Browns skipping another pro day
-
..or Carl Spackler
lmao...
"Here he is... the amazing young quarterback from Mentor... down by 35... late in the 4th... totally unphased as he calmly takes his spot under center..."
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
It's so damn obvious, the decision has already been made. It'Trubisky at #1 then a LB at 12. We don't need another damn DL we have plenty.
Yeah they played so well and led the league in non-sacks.
Yeah they played so well and led the league in non-sacks.
Let's not forget we are getting a new DC and switching to a 4-3 base. If you think getting 16 sacks total for a season is going to get us over the hump then so be it. What has Clowney and Watt done for the Texan's? Answer-alot but they cant get over the hump because they don't have a QB.
-
Yeah they played so well and led the league in non-sacks.
Let's not forget we are getting a new DC and switching to a 4-3 base. If you think getting 16 sacks total for a season is going to get us over the hump then so be it. What has Clowney and Watt done for the Texan's? Answer-alot but they cant get over the hump because they don't have a QB.
Let's not forget we are getting a new DC and switching to a 4-3 base. If you think getting 16 sacks total for a season is going to get us over the hump then so be it. What has Clowney and Watt done for the Texan's? Answer-alot but they cant get over the hump because they don't have a QB.
WE have their QB now....without having their defense.
-
Cinderella Story?
Cinderella Story?
Holy shi$ here Gip. Am losing my mind LMAO!! Here's the deal. Living in Carolina I have watched UNC a bunch..#1. Fedora was on NFL radio this week. Fedora was asked why Williams over Mitch? Larry Fedora explained "Mitch was just as prepared as Marquise Williams was. Mitch showed that when Mitch got on the field as he also pushed Williams all season. But,how do I(fedora)pull a guy in Marquise off the field if the starting QB wins 11 games & wins our main goal as the ACC Title"? #2.Stanford,NC.State & Miami was probably the best Mitch saw at the secondary position. He failed. Did not play Clemson. Watch the Fla.State tape. Mitch fared well with average secondary's. They won the FSU game Running over FSU. Yes, Mitch has had his clutch moments in every game. But he's late on some & tries to make up for it in arm strength & his ball placement on a couple go the other way..If Mitch is at #12, am probably pulling my hair out till the name is called..Mitchell will be a Cinderella Story alright. Let's just get it Right..
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
-
It's so damn obvious, the decision has already been made. It'Trubisky at #1 then a LB at 12. We don't need another damn DL we have plenty.
It's so damn obvious....... It'Trubisky at #1 then a LB at 12. ..
Cannot tell.....is this serious or joking?
Maybe a little Steve Canyon (though perhaps with the blonde hair, Josh McCown was a better match here):
Looks more like Phil Dawson to me....
Which again doesn't have anything to do with my original point... Which was about .... how quickly some seem to excuse this FO for doing the opposite of what was praise-worthy just 12 months ago.
My take ....EXACTLY.....
Our previous FO(who shall remain nameless) was persecuted for missing some pro-days.......
I remember him getting attacked for passing on Clowneys pro day, in favor of attending Bortles.....ha!
..or Carl Spackler
Hilarious!.....tho I think Spackle is a bit sharper....
-
So I read in the PD today that Hue and sashi are focusing their time on personal visits and letting the scouts handle the pro days. I'm ok with that. Makes sense, can't be everywhere at once.
-
Cinderella Story?
Holy shi$ here Gip. Am losing my mind LMAO!! Here's the deal. Living in Carolina I have watched UNC a bunch..#1. Fedora was on NFL radio this week. Fedora was asked why Williams over Mitch? Larry Fedora explained "Mitch was just as prepared as Marquise Williams was. Mitch showed that when Mitch got on the field as he also pushed Williams all season. But,how do I(fedora)pull a guy in Marquise off the field if the starting QB wins 11 games & wins our main goal as the ACC Title"? #2.Stanford,NC.State & Miami was probably the best Mitch saw at the secondary position. He failed. Did not play Clemson. Watch the Fla.State tape. Mitch fared well with average secondary's. They won the FSU game Running over FSU. Yes, Mitch has had his clutch moments in every game. But he's late on some & tries to make up for it in arm strength & his ball placement on a couple go the other way..If Mitch is at #12, am probably pulling my hair out till the name is called..Mitchell will be a Cinderella Story alright. Let's just get it Right..
Holy shi$ here Gip. Am losing my mind LMAO!! Here's the deal. Living in Carolina I have watched UNC a bunch..#1. Fedora was on NFL radio this week. Fedora was asked why Williams over Mitch? Larry Fedora explained "Mitch was just as prepared as Marquise Williams was. Mitch showed that when Mitch got on the field as he also pushed Williams all season. But,how do I(fedora)pull a guy in Marquise off the field if the starting QB wins 11 games & wins our main goal as the ACC Title"? #2.Stanford,NC.State & Miami was probably the best Mitch saw at the secondary position. He failed. Did not play Clemson. Watch the Fla.State tape. Mitch fared well with average secondary's. They won the FSU game Running over FSU. Yes, Mitch has had his clutch moments in every game. But he's late on some & tries to make up for it in arm strength & his ball placement on a couple go the other way..If Mitch is at #12, am probably pulling my hair out till the name is called..Mitchell will be a Cinderella Story alright. Let's just get it Right..
You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there.
-
Just who we need for a QB-Cinderella.
Just who we need for a QB-Cinderella.
Isn't that Tom Brady?
-
Holy shi$ here Gip. Am losing my mind LMAO!! Here's the deal. Living in Carolina I have watched UNC a bunch..#1. Fedora was on NFL radio this week. Fedora was asked why Williams over Mitch? Larry Fedora explained "Mitch was just as prepared as Marquise Williams was. Mitch showed that when Mitch got on the field as he also pushed Williams all season. But,how do I(fedora)pull a guy in Marquise off the field if the starting QB wins 11 games & wins our main goal as the ACC Title"? #2.Stanford,NC.State & Miami was probably the best Mitch saw at the secondary position. He failed. Did not play Clemson. Watch the Fla.State tape. Mitch fared well with average secondary's. They won the FSU game Running over FSU. Yes, Mitch has had his clutch moments in every game. But he's late on some & tries to make up for it in arm strength & his ball placement on a couple go the other way..If Mitch is at #12, am probably pulling my hair out till the name is called..Mitchell will be a Cinderella Story alright. Let's just get it Right..
You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there.
You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there.
Mr. Eric Church even wrote a song on me Gip. Mr. Misunderstood.give it a ear. But if the local kid saves His childhood browns it will be a Cinderella Story. I believe the Fedora part of my post should answer most posters questions about "Why Marquise over Mitch"? that is except maybe for that 1 attorney in the crowd
-
You don't follow. The "Cinderella Story" comment had nothing to do with MT....it was just in reply to the Carl Spackler photo. That's all. Don't read more into something that isn't there.
Mr. Eric Church even wrote a song on me Gip. Mr. Misunderstood.give it a ear. But if the local kid saves His childhood browns it will be a Cinderella Story. I believe the Fedora part of my post should answer most posters questions about "Why Marquise over Mitch"? that is except maybe for that 1 attorney in the crowd
Mr. Eric Church even wrote a song on me Gip. Mr. Misunderstood.give it a ear. But if the local kid saves His childhood browns it will be a Cinderella Story. I believe the Fedora part of my post should answer most posters questions about "Why Marquise over Mitch"? that is except maybe for that 1 attorney in the crowd
I don't think that a guy that is mentioned as being the best QB in the draft by at least half the pundits can be considered "Cinderella" even if he comes here and succeeds. Expectations would be very high on him to succeed. That is the opposite of Cinderella.
-
Why the hell would that have a bearing on anything?
Because it does...
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/03/browns_will_host_mitch_trubisk.html
-
Why the hell would that have a bearing on anything?
Because it does...
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2017/03/browns_will_host_mitch_trubisk.html
This is a whole different thing than what we were talking about. In this scenario, MT does not count against the 30 player visits, because he is a local boy.
The post I responded to seem to imply that he could not work out for the Browns because he is a "local boy".
That was a rule that I thought was being sited. Some misimpression going on apparently, by me or otherwise.
So, no, no, this is good.
-
Well, you responded to my post saying he could workout in Berea, to which you replied why it mattered he was local.
It does matter he was local, and I gave you a citation for it. ?
Well, you responded to my post saying he could workout in Berea, to which you replied why it mattered he was local.
It does matter he was local, and I gave you a citation for it.
like I said, Must have gotten signals crossed. There was the whole business about a player NOT being allowed to be worked out by a team at their team business (which I think is incorrect), then for some reason I thought you were saying that he could not be worked out because he was "local".
What you didn't say which perhaps would have cleared it up is that his "workout" with the Browns would not count as one of the 30 player workouts. So I get that now.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login