Hue Jackson's Jet's Presser
-
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
Gotta trust the 18yr process I guess?
-
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
Gotta trust the 18yr process I guess?
-
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
Its fine war has trouble admitting he is wrong and has been wrong about hue. Lol you'll get it right eventually
-
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
If we go 1-6 in the next seven games, we're gonna tie the 1976-77 Bucs (who started 2-26 in their first two NFL seasons ever)..
-
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
If we go 1-6 in the next seven games, we're gonna tie the 1976-77 Bucs (who started 2-26 in their first two NFL seasons ever)..
-
The word paucity doesn't make you sound nearly as smart as you think it does, hoss.
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
If we go 1-6 in the next seven games, we're gonna tie the 1976-77 Bucs (who started 2-26 in their first two NFL seasons ever)..
-
Yes, 1-20 is historically bad. BUT, OUR TEAM IS HISTORICALLY UNTALENTED.
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
I'm aware he's stripped it bare. And I'm in support of that. What I'm not in support of is blaming the HC for not being able to win with that handicap.
-
which is the point Ive been trying to make...its historically bad and historically untalented, why??????
Because Shashi stripped it bare...and with 3 drafts equivenlent of high picks, still hasnt hit on one single difference maker....let alone the 15 he actually needs....
I'm aware he's stripped it bare. And I'm in support of that. What I'm not in support of is blaming the HC for not being able to win with that handicap.
I'm aware he's stripped it bare. And I'm in support of that. What I'm not in support of is blaming the HC for not being able to win with that handicap.
You obviously didn't watch today's game? The Head Coach is the only one to blame.
-
We should go with y'all's plan. Replace the head coach! That's worked so well for us!
-
We should go with y'all's plan. Replace the head coach! That's worked so well for us!
or we should just stand pat until we're 3-33? That sounds like fun to us.
-
We should go with y'all's plan. Replace the head coach! That's worked so well for us!
or we should just stand pat until we're 3-33? That sounds like fun to us.
-
I think a lot of us believe we would win more games with a different coach....today would be an example...does not mean the rebuild ends....shashi can keep trading back and selecting massive quantities of shitty players, but at least we might have someone who knows what to do with them,....where to play them....how to develop them.....and how to call a game...and which players to play
-
I really can't stand when fans do the whole "we need to fire the coach!" rant, but even I have to say something is very wrong. And I get what Hue is trying to say about execution. If Kizer doesn't toss the pitch at Crow's feet, maybe he gets in, or gets the first. But anybody who watches "option football" knows that there's a MUCH higher chance of fumbling the ball, and doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why. My two biggest issues are the playcalling on 2nd and goal from the 3, and then the 4th down attempt. When we had 2nd down, we had been running quite well. You have to figure we had a good chance at getting in the end zone if we ran it three times from there, right? Or here's an idea, why don't we try a QB draw? I literally JUST SAW Brissett run that play again today, and we all know he ran it in on us. It's a safe play, there's low chance of turnover, and a pretty low chance of taking a nasty hit. Whenever I see that play run, the QB just waltzes right on in. You think WE could try that?
The 4th down attempt was even MORE puzzling, and I can't defend it at all. I can't even come up with a good explanation. Your defense played lights out all day. You're down THREE points. Even though our idiot kicker missed his two previous kicks, you HAVE to figure he'd make that one, right? Then the game is tied up, and it's basically anybody's match to win or lose. And not only that, but you chose to run a straight ahead running play? We didn't need 6 inches, we needed two freaking yards. And I realize that Crow is our more powerful back, but Duke has the ability to jump over the pile, and that might've been enough for a first down. He goes off the ground, and then lands on top of the pile. First down more than likely. I just can't fathom the decision making, and it will be the undoing of our coach.
The problem is, this isn't anywhere NEAR the first time something like this has happened! Here's the example I keep coming back to: Remember last year during our final game, when we had the ball at about the one yard line, and all we had to do to beat the Steelers was score a TD? You remember what Hue called? The ridiculous WR screen to Hawkins that lost about 8 yards. The same play that we've tried to run a million times, with no success. With the game on the line, Hue called THAT play. How many times has he done this? How many times have we questioned the clock management? He's completely terrible at calling plays when we need a play the most.
-
Hard to win when you turn it over twice in the red zone and miss 2 field goals including 1 chip shot.
If we started Hogan today I think we come away with a W
-
It may be sophistry and it is certainly suckage on a grand scale. The grandest. It puts a tear in my eye at the perfection they put into suck.
Keep em all, why bother starting over again,? It's just gonna stink more. I heard Donovan and Dieken at the end. They really earned their paycheck there. Glad I went fishing and missed most of it.
-
If you don't have a viable alternative then hush with the Hue whining. We're stuck with him.
we are stuck with him for the year.....but we certainly can find plenty of other people who want the job and are qualified candidates at the end of the year.
Also, changing the head coach doesn't mean 'starting over'. It doesn't mean we scratch this rebuild and start a new one. We can still develop the mostly crappy players we draftd over the last couple of years. Just with a hc who hasnt proven himself to lose 90% of his nfl games.
we are stuck with him for the year.....but we certainly can find plenty of other people who want the job and are qualified candidates at the end of the year.
Also, changing the head coach doesn't mean 'starting over'. It doesn't mean we scratch this rebuild and start a new one. We can still develop the mostly crappy players we draftd over the last couple of years. Just with a hc who hasnt proven himself to lose 90% of his nfl games.
So let another coach come in and lose all the games? At some point, you gotta stop firing coaches and instead think about aquiring talent.
-
Hard to win when you turn it over twice in the red zone and miss 2 field goals including 1 chip shot.
If we started Hogan today I think we come away with a W
Hard to win when you turn it over twice in the red zone and miss 2 field goals including 1 chip shot.
If we started Hogan today I think we come away with a W
Perhaps, but Hogan has proven that he can set the other team up to score as well as he does for the Browns. Both games he's played this year: Set the world on fire in his first drive only to throw a horrible interception the next drive or so that practically gives the other team a TD.
That being said, Hogan should be the starter now. He won't be, but I don't know what Kizer is learning from this. He's regressing.
sorry, couldn't get that out without laughing.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login