Skip to content

A Southerner's Shot @ the Draft

The Browns Board
32 11 872
  • More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

  • More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

    @wargograw said:

    More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

    Lol good spot

  • In his defense, the title of the thread did give that away.

    However..

    1) Skipper was the guy who cut-blocked Garrett and caused the injury last season.. not sure how that would play out internally.

    The other reason I question that pick [in my best Triumph the Insult Comic Dog voice] is because he sucks, you see.

    2) Not sure LB is the position needing the most investment in rounds 1/2.. Are you thinking we'll move both Collins and Kirksey to DE on passing downs?

  • lol... You go with what you see...

  • More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

    @wargograw said:

    More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

    Exactly why I titled it that way! Even snuck one in from SOUTHERN Cal. 😆 My one concession was the damn Yankees in Kansas. 😛

    Tour-most likely another safety if we got Allen @ 12. Deep position this year.

    Skipper was my Browns Mr. Irrelevant.And I put him on the other side so he can't fuck over Garrett in practice even.

  • @wargograw said:

    More like a southerner's draft of all southerners lol.

    Exactly why I titled it that way! Even snuck one in from SOUTHERN Cal. 😆 My one concession was the damn Yankees in Kansas. 😛

    Tour-most likely another safety if we got Allen @ 12. Deep position this year.

    Skipper was my Browns Mr. Irrelevant.And I put him on the other side so he can't fuck over Garrett in practice even.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Skipper was my Browns Mr. Irrelevant.And I put him on the other side so he can't fuck over Garrett in practice even.

    So you aren't moving Garrett around? 😉

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Skipper was my Browns Mr. Irrelevant.And I put him on the other side so he can't fuck over Garrett in practice even.

    So you aren't moving Garrett around? 😉

    @tour2ma said:

    So you aren't moving Garrett around? 😉

    I'll loop him inside occasionally with Allen crossing outside. 😄

  • I like that draft more than others I've seen on here. I'd just like to stay away from Foster

  • 1. (1) Garrett TAMU DE -nuff said.
    2. (12) Allen DT or Foster BAMA ILB -because one of the two will still be there.
    3. (33) Adoree Jackson USC CB -Do it all will add a lot to ST return game as well as CB.
    4. (52) Zack Cunningham VANDY OLB -plenty of safeties for later - get a good OLB while still there.

    5. (65) Jordan Willis KSU DE - he may be gone by now, but if he is there!? our staff saw his Senior Bowl work up close.

    6. (108) Eddie Jackson BAMA S -underrated player who is hopefully my steal of the draft.
    7. (142) Tanzel Smart TULANE DT -in case Allen is gone @ 12.

    8. (145) D'Onta Foreman Texas RB -ok I finally take an O player because we need some RB depth. He can get the tough yards in the red zone and has speed if the new OL can open a big hole.
    9. (177) Josh Reynolds TAMA WR - 6'4" not quite an Evans but the best they have had and did well in senior bowl practices in front of Browns staff.
    10. (183) Chad Kelly Ole Miss QB - potential is there for either a playa or a Johnny Football. Why not?
    11. (187) Dan Skipper ARK OT- 6'10" with a long reach - my one concession to the OL. Makes the conversion to RT from LT.

    @texasag1969 said:

    1. (1) Garrett TAMU DE -nuff said. CHECK-SACK Asarus Rex
    2. (12) A.WE PICK & TRADE MCCAFFERY OR HOWARD. A.JIMMY G. B.MITCH C.WATSON
    3. (33) A. Adoree Jackson USC CB OR JOSH JONES-SS- NCSU
    4. (52) ZAY frigin JONES--WR-ECU

    5. (65) TRADED FOR SHELTON RICHARDSON--move to 3 tech IF NOT TE-JAKE BUTT-ICKIGAN-(we don't need a starter..yet) 6. 108.) NO SHELTON--OK TOMLINSON-BAMA CARLOS WATKINS-CLEMSON OGUNJOBI-NCC WILL DO

    7. (142)RB- DOnde FOREMAN or JAMAR WILLIAMS-BYU(knows pro style game. just quick it up)

    8. (145) OPPOSITE POSITION OF #33. SEEMS MAQUEZ WHITE-CB-FSU STILL ON BOARD

    9. (177) PICK ANY DEPTH YOU WANT--TOLEDO-TE-MICHEAL ROBERTS still around if need.(TRADED?)
    10. (183) FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT'S HOLY TAKE THE BEST PK AVAILABLE--ZANE GONZALEZ-K-ZONA ST.(they got birds)
    11. (187) PICK YOUR OTHER DEPTH YOU WANT(TRADED?)

    When computer won't tab, best I can do 😉 NC is in the South(thanks AG)^^^^MOST IN CAPS... we will call it, "Pigeons, GET OFF OUR LAWN" Mock Draft..

  • I like the draft too Ag.....of course, all that D assures that.....

    My main beef is similar to Tours......basically, FS tops my list......SS would be nice too.......but forgoing those 2 key options(when there are great ones available) to pick an extra couple of DL is not where Id be.....Drop Allen and give me Adams...or Hooker....Budda....anyone....

    BUT.............LOVE the Adore pick......I want him too......(for all the same reasons)!!!

  • Biggest issue I'd have is with the focus on the front 7... 5 of your top 7 are spent there. No issues with any of the individual picks, in fact I like them all, just not the cumulative effect which is to under emphasize our 2ndary.

    What would you do at 142, if you did land Allen at 12?

    Only other comment is might be a tad optimistic on your last four falling quite as low as you nab them.

    Skipper is the name I like least in your entire mock. For that it's him, but also because we already have a 6'10 OT rostered. Then again we could run a double, low-post offense... 😉

    @tour2ma said:

    Biggest issue I'd have is with the focus on the front 7... 5 of your top 7 are spent there. No issues with any of the individual picks, in fact I like them all, just not the cumulative effect which is to under emphasize our 2ndary.

    What would you do at 142, if you did land Allen at 12?

    Only other comment is might be a tad optimistic on your last four falling quite as low as you nab them.

    Skipper is the name I like least in your entire mock. For that it's him, but also because we already have a 6'10 OT rostered. Then again we could run a double, low-post offense... 😉

    I'll tell you what I would do if I got Allen at 12. I'd change my pants.
  • I like the draft too Ag.....of course, all that D assures that.....

    My main beef is similar to Tours......basically, FS tops my list......SS would be nice too.......but forgoing those 2 key options(when there are great ones available) to pick an extra couple of DL is not where Id be.....Drop Allen and give me Adams...or Hooker....Budda....anyone....

    BUT.............LOVE the Adore pick......I want him too......(for all the same reasons)!!!

    @mudfly said:

    My main beef is similar to Tours......basically, FS tops my list......SS would be nice too.......but forgoing those 2 key options(when there are great ones available) to pick an extra couple of DL is not where Id be.....Drop Allen and give me Adams...or Hooker....Budda....anyone....

    So which Safety do you draft at 12 with Hooker and Adams off the board?

    I ask because in all probability they will be gone, and you cannot seriously be considering one of them at #1 overall... Can you?

    @comeonman said:

    I'll tell you what I would do if I got Allen at 12. I'd change my pants.

    So... you'd draft a pair of Levi's? 😉

  • @mudfly said:

    My main beef is similar to Tours......basically, FS tops my list......SS would be nice too.......but forgoing those 2 key options(when there are great ones available) to pick an extra couple of DL is not where Id be.....Drop Allen and give me Adams...or Hooker....Budda....anyone....

    So which Safety do you draft at 12 with Hooker and Adams off the board?

    I ask because in all probability they will be gone, and you cannot seriously be considering one of them at #1 overall... Can you?

    @comeonman said:

    I'll tell you what I would do if I got Allen at 12. I'd change my pants.

    So... you'd draft a pair of Levi's? 😉

    @tour2ma said:

    So which Safety do you draft at 12 with Hooker and Adams off the board?

    I ask because in all probability they will be gone, and you cannot seriously be considering one of them at #1 overall... Can you?

    Right....I dont take a safety at 12 if those 2 are gone....I probably tap a CB - LB - TE from my top 8 and get my safety in the 2nd....

    Baker and Williams should be there.....

  • Follow up...

    If you get Baker as a consolation prize, how big of a falloff from Hooker do you see? If Hooker's a 10, what is Baker?

    Ditto... for Williams?

  • Follow up...

    If you get Baker as a consolation prize, how big of a falloff from Hooker do you see? If Hooker's a 10, what is Baker?

    Ditto... for Williams?

    @tour2ma said:

    Follow up...

    If you get Baker as a consolation prize, how big of a falloff from Hooker do you see? If Hooker's a 10, what is Baker?

    Ditto... for Williams?

    I dont think Id call Hooker a 10......and honestly, I have him well below Adams..... and think Budda and Williams both have a more "complete" game....

    Bottom line.....Hooker has a more limited history to go by....and is not an exceptional tackler or very valuable in run support.....but he is off the charts in talent....ball skills....tracking and coverage......and, therefore, must have amazing instincts and football sense.....and that "off the charts" part is what has him in the top 10.......

    As a complete safety....Id give Hooker an 8....and Budda an 8.....and Williams a 7.....and would take Hooker based upon the higher ceiling......

  • To be clear... I wasn't saying "Hooker's a 10", but as the benchmark FS in the draft, I assigned him the 10 arbitrarily for you to scale off of. On an absolute scale? An 8 feels about right, but I'd go 9 due to ball skills more than offsetting any tackling/run support deficiencies.

    I don't see Baker his equal primarily due to Hooker's superior ball skills at range. So if restricted to whole numbers then I'd put one point lower on him... an 8.

    Williams??? I like him better than Baker primarily because I see him being more durable with equal skills... just less "abandon". Can I give him an 8a?

  • or...7....7.5....8...?

    Im having more and more misgivings about Hooker....not sure why.....but durability....tackling....experience are all huge ???? to me

  • or...7....7.5....8...?

    Im having more and more misgivings about Hooker....not sure why.....but durability....tackling....experience are all huge ???? to me

    @mudfly said:

    Im having more and more misgivings about Hooker....not sure why.....but durability....tackling....experience are all huge ???? to me

    Share those concerns... but the talent, his centerfield talent, has actually moved me in the opposite direction. Sufficiently moved me to where I can see taking him at 12, which is not where I started.

    See you in the middle...

  • yeah....I still have him up there....(just worrying a bit).....but he has sooooo many spectacular plays.....some of them are just amazing....

    Who wouldnt want that?

  • yeah....I still have him up there....(just worrying a bit).....but he has sooooo many spectacular plays.....some of them are just amazing....

    Who wouldnt want that?

    @mudfly said:

    yeah....I still have him up there....(just worrying a bit).....but he has sooooo many spectacular plays.....some of them are just amazing....

    Who wouldnt want that?

    Does he remind you of anyone who has played for us?

    He does me... and I'll reveal in a bit... don't want to poison the well.