Gingrich on cap and trade
-
Interesting, but you miss the point, Heck.
It's about taxing current technology because the new
super green tech isn't there yet.
Americans have always embraced new technology.
It's leftist crisis politics and power to tax everything that is
driving the frantic hate coal etc, before alternatives are in existence
on a society-practical scale.
Tax that.
-
Good idea. Obviously you have a firm grasp of what we're talking about.
-
Obviously, you don't, if you want cap and trade.
-
It'd be nice to hear an interview without the softballs......
Wouldn't it Heck? Really?
WSS
-
I thought it was a good interview, drawing out his expert opinion on a variety of energy issues. They don't all need to be needlessly confrontational. That's not what Zakaria does.
What questions would you like to have asked, should we ban leisure travel? Doesn't Al Gore have a big house? You want to make your single point about China and India one more time?
-
Gas prices and venture capital money invested in green technology. Hmm.
-
Zakaria and Obama both have Skull faces and come from Muslim backgrounds. Don't trust either one.
-
mz. said:
Cal, stuff like this must be the "intelligent discourse" you're craving....Yep. mz the pussy is so intelligent (in his mind). He belongs to the menses society.
-
I thought it was a good interview, drawing out his expert opinion on a variety of energy issues. They don't all need to be needlessly confrontational. That's not what Zakaria does.
What questions would you like to have asked, should we ban leisure travel? Doesn't Al Gore have a big house? You want to make your single point about China and India one more time?
I thought it was a good interview, drawing out his expert opinion on a variety of energy issues. They don't all need to be needlessly confrontational. That's not what Zakaria does.
What questions would you like to have asked, should we ban leisure travel? Doesn't Al Gore have a big house? You want to make your single point about China and India one more time?
Oh no Heck.
I like to hear you beat the same drum over and over and over.
Then huff and puff that I'm wrong though I'm not.
Fact is banning leisure travel would do a lot for the environment.
But
It would be extemely inconvenient annd bad for the economy in many ways.
So we must assume global warming is not enough of a threat to bother with it.
Tell me which part is wrong Heck.
WSS
-
Are you serious? You're not doing self-parody here?
-
Heck translation:
"I'm just a liberal hack with no answer. When I do have an answer, I don't like it,
so I just smart off about eh... something."
-
Heck translation:
"I'm just a liberal hack with no answer. When I do have an answer, I don't like it,
so I just smart off about eh... something."
-
@danamal said:
Cal isnt capable of reasonable conversation.He cant even believe the shit he writes and he does it to try and be funny and piss off the "liberals" but it just makes him look ignorant to everyone except T who is on the same short bus with him.
Seems it's been a while since I've heard you contibute beyond attacking someone.
You have a take?
Tell me where I'm wrong.
Should be easy for a reasonable conversationalist such as yourself.
WSS
-
There's a lot of great stuff I'd like to add,
but all it gets is -unwarranted- personal attacks.
As in, I tried, very clearly, to avoid confrontations and personal attacks
with mz the pussy. I stopped calling him "mosquitozits" and making him cry.
What happened - he kept right on with the childish quips instead
of trying to engage in serious discussions.
It goes back to some libs being outraged that the rest of us
dare to post legit info in disagreement. Then the source gets attacked.
Then repost it from their CNN, and if they can't attack the source,
they change the subject and attack the person who posted it.
And it goes on and on.
mz the pussy doesn't seem to have anything serious to offer, except to challenge
anything that is American family values, and make personal insults.
-
Cal isnt capable of reasonable conversation.
He cant even believe the shit he writes and he does it to try and be funny and piss off the "liberals" but it just makes him look ignorant to everyone except T who is on the same short bus with him. Dan
*********************************************
That's easy to disprove. See my reasonable discussions with Al about the Mideast.
How do you know, grandpoopoobah, about what I can believe?
The generalization that all I write is crap has no merit.
I am funny once in a while, but I don't do it to po anybody.
If I think it's funny, and it doesn't offend anyone, I'm successful.
I'm more successful if someone else thinks it's funny.
And again, totally unprovoked, Dan insults the learning disabled kids.
And that, Dan, makes YOU look very, very ignorant.
-
@danamal said:
I surrender im going to have to take a break from here ,Think i'll read a book or two.The only way you'll fit in, dan, is if you leave for awhile and unread every book you've ever read.
mz. said:
The only way you'll fit in, dan, is if you leave for awhile and unread every book you've ever read.Don't the two of you find it ironic that you spend so many posts just calling anyone who isn't an outspoken Democrat names?
Yes, I understand it happens from the right too but when you constantly bitch about the lack of discussion it seems like you could bring some to the table.
Seriously guys, wouldn't "You're wrong and here's why" be better than sniping?
WSS
-
mz. said:
The only way you'll fit in, dan, is if you leave for awhile and unread every book you've ever read.Don't the two of you find it ironic that you spend so many posts just calling anyone who isn't an outspoken Democrat names?
Yes, I understand it happens from the right too but when you constantly bitch about the lack of discussion it seems like you could bring some to the table.
Seriously guys, wouldn't "You're wrong and here's why" be better than sniping?
WSS
Don't the two of you find it ironic that you spend so many posts just calling anyone who isn't an outspoken Democrat names?
WSS
For the last time, Steve, I am not a Democrat. I don't know how often I have to state this fact.
And I have never, EVER, called Tupa, Legacy, budcarson, and probably you, an idiot. And you're "Rebublicans."
Cal is an idiot, ideology be damned. DieHard is a complete fcuking idiot. And a racist piece of garbage, too. Do you disagree? They just happen to be outspoken "Republicans," too.
There are plenty of dipshit Democrats.
This has grown way tiresome.
Seriously guys, wouldn't "You're wrong and here's why" be better than sniping?
I used to try that, way back when. It falls on deaf ears, followed by something like "you Libs don't think critically" or "you're a fag."
So tell me the point.........
-
"There he goes again" President Ronald Reagan
MousenadZ -
Go back and read again, my serious explanations about my strong anti-abortion feelings.
I didn't call names, I just seriously explained.
Then, read your reactions.
If you really want an answer about what's going on, do it, and get back to the rest of us
on what you found.
BTW, if you are not stupid, you should know that when you angrily throw superballs at a brick wall,
they will bounce right back your direction. Apparently, you have yet to catch on, so.....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login