Skip to content

Mock Draft Central

The Browns Board
222 30 7.0k
  • @tour2ma said:

    Not sure the NFL.com grades are DJ's... not his alone anyway. Are you seeing that somewhere?

    Just click on that second site in my reply above and it takes you to this title:

    "Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 prospects for 2017 NFL Draft 2.0"

    @texasag1969 said:

    Just click on that second site in my reply above and it takes you to this title:

    "Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 prospects for 2017 NFL Draft 2.0"

    Got ya...

    Brought this Three Dawg Nite tune to mind...

  • Nice reach. You need to get us a QB too. 😆

  • @tour2ma said:

    And DJ's mock 2.0...

    #1 Myles

    #12 OJH

    http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/mock-drafts/daniel-jeremiah/335600

    Can't imagine Niners fans being very happy if they draft a corner at #2 !

  • Got to be one of the best gigs in the land for about 7 months if you can find it. Magically we will report the good,the bad & the ugly of each draftee. Compile a list of the top draft candidates. Than do the impossible of guessing what each teams board should look like. I have ignored this hyped BS since it's finding..BTW--Who was the proud founder of this Mock anything & everything? Was there a guy before Kiper in any sport?

  • @tour2ma said:

    And DJ's mock 2.0...

    #1 Myles

    #12 OJH

    http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/mock-drafts/daniel-jeremiah/335600

    Can't imagine Niners fans being very happy if they draft a corner at #2 !

    @londonbrown said:

    Can't imagine Niners fans being very happy if they draft a corner at #2 !

    I heard a speculation today they might trade away their #2 for Romo. Now if the Cleveland FO(ols) took Trubisky, wouldn't it be "special" if the boys then added Garrett since it's a pass rusher they need most? That would surely endear the Browns to the rest of the league.LOL!

    EDIT: I love the silly season.

  • Haha #2 for Romo I don't think the Cowboys could get on the phone to NFL HQ quick enough if that offer came in

  • The number two pick...in which round?! NO way is Romo worth that. No QB of that age is.

  • If the Browns get Myles Garrett and Mitch Trubisky in the first round, I'd probably cry with joy. I'm serious...I'd fall apart. I honestly DON'T see it happening, but we'll see.

    I'm also seeing a surging trend that shows Pat Mahomes being the #1 QB taken in the draft.

  • I don't know about #1 but there are four QBs I'd be happy with at say #33 (or trading up into the back end of the first to get that sweet, sweet fifth year option) and Mahomes is one. I'd rather take him at #33 than any QB at #12.

  • Haha #2 for Romo I don't think the Cowboys could get on the phone to NFL HQ quick enough if that offer came in

    @londonbrown said:

    Haha #2 for Romo I don't think the Cowboys could get on the phone to NFL HQ quick enough if that offer came in

    No, No, No.....by #2 they don't mean they would trade the #2 overall pick for Romo.....what that means is that they are willing to trade and old Johnny Manziel #2 jersey for Romo.

    Now, that might be a fair trade.

    (Jmz might actually be a better qb pickup than Romo)

  • Matt Miller, Bleacher Report

    Browns - Myles Garrett DE

    49ers - Mitch Tribusky QB

    Bears - Josh Allen QB

    Jaguars - Jonathan Allen DL

    Titans - Mike Williams WR

    Jets - Tim Williams EDGE

    Chargers - Ryan Ramczyk OT

    Panthers - Leonard Fournette RB

    Bengals - Reuben Foster LB

    Bills - DeShaun Watson QB

    Saints - Derek Barnett DE

    Browns - Deshone Kizer QB

    @londonbrown said:

    Matt Miller, Bleacher Report

    Browns - Myles Garrett DE

    49ers - Mitch Tribusky QB

    Bears - Josh Allen QB

    Jaguars - Jonathan Allen DL

    Titans - Mike Williams WR

    Jets - Tim Williams EDGE

    Chargers - Ryan Ramczyk OT

    Panthers - Leonard Fournette RB

    Bengals - Reuben Foster LB

    Bills - DeShaun Watson QB

    Saints - Derek Barnett DE

    Browns - Deshone Kizer QB

    Some changes in his post super bowl mock, notably Allen falling to #10 and Browns taking Deshaun Watson at #12

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2691129-2017-nfl-mock-draft-matt-millers-post-super-bowl-predictions

  • If Allen is there at 10 we are on the phone with the bills offering a lot to move up.

  • If Allen is there at 10 we are on the phone with the bills offering a lot to move up.

    @gftchris said:

    If Allen is there at 10 we are on the phone with the bills offering a lot to move up.

    You bet!! Same for Foster if Allen is already gone, but Foster is there. Neither will happen though.

  • Might be of interest to some, a 25 min video discussing the latest mocks. One thing I picked up on was the comment if the Bears like the same QB as SF then one of those may trade with the Browns. That would be ideal for us if it was SF as we'd still get Garrett but if we have a similar grade on him AND someone like Allen then I could see us trading with the Bears too as you'd get either one. No idea what it would take for either team to move up to #1 I don't quite understand the charts as of yet

  • One thing we know about the draft is that we don't know everything that will happen. When you go back and look at virtually every mock draft, NOBODY comes close to getting them right (especially in February). One thing we can say with certainty is that SOMEONE will slide to us at #12, and we have to be ready for it. After his surgeries, could Malik Hooker slide a bit? Should we even contemplate taking him knowing that a shoulder injury is difficult to rehab and can be prone to re-injury? What about another defender like Reuben Foster? If Mitch or Watson is on the board, do we risk taking a QB?

    I would almost bet that one of these guys projected to be gone will slide to us, and we'll be smack in the middle of a difficult decision.

  • One thing we know about the draft is that we don't know everything that will happen. When you go back and look at virtually every mock draft, NOBODY comes close to getting them right (especially in February). One thing we can say with certainty is that SOMEONE will slide to us at #12, and we have to be ready for it. After his surgeries, could Malik Hooker slide a bit? Should we even contemplate taking him knowing that a shoulder injury is difficult to rehab and can be prone to re-injury? What about another defender like Reuben Foster? If Mitch or Watson is on the board, do we risk taking a QB?

    I would almost bet that one of these guys projected to be gone will slide to us, and we'll be smack in the middle of a difficult decision.

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I would almost bet that one of these guys projected to be gone will slide to us, and we'll be smack in the middle of a difficult decision.

    ... a decision further complicated by the phone ringing.

    But ultimately a decision which, if we have faith in our board... and we will, will sort itself out.

  • Charlie Cassely's 1.0 is out...

    1. Myles Garrett

    12. traded to NE for Jimmy G (Pats take Derrick Barnett OLB)

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785403/article/charley-casserly-mock-draft-10-trades-shake-up-round-1?campaign=tw-cf-sf55953387-sf55953387

  • If we trade #12 for JG I will be...unimpressed. Particularly with guys like Humphrey and Thomas still on the board. But, I would give him the benefit of the doubt and hope for the best. It would be polarising, no doubt.

    Garrett #1 seems more and more likely with every passing day.

  • Charlie Cassely's 1.0 is out...

    1. Myles Garrett

    12. traded to NE for Jimmy G (Pats take Derrick Barnett OLB)

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785403/article/charley-casserly-mock-draft-10-trades-shake-up-round-1?campaign=tw-cf-sf55953387-sf55953387

    @tour2ma said:

    Charlie Cassely's 1.0 is out...

    1. Myles Garrett

    12. traded to NE for Jimmy G (Pats take Derrick Barnett OLB)

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000785403/article/charley-casserly-mock-draft-10-trades-shake-up-round-1?campaign=tw-cf-sf55953387-sf55953387

    Interesting, but does trading off #12 fit the analytics model?

  • One thing we know about the draft is that we don't know everything that will happen. When you go back and look at virtually every mock draft, NOBODY comes close to getting them right (especially in February). One thing we can say with certainty is that SOMEONE will slide to us at #12, and we have to be ready for it. After his surgeries, could Malik Hooker slide a bit? Should we even contemplate taking him knowing that a shoulder injury is difficult to rehab and can be prone to re-injury? What about another defender like Reuben Foster? If Mitch or Watson is on the board, do we risk taking a QB?

    I would almost bet that one of these guys projected to be gone will slide to us, and we'll be smack in the middle of a difficult decision.

    @jiggins7919 said:

    One thing we know about the draft is that we don't know everything that will happen. When you go back and look at virtually every mock draft, NOBODY comes close to getting them right (especially in February). One thing we can say with certainty is that SOMEONE will slide to us at #12, and we have to be ready for it. After his surgeries, could Malik Hooker slide a bit? Should we even contemplate taking him knowing that a shoulder injury is difficult to rehab and can be prone to re-injury? What about another defender like Reuben Foster? If Mitch or Watson is on the board, do we risk taking a QB?

    I would almost bet that one of these guys projected to be gone will slide to us, and we'll be smack in the middle of a difficult decision.

    if all the scouts/FOs in the top 11 watch film - I can't see Foster sliding to #12.

    Very good point about Hooker's injury and being prone to re-injury considering how often Safeties involved with big collisions from being in space.

    A guy who is returning to us from injury with fresh legs in 2017 is Des Bryant meaning we might not have to consider a guy like Thomas if we're already with Garrett first overall with young guys like Nassib, Ogbah, Orchard (also returning from injury). This reminds me we might be able to consider an offensive guy at #12 and get back to defense at #33 and via free agency. The draft seems deep in the secondary. Lorenzo Jerome had a great Senior Bowl (causing 3 turnovers) and I'm thinking a small school like St Francis puts him in a bargain round.