Trump Jr's Emails
-
..."whataboutism is itself dishonesty — it’s pretending to care about the sins of the Left in order to justify the sins of the Right. It actually throws into sharp relief the hypocrisy of the Right: we complained endlessly and justifiably about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with Bill Clinton, but we’re fine with Donald Trump Jr. meeting secretly with Natalia Veselnitskaya; we ripped President Obama’s “flexibility” hot mic moment, but we’re fine with President Trump saying that America has killed people just like Putin; we correctly targeted Clinton over Chinagate, but now we’re happy to use Chinagate as an excuse to avoid talking about Russiagate. This isn’t conservative. It’s not even moral. Kindergarteners learn that “but he did it, too” isn’t an excuse for bad behavior." jblu
**********************************************************
the Trump meeting was not a sin. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton as his Wife was going to be investigated maybe...
except Lynch told Comey, head of the FBI, to NOT SAY "Investigation"....but to say "matter" instead.
The meeting between Trump Jr wasn't illegal, wasn't about protecting maybe Pres Trump anything. The russian lawyer
was not a prosecuting member of the American gov, there was no information shared that had anything to do with
getting higgardly. The equating is emotional fake narrative nonsense.
-
Exclusive: DOJ let Russian lawyer into US before she met with Trump team
"The Russian lawyer who penetrated Donald Trump’s inner circle was initially cleared into the United States by the Justice Department under “extraordinary circumstances” before she embarked on a lobbying campaign last year that ensnared the president’s eldest son, members of Congress, journalists and State Department officials, according to court and Justice Department documents and interviews.
This revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa." -
At the end of the day, I understand how far right a good chunk of this board swings. It's painfully obvious how far you will go to protect the party, especially over the last year. I think it's painfully obvious to anyone that isn't completely politically biased.
So you'll respond with calling me a liberal, something about Real America, etc. You'll blame everything on the left. And you'll see nothing biased about these responses, basically proving my point.
So continue to do whatever you can to protect Trump. I think blaming the "deep state" is really quintessential delusion. Grade A political board stuff.
At the end of the day, I understand how far right a good chunk of this board swings. It's painfully obvious how far you will go to protect the party, especially over the last year. I think it's painfully obvious to anyone that isn't completely politically biased.
So you'll respond with calling me a liberal, something about Real America, etc. You'll blame everything on the left. And you'll see nothing biased about these responses, basically proving my point.
So continue to do whatever you can to protect Trump. I think blaming the "deep state" is really quintessential delusion. Grade A political board stuff.
Now, here is what makes you an asswhole woodypeckerhead. I was not referring to you. But your emotional knee jerk pecking went
and made it about me. Count em - five times in one reply you bitch at me personally. and you completely ignore the content of the links. Pretty cheap way to try to sound intelligent and informed, woodpecker. I've said it before....you...just....can't....stop.....
being....the woodpecker.
I'm not the only one who wishes you would.
-
Do you, or did you, have a problem with Hillary and the Russians and the Clinton foundation? Hillary's assistance from the Ukraine? And if in fact the story is exactly true what particular 'information, if any, do you think the Russians were offering trump junior?
WSS
At least we can READ Trump Jr's emails...at least he didn't delete them...ya know...like Hillary.
Also wouldn't it be expected that particular governments around the world might prefer one u.s. president to another? We know that Barack Obama sent US taxpayer dollars to help oust Benjamin Netanyahu.
WSS
not with those hard core democratic/liberal/whacko states.... and the nutjobs leaving and starting over in another state and emotionally voting for marxist type nutjobs again.
Liberals never think they are wrong - they think it's just that the rest of the world just refused to allow perfection to sink in on their nonsense.
The Daily Wire: On 'Whataboutism' And Its Moral Hazards: http://www.dailywire.com/news/18511/whataboutism-and-its-moral-hazards-ben-shapiro?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=051717-news&utm_campaign=dwtwitter
..."whataboutism is itself dishonesty — it’s pretending to care about the sins of the Left in order to justify the sins of the Right. It actually throws into sharp relief the hypocrisy of the Right: we complained endlessly and justifiably about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with Bill Clinton, but we’re fine with Donald Trump Jr. meeting secretly with Natalia Veselnitskaya; we ripped President Obama’s “flexibility” hot mic moment, but we’re fine with President Trump saying that America has killed people just like Putin; we correctly targeted Clinton over Chinagate, but now we’re happy to use Chinagate as an excuse to avoid talking about Russiagate. This isn’t conservative. It’s not even moral. Kindergarteners learn that “but he did it, too” isn’t an excuse for bad behavior."
Well your examples aren't all that equal but besides that you are certainly correct. One side will shit its pants about something while overlooking the fact that their guy did pretty much the same thing.The Daily Wire: On 'Whataboutism' And Its Moral Hazards: http://www.dailywire.com/news/18511/whataboutism-and-its-moral-hazards-ben-shapiro?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=051717-news&utm_campaign=dwtwitter
..."whataboutism is itself dishonesty its pretending to care about the sins of the Left in order to justify the sins of the Right. It actually throws into sharp relief the hypocrisy of the Right: we complained endlessly and justifiably about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with Bill Clinton, but were fine with Donald Trump Jr. meeting secretly with Natalia Veselnitskaya; we ripped President Obamas flexibility hot mic moment, but were fine with President Trump saying that America has killed people just like Putin; we correctly targeted Clinton over Chinagate, but now were happy to use Chinagate as an excuse to avoid talking about Russiagate. This isnt conservative. Its not even moral. Kindergarteners learn that but he did it, too isnt an excuse for bad behavior."
I think the biggest problem with the well he did it to defense is the fact that only one of the offending parties gets 2/47 coverage.
And, JB, you aren't an idiot so I'm sure you can see that. And I don't make that claim about everyone here.
But just to_my Acusation there's a big difference between Hillary Clinton who is under investigation and her husband the ex president of the United States conferring in private with the Attorney-General whose decisions will be crucial in whether or not to nail his wife especially one that Attorney-General is a member of the same party.
A better correlation Would-be Donald Trump junior taking a meeting with someone who supposedly had dirt on Hillary and The Washington Post or New York Times sneaking around with hopes of finding dirt on Donald Trump in order to, what's the word, meddle in our democracy.

WSS
WSS
-
PS, I don't doubt for 1 second doubt that the republicans Would-be raising holy hell had Hillary won the election and the shoe is on the other foot, unfortunately The New York Times the Washington Post the LA Times CNN ABC CBS Time magazine would-be overlooking it and carrying her water.
WSS
-
Yes I know, but just for fun. At-least it should rank higher than South Park right kids?
WSS
-
Yes I know, but just for fun. At-least it should rank higher than South Park right kids?
WSS
Yes I know, but just for fun. At-least it should rank higher than South Park right kids?
WSS
Hannitys website has a news story about what Hannitys said on his own show. I'm I getting that right?
Again... This has nothing to do with whether or not anything actually happened at the meeting. And the "well the Obama deep state let her in the country!" again, misses the point.
-
Yes I know, but just for fun. At-least it should rank higher than South Park right kids?
WSS
Hannitys website has a news story about what Hannitys said on his own show. I'm I getting that right?
Again... This has nothing to do with whether or not anything actually happened at the meeting. And the "well the Obama deep state let her in the country!" again, misses the point.
Hannitys website has a news story about what Hannitys said on his own show. I'm I getting that right?
Again... This has nothing to do with whether or not anything actually happened at the meeting. And the "well the Obama deep state let her in the country!" again, misses the point.
Maybe you read the first line of my disclaimer?
And I know the point. The Trump haters want to be outraged.
WSS
-
The point is some people were outraged by every post from The Blaze about Obama. But this is from NBC CBS ABC the New York Times And The Washington Post.
WSS
-
The point is some people were outraged by every post from The Blaze about Obama. But this is from NBC CBS ABC the New York Times And The Washington Post.
WSS
The point is some people were outraged by every post from The Blaze about Obama. But this is from NBC CBS ABC the New York Times And The Washington Post.
WSS
And some people are outraged at everything they don't like coming from what they consider the "MSM"
and which group is on here?
-
Hannitys website has a news story about what Hannitys said on his own show. I'm I getting that right?
Again... This has nothing to do with whether or not anything actually happened at the meeting. And the "well the Obama deep state let her in the country!" again, misses the point.
Maybe you read the first line of my disclaimer?
And I know the point. The Trump haters want to be outraged.
WSS
Maybe you read the first line of my disclaimer?
And I know the point. The Trump haters want to be outraged.
WSS
South Park might be closer to reality.
and I say the Trump supporters want to find any and every reason why this doesn't matter.
-
Fuck South Park, them kids better stay off my lawn!
-
Maybe you read the first line of my disclaimer?
And I know the point. The Trump haters want to be outraged.
WSS
South Park might be closer to reality.
and I say the Trump supporters want to find any and every reason why this doesn't matter.
South Park might be closer to reality.
and I say the Trump supporters want to find any and every reason why this doesn't matter.
Of course they do. Because it doesn't. The only people it matters to our people who hate Trump and went to find some way to remove him from office. Same as most of the shit about Hillary except you won't admit it.
Something like the Billy what's his fuck interview, the grab the pussy interview. I don't really blame Billy what's his fuck because Donald Trump actually said those things. I don't think they were said knowing that they've broadcast.
Same thing with the dirt that was discovered through the suppose it hacking of Hillary and the DNC. It really was their fault. The dirt was their own dirt.
I assume you don't care about that.
WSS
-
CNN’s Chris Cuomo: It’s Okay that Hillary Clinton Campaign Colluded With Ukraine to Influence Election
Donald Trump, Jr. admitted taking a meeting with an attorney from Russia. The meeting was supposed to reveal opposition research on Hillary Clinton during the heat of the 2016 presidential election. The purpose of the meeting was a ruse as it turned out the attorney used the excuse to get the meeting in order to talk about Russian adoption. The meeting resulted in a big nothingburger.
However, Politico, a member of the Democrat Media Complex, reported in January that veteran DNC operative who previously worked in the Bill Clinton White House, Alexandra Chalupa, worked with Ukrainian government officials and journalists from both Ukraine and America to dig up Russia-related opposition research on Donald Trump and Paul Manafort, who was formerly the Trump campaign chairman. Chalupa also shared her anti-Trump opposition research with both the DNC and the Clinton campaign, Politico reported.
So there’s evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign “colluded” with Ukraine to influence the election and CNN’s Chris Cuomo, who is obsessed along with the rest of the mainstream media in creating the false “Trump-Russia collusion” narrative, revealed on Wednesday that he’s not okay with Don Jr. taking a meeting to get opposition research from a foreign nation but is perfectly fine with the Democrats doing exactly the same thing — but much worse.
Why? Because Chris Cuomo, who is perhaps most famous for saying that if you don’t want a grown man exposing his penis to your 12-year-old daughter in a girl’s bathroom then somehow you’re the bigot, is the brother of the progressive leftist Democrat Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, and the son of former Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo.
Chris Cuomo is a propagandist for the Democrat Party masquerading as a journalist for CNN.
-
Russia gave $35 million to Podesta's company WHILE he was running Hillary's presidential campaign.
Somehow the MSM doesn't say much about that.
-
The way the media is going crazy you would almost think Don JR gave hundreds of millions in cash to Iran secretly.
-
South Park might be closer to reality.
and I say the Trump supporters want to find any and every reason why this doesn't matter.
Of course they do. Because it doesn't. The only people it matters to our people who hate Trump and went to find some way to remove him from office. Same as most of the shit about Hillary except you won't admit it.
Something like the Billy what's his fuck interview, the grab the pussy interview. I don't really blame Billy what's his fuck because Donald Trump actually said those things. I don't think they were said knowing that they've broadcast.
Same thing with the dirt that was discovered through the suppose it hacking of Hillary and the DNC. It really was their fault. The dirt was their own dirt.
I assume you don't care about that.
WSS
Of course they do. Because it doesn't. The only people it matters to our people who hate Trump and went to find some way to remove him from office. Same as most of the shit about Hillary except you won't admit it.
Something like the Billy what's his fuck interview, the grab the pussy interview. I don't really blame Billy what's his fuck because Donald Trump actually said those things. I don't think they were said knowing that they've broadcast.
Same thing with the dirt that was discovered through the suppose it hacking of Hillary and the DNC. It really was their fault. The dirt was their own dirt.
I assume you don't care about that.
WSS
You're all over the place. But you know what happens when you assume...
Who cares if Trump knew he was being recorded or not, it was still a weird thing to say. Went passed "locker room talk"
The DNC actively plotting to undermine Bernie and give it to Clinton was bullshit. If a foreign govt hacked and leaked that info then there's an issue there,but it doesn't change the content.
Trump Jr actively accepted what he thought was the Russian Government's dirt on Clinton. In an email that said the Russian government is supporting Trump's campaign. When the last few months we've been wondering how much back and forth their was between Trump's campaign and Russia. Whether or not anything cane out of the meeting, the purpose of it was clear, and that's what people find worrisome.
I hate and want to stop so bad, and I support Clinton and wanted her to win so bad, that I voted third party. Makes sense
-
I'm not all-over the place at all. Trump made those statements whether or not anybody cares. The DNC did the dirty deeds whether anybody cares we're not. It's not the fault of the people that brought it to the attention of the public. As for you revote I don't really care because you threw it away on somebody you didn't want to be president. You did not vote for senator Sanders who you at-least said you supported. But now, today, maybe just in an imitative way you are riding the hate Trump train.
If my assumption that you don't care about Clinton and Democrat collusion with the Russians the Ukrainians the French etc etc then so be it. But I don't think you've ever mentioned it.
WSS
-
Nope. Nobody ever mentioned it... I didn't even know about it or I would have been disgusted.
the dnc liked it. right now, the dnc is so much like the kgb.
and the old socialist groupthink from the past rears it's ugly head in our country...
it's okay if WE are corrupt, but if you are, we'll throw you into the pokey, or at least
drive you out of town, keep you quiet....while the law only applies to you, because
WE are speshul.
-
In advance I apologize for posting a video. I realize it's kind of stupid to do but...

As we should recall this rose from an era In which the left was outraged by the right because of their seeming anti-Russian sentiment. And today?
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login