We don’t want them here. We want to ensure that we are not admitting into our country the very threat our soldiers are fighting overseas. We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country and love — deeply — our people.”

    http://politistick.com/trump-obama-preference-muslim-refugees/

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Who cares? do you know who appoints that former chief? the president. So you can take

    obamao's lackeys in our gov and shove their "opinions"

    On 911, we were hit, NOT because Trump said stuff. So your point is most correctly

    to be considered bullhockey. Let's see, not saying anything about the obamao-favored terrorists

    didn't help with Benghazi, did it? Your obamao wouldn't ever even say "radical ilamic terrorist" and

    Benghazi STILL happened. So, I call bs. Or, are you going to say Benghazi happened

    because obamao and higgardly said mean things to them. Which is it?

    Who cares? Anyone who cares about defeating ISIL cares. We should be fighting them physically while UNDERMINING their ideology. I'll take the word of a national security expert over yours in these matters any day of the week.

    My point, which is his point too, isn't 'bullhockey' it's sound strategy. As long as they can keep recruiting people, they can replace anyone we kill. Benghazi? Benghazi wasn't even the same group that carried out 911. One was Ansar Al-Sharia, a shi'ite group that only operates in Libya, and the other was Al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. The fact that you are conflating the two, however, shows how little you've actually tried to understand the situations.

    @osiris said:

    Who cares? Anyone who cares about defeating ISIL cares. We should be fighting them physically while UNDERMINING their ideology. I'll take the word of a national security expert over yours in these matters any day of the week.

    My point, which is his point too, isn't 'bullhockey' it's sound strategy. As long as they can keep recruiting people, they can replace anyone we kill. Benghazi? Benghazi wasn't even the same group that carried out 911. One was Ansar Al-Sharia, a shi'ite group that only operates in Libya, and the other was Al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. The fact that you are conflating the two, however, shows how little you've actually tried to understand the situations.

    no, "who cares" about your referring to obamao's wonk that said isis will use Trump's words against him.

    What is it with liberals? "don't fight them, they will use it as a recruiting tool".

    What a sissy way to do nothing - the obamao way. Answer my point - the obamao way, being

    nice to them so they can't use it as a "recruiting tool".... led to benghazi, and of course, your obaMao

    and higgardly....DID NOTHING. Benghazi happened in Sept. 2012. EIGHT YEARS of obamao led to

    Benghazi. So? How you going to explain that?

    Furthermore, isis began as an ancient cult object. I don't think that is Trump's fault, either.

    You want to argue with me, ya gotta know more history, Os.

    BTW, Isis, the current wasabi terror garbage', became a global concern about 2014.

    Now, how many years of obamao was that? He became pres in 2009. So, about 5 years

    of obamao's doing nothing, led to isis becoming a global concern.

    So, how the hell does anybody blame us for wanting to stop them ...being a "recruiting tool"???

    You also need to stop emoting - the liberal quip blame game now that we won the election and

    saved our America doesn't make any sense, historically, logically, or politically.

    Have a nice day.

  • @osiris said:

    Who cares? Anyone who cares about defeating ISIL cares. We should be fighting them physically while UNDERMINING their ideology. I'll take the word of a national security expert over yours in these matters any day of the week.

    My point, which is his point too, isn't 'bullhockey' it's sound strategy. As long as they can keep recruiting people, they can replace anyone we kill. Benghazi? Benghazi wasn't even the same group that carried out 911. One was Ansar Al-Sharia, a shi'ite group that only operates in Libya, and the other was Al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization. The fact that you are conflating the two, however, shows how little you've actually tried to understand the situations.

    no, "who cares" about your referring to obamao's wonk that said isis will use Trump's words against him.

    What is it with liberals? "don't fight them, they will use it as a recruiting tool".

    What a sissy way to do nothing - the obamao way. Answer my point - the obamao way, being

    nice to them so they can't use it as a "recruiting tool".... led to benghazi, and of course, your obaMao

    and higgardly....DID NOTHING. Benghazi happened in Sept. 2012. EIGHT YEARS of obamao led to

    Benghazi. So? How you going to explain that?

    Furthermore, isis began as an ancient cult object. I don't think that is Trump's fault, either.

    You want to argue with me, ya gotta know more history, Os.

    BTW, Isis, the current wasabi terror garbage', became a global concern about 2014.

    Now, how many years of obamao was that? He became pres in 2009. So, about 5 years

    of obamao's doing nothing, led to isis becoming a global concern.

    So, how the hell does anybody blame us for wanting to stop them ...being a "recruiting tool"???

    You also need to stop emoting - the liberal quip blame game now that we won the election and

    saved our America doesn't make any sense, historically, logically, or politically.

    Have a nice day.

    @calfoxwc said:

    no, "who cares" about your referring to obamao's wonk that said isis will use Trump's words against him.

    What is it with liberals? "don't fight them, they will use it as a recruiting tool".

    What a sissy way to do nothing - the obamao way. Answer my point - the obamao way, being

    nice to them so they can't use it as a "recruiting tool".... led to benghazi, and of course, your obaMao

    and higgardly....DID NOTHING. Benghazi happened in Sept. 2012. EIGHT YEARS of obamao led to

    Benghazi. So? How you going to explain that?

    Furthermore, isis began as an ancient cult object. I don't think that is Trump's fault, either.

    You want to argue with me, ya gotta know more history, Os.

    BTW, Isis, the current wasabi terror garbage', became a global concern about 2014.

    Now, how many years of obamao was that? He became pres in 2009. So, about 5 years

    of obamao's doing nothing, led to isis becoming a global concern.

    So, how the hell does anybody blame us for wanting to stop them ...being a "recruiting tool"???

    You also need to stop emoting - the liberal quip blame game now that we won the election and

    saved our America doesn't make any sense, historically, logically, or politically.

    Have a nice day.

    LOL! ISIL did NOT begin as an ancient cult object. I have no clue where you are getting that information but it is "bullhockey." I'm sure some whacko website is trying to conflate ISIS with Isis (the ancient Egyptian goddess of health) and you ate it all up. LOL. They began in 2006 as a result of the power vacuum left by the Second Gulf War. Ancient cult object... lol, good one! You do understand that "ISIS" is an acronym, right? And that it's just the translation of what they call themselves in Arabic.

    Second, nobody said be nice to them. I'm saying be smarter than them. In fact, I said they have to be fought on physically, as in killed off. But I'm saying be smart about it. Undermine their recruiting efforts. For example, say:

    "ISIS poses an existential threat to our Arab, Israeili, and Muslim allies therefore it is our duty to assist them in our shared battle against Isis. The biggest victims of ISIS are the people they subjugate and kill every day and they must be eliminated."

    That alone undermines much of their argument for why people should join Isis. Fight smart on all fronts. Don't compromise the battle our soldiers would face if we do get into ground combat with them by giving them recruiting fodder.

  • sure. but the word isis goes way, way back to the cult of the goddess.

    but I posted that just because... well, go read the article on the goddess...

    maybe you'll get it..........

    sure, it's an acronym. But the ancient terrorist culture goes way, way way back.

    You libs like to paint terrorism as something that happens when you don't

    win elections, to denigrate political opposition.

    If you don't think that is helping terrorists, you are full of bullhockey.

    Os, they exist by using ANYTHING and EVERYTHING as fodder. Should we

    allow them free passage into our country or else they use our stopping them

    as "fodder" ?

    You don't seem to understand that trying to say out of WWI and WWII didn't work, right?

    Neville Chamberlain being nice to them didn't work, right?

    You want to be Neville, aren't learning from history. The "don't make em mad" crap is

    the liberal excuse for "I don't want to do anything"... it's letting the world fall apart,

    terrorists into our country. 9/11 happened and was planned for three years.

    The last 6/7 months or so was during the Bush admin.

    One more time. 9/11 happened in 2001. We didn't go into Iraq until 2003. So you can take your

    "oh, let's not give them fodder, let's be nice to them" crap and shove it. Isis began later,

    al queada began in 1988.

    So, you liberals can STFU about it being our fault, Trump's fault, Bush's fault, our military's fault.

    They recruit by force. They don't need stupid "fodder" excuses for recruiting.

    Blaming US for the terrorists is just a candy-ass wimpy way of being cowards and not doing anything

    about anything. The inner cities are just as inner city, the terrorists want to kill us because

    we aren't THEM, and your obaMao has been pres for eight do nothing, asswipe loser years,

    so you just go ahead and pretend that the ottoman empire was a really utopian nice place.

    and, LOL, I posted about the goddess ISIS, because your online name is her brother, Osiris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis

    "She married her brother, Osiris, and she conceived Horus with him. "

    I knew you would step in it, of course it was just the goddess Isis, but I was letting you

    know you are all wet in Egypt. LOL LOL LOL LOL ... "sniff" ... (did you read it yet?)

  • I love it when a plan together... lol

  • sure. but the word isis goes way, way back to the cult of the goddess.

    but I posted that just because... well, go read the article on the goddess...

    maybe you'll get it..........

    sure, it's an acronym. But the ancient terrorist culture goes way, way way back.

    You libs like to paint terrorism as something that happens when you don't

    win elections, to denigrate political opposition.

    If you don't think that is helping terrorists, you are full of bullhockey.

    Os, they exist by using ANYTHING and EVERYTHING as fodder. Should we

    allow them free passage into our country or else they use our stopping them

    as "fodder" ?

    You don't seem to understand that trying to say out of WWI and WWII didn't work, right?

    Neville Chamberlain being nice to them didn't work, right?

    You want to be Neville, aren't learning from history. The "don't make em mad" crap is

    the liberal excuse for "I don't want to do anything"... it's letting the world fall apart,

    terrorists into our country. 9/11 happened and was planned for three years.

    The last 6/7 months or so was during the Bush admin.

    One more time. 9/11 happened in 2001. We didn't go into Iraq until 2003. So you can take your

    "oh, let's not give them fodder, let's be nice to them" crap and shove it. Isis began later,

    al queada began in 1988.

    So, you liberals can STFU about it being our fault, Trump's fault, Bush's fault, our military's fault.

    They recruit by force. They don't need stupid "fodder" excuses for recruiting.

    Blaming US for the terrorists is just a candy-ass wimpy way of being cowards and not doing anything

    about anything. The inner cities are just as inner city, the terrorists want to kill us because

    we aren't THEM, and your obaMao has been pres for eight do nothing, asswipe loser years,

    so you just go ahead and pretend that the ottoman empire was a really utopian nice place.

    and, LOL, I posted about the goddess ISIS, because your online name is her brother, Osiris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis

    "She married her brother, Osiris, and she conceived Horus with him. "

    I knew you would step in it, of course it was just the goddess Isis, but I was letting you

    know you are all wet in Egypt. LOL LOL LOL LOL ... "sniff" ... (did you read it yet?)

    @calfoxwc said:

    sure. but the word isis goes way, way back to the cult of the goddess.

    but I posted that just because... well, go read the article on the goddess...

    maybe you'll get it..........

    sure, it's an acronym. But the ancient terrorist culture goes way, way way back.

    You libs like to paint terrorism as something that happens when you don't

    win elections, to denigrate political opposition.

    If you don't think that is helping terrorists, you are full of bullhockey.

    Os, they exist by using ANYTHING and EVERYTHING as fodder. Should we

    allow them free passage into our country or else they use our stopping them

    as "fodder" ?

    You don't seem to understand that trying to say out of WWI and WWII didn't work, right?

    Neville Chamberlain being nice to them didn't work, right?

    You want to be Neville, aren't learning from history. The "don't make em mad" crap is

    the liberal excuse for "I don't want to do anything"... it's letting the world fall apart,

    terrorists into our country. 9/11 happened and was planned for three years.

    The last 6/7 months or so was during the Bush admin.

    One more time. 9/11 happened in 2001. We didn't go into Iraq until 2003. So you can take your

    "oh, let's not give them fodder, let's be nice to them" crap and shove it. Isis began later,

    al queada began in 1988.

    So, you liberals can STFU about it being our fault, Trump's fault, Bush's fault, our military's fault.

    They recruit by force. They don't need stupid "fodder" excuses for recruiting.

    Blaming US for the terrorists is just a candy-ass wimpy way of being cowards and not doing anything

    about anything. The inner cities are just as inner city, the terrorists want to kill us because

    we aren't THEM, and your obaMao has been pres for eight do nothing, asswipe loser years,

    so you just go ahead and pretend that the ottoman empire was a really utopian nice place.

    and, LOL, I posted about the goddess ISIS, because your online name is her brother, Osiris.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis

    "She married her brother, Osiris, and she conceived Horus with him. "

    I knew you would step in it, of course it was just the goddess Isis, but I was letting you

    know you are all wet in Egypt. LOL LOL LOL LOL ... "sniff" ... (did you read it yet?)

    So Osiris is married to ISIS? Interesting.....

  • the tweets from intelligent people make your post look ignorant.

    @calfoxwc said:

    the tweets from intelligent people make your post look ignorant.

    So you have no idea which particular one I'm referring to, youre just being an ass?

    Keep in mind if is you that has begun the insults here. In case you want to (incorrectly) label myself as a liberal in the future that launched attacks on you in threads.

    @osiris said:

    What tweets are you talking about?

    December of 2015 Pence stating that banning Muslims from the US is wrong and unconstitutional.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    the tweets from intelligent people make your post look ignorant.

    So you have no idea which particular one I'm referring to, youre just being an ass?

    Keep in mind if is you that has begun the insults here. In case you want to (incorrectly) label myself as a liberal in the future that launched attacks on you in threads.

    @osiris said:

    What tweets are you talking about?

    December of 2015 Pence stating that banning Muslims from the US is wrong and unconstitutional.

    @tiamat63 said:

    So you have no idea which particular one I'm referring to, youre just being an ass?

    Keep in mind if is you that has begun the insults here. In case you want to (incorrectly) label myself as a liberal in the future that launched attacks on you in threads.

    December of 2015 Pence stating that banning Muslims from the US is wrong and unconstitutional.

    ah. A total complete ban on Muslims is wrong. A temporary stay til we fix our broken

    stupidass dumbfook asswipe obaMao immigration is smart, and very American and very

    Constitutional.

    Or, you could explain how holder and obaMao violated our Constituion by trying desperately to kick

    the German Christian couple out because they wanted to home school their kids...

  • Trump is an idiot. I agree with a temp ban on certain muslim countries but the idiot is saying christians from those countries can come in. I guess this is some bird brained appeasement to the right. What do you think is going to happen? These guys will shave their beards and wear a cross. A ban is a ban. It has to be uniform

  • Uniform? Then it should be every country across the world right?

    WSS

  • Uniform? Then it should be every country across the world right?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Uniform? Then it should be every country across the world right?

    WSS

    Wut? No....uniform in terms of the populations within the countries we've deemed to be risky. Not a hard concept steve

  • They're stopping terrorists, stopping illegal immigration, increasing jobs, oil production, and promoting good American family values. He is turning around everything Obummer did in 1 week.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Uniform? Then it should be every country across the world right?

    WSS

    Wut? No....uniform in terms of the populations within the countries we've deemed to be risky. Not a hard concept steve

    @clevfan4life said:

    Wut? No....uniform in terms of the populations within the countries we've deemed to be risky. Not a hard concept steve

    It's a ridiculous concept.

    To be honest I doubt the any kind of a ban will make much difference, I don't think people in those parts of the country are solidly recorded in any particular system and it would be pretty easy to make some shit up and come on over anyway but unfortunately it's the one particular religion that's causing the problems in this case. Maybe that sounds unfair to the ones who don't mean us harm. That's unfortunate. You go ahead and pretend it's something other than what it is.

    WSS

  • Countries the ban applies to:

    Syria

    Iraq

    Iran

    Yemen

    Somalia

    Libya

    Sudan

    Countries the donald doesn't have business interests in:

    Syria

    Iraq

    Iran

    Yemen

    Somalia

    Libya

    Sudan

    Stunning coincidence.

    Countries the 9/11 terrorists came from (just in case the EO was genuinely about stopping terrorists getting in, you'd include them too)

    Saudi Arabia

    Egypt

    UAE

    Lebanon

    Note the lack of those countries on the banned list.

    Countries the donald *does* have business interests in:

    Saudi Arabia

    Egypt

    UAE

    Stunning coincidence.

    Pure coincidence, I've no doubt. Just an oversight to be corrected immediately.

  • Yeah the ban list seems like a fine upstanding bunch of folks Chris.

    I'm sure it's made from a business standpoint. 😉