Foster failed drug test
-
Most impressive besides arriving to the ball with an attitude is the fact he reads plays so well and knows his assignment when he sniffs it out. I have always suspected he spends hours watching tape of his opponents up next, something I would expect from a great pro player.
-
Update: The follow up interview segment on NFL LIve was a pretty bland repeat with Wendy Nix subbing for Trey Wingo, who was traveling to Philly, and then a board session with Mark May... who did all the talking.
Added just enough to put him all the way back on my board. He's my pick at 12, if he's there. Only Adams and Thomas, in that order, would beat him out for that pick.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Update: The follow up interview segment on NFL LIve was a pretty bland repeat with Wendy Nix subbing for Trey Wingo, who was traveling to Philly, and then a board session with Mark May... who did all the talking.
Added just enough to put him all the way back on my board. He's my pick at 12, if he's there. Only Adams and Thomas, in that order, would beat him out for that pick.
Tour you seem very confident he won't be a suspension couch potato. Why?Update: The follow up interview segment on NFL LIve was a pretty bland repeat with Wendy Nix subbing for Trey Wingo, who was traveling to Philly, and then a board session with Mark May... who did all the talking.
Added just enough to put him all the way back on my board. He's my pick at 12, if he's there. Only Adams and Thomas, in that order, would beat him out for that pick.
-
Tour you seem very confident he won't be a suspension couch potato. Why?Update: The follow up interview segment on NFL LIve was a pretty bland repeat with Wendy Nix subbing for Trey Wingo, who was traveling to Philly, and then a board session with Mark May... who did all the talking.
Added just enough to put him all the way back on my board. He's my pick at 12, if he's there. Only Adams and Thomas, in that order, would beat him out for that pick.
-
Id pick him at 12 in a second.....
You never know with any player, what they will become and this one has been a dependable hard working - hard playing teammate for years....never an issue...no arrests...no suspensions....no history of drugs....
Unlike some of our other problem children, who had extensive histories of trouble before they were drafted....
At this point, nobody has shown that he's done anything wrong....except hydrate....
-
Id pick him at 12 in a second.....
You never know with any player, what they will become and this one has been a dependable hard working - hard playing teammate for years....never an issue...no arrests...no suspensions....no history of drugs....
Unlike some of our other problem children, who had extensive histories of trouble before they were drafted....
At this point, nobody has shown that he's done anything wrong....except hydrate....
Id pick him at 12 in a second.....
You never know with any player, what they will become and this one has been a dependable hard working - hard playing teammate for years....never an issue...no arrests...no suspensions....no history of drugs....
Unlike some of our other problem children, who had extensive histories of trouble before they were drafted....
At this point, nobody has shown that he's done anything wrong....except hydrate....
I would take him at 12....IF he were an OLB....a prime position of need. But we already got an ILB playing OLB: Collins.
Can Foster play full time at OLB....or roam?
-
Id pick him at 12 in a second.....
You never know with any player, what they will become and this one has been a dependable hard working - hard playing teammate for years....never an issue...no arrests...no suspensions....no history of drugs....
Unlike some of our other problem children, who had extensive histories of trouble before they were drafted....
At this point, nobody has shown that he's done anything wrong....except hydrate....
I would take him at 12....IF he were an OLB....a prime position of need. But we already got an ILB playing OLB: Collins.
Can Foster play full time at OLB....or roam?
I would take him at 12....IF he were an OLB....a prime position of need. But we already got an ILB playing OLB: Collins.
Can Foster play full time at OLB....or roam?
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
-
I would take him at 12....IF he were an OLB....a prime position of need. But we already got an ILB playing OLB: Collins.
Can Foster play full time at OLB....or roam?
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Then he tackles head first and gets concussed...
-
I would take him at 12....IF he were an OLB....a prime position of need. But we already got an ILB playing OLB: Collins.
Can Foster play full time at OLB....or roam?
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Honestly, our need for an OLB, who can rush, cover the TE, and hold the edge on running plays is greater than our need for a strictly DE.
Of course, you can say: but you can't pass up the great player just because he doesn't exactly fit our position of need. I hear that.
But, if Foster is the beast some say....he may actually turn out to be better than that guy you want at #1.
So....maybe the Browns take MT at #1 and Foster at #12.
What would you think about that?
-
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Then he tackles head first and gets concussed...
Then he tackles head first and gets concussed...
A risk they all take.
-
Yes, he's that good. He reads plays and gets to the ball like the best in the league.
Honestly, our need for an OLB, who can rush, cover the TE, and hold the edge on running plays is greater than our need for a strictly DE.
Of course, you can say: but you can't pass up the great player just because he doesn't exactly fit our position of need. I hear that.
But, if Foster is the beast some say....he may actually turn out to be better than that guy you want at #1.
So....maybe the Browns take MT at #1 and Foster at #12.
What would you think about that?
Honestly, our need for an OLB, who can rush, cover the TE, and hold the edge on running plays is greater than our need for a strictly DE.
Of course, you can say: but you can't pass up the great player just because he doesn't exactly fit our position of need. I hear that.
But, if Foster is the beast some say....he may actually turn out to be better than that guy you want at #1.
So....maybe the Browns take MT at #1 and Foster at #12.
What would you think about that?
Bird in hand worth 2 in the bush. Foster will be gone by 12 and if he is there, he would be great operating with Garrett-best of both worlds and use a lot of that ammunition to acquire more for the QB's next year. I just like them better next year.
-
Honestly, our need for an OLB, who can rush, cover the TE, and hold the edge on running plays is greater than our need for a strictly DE.
Of course, you can say: but you can't pass up the great player just because he doesn't exactly fit our position of need. I hear that.
But, if Foster is the beast some say....he may actually turn out to be better than that guy you want at #1.
So....maybe the Browns take MT at #1 and Foster at #12.
What would you think about that?
Bird in hand worth 2 in the bush. Foster will be gone by 12 and if he is there, he would be great operating with Garrett-best of both worlds and use a lot of that ammunition to acquire more for the QB's next year. I just like them better next year.
Bird in hand worth 2 in the bush. Foster will be gone by 12 and if he is there, he would be great operating with Garrett-best of both worlds and use a lot of that ammunition to acquire more for the QB's next year. I just like them better next year.
But, he would not be operating with Garrett. Browns take MT...and so they need their defender at 12. Foster could be the choice.
If he's not there....someone else.
Maybe the Browns go Ghoolie....and address their two biggest needs on offense in round 1: MT plus OJ. And leave defense for the rest of the draft.
How about that?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login