Warmonger Trump
-
-
Seems as all the war experts on here are in the minority. All of our allies seem to agree with the strike. I think it was a good idea.
-
Seems as all the war experts on here are in the minority. All of our allies seem to agree with the strike. I think it was a good idea.
Seems as all the war experts on here are in the minority. All of our allies seem to agree with the strike. I think it was a good idea.
Of course they are. We are picking up the tab for them again.
-
I'm good with the strike.
I don't want to get embroiled in a ground fight and I don't think we will.
I do agree the rebels will probably big as big as Assad in the scumbag Department.
What we rattled our Sabers last time used poison gas and then pussed out.
WSS
-
I have mixed feelings on the strike. I think:
a- It was the right thing to do from a moral perspective.
b- It's politically a tried and true tactic of leaders who are unpopular to try and increase their popularity.
c- A very dangerous escalation if it signals the start of another US attempt at regime change. We've seen how that goes.
"I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta -
We're the world power. We cannot allow chemical weapons to be used without a response. Obama did, and it emboldened Syria to do it again. This will also send a message to my avatar that Trump is willing to strike if provoked.
-
a - true
b- that is stupid. I suppose you think that is why assad used SARIN gas again?
c - Trump was very correct - the clintonobamao plan to go in with our jet fighters protecting
a safe zone would have dangerously, possibly, led us into direct conflict with the Russians,
a point Jblu doesn't understand, as usual.
The reason for the hitting of only ONE of their military airports, is because THAT AIRPORT was the one used by
Syrian/Russian? jet fighters in dropping the sarin weapons on an entire city of innocent men, women and children.
And, as usual, the "security council" refused to condemn the attack, because of the russians and/or China. The Soviets KNEW they were going to do it.
It isn't any kind of "dangerous escalation at all - there is no "signal of regime change" - it's a limited strike
at a military target. They have all sorts of military bases. This airfield was the only target. If it was to signal regime change,
they would have taken out all the airfields, along with his military, probably take one of his houses out while it was empty.
Our spec ops on the ground, secretly there, gave them the signals the missiles used in extremely accurate destruction.
Obamao drew a red line on the chem attacks, and assad and the russians simply defied his lilly-livered, cowardly "presidency",
and did it anyways. And, obamao did absolutely nothing. And assad did it again. If he is insane enough to try it again,
he will probably lose all his airfields.
So far, I have heard that Egypt, the Saudis, Jordan, Israel, several allies, were the first to agree with it.
Hell,
***EVEN CHUCK SCHUMER said it was the right thing to do.
Even John senile Mccain and others said it was the right thing to do.
It sure as hell sends a very, very important, valid message: we aren't going to sit back and let the world continue to go to war crimes hell in syria - and you can bet that message is also sent to China/n korea, Russia and terrorist groups.
I think Russia will also stop the attempts to intimidate our navy ships and planes with their stupidass,
dangerously close, aggressive fly-bys, and Iran will stop their ships from trying to intimidate our ships
in international waters.
-
I think this is the same response you would have gotten from President Obama or President Clinton.
As far as what happens next, we'll see.
-
No, we don't need another war. We need to focus on America first. I thought Trump would be the guy to do that.
-
We're back to the question though of who those chem bombs were thrown at. Nothings changed from 6 months ago when all of u trump fluffers brought up the same point. Yes it sucks children got caught up in that but if those were isis or al quida in syria positions.....
So in conclusion if the colored boy was still potus u all would be hopping up and down on both legs about war with russiya. And if the russians were right that it was the result of rebel chem factory that got inadvertently bombed whst then?
-
Why didn't he send middles at ISIS positions?
-
No, we don't need another war. We need to focus on America first. I thought Trump would be the guy to do that.
No, we don't need another war. We need to focus on America first. I thought Trump would be the guy to do that.
At least u have principle and arent changing ur tune
-
Cleve you might considered spitting out Obama's dick. Just for a minute.
That aside it's unfortunate that the United Nations is such a bunch of cunts and so willing to overlook sarin gas attacks.
I'm at a loss to understand why Assad and the Russians think that would be acceptable when all they would have to do is Wipe Out the civilian population with Conventional Weapons and the world would probably look the other way.
WSS
-
Why didn't he send middles at ISIS positions?
Why didn't he send middles at ISIS positions?
Prob because its a waste of time and money, its likevwhack a mole
-
I have mixed feelings on the strike. I think:
a- It was the right thing to do from a moral perspective.
b- It's politically a tried and true tactic of leaders who are unpopular to try and increase their popularity.
c- A very dangerous escalation if it signals the start of another US attempt at regime change. We've seen how that goes.
I have mixed feelings on the strike. I think:
a- It was the right thing to do from a moral perspective.
b- It's politically a tried and true tactic of leaders who are unpopular to try and increase their popularity.
c- A very dangerous escalation if it signals the start of another US attempt at regime change. We've seen how that goes.
Pretty much how I feel about it. A response to that gas attack was necessary, but Trump and Co. should take lessons from previous administrations on the dangers of escalating US involvement in the Middle East.
-
Why was a response necessary?
-
Why is it that " all of a sudden " we cant work with nor trust the russians in syria? 6 months ago u sprung trump females were bouncing ur titties up and down and rubbing ur clits whenever putins name was spoken.
-
After 6 long brutal years, hundreds of thousands killed many with the long outlawed POISON GAS, the biggest refuge crisis since WWII, the virtual total destruction of entire cities all so Assad can still hold on to his brutal grip on power it's LONG overdue for something like this to happen.
Shame on the world just sitting on their hands and watching this just happen.
Plus Russia, China, North Korea and every other rogue state being more emboldened year after year.
Trump was right in doing this, time for the rest of the free world (UN, NATO, our "allies") to join us.
-
I think this is the same response you would have gotten from President Obama or President Clinton.
As far as what happens next, we'll see.
-
I know, nothing good will come of this.
So far both Republicans and Democrats on the hill are supporting this action.I know, nothing good will come of this.
And yes to quote William Tecumseh Sherman from the Civil War "war is hell" but so is watching children slowly die from being bombed with Sarin mixed with chlorine gas.
Chlorine gas was outlawed after WWI because it was so inhumane.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better ๐
Register Login