Skip to content

Myles Garrett

The Browns Board
85 29 2.9k
  • @ghoolie said:

    Just like Joe Thomas was a waste of a pick. If a guy cannot translate into wins IMMEDIATELY................for the worst team in the NFL, that is a wasted pick

    Didn't the Browns go to the playoffs during his rookie year in which he started every game?

    @londonbrown said:

    Didn't the Browns go to the playoffs during his rookie year in which he started every game?

    No we missed with a 10-6 record
  • Very interesting demonstration of what Garrett needs to learn from Joe Thomas. They go into the 3 step and 5 step QB drops and what Garrett needs to do to counter the LT moves. I really believe Joe is going to take a great athlete and make an elite DE out of him within the next couple of years. Nothing like the best to teach you the intricacies of the game.

    So Ghoolie is already walking his story back? Gotta be a new record time...

    @texasag1969 said:

    Very interesting demonstration of what Garrett needs to learn from Joe Thomas. They go into the 3 step and 5 step QB drops and what Garrett needs to do to counter the LT moves. I really believe Joe is going to take a great athlete and make an elite DE out of him within the next couple of years. Nothing like the best to teach you the intricacies of the game.

    THAT was a great segment... real "pass rush" PhD stuff.

  • getting back to basics:

  • So Ghoolie is already walking his story back? Gotta be a new record time...

    @texasag1969 said:

    Very interesting demonstration of what Garrett needs to learn from Joe Thomas. They go into the 3 step and 5 step QB drops and what Garrett needs to do to counter the LT moves. I really believe Joe is going to take a great athlete and make an elite DE out of him within the next couple of years. Nothing like the best to teach you the intricacies of the game.

    THAT was a great segment... real "pass rush" PhD stuff.

    @tour2ma said:

    So Ghoolie is already walking his story back? Gotta be a new record time...

    THAT was a great segment... real "pass rush" PhD stuff.

    I thought so too. But it is hard to evaluate that in terms of what Garrett already knows from his college play because so much of the time he is double teamed throughout that last year. Much, much harder to make moves (especially to the inside) when the guard is coming over to take that way from you should you get through the LT's right side.

    However it's also why I believe Ogbah is going to have a stellar year. Because if they keep doubling Garrett, Ogbah & the DT's will shine in one on one's.

  • Pretty sure Danny will have something to say about where the LG's attention goes... πŸ™‚

  • Pretty sure Danny will have something to say about where the LG's attention goes... πŸ™‚

    @tour2ma said:

    Pretty sure Danny will have something to say about where the LG's attention goes... πŸ™‚

    In other words expect more TE's to stay in close to the LT. πŸ˜‰

  • @tour2ma said:

    Pretty sure Danny will have something to say about where the LG's attention goes... πŸ™‚

    In other words expect more TE's to stay in close to the LT. πŸ˜‰

    @texasag1969 said:

    In other words expect more TE's to stay in close to the LT. πŸ˜‰

    I am a little curious if they devote that much attention to a rookie. In college he was so much faster/stronger than the opposition that teams wouldn't risk it until they had him tired out, or they would do rollouts the other way. He won't have quite the same advantage and I would think the Steelers would think he could be contained by being "out-techniqued" at the early stages of his career.

    Also the last time we (Broncos) played the Steelers they went max protection most of the time. We didn't get a lot of pressure on him but our secondary had less routes to cover and a numbers advantage.

    I am curious to see if your secondary will improve quite a bit this year. Any secondary will look like garbage if the opponent can go 4/5 wide and have all day to throw. It can get a little frustrating seeing the qb constantly take the first option / throw away all the time because his clock is sped up, instead of getting sacked. But those are the things that don't show up on the stat sheet that really help your defense when you have elite pass rushers.

  • Mr. Garrett is officially a Brown. Just signed the dotted line.

  • Mr. Garrett is officially a Brown. Just signed the dotted line.

    @htownbrown said:

    Mr. Garrett is officially a Brown. Just signed the dotted line.

    so much shit going right for the Browns I almost don't know how to act.
  • @texasag1969 said:

    In other words expect more TE's to stay in close to the LT. πŸ˜‰

    I am a little curious if they devote that much attention to a rookie. In college he was so much faster/stronger than the opposition that teams wouldn't risk it until they had him tired out, or they would do rollouts the other way. He won't have quite the same advantage and I would think the Steelers would think he could be contained by being "out-techniqued" at the early stages of his career.

    Also the last time we (Broncos) played the Steelers they went max protection most of the time. We didn't get a lot of pressure on him but our secondary had less routes to cover and a numbers advantage.

    I am curious to see if your secondary will improve quite a bit this year. Any secondary will look like garbage if the opponent can go 4/5 wide and have all day to throw. It can get a little frustrating seeing the qb constantly take the first option / throw away all the time because his clock is sped up, instead of getting sacked. But those are the things that don't show up on the stat sheet that really help your defense when you have elite pass rushers.

    @broncolurker said:

    I am a little curious if they devote that much attention to a rookie. In college he was so much faster/stronger than the opposition that teams wouldn't risk it until they had him tired out, or they would do rollouts the other way. He won't have quite the same advantage and I would think the Steelers would think he could be contained by being "out-techniqued" at the early stages of his career.

    I think we get that question answered very early on. If he shows out quickly against 1st teamers in preseason, then I would expect he gets extra attention from game one. We shall see how well Joe "coaches him up". I think we also get to see if the older pro LT's get extra no call "holds" as he gets around them. That was chronic in the SEC that often allowed him to get tackled by the neck as he went by. Really shitty refs when it comes to that.

  • And it'll take a while for him to "earn" calls in NFL games as well...

  • I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

  • I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

    @medicineman said:

    I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

    In the meantime just be happy if he takes pressure off Ogbah to really turn it on this year.

  • @londonbrown said:

    Didn't the Browns go to the playoffs during his rookie year in which he started every game?

    No we missed with a 10-6 record

    @comeonman said:

    No we missed with a 10-6 record

    My mistake. I'd still say that was an immediate impact mind

  • getting back to basics:

    @calfoxwc said:

    getting back to basics:

    Thanks Calsies! As Tommy Chong would say "Far out man - good stuff!"

  • I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

    @medicineman said:

    I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

    All I was saying was that if you thought what Garrett said was "smack talk" then you must think everything is smack talk. He wasn't disrespectful or degrading, he said what any highly touted rookie with something to prove would say. Getting bent out of shape over a mundane interview with the media is faaarrr worse than getting excited about a prospect who hasn't played a down yet.

  • @medicineman said:

    I don't eat it because I don't like it. But either way that made no sense. I am not wanting to see any Browns player fail but we do this shit every damn year, Think 1 player is going to come in and save the browns............The worse I ever seen was people crying over Quinn. Just wait and see what happens before you guys go balls deep in the guys jock.

    All I was saying was that if you thought what Garrett said was "smack talk" then you must think everything is smack talk. He wasn't disrespectful or degrading, he said what any highly touted rookie with something to prove would say. Getting bent out of shape over a mundane interview with the media is faaarrr worse than getting excited about a prospect who hasn't played a down yet.

    @roycerolls said:

    All I was saying was that if you thought what Garrett said was "smack talk" then you must think everything is smack talk. He wasn't disrespectful or degrading, he said what any highly touted rookie with something to prove would say. Getting bent out of shape over a mundane interview with the media is faaarrr worse than getting excited about a prospect who hasn't played a down yet.

    Well said! If people actually listened to the context of what he said - they'd probably like his answer to the question he was asked.

  • Exactly! what is he supposed to say?

    "I'll probably be shitty for a while, especially when we play the steelers, but I got a kickass signing bonus so who cares?"

  • Gareth will be a fucking impact player and love his work ethic .

  • He is going to play sack a rapist twice a year