Tucker Carlson Brutally OUTS Bill Nye as a Fake Science Fraud [VIDEO]
-
Deforestation and Its Extreme Effect on Global Warming - Scientific ...By most accounts, deforestation in tropical rainforests adds more carbon ... forest destruction, forest clearing will put another 200 billion tons of carbon into the ... “Conservation costs money, while profits from timber, charcoal, pasture and ...The Cost of the Biofuel Boom: Destroying Indonesia's Forests - Yale ...e360.yale.edu/features/the_cost_of_the_biofuel_boom_destroying_indonesias_forests
Jan 19, 2009 - The clearing of Indonesia's rain forest for palm oil plantations is having ... people, and releasing massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. ... The Cost of the Biofuel Boom:Destroying Indonesia's Forests.
$5,000,000,000,000: The cost each year of vanishing rainforest | The ...www.independent.co.uk › Environment › Climate ChangeOct 2, 2010 - British scientific experts have made a major breakthrough in the fight to save the natural world from destruction, leading to an international effort ...Cocaine and the Destruction of the Rainforests - Drug-Aware.comwww.drug-aware.com/articles/157/cocaine-and-the-destruction-of-the-rainforests/... costs of cocaine production - Cocaine and the Destruction of the Rainforests. ... be cleared or burned (how's that for a carbon footprint), causing air pollution, ...The Impact of Agriculture in the Rainforest - Rainforestsrainforests.mongabay.com/0811.htmJul 28, 2012 - Agricultural use of some rainforest land proves to be a failure because of the ... with theprice fluctuations so common in international commodities markets. .... accuses McDonald's ofdestroying the Amazon rainforest (04/07/2006) ... When peatlands are drained, the stored carbonreacts with air to release ... -
but talking about destruction of the earth's rainforests doesn't
redistribute America's wealth.........
-
Saving the rainforests have been a liberal agenda for decades, where have you have been? Conservatives have been mocking the "tree huggers" for the whole duration.
-
But do you have an opinion of your own? It isn't looking good...
It looks good for the first amendment as it doesn't appear that the brilliant idea of criminal penalties for those who don't agree with MMGW is going to happen any time soon under a RICO act or any other charge.
It looks good for the first amendment as it doesn't appear that the brilliant idea of criminal penalties for those who don't agree with MMGW is going to happen any time soon under a RICO act or any other charge.
So what would you recommend if a tobacco company was willfully presenting false information to the public to downplay the health rusks of smoking?
-
It looks good for the first amendment as it doesn't appear that the brilliant idea of criminal penalties for those who don't agree with MMGW is going to happen any time soon under a RICO act or any other charge.
So what would you recommend if a tobacco company was willfully presenting false information to the public to downplay the health rusks of smoking?
So what would you recommend if a tobacco company was willfully presenting false information to the public to downplay the health rusks of smoking?
I will throw it back on you. Should Al Gore be charged with inducing panic for making false claims:
8 Years Ago Al Gore Predicted North Pole Would Be Ice Free in 5 Yearshttp://humansarefree.com/2017/01/8-years-ago-al-gore-predicted-north.html
-
Answer me first. I've been asking for a while now and all you seem to be able to do is copy and paste articles...
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
-
Look at her what the hell is she doing? Is there any reason whatsoever she's sitting on the couch like my 8 yr old niece? Who would get lit up by her grandma for that if she had shoes on......i speak from personal exp there, her grandma is a major pain in the ass
-
Looks like she's getting ready for a gangbang
-
That dude over her left shoulder is down
-
Answer me first. I've been asking for a while now and all you seem to be able to do is copy and paste articles...
Answer me first. I've been asking for a while now and all you seem to be able to do is copy and paste articles...
LOL I make a comment about what Al Gore said and then provide the link so I don't get "where's the link?" and now that is copy and pasting...
The comparison is apples to oranges. There is a clear link between smoking and lung cancer which is why tobacco industry has lost a number of lawsuits. The science is not there to prove man made climate change so people can and do disagree about it. The polar ice cap hasn't melted away as Al predicted it would years ago.
-
Looks like she's getting ready for a gangbang
Looks like she's getting ready for a gangbang
The conway 500?
-
apples to oranges has always happened a lot from liberals around here...
over the years, even.
-
Tucker insults everybody on that show that does not agree with him.
-
He has fun with liberal double-speak and bs. Tucker rocks.
-
I'm sick to the death of articles going
"Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"
"Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"
"Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"
Sick. To the death.
I'm sick to the death of articles going
"Joe blow DESTROYS noob dingleberry!"
"Haircut McGee OUTS col. Bowtie!"
"Lenin Stalin mcMarx OBLITERATED by John Smith with simple gotcha question!"
Sick. To the death.
That's news for you these days.
-
1) Yes, you're doing exactly what Carlson did. "answer every last question I have or you're wrong." Nye fell for the bait there. I'm guessing he was referring to 1750 as the point where man starts to affect the climate. Without that, it's not difficult to say we'd be closer to 1750 climate today. Without the influence of man on the climate.
2) Again, what do YOU THINK he said. You're just copy and pasting literally the most biased sources you can. (Again, how can you read that article and think "Yeah, that told the whole story!").
If you are stating something as factual then produce the facts and Nye cannot do it because they aren't there. It is speculation. I don't see why Nye doesn't just make more of the case the facts appear to suggest this instead of speaking about climate change being caused by man as an exact science and even going so far as to want to punish scientists who differ on it.
The article is about the interview with Carlson and Nye and I watched the video.
If you are stating something as factual then produce the facts and Nye cannot do it because they aren't there. It is speculation.
Pretty much sums up religious beliefs in a nutshell.
-
If you are stating something as factual then produce the facts and Nye cannot do it because they aren't there. It is speculation.
Pretty much sums up religious beliefs in a nutshell.
Pretty much sums up religious beliefs in a nutshell.
I'm not religious at all but how is religion the issue in this thread? This is about Bill Nye, not producing the science that he's claiming is a fact. Turning it into another pointless attack on OBF's religious beliefs is not helping that fact to be objectively explained sufficiently. It's just a way to distract from it.
-
Pretty much sums up religious beliefs in a nutshell.
I'm not religious at all but how is religion the issue in this thread? This is about Bill Nye, not producing the science that he's claiming is a fact. Turning it into another pointless attack on OBF's religious beliefs is not helping that fact to be objectively explained sufficiently. It's just a way to distract from it.
I'm not religious at all but how is religion the issue in this thread? This is about Bill Nye, not producing the science that he's claiming is a fact. Turning it into another pointless attack on OBF's religious beliefs is not helping that fact to be objectively explained sufficiently. It's just a way to distract from it.
Not an attack at all, just highlighting an irony. And if this board was concerned about staying on topic, it wouldn't be nearly as cluttered as it is. But, point taken. Guess I just had a moment.
-
Just to be clear, on a live TV interview what does 'producing the facts' exactly mean? Citing specific papers? Because one paper by itself doesn't make a conclusive case, there are countless papers coming to the same conclusions.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login