Skip to content

Government Readies Youth Corps To Take On Vets

Political Discussion
49 6 2.5k
  • Here's an idea of what he means by being as well-funded as the military, ballpeen:

    The Peace Corps budget is $340-million. In his 2010 budget, Obama wants to increase that by 10% to $373.4 million.

    That's all he means. He's talking about fully funding priorities.

    Or, as you allege, you can take this to mean that he really wants to outfit groups like the Peace Corps with F-18s, Predator drones, and Hummers with 50-caliber machine guns mounted on top, just like the military. That way he can have his own military that's ready and willing to impose his vision of a totalitarian state.

    Your choice.

    Honestly, fellas. Can we get real? You don't have to be a f'cking idiot all of your life.

  • But those are the budget numbers Obama wants you to see.

    And as we all know, the real budget is written on the back of Obama's birth certificate. In invisible ink. That only the NWO/Illuminati/Gang of 14 can read.

  • The master stroke really is arming the Peace Corps, isn't it? Because it's got the word "Peace" in the title. No one will see that coming. And then - BAM! - we've got your guns and your churches.

  • Alinskyites are good at doing stuff like that. You can read all about it in Human Events.

  • And, unlike Legacy, who mentioned his concern and then quickly realized there was no reason for concern once he saw the text of the speech, you've got three guys who still contend that this excerpt means that Obama is going to arm the young people of Americorps just like he does the military, and we're on our way to totalitarian-inspired youth groups. And they'll even make up parts of the speech to prove it!

  • @heckofajobbrownie said:

    Cal, for one thing, he doesn't say well-equipped. You just keep making that part up. Like I said, you should stop doing that.

    "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

    You're wasting your time on this one. He's simply saying we should fund the instruments of soft power with the same intent as we do the military. He's not even saying they should be equally funded. He's saying they should be "just as well-funded", as in fully or close to fully funded, like the military is.

    And yes, I'm doubting your ability to comprehend what you read.

    Are you still contending that Obama is proposing to arm a civilian defense corps and make them as powerful as the military? Is that what you think this speech means?

    You should be able to see that you're wrong on this one by now, but I'm not holding my breath.

    ballpeen, can you see that you were wrong on this one?

    No 😉

    I do admit the word equipped wasn't in the speech....so, here i copy again

    We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

    Just as powerful...what does he mean here....just as powerful? When I think of the military I thing of guns and bombs

    Just as strong.....it goes to the above. Had the President mentioned it only once, powerful or strong, I might be able to see how he was using it in a comparative ideological manner. Twice seems to indicate two meanings.

    Just as well funded?? Where is that money going to come from? The military budget is pretty darn big.

    At any rate, my intent isn't to tick people off and it seems I do when I express a opinion around here, so I think it is best to just stick to a football board for a while. At least there I am not called half brained, a hick, a member of the KKK, hillbilly etc. etc.

    I have better things to do than read people's drivel.

    @ballpeen said:

    No 😉

    I do admit the word equipped wasn't in the speech....so, here i copy again

    We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

    Just as powerful...what does he mean here....just as powerful? When I think of the military I thing of guns and bombs

    Just as strong.....it goes to the above. Had the President mentioned it only once, powerful or strong, I might be able to see how he was using it in a comparative ideological manner. Twice seems to indicate two meanings.

    Just as well funded?? Where is that money going to come from? The military budget is pretty darn big.

    At any rate, my intent isn't to tick people off and it seems I do when I express a opinion around here, so I think it is best to just stick to a football board for a while. At least there I am not called half brained, a hick, a member of the KKK, hillbilly etc. etc.

    I have better things to do than read people's drivel.

    your opinion is appreciated sorry you have been ridiculed for speaking up, but thats the way they do it around here if it isn't a liberal fairy tale then use get shouted at by the board gastopo

    for all of those who dont believe what the purpose of Obama's statements are, here you go they have allready started the training program.

    14explorers2-600a.jpg

    14explorers_spanh-1-1.jpg

    27878860.jpg

    27878868.jpg

    Explorer Explorers Train to Fight Terrorists, and More

  • T: posting those pictures tells us you didn't even read THE ARTICLE YOU YOURSELF POSTED.

  • Seriously. That's a story on a creepy outfit that's aligned with the Boy Scouts of America. How does this have anything to do with what we're talking about?

    So after making up a quote and attributing it to Obama, now we've moved on to saying that groups unaffiliated with the government are under Obama's direct control - watch out!

    Really, you should stop making things up. But look who I'm talking to - Captain Tinfoil.

    It's all true, T! We're coming for you!!

    ...One of us. One of us. One of us.

  • Dan, Heck & mz the pussy, I know you allready read it but Thank You for the applause anyways.

    clapping.gif

  • @danamal said:

    As long as your happy with your ignorance T,

    Thats all that matters ,you just cant get upset when rational people dont bite.

    Thank you! Another drum roll now! drumroll.gif

    You can go take off your hi heels and go read your comic books then.

  • Seriously. That's a story on a creepy outfit that's aligned with the Boy Scouts of America. How does this have anything to do with what we're talking about?

    So after making up a quote and attributing it to Obama, now we've moved on to saying that groups unaffiliated with the government are under Obama's direct control - watch out!

    Really, you should stop making things up. But look who I'm talking to - Captain Tinfoil.

    It's all true, T! We're coming for you!!

    ...One of us. One of us. One of us.

    @heckofajobbrownie said:

    ...One of us. One of us. One of us.

    It's been awhile since this was last posted.