Skip to content

well, well, well. last 5 years, global ice 40percent increased

Political Discussion
45 11 1.1k
  • The same "evidence" that had been posted and refuted on here dozens of times. Seems like I'm not missing much.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Okay Tex I've been making this point for many years and most of the global warming alarmists are bored with it, so be it. But you are a bright guy so I'll just ask you... What exactly are you willing to sacrifice for the cause of man-made global warming and how much good do you think it will do? I think it's at least somewhat agreed that whatever effect might be is delayed so even if we stop all emissions of fluorocarbons Etc the situation will continue to deteriorate. I've asked a lot of the other folks if they have gotten rid of their gasoline powered cars stopped eating meat and purchased solar panels and windmills for their homes as well as keeping the heat at 60 and the air conditioning at at. Also I guess if the survival of the planet is really at stake shouldn't we outlaw travel for anything other than emergencies or work? Because, as I see it, if you don't severely cut back on the lavish lifestyle most Americans live we are all going to die.

    In my opinion it's just political bickering and some people think they can save the world just by raising taxes. If your only tool is a hammer every problem looks like a nail.

    But what are you willing to give up?

    WSS

    Chocolate.😁

    PS-The community I live in gets 100% of it's electric power from wind and solar as of this year. Pretty unusual for a town that's 90% Republican with a forward looking Republican mayor that made it happen.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Chocolate.😁

    PS-The community I live in gets 100% of it's electric power from wind and solar as of this year. Pretty unusual for a town that's 90% Republican with a forward looking Republican mayor that made it happen.

    Geez dude, you should just move to Austin and wear an antifa hat.

  • The same "evidence" that had been posted and refuted on here dozens of times. Seems like I'm not missing much.

    @mld-woody said:

    The same "evidence" that had been posted and refuted on here dozens of times. Seems like I'm not missing much.

    “Refuted”? When did that happen...and by whom?

  • never was. but he's happy to FEEL that is was. when they say "NOOOOOOOOOOO"...

    they pretend that is refuting facts that don't make them feel happy.

  • @mld-woody said:

    The same "evidence" that had been posted and refuted on here dozens of times. Seems like I'm not missing much.

    “Refuted”? When did that happen...and by whom?

    @canton-dawg said:

    “Refuted”? When did that happen...and by whom?

    Literally a dozen times. Just search the board

  • I was watching a new program on the solar system last night that focused on the sun. One thing that has been happening there over the last decade is the shrinking of the solar spots to the point that the normal 11 year cycle of activity vs lessor activity may be getting to the point it got where it is recorded in history about 350 years ago that solar spots disappeared for about 70 years. We may actually be about to get into that same even longer cycle. And guess what the effect was. The mini-ice age in which the River Thames actually froze over at one point.

    So will that counteract the effects of man induced global warming? And by the time we come out of that min-ice age, if it happens, will we be better prepared to prevent man-made global warming? Good questions!

  • @canton-dawg said:

    “Refuted”? When did that happen...and by whom?

    Literally a dozen times. Just search the board

    @mld-woody said:

    Literally a dozen times. Just search the board

    You mean someone provided some type of concrete evidence?

    Please show me the link.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Literally a dozen times. Just search the board

    You mean someone provided some type of concrete evidence?

    Please show me the link.

    @canton-dawg said:

    You mean someone provided some type of concrete evidence?

    Please show me the link.

    You can search the board. 

    I have zero hope for 70% of the posters on this board. I've stopped wasting my team. Look it up. This increase in ice isn't the "mmgw" killer you and others think it is. But I've learned this issue has become so politicized that those with their heads up a party's ass will ignore anything that doesn't fit their narrative

  • @canton-dawg said:

    You mean someone provided some type of concrete evidence?

    Please show me the link.

    You can search the board. 

    I have zero hope for 70% of the posters on this board. I've stopped wasting my team. Look it up. This increase in ice isn't the "mmgw" killer you and others think it is. But I've learned this issue has become so politicized that those with their heads up a party's ass will ignore anything that doesn't fit their narrative

    @mld-woody said:

    You can search the board. 

    I have zero hope for 70% of the posters on this board. I've stopped wasting my team. Look it up. This increase in ice isn't the "mmgw" killer you and others think it is. But I've learned this issue has become so politicized that those with their heads up a party's ass will ignore anything that doesn't fit their narrative

    Can you at least admit that is across the board?

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    One internet article does not a science make. You could also post one on the Delaware sized ice island that has broken off Antarctica or another on the back to back Cat 5 monsters in the Caribbean as evidence of global warming. Makes just about as much sense.

    Okay Tex I've been making this point for many years and most of the global warming alarmists are bored with it, so be it. But you are a bright guy so I'll just ask you... What exactly are you willing to sacrifice for the cause of man-made global warming and how much good do you think it will do? I think it's at least somewhat agreed that whatever effect might be is delayed so even if we stop all emissions of fluorocarbons Etc the situation will continue to deteriorate. I've asked a lot of the other folks if they have gotten rid of their gasoline powered cars stopped eating meat and purchased solar panels and windmills for their homes as well as keeping the heat at 60 and the air conditioning at at. Also I guess if the survival of the planet is really at stake shouldn't we outlaw travel for anything other than emergencies or work? Because, as I see it, if you don't severely cut back on the lavish lifestyle most Americans live we are all going to die.

    In my opinion it's just political bickering and some people think they can save the world just by raising taxes. If your only tool is a hammer every problem looks like a nail.

    But what are you willing to give up?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Okay Tex I've been making this point for many years and most of the global warming alarmists are bored with it, so be it. But you are a bright guy so I'll just ask you... What exactly are you willing to sacrifice for the cause of man-made global warming and how much good do you think it will do? I think it's at least somewhat agreed that whatever effect might be is delayed so even if we stop all emissions of fluorocarbons Etc the situation will continue to deteriorate. I've asked a lot of the other folks if they have gotten rid of their gasoline powered cars stopped eating meat and purchased solar panels and windmills for their homes as well as keeping the heat at 60 and the air conditioning at at. Also I guess if the survival of the planet is really at stake shouldn't we outlaw travel for anything other than emergencies or work? Because, as I see it, if you don't severely cut back on the lavish lifestyle most Americans live we are all going to die.

    In my opinion it's just political bickering and some people think they can save the world just by raising taxes. If your only tool is a hammer every problem looks like a nail.

    But what are you willing to give up?

    WSS

    You cant ask people to give up gas cars when currently they are 20% at least, more exp than comparable gas cars. If the country demanded more ev cars, they'd have to make more and therefor price would come down. The issue is people dont want to give up the "sound" of gas cars even tho its been demonstrably proven ev cars will shred gas cars 0-60

  • @westside-steve said:

    Okay Tex I've been making this point for many years and most of the global warming alarmists are bored with it, so be it. But you are a bright guy so I'll just ask you... What exactly are you willing to sacrifice for the cause of man-made global warming and how much good do you think it will do? I think it's at least somewhat agreed that whatever effect might be is delayed so even if we stop all emissions of fluorocarbons Etc the situation will continue to deteriorate. I've asked a lot of the other folks if they have gotten rid of their gasoline powered cars stopped eating meat and purchased solar panels and windmills for their homes as well as keeping the heat at 60 and the air conditioning at at. Also I guess if the survival of the planet is really at stake shouldn't we outlaw travel for anything other than emergencies or work? Because, as I see it, if you don't severely cut back on the lavish lifestyle most Americans live we are all going to die.

    In my opinion it's just political bickering and some people think they can save the world just by raising taxes. If your only tool is a hammer every problem looks like a nail.

    But what are you willing to give up?

    WSS

    You cant ask people to give up gas cars when currently they are 20% at least, more exp than comparable gas cars. If the country demanded more ev cars, they'd have to make more and therefor price would come down. The issue is people dont want to give up the "sound" of gas cars even tho its been demonstrably proven ev cars will shred gas cars 0-60

    @clevfan4life said:

    You cant ask people to give up gas cars when currently they are 20% at least, more exp than comparable gas cars. If the country demanded more ev cars, they'd have to make more and therefor price would come down. The issue is people dont want to give up the "sound" of gas cars even tho its been demonstrably proven ev cars will shred gas cars 0-60

    And the reason you can't ask them to give up anything is because beyond fucking with conservatives they don't really think man-made global warming means anything. It's just a political talking point, just an easy way to grab a little bit more in tax money. I mean seriously if any of these global warming alarmists really believed the Earth was in peril and still refused to make even the slightest sacrifice...

    WSS

  • image.thumb.jpeg.c82fca20a76b275e87fdf9c8a8a067cd.jpeg

  • image.jpeg.f9b96ec7666719775c48779ad280ca14.jpeg

  • image.thumb.jpeg.ec15ab94dc5d8e7507ce243117306313.jpeg

    'Nuff said . . .

  • image.thumb.png.80cdc2621fedff0d452bad253ff202c5.png

  • You’re wasting your time JAFBF, the global warming lemmings will say that your data was sponsored by someone from the “Big Oil Companies”.

  • Global warming is about taxation and if you are a company that must pollute - you can buy carbon credits - lol what a crock of sh*t -      Money , power , passing of more freedom robbing legislation and the advancement of a One World Order , Govern by the UN  

    By the way why are our skies continually sprayed - ie Chem Trails ?

  • You’re wasting your time JAFBF, the global warming lemmings will say that your data was sponsored by someone from the “Big Oil Companies”.

    @canton-dawg said:

    You’re wasting your time JAFBF, the global warming lemmings will say that your data was sponsored by someone from the “Big Oil Companies”.

    Lol

  • Branco-Out-in-the-Cold.jpg

  • You’re wasting your time JAFBF, the global warming lemmings will say that your data was sponsored by someone from the “Big Oil Companies”.

    @canton-dawg said:

    You’re wasting your time JAFBF, the global warming lemmings will say that your data was sponsored by someone from the “Big Oil Companies”.

    You mean not enough correlation ?

    image.jpeg.8ce8502fd9e3b3e32041355fa30d1d87.jpeg