Browns Trade For NYJ S Calvin Pryor
-
ghoolie's nephew.
the glass an eighth full crowd.
-
I wouldn't be surprised if Pryor gets a chance to play FS. At Louisville he was a playmaker. He was either lay big shots or making crazy picks. He has range so I think he could play the single high safety role, but I don't know about him coming down and playing man
I wouldn't be surprised if Pryor gets a chance to play FS. At Louisville he was a playmaker. He was either lay big shots or making crazy picks. He has range so I think he could play the single high safety role, but I don't know about him coming down and playing man
Not a chance he plays centerfield unless we are in deep shit.
-
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.
Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.
-
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
Pryor at full time SS, Peppers at full time SAM who slides out to $lb from time to time.
Peppers is probably our Barron/Bucannon.
-
Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.
Time for a new name.Goddamn, I gotta hand it to theae guys, this here... THIS is that missing piece we needed to take that next step. A fucking bust at SS. The needle just moved ladies and gents, we are on our way with Pryor.
-
Mini Ghoolie
Face Badly In Need Of A Fist
-
Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.
And we didn't give up anything to get him.
Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.
Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.
And we didn't give up anything to get him.
Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.
Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.
-
That was Devante Parker.
FIFY
-
Just putting this in here to rep the classy response by Demario Davis. Good luck my man.
-
I am interested to see what happens. I have heard that Wiliams will run a 4-2-5 defense a lot. Basically, 2 LB's being Collins and Kirksey with Peppers and Poyer in the box SS with a FS and the two CB's. Also, I wouldn't discount McCourty moving to FS in these types of sets. If you have Haden and BBC/Taylor on the outside and McCourty out high, this may not be so bad.
I am interested to see what happens. I have heard that Wiliams will run a 4-2-5 defense a lot. Basically, 2 LB's being Collins and Kirksey with Peppers and Poyer in the box SS with a FS and the two CB's. Also, I wouldn't discount McCourty moving to FS in these types of sets. If you have Haden and BBC/Taylor on the outside and McCourty out high, this may not be so bad.
Poyer's gone to Bills..Williams will run mostly 4 2 5 or nickle. Peppers on 3rd & longs maybe resting on sidelines awaiting punt return..this is where McCourty/T.Powell &/or Pryor will see time at S/FS imo
-
That was Devante Parker.
FIFY
FIFY
Shit. You are right.
-
First of all, ignore ghoolie the troll
Second, what does this mean position wise?
- Pryor at FS? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at SAM? Probably not
- Pryor at SS with Pep at FS? Unlikely
- Pep at SS and Pryor at a LB hybrid role? Maybe
- Pep at SS in base sets, with Pryor at SS and Pep at nickel/SAM in 4-2-5 packages? I think that's most likely.
Who knows
Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.
Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.
Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.
Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.
Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.
Mike
IN DORSEY I TRUST -
Nobody ever said "this" was the missing piece except you. Pryor is better than who we had on the roster, period. All good teams look for small ways to get better every day, and this is yet another brick in the road.
And we didn't give up anything to get him.
Time for you to change your unrealistic expectations. The only thing that's a bust is your understanding of how good teams are actually built.
Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.
Oh look, the ESPN fanboy has an original take. How cute...Good teams are built off the QB. From there good teams don't trade for busts and fucking trash while rebuilding. Football 101 stuff right there so not a surprise some faggot polesmoker from MA wouldn't understand the basics of the game.
Hows trollies sloppy seconds Workin for ya?
-
Maybe we will just have a bunch of roaming, swarming pack of dogs, like a wolf pack...and the actual label of the position they play will be irrelevent.
Like a basketball team where all 5 guys on the court are 6'7 to 6'9 and interchangeable.
Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.
Mike
Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.
Mike
I don't hate the Brown Bombers. Saw that one mentioned elsewhere.
-
Gip, someone on this board said this D will play their way into a nickname..It may just turn out to be "Wolf Pack"....relentless in attack & pursuit.
Mike
I don't hate the Brown Bombers. Saw that one mentioned elsewhere.
I don't hate the Brown Bombers. Saw that one mentioned elsewhere.
sounds too much like the bronx bombers and i can't stand the yankees.
-
If we're in a 4-2-5 nickel the majority of the time, and this move is to free up Peppers to play the same role he did for Michigan, that would be real interesting.
-
@ghoolie said:
No QB, no WR, TE or RB. No offense = defense gets tired, fatigued, injured and discouraged. 2 - 14 +/- 1 win.
I'm gonna be nice and say 4-12 just to keep the Sunshine Pumpers happy...But all the same.. I see a garbage season on the horizon , again...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login