PFF Week 3 Power Rankings
-
1) Atlanta
2) New England
3) Kansas City
4) Pittsburgh
5) Carolina
6) Denver
7) Green Bay
Oakland
9) Dallas
10) Baltimore
and the rest. . .
-
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
... and holding... lol
-
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
As A Browns fan, it would indeed make sense that you, and for sure Hoorta doesn't get it. It seems that the " EXPERTS" all agree with yours Truly that the Bengals are still a decent team, certainly way better than the Browns.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers. Their defense is middle of the road but QB hungry. This is why they will sweep the Browns yet again.
The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL -
Hoorta............... hurry up, call ESPN and tell them how good our OL is, and then tell them how bad the Bengals line is.
Flugel..............hurry up, call ESPN and tell them how Williams is going to have our defense whipped into shape. While you are at it, whoever the fuck it is that your trust this week, tell them your mantra...."In (insert asshole) we trust"
-
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
As A Browns fan, it would indeed make sense that you, and for sure Hoorta doesn't get it. It seems that the " EXPERTS" all agree with yours Truly that the Bengals are still a decent team, certainly way better than the Browns.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers. Their defense is middle of the road but QB hungry. This is why they will sweep the Browns yet again.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers.
Then why haven’t they scored a single TD through 2 games?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
PFF sucks. Its flawed and most nfl personel share the same sentiment. People put entirely too much stock in it. Collinsworth got involved and it really went into the shitter. Their advanced stats used to be good, not so much anymore.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Then why haven’t they scored a single TD through 2 games?
Dude, they are a decent team. Common sense tells you they will not stink like the Browns stink. They have some skilled players, the 0 - 2, for them, is not indicative of their talent level. That's why they are 20th and not like us, 32nd.
-
Then why haven’t they scored a single TD through 2 games?
Shitty OL? Oh wait, someone said that wouldn't affect them at all.
-
The first thing that jumps out at me is, how in the hell are the Bungholes at #20?
As A Browns fan, it would indeed make sense that you, and for sure Hoorta doesn't get it. It seems that the " EXPERTS" all agree with yours Truly that the Bengals are still a decent team, certainly way better than the Browns.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers. Their defense is middle of the road but QB hungry. This is why they will sweep the Browns yet again.
As A Browns fan, it would indeed make sense that you, and for sure Hoorta doesn't get it. It seems that the " EXPERTS" all agree with yours Truly that the Bengals are still a decent team, certainly way better than the Browns.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers. Their defense is middle of the road but QB hungry. This is why they will sweep the Browns yet again.
That's one "Power Ranking" make that "Beauty Contest" out of many pal. The above particular one thinks Whoopi Goldberg is better looking than Scarlett Johansson, or Charlize Theron for that matter. Let me enlighten you about what the rest of the sporting world thinks.
The Bungles have an average quarterback who won't make it through the season the way he's getting killed behind the (now) sieve of an OL. In case you haven't heard, some of the local Bungle fans are already yapping to have the Red Peashooter benched, and bring in McCarron. They have one playmaker obviously superior to anything the Browns have- AJ Green, and that will change should Gordon get reinstated. So just keep dreaming OL doesn't matter. When you've got to make excuses, or harp on outliers- you've already lost.
SB Nation LOL, the exact opposite Browns #20, Bungles #32
NFL.com- Browns #28, Bungles #30
USA Today - Browns #27, Bungles #31
CBS Sports- Browns #28, Bungles #27
Sporting News- Browns #27, Bungles #30
ESPN- Browns #29, Bungles #28
So the consensus is: hold your breath- Browns #28.2, Bungles #28.2 equally sucky.
-
PFF sucks. Its flawed and most nfl personel share the same sentiment. People put entirely too much stock in it. Collinsworth got involved and it really went into the shitter. Their advanced stats used to be good, not so much anymore.
PFF sucks. Its flawed and most nfl personel share the same sentiment. People put entirely too much stock in it. Collinsworth got involved and it really went into the shitter. Their advanced stats used to be good, not so much anymore.
I put NO stock in ANY "Power Rankings". The only power rankings I put any stock in are called: "The Standings". Because they are ALL that matters.
-
Have they seen the Panthers play this year?
-
PFF sucks. Its flawed and most nfl personel share the same sentiment. People put entirely too much stock in it. Collinsworth got involved and it really went into the shitter. Their advanced stats used to be good, not so much anymore.
I put NO stock in ANY "Power Rankings". The only power rankings I put any stock in are called: "The Standings". Because they are ALL that matters.
I put NO stock in ANY "Power Rankings". The only power rankings I put any stock in are called: "The Standings". Because they are ALL that matters.
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board. The only area they even make sense is o-line and d-line and thats because they are easier to measure. Pro football focus sucks and has for some time now. I wish people stopped using it, their advanced stats used to be good.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
I put NO stock in ANY "Power Rankings". The only power rankings I put any stock in are called: "The Standings". Because they are ALL that matters.
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board. The only area they even make sense is o-line and d-line and thats because they are easier to measure. Pro football focus sucks and has for some time now. I wish people stopped using it, their advanced stats used to be good.
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board. The only area they even make sense is o-line and d-line and thats because they are easier to measure. Pro football focus sucks and has for some time now. I wish people stopped using it, their advanced stats used to be good.
GPR - Ghoolie Power Rankings Browns @ 32 Worst team in the NFL.
No QB, no Wrs, Rbs, TEs. Dumb bastard head coach, and top draft picks injured or suffering headaches.
Colts win in a blow out.
-
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board. The only area they even make sense is o-line and d-line and thats because they are easier to measure. Pro football focus sucks and has for some time now. I wish people stopped using it, their advanced stats used to be good.
GPR - Ghoolie Power Rankings Browns @ 32 Worst team in the NFL.
No QB, no Wrs, Rbs, TEs. Dumb bastard head coach, and top draft picks injured or suffering headaches.
Colts win in a blow out.
GPR - Ghoolie Power Rankings Browns @ 32 Worst team in the NFL.
No QB, no Wrs, Rbs, TEs. Dumb bastard head coach, and top draft picks injured or suffering headaches.
Colts win in a blow out.
The dumbassery of this is the fact that you are not aware that the Colts are even more of a shitstorm. Everything you say above about the Browns applies to the Colts, plus much more in spades.
-
As A Browns fan, it would indeed make sense that you, and for sure Hoorta doesn't get it. It seems that the " EXPERTS" all agree with yours Truly that the Bengals are still a decent team, certainly way better than the Browns.
Let me fill you in. They have a good QB and some very good playmakers. Their defense is middle of the road but QB hungry. This is why they will sweep the Browns yet again.
That's one "Power Ranking" make that "Beauty Contest" out of many pal. The above particular one thinks Whoopi Goldberg is better looking than Scarlett Johansson, or Charlize Theron for that matter. Let me enlighten you about what the rest of the sporting world thinks.
The Bungles have an average quarterback who won't make it through the season the way he's getting killed behind the (now) sieve of an OL. In case you haven't heard, some of the local Bungle fans are already yapping to have the Red Peashooter benched, and bring in McCarron. They have one playmaker obviously superior to anything the Browns have- AJ Green, and that will change should Gordon get reinstated. So just keep dreaming OL doesn't matter. When you've got to make excuses, or harp on outliers- you've already lost.
SB Nation LOL, the exact opposite Browns #20, Bungles #32
NFL.com- Browns #28, Bungles #30
USA Today - Browns #27, Bungles #31
CBS Sports- Browns #28, Bungles #27
Sporting News- Browns #27, Bungles #30
ESPN- Browns #29, Bungles #28
So the consensus is: hold your breath- Browns #28.2, Bungles #28.2 equally sucky.
That's one "Power Ranking" make that "Beauty Contest" out of many pal. The above particular one thinks Whoopi Goldberg is better looking than Scarlett Johansson, or Charlize Theron for that matter. Let me enlighten you about what the rest of the sporting world thinks.
The Bungles have an average quarterback who won't make it through the season the way he's getting killed behind the (now) sieve of an OL. In case you haven't heard, some of the local Bungle fans are already yapping to have the Red Peashooter benched, and bring in McCarron. They have one playmaker obviously superior to anything the Browns have- AJ Green, and that will change should Gordon get reinstated. So just keep dreaming OL doesn't matter. When you've got to make excuses, or harp on outliers- you've already lost.
SB Nation LOL, the exact opposite Browns #20, Bungles #32
NFL.com- Browns #28, Bungles #30
USA Today - Browns #27, Bungles #31
CBS Sports- Browns #28, Bungles #27
Sporting News- Browns #27, Bungles #30
ESPN- Browns #29, Bungles #28
So the consensus is: hold your breath- Browns #28.2, Bungles #28.2 equally sucky.
I'm thinking the PFF Cincy love affair stems from the fact that Chris Collinsworth is the majority owner of PFF (not to mention its headquartered in Cincy as well).
-
I put NO stock in ANY "Power Rankings". The only power rankings I put any stock in are called: "The Standings". Because they are ALL that matters.
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board. The only area they even make sense is o-line and d-line and thats because they are easier to measure. Pro football focus sucks and has for some time now. I wish people stopped using it, their advanced stats used to be good.
Im not talking about the power rankings as much as i am the now flawed algorithm pff uses to tabulate their rankings across the board.
Like PFF's individual player grading process, but when they try to extend those grades to unit or team grades, they do suffer.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Like PFF's individual player grading process, but when they try to extend those grades to unit or team grades, they do suffer.
If that #20 is a homer ranking, well the Natives are getting mighty restless here in SW Ohio. We "supposedly" have all that talent, and we're not winning. If Ghoolie thinks Hue Jackson is a bad coach, he's a Bill Bellichick compared to Marvin Lewis. If it wasn't for Mike Brown, Marvin would have been fired by any other team years ago.
My prediction? Browns will have more wins than the Bungles this year. Marvin Lewis will finally be ? fired.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login