Skip to content

Hue Jackson: Browns won't trade No. 1 overall pick

The Browns Board
81 26 2.3k
  • @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    @hoorta said:

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    Except when old George trotted into a game to break our hearts... among other opponents' fans.

    Not at #1??? Does he not understand the desperate importance of the position? please let me know if he does... a simple quote click for posterity will do.

  • Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    Trubisky

  • Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    He said MT.

  • @orion said:

    Well, I guess HUE knows who he wants to draft.

    ...and that 'not trading' thing is always subject to change based on the offer.

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    @tour2ma said:

    Has the accordion king named the player he wants at one yet?

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    @mld-woody said:

    If any QB could play until he's 46, it's Brady

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

  • @hoorta said:

    It would take at least what Washington gave up for Griffin, if not more for the Browns to be interested- MHO We start at three firsts and a second.

    I know which QB he wants, but not sure if he's said @ #1 yet.

    Until he gets hurt. That might change his mind. My bet is he won't make it that far, 2017 might well be his last season. Looked it up, Geroge Blanda played until he was 48, but his last 9 seasons he was essentially just a kicker.

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

  • @nickers said:

    It's Paxton Lynch! , remember?.. the great Paxton lynch?.. Clip board holder/ bench warmer.. LOL

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I would offer a bag of used footballs and maybe throw in a JUGS machine for him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    No, we will not trade with Mr. Elway. He caused enough pain around here, although I think Marty aided & abetted him.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    I might. I really would have to ponder what I would give up. Perhaps #33. Though, I would still rather have MT.

    The issue would be who would be better: Lynch or one of this year's QB candidates besides MT.

  • @mark-o said:

    And when he did play, he looked worse that Johnny Manzidiot.

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    @the-gipper said:

    Lynch was just a rookie, and IMO the Broncos did the right thing with him, basically letting him sit. For all we know he could now come out great guns. It remains to be seen.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

  • @broncolurker said:

    He showed some flashes, but with our (Denver's) o-line and our running game, not much could be expected.

    Would you trade for him, if so what would you give up? If for some reason the Broncos go the Romo route and are looking to deal him.

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

    @roycerolls said:

    Broncos wouldn't Trade their 23 year old first rd QB because they brought in an over the hill, chronically broke-dick has-been who couldn't stay healthy behind what is widely regarded as the best O line in the NFL.

    Probably not, but they also have a guy they drafted the year before. It's hard to read how they really feel about the 2 and would possibly trade the one with the bigger trade value if they rate them equal and bring in Romo.

  • I can't imagine any GM would see Romo as anything more than a 4 game solution. The guy has injured his back in 3 of the last 4 seasons and is on the wrong side of 35. Just ask Frida Kahlo how hard it is to Return from back injury.

  • http://sportsinjurypredictor.com/injury-predictor/player/6624

    Here is Tony's injury history. While looking at his last four seasons, you'll see 3 fractures and a herniated disc which required surgery...

    Maybe a team kicks the tires, but to move ANY quarterback because Romo joined the room doesn't seem very realistic to me.

  • I can't imagine any GM would see Romo as anything more than a 4 game solution. The guy has injured his back in 3 of the last 4 seasons and is on the wrong side of 35. Just ask Frida Kahlo how hard it is to Return from back injury.

    @roycerolls said:

    I can't imagine any GM would see Romo as anything more than a 4 game solution. The guy has injured his back in 3 of the last 4 seasons and is on the wrong side of 35. Just ask Frida Kahlo how hard it is to Return from back injury.

    agree. Fox seriously wants Tony to replace John Lynch in the booth this season. That's what i would be telling Jerry & Jerry would surely release him on those terms. Stay in shape. heal another year. stay in the game. See what shakes in 18 season? it's not about the money anymore. but that chase for the ring is killing him.. 🥷

  • @boo-fagley said:

    The Pats never tip their hand.

    If they say Jimmy wont be traded he is as good as gone.

    We're not gonna start this all over again- but the Browns new Front Office haven't tipped their hand either. None of the insiders saw the Osweiler trade coming. All the media yammering is just that- pure speculation.

  • Brady will play 1-2 more years like every other QB.

  • I think a lot of fans are comforted by hearing we won't trade the pick. Looking at our history, it's pretty obvious why fans have some concern. There are no guarantees when it comes to picking players, but the stats say the higher you draft a player, the better off the chances are that player will make an impact. We desperately want that "blue chip" guy who can possibly change a game, and I think Myles Garrett can do that. I also think Garrett's presence will immediately help Ogbah's numbers.

  • http://sportsinjurypredictor.com/injury-predictor/player/6624

    Here is Tony's injury history. While looking at his last four seasons, you'll see 3 fractures and a herniated disc which required surgery...

    Maybe a team kicks the tires, but to move ANY quarterback because Romo joined the room doesn't seem very realistic to me.

    @roycerolls said:

    http://sportsinjurypredictor.com/injury-predictor/player/6624

    Here is Tony's injury history. While looking at his last four seasons, you'll see 3 fractures and a herniated disc which required surgery...

    Maybe a team kicks the tires, but to move ANY quarterback because Romo joined the room doesn't seem very realistic to me.

    I think Elway is serious when he says he has no interest in Romo. And Romo has a big roster bonus due on April 17 if he is still with the team. So, I think he gets cut by then. Then, in my mind, the only question is whether or not the Texans would want him. Otherwise, he will be doing TV and be retired.

  • Romo has basically not played for two years, I don't think there's a market out there for him like the media believe.