Jimmy Garoppolo Speculation
-
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
U-Mad-Bitch1? U have no damn clue what the Browns are thinking. U have no damn clue on your real Been-Gals thoughts..Do you really believe any Source "flatly stating" anything this time of the season? now your making up our own choices on a Browns Board..what a life Uown, UMadBitch1,go see if the Zoo is hiring in the Been Gal Tiger feeding BS Department..Theirrr Great!!
-
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
I agree with beare, I'll say any of this Media stuff means about zero, especially if it came from Mary Kay Cabbot- who has a school girl crush on Garropolo. Misinformation this time of year is rampant,like teams want to get it out in public what they're really thinking? & If Maycock was that great at evaluating talent, he'd be working for a team, not blabbering on ESPN. There was a look back on a site of Maycock's and Kipper's first round picks for the Browns, I did every bit as well as the "experts". For the record I almost puked when they drafted Manziel.
-
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
I agree with beare, I'll say any of this Media stuff means about zero, especially if it came from Mary Kay Cabbot- who has a school girl crush on Garropolo. Misinformation this time of year is rampant,like teams want to get it out in public what they're really thinking? & If Maycock was that great at evaluating talent, he'd be working for a team, not blabbering on ESPN. There was a look back on a site of Maycock's and Kipper's first round picks for the Browns, I did every bit as well as the "experts". For the record I almost puked when they drafted Manziel.
I agree with beare, I'll say any of this Media stuff means about zero, especially if it came from Mary Kay Cabbot- who has a school girl crush on Garropolo. & If Maycock was that great at evaluating talent, he'd be working for a team, not blabbering on ESPN. There was a look back on a site of Maycock's and Kipper's first round picks for the Browns, I did every bit as well as the "experts". For the record I almost puked when they drafted Manziel.
Not all entirely true about working for a team. It's possible they don't want to. I know Daniel Jerimiah on NFL network has turned down offers to work for teams because he doesn't want to move his family from southern california. I think the NFL network guys do a great job of breaking down the players. But it's still all a crapshoot anyways.
-
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
Gipper---You can read, right? The pecking order was from a Cleveland based source and was the most important part of Beare's post. Further, the source states flatly the Browns will make an offer for McCarron if the Browns can't get deals with Garappolo or Tyrod Taylor. And even someone with limited lawyer-like abilities should be able to figure out if someone is 3rd choice, McCarron, whatever comes next (Trubisky?) is going to be 4th choice at best.
Well, apparently you can't read. I don't care what some source says.....sources can be full of shit. Sources just speculate.
This "Cleveland Source" may just be some dude like me and you stating this. I guaranfuckingtee you that the source was not someone from the Browns. And I read the Cleveland area news, and listen to the Cleveland area talk shows...and I can tell you NO ONE is talking about doing any kind of deal for McCarron...beyond saying "McCarron?....Oh he may be someone to think about". That is it.
The Browns HAVE talked about the 4 QBs in the draft. They have mentioned certain FA QBs. They HAVE talked about continuing to work with RG and Kessler (I didn't even include them in front of McCarron in the Top 10 Options).
McCarron? Not a fucking word. Of course, certainly they can not talk about McCarron because he is under contract....but there are a HUNDRED other "Cleveland sources" that haven't mentioned a peep about McCarron.
I think it is pretty clear merely that YOU are the one playing some bullshit Belichick like game and it is you promoting the trade of McCarron.
Why? Perhaps because he actually sucks swamp water, and you know it and you just would like to see your team dump your garbage on us for some ridiculous price.
-
Hoorta---Who said anything about using the #12 for McCarron? Tobin hinted it was going to ask for something that hurt, but I doubt the Bengals trade demands are even close to that. Furthermore, your team doesn't get to decide if the Bengals keep their bait, because the Browns aren't the only team fishing for a new starter. Rather, all the Browns can control is if they trade a draft pick or two that history suggests wouldn't turn out very good even if kept.
Gipper---The Bengals demanded a 1st and a 4th last year, and claim that in return they were offered a 2nd and a sweetener. They won't say which team made the offer but I'm guessing Houston. If true I'm guessing the Bengals were looking for a package of trade compensation of roughly 650-750 points, per the standard trade value chart found almost anywhere. How the Browns would attempt to match that demand is uncertain, but IMO the two most likely scenarios wouldn't even include a 1st round pick in the package. For example, #33 and #142 seems obvious, but of course that's still too much for you guys right? So how about #52 and #65? Still too much? Well now you're just embarrassing yourselves.
Tour---My schtick never gets old. My jokes will still seem fresh and vibrant even when you and choco get tired of policing my grammar or correcting any spelling mistakes I might make.
PoeticG---Isn't it funny how both of us want the same thing for your team? In fact, watching the Browns draft Trubisky in the 1st round is any Bengal fans best case scenario.
Tour---My schtick never gets old. My jokes will still seem fresh and vibrant even when you and choco get tired of policing my grammar or correcting any spelling mistakes I might make.
First, I'll be the judge of when you grow tiresome, thank you.
Second, are you claiming that the shift from "true value" to "value" was a "grammatical error"?
-
Gumby---My goodness, you're a mess. Do other posters respond to your posts, and if so...how? Who translates? Have you been officially diagnosed? What flavor Jell-O are they serving in the cafeteria today?
Hoorta---Of course you agree with Beare. He's good people. I can sense that. As for your rant about the media, if you value their input at zero then you're knowingly making your opinions on less than zero information. Furthermore, nobody is suggesting you swallow everything whole. Treat it as speculation from an inconsistent source.
-
Gipper---You're not calling Beare a liar, are you?
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
-
Gipper---You're not calling Beare a liar, are you?
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
Gipper---You're not calling Beare a liar, are you?
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
If you really want to be a cunt the process is that you must come and suck my dick.
Doing such a move just evidences your cowardice. You can't win an argument, so you chicken out. Chicken. Go ahead. Go away. But if you block me...you are blocking your best "source" of information
And I don't know say Beare is a liar....I am only saying that "ONE" single "Cleveland" source saying that McCarron is high on the Browns list don't mean shit. That "source" may be just some writer that has no more credibility than you or I. Like I said...I read a hundred "sources" that don't have the thought of McCarron at all on their mine. No more than the entire list of FA QBs out there.
-
Gipper---You're not calling Beare a liar, are you?
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
Not inclined to reply since you took a shot at my bud, gumby... but since it's for your friend...
Click on your screen name at top right of page. The lower right option in the drop down menu will be "Manage Ignore Prefs".
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Tour---I'm new here. What are the steps I need to take to block Gippers posts? Asking for a friend.
Not inclined to reply since you took a shot at my bud, gumby... but since it's for your friend...
Click on your screen name at top right of page. The lower right option in the drop down menu will be "Manage Ignore Prefs".
Not inclined to reply since you took a shot at my bud, gumby... but since it's for your friend...
Click on your screen name at top right of page. The lower right option in the drop down menu will be "Manage Ignore Prefs".
-
Gipper---Relax, it's my friend who wants to block you. I happen to like the taste of low hanging fruit. Also, we may be only talking about one media source in this example, but even that is proof enough that I'm not the one making things up. What's more, you were pretty quick to embrace a dubious source from the radio when you thought it supported your rant about 1962 still mattering.
Tour---You have every right to defend your friend Gumby. He's very high achieving.
-
Gipper---Relax, it's my friend who wants to block you. I happen to like the taste of low hanging fruit. Also, we may be only talking about one media source in this example, but even that is proof enough that I'm not the one making things up. What's more, you were pretty quick to embrace a dubious source from the radio when you thought it supported your rant about 1962 still mattering.
Tour---You have every right to defend your friend Gumby. He's very high achieving.
Gipper---Relax, it's my friend who wants to block you. I happen to like the taste of low hanging fruit. Also, we may be only talking about one media source in this example, but even that is proof enough that I'm not the one making things up. What's more, you were pretty quick to embrace a dubious source from the radio when you thought it supported your rant about 1962 still mattering.
Tour---You have every right to defend your friend Gumby. He's very high achieving.
Well...I simply reported what I heard..from a named source guy that works for The Sporting News......something what has overwhelmingly been part of the Bengal/Browns dynamic for all these years...that everyone knows.
That is different than one source saying the Browns are hot after McCarron.
And 1962 DOES still matter....mostly to Mike Brown. Go ahead and ask him of you don't believe the reports.
-
Jimmy G Peace out imstagram post tonight
-
Page isn't available. Summary? Suicide?
-
-
well if he is being traded to the browns hopefully we gave up as little as possible
-
Hmm link works for me, He posted pic of Him on Pats uniform with peace sign. People speculating it's "peace out" lol, who knows since it's silly season.
-
-
-
Everything on the internet (so it must be true, right?) says the Browns are going hard for Tyrod Taylor. I haven't seen ANYTHING about us going for Garoppolo, which makes me sad. Here's how I see it going down: Browns sign Tyrod Taylor after the Bills officially cut him loose. Browns then draft a QB during the first two rounds, and that guy holds the clipboard and learns while we start Tyrod for a year...maybe more depending on how he plays. If Tyrod remains healthy, like he usually does, and puts up similar numbers (say 20 TD's and 7 picks), the Browns could go from 1 win all the way to....what...5? 6? I don't think we'll have a WORSE defense, and I like our RB's. If we somehow manage to keep Pryor, I actually think 5 or 6 wins is realistic, and something to be proud of. Without Pryor...well....I don't want to think about it.
I still want Garoppolo...want him very badly. But I see NOTHING to suggest that we want him, or that he'll even be available.
Italians 
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login