Dude in seattle wearing swastika gets "rocked"
-
Now that i read he was chucking bananas at people that punch wasnt enough. He got up from that. Something far worse should have happened to him
-
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/antifa-used-twitter-to-track-down-a-nazi-and-punch-him/
Well hopefully somebody knows who hoodie hood rat is tracks him down and prosecutes him.
WSS
-
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/antifa-used-twitter-to-track-down-a-nazi-and-punch-him/
Well hopefully somebody knows who hoodie hood rat is tracks him down and prosecutes him.
WSS
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/antifa-used-twitter-to-track-down-a-nazi-and-punch-him/
Well hopefully somebody knows who hoodie hood rat is tracks him down and prosecutes him.
WSS
Man, I loved seeing them pussy faggot antifa getting gassed.
-
Yeah lets track down the dude that tracked down the dude who threw bananas at black people
-
Yeah lets track down the dude that tracked down the dude who threw bananas at black people
Yeah lets track down the dude that tracked down the dude who threw bananas at black people
Maybe you should share that link since you seem to believe he assaulted the guy who attacked him with bananas. The one you put up said there were no Witnesses. And the video was 15 seconds long and didn't show the guy being abusive the slightest bit.
WSS
-
Ask and u shall receive steve....
"Now, the tropical fruit has shown up as as instrument in another disturbing event. According to Seattle alt-weekly The Stranger, on Sunday, a man wearing a red swastika armband was being "belligerent" and "Alex Jones-style yelling" at a crowd of people on the street. After an unnamed bystander told the unnamed neo-Nazi to "get the fuck out of our city," the neo-Nazi reportedly responded by calling the man "an ape" and throwing a banana at him."
-
https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/43awzg/seattle-neo-nazi-punched-after-throwing-banana-at-man
This is your source? I think I rest my case
WSS
-
https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/43awzg/seattle-neo-nazi-punched-after-throwing-banana-at-man
This is your source? I think I rest my case
WSS
https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/43awzg/seattle-neo-nazi-punched-after-throwing-banana-at-man
This is your source? I think I rest my case
WSS
1) You and ur boys here have no leg to stand on when it comes to sources. You dumbfucks will cite ammoland on climate change articles sooooo....yeah.
2) if you processed information like normal people, you'd have caught this sentence...."According to Seattle alt-weekly The Stranger"
-
1 Me?
2 LOL yeah that's a dandy.
WSS
-
Hate to say it but DailyCaller isn't much better than Vice as a source. Both of them are slanted hot garbage. But then again, people only like to read and believe what they already believe.
-
Hate to say it but DailyCaller isn't much better than Vice as a source. Both of them are slanted hot garbage. But then again, people only like to read and believe what they already believe.
Hate to say it but DailyCaller isn't much better than Vice as a source. Both of them are slanted hot garbage. But then again, people only like to read and believe what they already believe.
I have no problem with a site that has a political slant as long as the reporting at least sounds credible. This particular backstory did not. Did you read the disjointed slapdash account of somebody with a banana on a bus? That sound like solid reporting to you?
For instance if somebody posts a video I assumed that the incident actually took place. Even if what led up to it is conveniently missing.
WSS
-
Are bananas racist now? Because I love bananas. As a side note when has anyone here actually seen a monkey eat a banana? I've seen any number of monkeys eat poop but never a banana.
-
Hate to say it but DailyCaller isn't much better than Vice as a source. Both of them are slanted hot garbage. But then again, people only like to read and believe what they already believe.
I have no problem with a site that has a political slant as long as the reporting at least sounds credible. This particular backstory did not. Did you read the disjointed slapdash account of somebody with a banana on a bus? That sound like solid reporting to you?
For instance if somebody posts a video I assumed that the incident actually took place. Even if what led up to it is conveniently missing.
WSS
I have no problem with a site that has a political slant as long as the reporting at least sounds credible. This particular backstory did not. Did you read the disjointed slapdash account of somebody with a banana on a bus? That sound like solid reporting to you?
For instance if somebody posts a video I assumed that the incident actually took place. Even if what led up to it is conveniently missing.
WSS
Don't get me wrong. As soon as someone quotes an article without the source I will assume the source is Alex Jonesian. I also agree that bathing in the love of watching someone get beat up isn't helpful to any sort of discourse. But I will also go back to my point that any website that has nothing but clickbait titles and complete slant doesn't deserve an an ounce of my time or energy. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT WILL LEAVE YOU SPEECHLESS! THE REPUBLICANS LOSE THEIR MINDS! LIBERALS ARE TERRIFIED!
It's garbage.
Neither side wants to even bother anymore trying to understand each other. It's name calling and partisan politics. Democrats are now just as big, if not bigger, warmongers than Republicans. Republicans have been come less fiscally responsible than most Democrats. The two party system is broken and all of these slant websites on both sides do nothing but divide and distract while we start more wars and spend more money on non solutions.
My rant is over about it. Because let's face it, no one from either side is going to listen to me anyway. People just want to get their panties in a bunch.
Have a great day.

-
Are bananas racist now? Because I love bananas. As a side note when has anyone here actually seen a monkey eat a banana? I've seen any number of monkeys eat poop but never a banana.
Are bananas racist now? Because I love bananas. As a side note when has anyone here actually seen a monkey eat a banana? I've seen any number of monkeys eat poop but never a banana.
If you don't see the racial implications of throwing a banana at a black person then you're just being willfully obtuse to prove a point. I'm all for not attaching meaning where this none, but the other side of that coin is then admitting when the implication is obvious.
-
So let's say that's true, and that the banana is now elevated to the same status as the Confederate Battle Flag or a statue of Robert E Lee.. And remembering the admonition to read this shit story we know there were no Witnesses. And yet someone made the proclamation that this Nazi threw a banana. Not at a negro but supposedly at the white person who assaulted him. Just asking any of you guys who are so skeptical about most shit if that rings true with you?
PS was there any evidence of that on the video?
WSS
-
How about throwing a potato at an Irishman? Or a Kiebasa at a Pollack? Or a piece of Pizza at a whop?
-
Are bananas racist now? Because I love bananas. As a side note when has anyone here actually seen a monkey eat a banana? I've seen any number of monkeys eat poop but never a banana.
If you don't see the racial implications of throwing a banana at a black person then you're just being willfully obtuse to prove a point. I'm all for not attaching meaning where this none, but the other side of that coin is then admitting when the implication is obvious.
If you don't see the racial implications of throwing a banana at a black person then you're just being willfully obtuse to prove a point. I'm all for not attaching meaning where this none, but the other side of that coin is then admitting when the implication is obvious.
Who the fuck are you?
Yeah I get it, partially, but in the same token it's people like you that give rise to incredible bullshit like this
-
Some black people saw a banana peel on the ground and it "frightened" them so badly that they had to cancel the fraternity retreat
-
And this
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/19/hobby-lobby-cotton-decor-triggers-customer.html
Hobby lobby had a decoration of cotton and black people were offended because, reasons, never mind that they most likely wear cotton seven days a week.
-
And this
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/19/hobby-lobby-cotton-decor-triggers-customer.html
Hobby lobby had a decoration of cotton and black people were offended because, reasons, never mind that they most likely wear cotton seven days a week.
And this
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/19/hobby-lobby-cotton-decor-triggers-customer.html
Hobby lobby had a decoration of cotton and black people were offended because, reasons, never mind that they most likely wear cotton seven days a week.
I'd say it's important to distinguish between "black people" and a black person. One idiot can be offended, sure. But just pouring through comments you have a large amount of black people on there calling that pure idiocy.
You're painting the picture that black folk everywhere are running around CVS telling management to pull cotton swabs off the shelves. No bueno.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login