Skip to content

Trump Jr's Emails

Political Discussion
95 12 1.5k
  • http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-jr-posts-purported-emails-meeting-russian/story?id=48567195

    Does anyone see any issues here? A Russian figure says the Russian govt. wants to support Trump's campaign and that they have dirt on Hilary. Trump Jr is excited by this info and wants to meet about it.

    @mld-woody said:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-jr-posts-purported-emails-meeting-russian/story?id=48567195

    Does anyone see any issues here? A Russian figure says the Russian govt. wants to support Trump's campaign and that they have dirt on Hilary. Trump Jr is excited by this info and wants to meet about it.

    I applaud your effort but this is going to fall on deaf ears. The same people who Reagan whipped into a frenzy about the evils of the Soviet Union have no issue with the current administration cozying up to a Russia that may be more dangerous, economically speaking. What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

  • @mld-woody said:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-jr-posts-purported-emails-meeting-russian/story?id=48567195

    Does anyone see any issues here? A Russian figure says the Russian govt. wants to support Trump's campaign and that they have dirt on Hilary. Trump Jr is excited by this info and wants to meet about it.

    I applaud your effort but this is going to fall on deaf ears. The same people who Reagan whipped into a frenzy about the evils of the Soviet Union have no issue with the current administration cozying up to a Russia that may be more dangerous, economically speaking. What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

    @baconhound said:

    I applaud your effort but this is going to fall on deaf ears. The same people who Reagan whipped into a frenzy about the evils of the Soviet Union have no issue with the current administration cozying up to a Russia that may be more dangerous, economically speaking. What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

    And isn't it ironic how the two sides have switched uniforms now?

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-jr-posts-purported-emails-meeting-russian/story?id=48567195

    Does anyone see any issues here? A Russian figure says the Russian govt. wants to support Trump's campaign and that they have dirt on Hilary. Trump Jr is excited by this info and wants to meet about it.

    I applaud your effort but this is going to fall on deaf ears. The same people who Reagan whipped into a frenzy about the evils of the Soviet Union have no issue with the current administration cozying up to a Russia that may be more dangerous, economically speaking. What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

    @baconhound said:

    What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

    Yeah, you two are leading the fervent hypocrisy parade

  • AxeA Axe

    @baconhound said:

    What continues to dismay me is the fervent hypocrisy that so many exhibit.

    Yeah, you two are leading the fervent hypocrisy parade

    @axe said:

    Yeah, you two are leading the fervent hypocrisy parade

    This is where I ask for an example and you respond with some anti liberal meme....

  • like the msm, you overlooked, defended, and/or ignored all the scandals of the obaMao regime....

    but then you roar about what isn't there with Trump.

    Emotions "trump" common sense and actual facts with liberals.

    when liberals complain on the "basis of principle"... it's false - they are actually

    complaining about their emotions. If THEIR candidate wins, they are happy....everything is ok.

    If their candidate loses, they are upset and angry everything is wrong, nothing is ok....

    even when the situation was far worse in the first instance.

  • Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

    there are some great facts to consider:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341788-exclusive-doj-let-russian-lawyer-into-us-before-she-met-with-trump

    yep. The russian lawyer was let into the country...by....an ObaMao democrat...member of....ObaMao's Department of

    INJustice.

    Headed up, of course, by.......wait for it....his little leftist liar princess Lynch.

    "This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa."

  • Want more facts? this russian lawyer was a major anti-Trump person. She had her pic taken with

    "X" in his office.

    Who is "X" ? John McCain. Who got Soros money...indirectly. Watch this:

    "deep state" isn't fake news. It's real dangerous to all of us Americans who voted for a Real American

    to be our President. The deep state HATES to lose control.

    and this russian lawyer was right in the middle of it.

  • Trump Jr didn't collude

    Well he met but nothing happened

    Hillary did things too

    Candidates get dirt from other sources all of the time

    It's actually Obama's fault

    The Russian lawyer was a plant by the deep state!

    .....................................................................

    jimmy-valmer-i-mean-come-on.jpg

    am I missing any of the latest diversions, I mean reasons, for why this is ok?

  • Actually, it wouldn't surprise me if this was Obama/Clinton/Holder/Lynch with Soro's at the helm of course. Luckily, it is all falling apart at the seams, LMAO.

  • Come now bacon Hound. I realize that anybody on the left has an easy time getting Woody's support but let's be honest. Yes Ronald Reagan is an icon of the right and usually reviled by the left across the board but remember thi:

    Yes one of his talking points was the evil empire. Remember the times we are dealing with, bacon I don't think you are as young as Woody right? At that point in history the Soviet Union was losing much of its strength. Why? Well all their little satellite nations we're going broke since communism is really a shity way to produce goods and services. That meant Mother Russia had to pick up the tab* to keep these places above water. And let's face it, the Russians don't really make much that anybody needs. Weapons and oil is about the extent. Ronald Reagan gave Mikhail Gorbachev the opportunity to get out from under a lot of that weight and loosen the grip on the extended Soviet family. Tear down the wall look like a progressive get out of trouble all that shit.. I think bacon probably remembers that Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan were closer than any other Russian leader and American leader we can remember even with the early evil empire remarks. This hysterical anti-putin rhetoric is politics to the nth degree no more no less. Add that to the irrational Trump hatred and the New York Times, Washington Post and CNN has again have a purpose in life.

    WSS

  • * just as the United States federal government is being forced more and more to subsidize the failing political systems and places like California New York and Illinois. Anybody see that getting better in the future?

    WSS

  • Trump Jr didn't collude

    Well he met but nothing happened

    Hillary did things too

    Candidates get dirt from other sources all of the time

    It's actually Obama's fault

    The Russian lawyer was a plant by the deep state!

    .....................................................................

    jimmy-valmer-i-mean-come-on.jpg

    am I missing any of the latest diversions, I mean reasons, for why this is ok?

    @mld-woody said:

    Trump Jr didn't collude

    Well he met but nothing happened

    Hillary did things too

    Candidates get dirt from other sources all of the time

    It's actually Obama's fault

    The Russian lawyer was a plant by the deep state!

    .....................................................................

    jimmy-valmer-i-mean-come-on.jpg

    am I missing any of the latest diversions, I mean reasons, for why this is ok?

    you are missing facts. Your knarly quips aren't facts - experts are saying he did NOT collude. Why run with

    the hateful left's rhetoric every freaking time? Since when does "collude" mean "goldamit, we're po'd we lost

    control again, so we are raising all hell and making asses of ourselves we don't care anymore" ?

    A dem is "innocent til proven guilty and of course they are innocent".... a rep is guilty when the evidence isn't there to

    even believe they are guilty...

  • * just as the United States federal government is being forced more and more to subsidize the failing political systems and places like California New York and Illinois. Anybody see that getting better in the future?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    * just as the United States federal government is being forced more and more to subsidize the failing political systems and places like California New York and Illinois. Anybody see that getting better in the future?

    WSS

    not with those hard core democratic/liberal/whacko states.... and the nutjobs leaving and starting over in another state and emotionally voting for marxist type nutjobs again.

    Liberals never think they are wrong - they think it's just that the rest of the world just refused to allow perfection to sink in on their nonsense.

  • I reckon we need some first grade show and tell help for liberals to get it:

    https://twitter.com/_/status/885330686080675841

  • At the end of the day, I understand how far right a good chunk of this board swings. It's painfully obvious how far you will go to protect the party, especially over the last year. I think it's painfully obvious to anyone that isn't completely politically biased.

    So you'll respond with calling me a liberal, something about Real America, etc. You'll blame everything on the left. And you'll see nothing biased about these responses, basically proving my point.

    So continue to do whatever you can to protect Trump. I think blaming the "deep state" is really quintessential delusion. Grade A political board stuff.

  • @mld-woody said:

    No concern with the other party here being a foreign government? This isn't another politician in the US offering dirt, it's Russia. Even mentioning the Russian Government's support for Trump's campaign.

    Yes, politics are dirty and people offer dirt, but you don't have any concerns with it coming from a foreign government?

    Do you, or did you, have a problem with Hillary and the Russians and the Clinton foundation? Hillary's assistance from the Ukraine? And if in fact the story is exactly true what particular 'information, if any, do you think the Russians were offering trump junior?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Do you, or did you, have a problem with Hillary and the Russians and the Clinton foundation? Hillary's assistance from the Ukraine? And if in fact the story is exactly true what particular 'information, if any, do you think the Russians were offering trump junior?

    WSS

    @canton-dawg said:

    At least we can READ Trump Jr's emails...at least he didn't delete them...ya know...like Hillary.

    @westside-steve said:

    Also wouldn't it be expected that particular governments around the world might prefer one u.s. president to another? We know that Barack Obama sent US taxpayer dollars to help oust Benjamin Netanyahu.

    WSS

    @calfoxwc said:

    not with those hard core democratic/liberal/whacko states.... and the nutjobs leaving and starting over in another state and emotionally voting for marxist type nutjobs again.

    Liberals never think they are wrong - they think it's just that the rest of the world just refused to allow perfection to sink in on their nonsense.

    The Daily Wire: On 'Whataboutism' And Its Moral Hazards: http://www.dailywire.com/news/18511/whataboutism-and-its-moral-hazards-ben-shapiro?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=051717-news&utm_campaign=dwtwitter

    ..."whataboutism is itself dishonesty — it’s pretending to care about the sins of the Left in order to justify the sins of the Right. It actually throws into sharp relief the hypocrisy of the Right: we complained endlessly and justifiably about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with Bill Clinton, but we’re fine with Donald Trump Jr. meeting secretly with Natalia Veselnitskaya; we ripped President Obama’s “flexibility” hot mic moment, but we’re fine with President Trump saying that America has killed people just like Putin; we correctly targeted Clinton over Chinagate, but now we’re happy to use Chinagate as an excuse to avoid talking about Russiagate. This isn’t conservative. It’s not even moral. Kindergarteners learn that “but he did it, too” isn’t an excuse for bad behavior."

  • At the end of the day, I understand how far right a good chunk of this board swings. It's painfully obvious how far you will go to protect the party, especially over the last year. I think it's painfully obvious to anyone that isn't completely politically biased.

    So you'll respond with calling me a liberal, something about Real America, etc. You'll blame everything on the left. And you'll see nothing biased about these responses, basically proving my point.

    So continue to do whatever you can to protect Trump. I think blaming the "deep state" is really quintessential delusion. Grade A political board stuff.

    @mld-woody said:

    At the end of the day, I understand how far right a good chunk of this board swings. It's painfully obvious how far you will go to protect the party, especially over the last year. I think it's painfully obvious to anyone that isn't completely politically biased.

    So you'll respond with calling me a liberal, something about Real America, etc. You'll blame everything on the left. And you'll see nothing biased about these responses, basically proving my point.

    So continue to do whatever you can to protect Trump. I think blaming the "deep state" is really quintessential delusion. Grade A political board stuff.

    "at the end of the day" LOL ? It's 9 AM, Woody. "far right"...yeah, I think I'm pretty much right of center. But that doesn't mean

    Trump Jr is guilty of collusion. It's a change of subject.

    And I'm not "protecting the party"... I'm posting articles to explain why Trump Jr is not guilty, as much as you liberals frantically and desperately want him to be. Experts are saying he is NOT. Do you even know what "collusion" is?

    You liberals modify definition of words to emotionally evoke your anti-everything knee jerk responses.

    I have never blamed everything on the left, that is just a false narrative to protect liberalism. And we have NOT been talking about

    this leftwing admitted all out attack on OUR PRESIDENT for a year.

    So, it would be good for you to explain detail what you think it means:

    FACT: the russian lawyer did NOT HAVE A VISA. She was supposed to be going back to russia. How did she get to stay

    here? OBAMAO's DOJ...HEADED BY HIS LORETTA LYNCH. And what did she do while here? SHE HAD A MEETING ARRANGED WITH TRUMP JR. He didn't know her.

    Of course I'm biased... not as much as you are. Do you know the story behind the actual collusion between

    reps of Ukraine, and the democratic party?

    I mean, are you against all collusion, or you just want the Trump presidency to be damaged?

    Here are more FACTS:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/07/12/donald-trump-jr-russian-collusion-democrats-clinton-ukraine-putin-chalupa

    http://www.dailywire.com/news/18477/flashback-hillary-allies-coordinated-ukrainian-aaron-bandler

    now, read those, watch the video... and then let us all know how you aren't biased polically....

  • ..."whataboutism is itself dishonesty — it’s pretending to care about the sins of the Left in order to justify the sins of the Right. It actually throws into sharp relief the hypocrisy of the Right: we complained endlessly and justifiably about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with Bill Clinton, but we’re fine with Donald Trump Jr. meeting secretly with Natalia Veselnitskaya; we ripped President Obama’s “flexibility” hot mic moment, but we’re fine with President Trump saying that America has killed people just like Putin; we correctly targeted Clinton over Chinagate, but now we’re happy to use Chinagate as an excuse to avoid talking about Russiagate. This isn’t conservative. It’s not even moral. Kindergarteners learn that “but he did it, too” isn’t an excuse for bad behavior." jblu

    **********************************************************

    the Trump meeting was not a sin. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton as his Wife was going to be investigated maybe...

    except Lynch told Comey, head of the FBI, to NOT SAY "Investigation"....but to say "matter" instead.

    The meeting between Trump Jr wasn't illegal, wasn't about protecting maybe Pres Trump anything. The russian lawyer

    was not a prosecuting member of the American gov, there was no information shared that had anything to do with

    getting higgardly. The equating is emotional fake narrative nonsense.

  • http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/341788-exclusive-doj-let-russian-lawyer-into-us-before-she-met-with-trump

    Exclusive: DOJ let Russian lawyer into US before she met with Trump team

    "The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump’s inner circle was initially cleared into the United States by the Justice Department under “extraordinary circumstances” before she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president’s eldest son, members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and Justice Department documents and interviews.

    This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa."