Skip to content

Browns Trade For NYJ S Calvin Pryor

The Browns Board
89 35 4.1k
  • @vikingdawg said:

    I call it like it actually is. Too burned out by idiot regimes selling Browns fans fucking garbage year in and year out and hearing how shitty 3 win calober scrubs are elite.

    Stick to the Vikings then? You won't be missed

    @londonbrown said:

    Stick to the Vikings then? You won't be missed

    Not a Vikings fan dumbfuck.

  • @ghoolie said:

    No QB, no WR, TE or RB. No offense = defense gets tired, fatigued, injured and discouraged. 2 - 14 +/- 1 win.

    I'm gonna be nice and say 4-12 just to keep the Sunshine Pumpers happy...But all the same.. I see a garbage season on the horizon , again...

    @nickers said:

    I'm gonna be nice and say 4-12 just to keep the Sunshine Pumpers happy...But all the same.. I see a garbage season on the horizon , again...

    I'm thinking 3-13.

  • 5-11 floor with 7-9 upside

  • we will be 7-9 and I will be shitting pots of brown gold ones in the morning.

    Hue and Co. got this

  • @londonbrown said:

    Stick to the Vikings then? You won't be missed

    Not a Vikings fan dumbfuck.

    @vikingdawg said:

    Not a Vikings fan dumbfuck.

    Nah, you just grew a semi decent bush on your puss and thought you looked like a Viking, am I right?

    Don't bother answering, I know I am.

  • From a talent perspective the trade seems pretty even...

    From a need perspective? Not so much...

  • From a talent perspective the trade seems pretty even...

    From a need perspective? Not so much...

    @tour2ma said:

    From a talent perspective the trade seems pretty even...

    From a need perspective? Not so much...

    Weird trade indeed......

    Thought we were short at LB to begin with.....and SS now has 6 names vying for one position......

    The good news is that we should, at least, have some improved play from that position....

    Now.....wondering 2 things.....How many of these SS candidates stick.....3?......and can any of them play FS?

    Peppers - Campbell - Kindred - Pryor - Powell - Curry...

  • @tour2ma said:

    From a talent perspective the trade seems pretty even...

    From a need perspective? Not so much...

    Weird trade indeed......

    Thought we were short at LB to begin with.....and SS now has 6 names vying for one position......

    The good news is that we should, at least, have some improved play from that position....

    Now.....wondering 2 things.....How many of these SS candidates stick.....3?......and can any of them play FS?

    Peppers - Campbell - Kindred - Pryor - Powell - Curry...

    @mudfly said:

    Weird trade indeed......

    Thought we were short at LB to begin with.....and SS now has 6 names vying for one position......

    The good news is that we should, at least, have some improved play from that position....

    Now.....wondering 2 things.....How many of these SS candidates stick.....3?......and can any of them play FS?

    Peppers - Campbell - Kindred - Pryor - Powell - Curry...

    Reynolds showed a little promise maybe he gets better with another year under his belt.

  • @mudfly said:

    Weird trade indeed......

    Thought we were short at LB to begin with.....and SS now has 6 names vying for one position......

    The good news is that we should, at least, have some improved play from that position....

    Now.....wondering 2 things.....How many of these SS candidates stick.....3?......and can any of them play FS?

    Peppers - Campbell - Kindred - Pryor - Powell - Curry...

    Reynolds showed a little promise maybe he gets better with another year under his belt.

    @topdawg31 said:

    Reynolds showed a little promise maybe he gets better with another year under his belt.

    Let's hope......I saw some stuff from him that I liked, but really see him as more of a special teams guy/back up player......

  • @vikingdawg said:

    Not a Vikings fan dumbfuck.

    Nah, you just grew a semi decent bush on your puss and thought you looked like a Viking, am I right?

    Don't bother answering, I know I am.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Nah, you just grew a semi decent bush on your puss and thought you looked like a Viking, am I right?

    Don't bother answering, I know I am.

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Nah, you just grew a semi decent bush on your puss and thought you looked like a Viking, am I right?

    Don't bother answering, I know I am.

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

    @vikingdawg said:

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

  • @topdawg31 said:

    Reynolds showed a little promise maybe he gets better with another year under his belt.

    Let's hope......I saw some stuff from him that I liked, but really see him as more of a special teams guy/back up player......

    @mudfly said:

    Let's hope......I saw some stuff from him that I liked, but really see him as more of a special teams guy/back up player......

    If we get the level of play & effort from all our back ups that we get from Reynolds, we'll be much better.

    Mike

  • @vikingdawg said:

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    More likely the Ghool will ask for the ban for not coming up to his standards of insult. Very pathetic attempt. "Sad!"

  • Why couldn't Peppers play free safety? What would be the hangup there? He's plenty fast enough to cover the top especially with a 15-25yd cusion/buffer area below him. He's not being asked to play bump and run or press man coverage. He's not small and he's not big, he's a scrapper. He's a bit short but I think he's close to 6 foot. Probably 6+ with his cleats and helmet on... but I digress, I think that we get entirely too caught up in the position name game. You keep it simple... Peppers and Pryor cover the back half and destroy or intercept any and everything that comes your way. When they get tired, you put in Kindred and Campbell or Powell.

    There really is not an issue here, from the film above you can see that Peppers can do anything a FS can do... and just maybe better.

  • Never played the part and being a quality centerfield man goes beyond being fast.

    Physically he's not all that different from Earl...but his current strengths do not align with playing a deep 1/3. If you want the possibility of year 1 production, youll place him in a similar spot to what he does now.

  • There seems to very much be a difference in the safeties in Williams' D, as it has been described.

    Peppers was rarely asked to play deep coverage. Not to say he couldn't, I'd bet that he eventually could be great, but the fact is he's rarely done it so far. It would take some experience and some mistakes.

  • There seems to very much be a difference in the safeties in Williams' D, as it has been described.

    Peppers was rarely asked to play deep coverage. Not to say he couldn't, I'd bet that he eventually could be great, but the fact is he's rarely done it so far. It would take some experience and some mistakes.

    @mld-woody said:

    There seems to very much be a difference in the safeties in Williams' D, as it has been described.

    Peppers was rarely asked to play deep coverage. Not to say he couldn't, I'd bet that he eventually could be great, but the fact is he's rarely done it so far. It would take some experience and some mistakes.

    And a lot of serious game tape study every week to recognize what the receivers/QB are doing. That's where serious coaching comes into play.

  • @vikingdawg said:

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    Some serious grade school shit there...?
  • http://disq.us/t/2pfrw9g A pretty fair read at the Big Nickle D & 3 tech..

  • I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)