Jeremy Maclin
-
I'd do it.
Funny how KC does this after all the shit they got in when they signed him.
-
I don't see how it could hurt other than to squash the egos of the current wr corp.
-
No.. Just No.. we have a bunch of Maclins on the team already.. Analytics says no to paying him 10.5 mill at 29 years old
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
No.. Just No.. we have a bunch of Maclins on the team already.. Analytics says no to paying him 10.5 mill at 29 years old
first off he won't command $10.5MM anywhere. Maclin was injured last year. He would likely be very productive for us barring another groin injury.No.. Just No.. we have a bunch of Maclins on the team already.. Analytics says no to paying him 10.5 mill at 29 years old
-
-
-
Kinda like Maclin... only missed 6 starts in the last 4 seasons... but at 29? Not feeling a long term add in him...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
No.. Just No.. we have a bunch of Maclins on the team already.. Analytics says no to paying him 10.5 mill at 29 years old
-
I'd kick the tires.
-
I don't see how it could hurt other than to squash the egos of the current wr corp.
Whose ego are we protecting?.......we only have 2 viable receivers(Britt-Coleman)....all the rest are late rounders and udfa's.....
Is the suggestion that we should pass on getting developed talent because it may prevent undeveloped speculative talent from doing well?
-
CBS ranks all 32 in terms of a landing spot making sense. Guess who #1 is.
-
more retreads.
building from ground up from ground down.
cheap? hungry? ok. but as someone else he doesn't scare anyone. might instill confidence in our young D backfield though as they run circles around him.
-
I don't see how it could hurt other than to squash the egos of the current wr corp.
Whose ego are we protecting?.......we only have 2 viable receivers(Britt-Coleman)....all the rest are late rounders and udfa's.....
Is the suggestion that we should pass on getting developed talent because it may prevent undeveloped speculative talent from doing well?
Whose ego are we protecting?.......we only have 2 viable receivers(Britt-Coleman)....all the rest are late rounders and udfa's.....
Is the suggestion that we should pass on getting developed talent because it may prevent undeveloped speculative talent from doing well?
Nah I was just speculating that the FO would be concerned with sending the message to the current squad that they suck.
-
CBS ranks all 32 in terms of a landing spot making sense. Guess who #1 is.
CBS ranks all 32 in terms of a landing spot making sense. Guess who #1 is.
I could envision his agent asking him Browns or Ravens? You make the call Jeremy.
-
Whose ego are we protecting?.......we only have 2 viable receivers(Britt-Coleman)....all the rest are late rounders and udfa's.....
Is the suggestion that we should pass on getting developed talent because it may prevent undeveloped speculative talent from doing well?
Nah I was just speculating that the FO would be concerned with sending the message to the current squad that they suck.
Nah I was just speculating that the FO would be concerned with sending the message to the current squad that they suck.
Ha!....well, they sort of do.....and all of them have been cut or spent their NFL time on the bench....soooo, message already delivered....
Our entire staff of 9(not counting Britt) has less than 1000 career yards.......thats career yards.....with 12 years combined experience....
IE.....Ill allow that they are all young.....but none have ever cracked anyones line up or performed at an NFL level.....(yet)
-
per spottrac, you get what we pay for (Haden...we need you man)..We rank 26th at WR..The FO analytical hope is their is over 400 WR's on rosters. Most carrying 10-15(us 11). A Huge $ drop after Gordon...Britt ranks [email protected] ranks [email protected] just over a million than ka-boom Louis 681K..We rank 30th in SS payroll..24th at FS..but have no fear,, 312 CB's are out there. along with over 150 LB'ers
-
Smh...
When fans gonna start accepting that players can get better after rookie year.
This shit is tiresome...
Payton, Louis, Higgins didn't get many snaps last year, but we know they suck cause they didn't light he league on fire. My God that opinion is so myopic.
-
Smh...
When fans gonna start accepting that players can get better after rookie year.
This shit is tiresome...
Payton, Louis, Higgins didn't get many snaps last year, but we know they suck cause they didn't light he league on fire. My God that opinion is so myopic.
Smh...
When fans gonna start accepting that players can get better after rookie year.
This shit is tiresome...
Payton, Louis, Higgins didn't get many snaps last year, but we know they suck cause they didn't light he league on fire. My God that opinion is so myopic.
Who says they cant get better?.....they better get better or the Browns better find some better receivers.....
Louis played plenty, while Higgins and Payton couldnt get on the field with a team that was desperate for WR's.......
As Ive said a thousand(10 thousand?) times.....not condemning them, not calling them busts, not saying they wont get better.....just saying that SO FAR, no one has impressed......why is this concept so hard to digest????
Myopic?....you must love that word....how platitudinous....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login