Be honest, How does everybody feel about Brock as a starter
-
He might look better if Joe Thomas plays instead of our O line mistake Cam Erving.
Sabotage?
WSS
He might look better if Joe Thomas plays instead of our O line mistake Cam Erving.
Sabotage?
WSS
Boy, that was an NSS statement out of WSS.
(Sabotage? That could make Cam Erving the star of an Alfred Hitchcock thriller, no?)
-
Brock looked uncomfortable like he was struggling with decisions and plays. I'm not encouraged by what I saw of him last night. I also don't see much that a young QB should be learning from. Kizer looked like the starter to me.
Brock looked uncomfortable like he was struggling with decisions and plays. I'm not encouraged by what I saw of him last night. I also don't see much that a young QB should be learning from. Kizer looked like the starter to me.
not defending but brock only had 2 practices with the ones
-
and when person says he'll bet the farm that osweiler throws int in first drive and someone calls him on it dude is quiet a church mouse.
nobody is any good. i'm hoping they get to a 5 win season so ghoolie owes me a bottle of rum.
other than that another year of shit.
-
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
You are not alone, I had the Chicago game on my phone while I was at the Browns game just so I could see what we will regret in not doing. Not drafting Trubisky will turn this fan base against the morons that decided to pass on him at #1. Won't take long.
-
So limp biscuit played good against 2nd d. So did Kiser. Kiserplaying more in college. Time will tell who will be better. Lets see them against starters to judge.
-
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
good in preseason against bums. hell tim couch looked liked the second coming of roger staubach in the HOF game his rookie season.
then they played for real and his soul and shoulders are still being looked for somewhere around midfield.
great offensive line? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
-
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
You are not alone, I had the Chicago game on my phone while I was at the Browns game just so I could see what we will regret in not doing. Not drafting Trubisky will turn this fan base against the morons that decided to pass on him at #1. Won't take long.
You are not alone, I had the Chicago game on my phone while I was at the Browns game just so I could see what we will regret in not doing. Not drafting Trubisky will turn this fan base against the morons that decided to pass on him at #1. Won't take long.
Unless of course the improved Browns D with an all pro in MG sets up the O multiple times per game. All depends what kind of football you like best. I prefer great defenses and just better than average offenses when forced too chose.
-
You are not alone, I had the Chicago game on my phone while I was at the Browns game just so I could see what we will regret in not doing. Not drafting Trubisky will turn this fan base against the morons that decided to pass on him at #1. Won't take long.
Unless of course the improved Browns D with an all pro in MG sets up the O multiple times per game. All depends what kind of football you like best. I prefer great defenses and just better than average offenses when forced too chose.
It's risk vs reward.Unless of course the improved Browns D with an all pro in MG sets up the O multiple times per game. All depends what kind of football you like best. I prefer great defenses and just better than average offenses when forced too chose.
I believe any GM would pick a franchise QB over a stud DL 10 out of 10 times.
-
You are not alone, I had the Chicago game on my phone while I was at the Browns game just so I could see what we will regret in not doing. Not drafting Trubisky will turn this fan base against the morons that decided to pass on him at #1. Won't take long.
Unless of course the improved Browns D with an all pro in MG sets up the O multiple times per game. All depends what kind of football you like best. I prefer great defenses and just better than average offenses when forced too chose.
Unless of course the improved Browns D with an all pro in MG sets up the O multiple times per game. All depends what kind of football you like best. I prefer great defenses and just better than average offenses when forced too chose.
Eggsactly.....lets be honest.....The O failed to get into the end zone on one series and ended up handing the ball over on the goal line.....THEN the D got it back at the 20, allowing us to score our first TD......cause then the O only had to go 20 to score....
Last year(and the year before) our O could not sustain drives and regularly gave the ball back, well before the D got rested. This continuously resulted in the D getting worn down and then failing....and we lost TOP every. single. game.....Which gave our D a much worse look than they deserved. Thursdays game was different....why?....because we won TOP. And the reason is NOT because our O held the ball and chewed up clock(cause they didnt)....the reason is because our D stopped the other team, got the ball back....and gave the O extra opportunities(which they needed).....
Plain and simple.....D make the O better, by giving them opportunities.....(and a shorter ladder to climb) to outscore the other team....We only scored 20 points(which is below average), but won because the other team only scored 14.....had we allowed the other team to just score the average 24 pts, then woulda lost......and probably wouldnt have even gotten 20, cause the other team woulda scored on a few drives that we had stopped.....
-
Remember Kizer was playing against the 3's and Brock played against the 1's. It's nice to dream, but Kizer didn't "look like the starter" because he was playing against essentially DB's who wouldn't start at Ohio State.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
Remember Kizer was playing against the 3's and Brock played against the 1's. It's nice to dream, but Kizer didn't "look like the starter" because he was playing against essentially DB's who wouldn't start at Ohio State.
Remember Kizer was playing against the 3's and Brock played against the 1's. It's nice to dream, but Kizer didn't "look like the starter" because he was playing against essentially DB's who wouldn't start at Ohio State.
Right....the one(very obvious) thing Kizer had in his favor....WIDE open receivers.....which the other 2 never had(or saw)....
But....the other thing Kizer had was vision and accuracy....because he saw them, then hit them.....
-
No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
good in preseason against bums. hell tim couch looked liked the second coming of roger staubach in the HOF game his rookie season.
then they played for real and his soul and shoulders are still being looked for somewhere around midfield.
great offensive line? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
good in preseason against bums. hell tim couch looked liked the second coming of roger staubach in the HOF game his rookie season.
then they played for real and his soul and shoulders are still being looked for somewhere around midfield.
great offensive line? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
As usual, quality shitpost.
-
None of the Brown's QB's looked impressive last night, but it IS just preseason.
At the risk of sounding like a fisherman (you know the one that got away) did anyone besides myself, keep an eye on how Mitch played last night?
No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
I liked the Kizer pick, but if you think he looked great playing against guys that will be selling insurance in a couple weeks...don't let me piss on your parade.No, because he doesn't matter.
If you don't think any QB's looked good, you mustn't have been watching.
-
I thought all the QBs were OK, there were drops that muted all the QBs performances. Brock should have had a TD, I believe he also had another well thrown ball dropped. Kessler had a ball dropped by Hall at the end of half that would have put them in FG position. It was a well thrown ball too. I liked the way Kizer moved in the pocket on a couple of his throws and like the pump fakes too. Also the penalties to me killed some of the drives and forced them into some predictable pass situations.
I thought all the QBs were OK, there were drops.....
Yep....lots of them too.....Britt, Hall and Boyce all had blatant ones......and there was a complete lack of winning balls or great catches, which is the job of quality receivers....
QB's are not always afforded the ease of hitting wide open receivers....so it's the QB's job to just get the ball close enough for the WR to go get it.....and to place it where the other guy cant get it......Our WR's dont appear to know how to win their part of that equation....
-
I thought all the QBs were OK, there were drops.....
Yep....lots of them too.....Britt, Hall and Boyce all had blatant ones......and there was a complete lack of winning balls or great catches, which is the job of quality receivers....
QB's are not always afforded the ease of hitting wide open receivers....so it's the QB's job to just get the ball close enough for the WR to go get it.....and to place it where the other guy cant get it......Our WR's dont appear to know how to win their part of that equation....
Yep....lots of them too.....Britt, Hall and Boyce all had blatant ones......and there was a complete lack of winning balls or great catches, which is the job of quality receivers....
QB's are not always afforded the ease of hitting wide open receivers....so it's the QB's job to just get the ball close enough for the WR to go get it.....and to place it where the other guy cant get it......Our WR's dont appear to know how to win their part of that equation....
What do you want Mud, pro receivers too?
-
For those thinking Myles will produce more than a franchise QB will, compare Myles game to the #30 overall pick TJ Watt. His stats in his debut make Myles look like a bust.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login