Skip to content

Where is the real talent in this year's draft?

The Browns Board
41 11 1.0k
  • "Weak" NFL draft classes in terms of number of players drafted that made the HOF...since WWII:

    1992...NONE (perhaps best players that year were: Jimmy Smith WR and DB Troy Vincent)

    1947....1: Dante Lavelli

    1954: 1: Raymond Berry

    1955: 1. Johnny Unitas

    1959: 1. Dick Lebeau

    1972: 1. Franco Harris

    1977: 1. Tony Dorsett.

    1986: 1. Charles Haley

    (note: the latest draft class in which someone is now in the HOF is the 1997 class: Orlando Pace and Walter Jones

    1998 will have Peyton, Charles Woodson, Randy Moss, Alan Faneca.

    1999 best bets are Champ Bailey, Donovan McNabb and Edgerrin James.

  • I call it now, Garrett will be Corey Brown.



    I assume you mean Courtney Brown?



    I am not saying Garrett will be Courtney Brown....but he could be. Or he could be Von Miller. All Johnny lovers who have hung on here think the latter.


    I am not saying that Trubisky will be Aaron Rodgers...but he could be


    Or he could be Joey Harrington.


    @the-gipper said:

    I call it now, Garrett will be Corey Brown.

    I assume you mean Courtney Brown?

    I am not saying Garrett will be Courtney Brown....but he could be. Or he could be Von Miller. All Johnny lovers who have hung on here think the latter.

    I am not saying that Trubisky will be Aaron Rodgers...but he could be

    Or he could be Joey Harrington.

    We heard you the first 196 times.

  • @the-gipper said:

    I call it now, Garrett will be Corey Brown.

    I assume you mean Courtney Brown?

    I am not saying Garrett will be Courtney Brown....but he could be. Or he could be Von Miller. All Johnny lovers who have hung on here think the latter.

    I am not saying that Trubisky will be Aaron Rodgers...but he could be

    Or he could be Joey Harrington.

    We heard you the first 196 times.

    @wargograw said:

    We heard you the first 196 times.

    And we heard that you were a Garrett fag the first 9196 times.

  • @mjp28 said:

    Definitely some immortal players! But for overall draft must look beyond just HOF players because of their small overall numbers but check out these names most all 1st round picks:

    That is why I say that 1957 and 1964 stack up well vs. 1983.

    10 HOF in '64

    9 in '57

    only 7 in '83

    Plus, for 57 particularly...look at that list of Non-HOF guys. Kemp...2 time champ. Brodie...outstanding QB.

    Interesting. Good stuff.

    @the-gipper said:

    That is why I say that 1957 and 1964 stack up well vs. 1983.

    10 HOF in '64

    9 in '57

    only 7 in '83

    Plus, for 57 particularly...look at that list of Non-HOF guys. Kemp...2 time champ. Brodie...outstanding QB.

    Interesting. Good stuff.

    I personally would have no problem bumping up '57 and '64 but then again I might be a bit prejudiced there because I grew up watching those guys instead of 1989 when I was already out of grad school...different passions maybe and many more games watched.

    One thing too all of the HOF guys are good, great or excellent we'll see how this year's bunch shakes out in maybe 15-20 years....if we're still here. 😉

  • Hopefully there's no Mike Junkin's, Clifford Charlton's or Mingo's out there this year. (perhaps we're just not qualified to draft LB'er early in the draft)

    In general, I want the biggest, fastest, strongest, shiftiest son's of bitches out there...so long as they don't wear blond wigs and call themselves Billy.

  • @wargograw said:

    We heard you the first 196 times.

    And we heard that you were a Garrett fag the first 9196 times.

    @the-gipper said:

    And we heard that you were a Garrett fag the first 9196 times.

    But you haven't. Back to your lying ways? Quote me...

  • Hopefully there's no Mike Junkin's, Clifford Charlton's or Mingo's out there this year. (perhaps we're just not qualified to draft LB'er early in the draft)

    In general, I want the biggest, fastest, strongest, shiftiest son's of bitches out there...so long as they don't wear blond wigs and call themselves Billy.

    @orion said:

    Hopefully there's no Mike Junkin's, Clifford Charlton's or Mingo's out there this year. (perhaps we're just not qualified to draft LB'er early in the draft)

    In general, I want the biggest, fastest, strongest, shiftiest son's of bitches out there...so long as they don't wear blond wigs and call themselves Billy.

    Billy is resurrecting in the NFL Spring League this April. Could provide some nice relief for football starved fans just before the draft with 6 total games among 4 teams. Player bios are supposed to be posted by the end of this Month according to their website. All 32 teams will have scouts at the games/practices.

    https://www.thespringleague.com/

  • @ghoolie said:

    No, I meant Corey Brown

    You know, it really is good to be me. Fuck man, I am a one man party. Never a dull moment in my life. I can always make myself laugh.

    http://fox6now.com/tag/corey-brown/

    Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.

  • @the-gipper said:

    And we heard that you were a Garrett fag the first 9196 times.

    But you haven't. Back to your lying ways? Quote me...

    @wargograw said:

    But you haven't. Back to your lying ways? Quote me...

    Sure, I will quote you: "I am a fag for Gayrett". This paraphrases everything you have said here for 6 months.

  • @orion said:

    Hopefully there's no Mike Junkin's, Clifford Charlton's or Mingo's out there this year. (perhaps we're just not qualified to draft LB'er early in the draft)

    In general, I want the biggest, fastest, strongest, shiftiest son's of bitches out there...so long as they don't wear blond wigs and call themselves Billy.

    Billy is resurrecting in the NFL Spring League this April. Could provide some nice relief for football starved fans just before the draft with 6 total games among 4 teams. Player bios are supposed to be posted by the end of this Month according to their website. All 32 teams will have scouts at the games/practices.

    https://www.thespringleague.com/

    @texasag1969 said:

    Billy is resurrecting in the NFL Spring League this April. Could provide some nice relief for football starved fans just before the draft with 6 total games among 4 teams. Player bios are supposed to be posted by the end of this Month according to their website. All 32 teams will have scouts at the games/practices.

    https://www.thespringleague.com/

    Could be an interesting experiment. Would it be a US version of NFL Europe?

  • @wargograw said:

    But you haven't. Back to your lying ways? Quote me...

    Sure, I will quote you: "I am a fag for Gayrett". This paraphrases everything you have said here for 6 months.

    @the-gipper said:

    Sure, I will quote you: "I am a fag for Gayrett". This paraphrases everything you have said here for 6 months.

    No, it doesn't. I have not joined any camp on pick #1. I'd be fine with most of the names that have been bandied about. Lying yet again.

  • Where's the talent? His name is Mahomes ll

  • @the-gipper said:

    Sure, I will quote you: "I am a fag for Gayrett". This paraphrases everything you have said here for 6 months.

    No, it doesn't. I have not joined any camp on pick #1. I'd be fine with most of the names that have been bandied about. Lying yet again.

    @wargograw said:

    No, it doesn't. I have not joined any camp on pick #1. I'd be fine with most of the names that have been bandied about. Lying yet again.

    OK, I will appease you and just truncate my quote of you to: "I am a fag..."

  • More lying.

  • More lying.

    @wargograw said:

    More lying.

    Says the pasta fag-ioli.

  • Wanna take another stab at that one, hoss?

  • Wanna take another stab at that one, hoss?

    @wargograw said:

    Wanna take another stab at that one, hoss?

    Sure:

    Faget:

    An internet term meant to describe individuals engrossed in the process of faggotry. The alternate spelling is to distinguish those instigators of faggotry from legitimate homosexuals, towards whom no offense is intended.
    Stop being a faget.

    (assumes the target isn't legitimately homosexual)

  • But you are legitimately a liar.

  • But you are legitimately a liar.

    @wargograw said:

    But you are legitimately a liar.

    And you are both liar and a faget. You lie about being a faget.