Trading back into the 1st round ?
-
-
Makes sense because of the 5th year option
-
So we would take the broncos pick? Any clue as to what the broncos want?
-
I am not sure what is being proposed here.
-
Zombo said:
Trading our #33 to move back into the first round. We'd have three #1s then.
Zombo
I did the math and this checks out.
-
#33, a 3rd and a late rounder. Seems we're talking to others as well besides the Broncos. Titans (18) and Lions (21) mentioned too. Must be a player in there we are after.
-
Moving up from #33 to #20? and giving up what? I assume probably at least giving them #52?
And to target what? A CB? TE? QB?
-
.....so then, when the Broncos pick is coming up.....and there's a certain guy still out there that we were hoping might be there....then we've got their phone #.
-
Would make sense they're targeting a DB around that spot or perhaps OJH. Unless of course their QB falls down the board - at which case id pass all together.
Only problem is there are quality day 2 Day DB's so moving up seems silly for that reason.
-
Would make sense they're targeting a DB around that spot or perhaps OJH. Unless of course their QB falls down the board - at which case id pass all together.
Only problem is there are quality day 2 Day DB's so moving up seems silly for that reason.
Would make sense they're targeting a DB around that spot or perhaps OJH. Unless of course their QB falls down the board - at which case id pass all together.
Only problem is there are quality day 2 Day DB's so moving up seems silly for that reason.
That is RB territory so that is my guess. Or maybe Miami's TE since OJ may be gone @ 12.
-
All I know is if they trade with the Miami Dolphins to catch a falling QB prospect at #22 I'm going to quit being a Browns fan.
-
I hope they do trade up from 33 to the twenties, if they can get their third 1st round
immediate impact player.... hopefully, they got Howard at 12. (or, Trubisky at 12, who doesn't
have to start, but ....)
-
Garrett, Howard and if it is Denver's pick ...... best Safety or Corner on the board....
-
Zombo said:
Trading our #33 to move back into the first round. We'd have three #1s then.
Zombo
I did the math and this checks out.
From #33 to 20? Sound more expensive than I'd pay... or Meers would pay.
But then I've no idea who they might want around 20. Probably just feelers, if that, in case someone keeps falling that we almost like at 12.
I did the math and this checks out.
lmao... not sure why, but I did...
-
Browns Source 'You see we don't have bridge QB. Maybe we trade for McCarron. Bengals appear opposed to that. We like Trubisky & Webb.'
-
Nothing is coming out of the Browns FO this off season, NOBODY knew about the Ossweiler deal. Ignore these guessing bums on twitterr
-
Clearly moving up for Peppers. Clearly.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Nothing is coming out of the Browns FO this off season, NOBODY knew about the Ossweiler deal. Ignore these guessing bums on twitterr
Nothing is coming out of the Browns FO this off season, NOBODY knew about the Ossweiler deal. Ignore these guessing bums on twitterr
Exactly!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login