Skip to content

2017 OHIO STATE Football Schedule, how far do they go?

College Football Forum
150 9 6.0k
  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Easily 11-0 going into the game

  • Easily 11-0 going into the game

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @mld-woody said:

    Easily 11-0 going into the game

    Maybe the most anticipated The Game in many years, we'll see what "m" has left from last year. Plus we'll also see the accumulated value of having Coach Harbaugh in Ann Arbor.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I already have my ticket

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #10

    Composite Top 25 college football rankings from The Sporting News

    TEAM POINTS

    1. Alabama 147

    2. Ohio State 142

    3. Florida State 137

    4. USC 134

    5. Penn State 120

    6. Clemson 119

    7. Washington 111

    8. Oklahoma 110

    9. Oklahoma State 95

    10. Auburn 92

    11. Michigan 88

    12. Wisconsin 80

    13. LSU 76

    14. Georgia 76

    15. Stanford 67

    16. Louisville 65

    17. Kansas State 47

    18. Florida 44

    19. South Florida 43

    20. Miami, Fla. 36

    21. West Virginia 34

    22. Texas 21

    23. Tennessee 16

    24. Oregon 14

    25. Boise State 11

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
    #11

    Preseason FPI Rankings - Version 1.0 for top 130 see link. http://www.espn.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/129505/ohio-state-is-no-1-in-preseason-fpi-1-0

    RANK TEAM FPI PRED

    1 Ohio State 28.9 2 12.1 2 14.8 <---- lots of B10 😉

    2 Alabama 25.9 9 8.3 1 15.7

    3 Oklahoma 24.5 1 17.4 20 6.2

    4 Florida State 24.3 3 11.8 4 11.6

    5 Auburn 21.5 5 10.4 10 9.4

    6 LSU 19.6 10 8.0 6 10.4

    7 Clemson 19.6 16 7.0 3 11.9

    8 Penn State 18.9 6 9.9 17 7.7

    9 Washington 18.7 8 8.6 12 8.7

    10 Wisconsin 17.4 15 7.0 9 9.4

    11 Stanford 16.7 30 4.7 8 9.7

    12 USC 16.3 18 6.7 15 8.1

    13 Georgia 15.6 36 3.5 5 11.1

    14 Louisville 14.9 21 6.3 14 8.4

    15 Florida 14.5 46 2.6 7 10.0

    16 Miami (FL) 14.4 40 3.3 11 9.3

    17 Notre Dame 14.2 14 7.2 22 6.0

    18 Michigan 13.7 26 5.2 19 7.3

    19 TCU 13.5 11 7.6 27 5.2

    20 Tennessee 13.4 22 6.2 25 5.4

    21 Oregon 12.3 4 11.6 61 -0.1

    22 North Carolina State 12.2 19 6.5 23 5.7

    23 UCLA 12.1 34 3.8 18 7.4

    24 Texas 11.8 41 3.3 16 7.9

    25 Washington State 11.7 13 7.3 29 4.3

    26 Oklahoma State 10.6 12 7.3 46 2.2

    27 Texas A&M 10.6 43 2.9 21 6.1

    28 Baylor 8.7 27 5.0 32 3.6

    29 Northwestern 8.6 48 2.5 26 5.

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

  • Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @mld-woody said:

    Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

    Not hating just an observation.

  • Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @mld-woody said:

    Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

    That is not why "you" are hated.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Everyone is hating on us because we have the least returning starters in college football. I think.

    Not hating just an observation.

    MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @mjp28 said:

    Not hating just an observation.

    Well an observation resulting in lower rankings. I think it is an overreaction. We'll see.

  • @mjp28 said:

    Not hating just an observation.

    Well an observation resulting in lower rankings. I think it is an overreaction. We'll see.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @mld-woody said:

    Well an observation resulting in lower rankings. I think it is an overreaction. We'll see.

    Well 18 isn't so bad.

    And almost two months until my favorite sport NCAA football!

  • mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #17

    At first on the FPI 130 I thought the B10 was well represented but on closer inspection:

    1 OSU

    8 PSU

    10 WIS

    18 M

    29 NW

    39 IOW

    57 NEB (miss Bo now?)

    58 MST (really?)

    60 IND

    61 MIN

    69 MAR (was MAR & RUT a total bust?)

    83 ILL (ILLINI fans ill)

    88 RUT

    98 PUR (gave up football for engineering? )

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #18

    MST?

  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #19

    OSU wins it all this year. UM won't even be invited to a bowl game.

  • Composite Top 25 college football rankings from The Sporting News

    TEAM POINTS

    1. Alabama 147

    2. Ohio State 142

    3. Florida State 137

    4. USC 134

    5. Penn State 120

    6. Clemson 119

    7. Washington 111

    8. Oklahoma 110

    9. Oklahoma State 95

    10. Auburn 92

    11. Michigan 88

    12. Wisconsin 80

    13. LSU 76

    14. Georgia 76

    15. Stanford 67

    16. Louisville 65

    17. Kansas State 47

    18. Florida 44

    19. South Florida 43

    20. Miami, Fla. 36

    21. West Virginia 34

    22. Texas 21

    23. Tennessee 16

    24. Oregon 14

    25. Boise State 11

    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @the-gipper said:

    Composite Top 25 college football rankings from The Sporting News

    TEAM POINTS

    1. Alabama 147

    2. Ohio State 142

    3. Florida State 137

    4. USC 134

    5. Penn State 120

    6. Clemson 119

    7. Washington 111

    8. Oklahoma 110

    9. Oklahoma State 95

    10. Auburn 92

    11. Michigan 88

    12. Wisconsin 80

    13. LSU 76

    14. Georgia 76

    15. Stanford 67

    16. Louisville 65

    17. Kansas State 47

    18. Florida 44

    19. South Florida 43

    20. Miami, Fla. 36

    21. West Virginia 34

    22. Texas 21

    23. Tennessee 16

    24. Oregon 14

    25. Boise State 11

    Lol. No matter what, Texas must be in every preseason football top 25. It is written in stone somewhere.

  • W wargograw wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Returning starters is traditionally a pretty good indicator...

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Traditionally, sure. There are a handful of exceptions in this case I'd argue

  • @the-gipper said:

    Composite Top 25 college football rankings from The Sporting News

    TEAM POINTS

    1. Alabama 147

    2. Ohio State 142

    3. Florida State 137

    4. USC 134

    5. Penn State 120

    6. Clemson 119

    7. Washington 111

    8. Oklahoma 110

    9. Oklahoma State 95

    10. Auburn 92

    11. Michigan 88

    12. Wisconsin 80

    13. LSU 76

    14. Georgia 76

    15. Stanford 67

    16. Louisville 65

    17. Kansas State 47

    18. Florida 44

    19. South Florida 43

    20. Miami, Fla. 36

    21. West Virginia 34

    22. Texas 21

    23. Tennessee 16

    24. Oregon 14

    25. Boise State 11

    Lol. No matter what, Texas must be in every preseason football top 25. It is written in stone somewhere.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @wargograw said:

    Lol. No matter what, Texas must be in every preseason football top 25. It is written in stone somewhere.

    But, apparently the same does not hold true for A&M. In fact, I note that UT or is it TU...is the only Texas school on the entire list.

  • Traditionally, sure. There are a handful of exceptions in this case I'd argue

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #24

    @mld-woody said:

    Traditionally, sure. There are a handful of exceptions in this case I'd argue

    Some schools just reload. According to some, Alabama just lost an entire NFL defense to the pros...yet, they have the top ranking. Ohio State just lost 3 DBs to the first round....every one of which could have returned if they wanted to...and they still come in second place in this ranking.

    Some other schools cannot do as well with a whole pile of losses to the pros or graduation. (Remains to be seen if Michigan is one of them. Of course, just in their division they have Penn St. and OSU rated ahead...and you have to ask yourself: can Michigan St. rebound after a bad year?)

  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Both of those schools have established coaches. Harbaugh will just now be entering his third year here. Anyone the follows CFB and sees how he's recruiting will know we'll get to that reload stage.

    Recently, and for another season or so, we'll be dealing with some gaps in talent left by the previous staff.

    That's part of the reason I'd say this giant loss in starters won't be as bad in this situation as it would be normally.

    OSU also has 15 returning starters to our 5. It makes sense they aren't dropping far in the rankings.

    If you've been following everything going on in east Lansing, you'd know the chances of a bounce back year are slim.

  • Both of those schools have established coaches. Harbaugh will just now be entering his third year here. Anyone the follows CFB and sees how he's recruiting will know we'll get to that reload stage.

    Recently, and for another season or so, we'll be dealing with some gaps in talent left by the previous staff.

    That's part of the reason I'd say this giant loss in starters won't be as bad in this situation as it would be normally.

    OSU also has 15 returning starters to our 5. It makes sense they aren't dropping far in the rankings.

    If you've been following everything going on in east Lansing, you'd know the chances of a bounce back year are slim.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @mld-woody said:

    Both of those schools have established coaches. Harbaugh will just now be entering his third year here. Anyone the follows CFB and sees how he's recruiting will know we'll get to that reload stage.

    Recently, and for another season or so, we'll be dealing with some gaps in talent left by the previous staff.

    That's part of the reason I'd say this giant loss in starters won't be as bad in this situation as it would be normally.

    OSU also has 15 returning starters to our 5. It makes sense they aren't dropping far in the rankings.

    If you've been following everything going on in east Lansing, you'd know the chances of a bounce back year are slim.

    I haven't been following. I just know that Mark Dantonio has been one hell of a good coach.

    What has been going on in East Lansing that would keep him from being a good coach? I mean, a few criminal arrests won't stop that.