Garrett Hurt Already
-
I'm certainly HOPING Garrett doesn't have to sit next week, but it's certainly hard to imagine his ankle will have the needed time to heal. I don't know if he tweeked it, or if it's just sore, but it's obvious he was hurting pretty bad during his last play. What really hurts is you get a taste of what this guy can do, and it's completely obvious that if he's healthy, there's no way anybody is going to block him consistently. He's about the biggest rascal I've ever seen, and he's going to put the hurtin' on people for a LONG time. Let's not panic yet, it's very possible that he didn't hurt it further, and it's just sore. Sprained ankles don't generally "heal" quickly, and they freaking linger forever. They get sore and they pissed off if you use them too much. Hopefully the treatment he receives makes him available this weekend.
-
I didnt see where it was horribly bothering him, i think its just sore. He might sit next week and then get another 10-15 snaps the following week. We'd be doing the right thing by throttling him up then down for awhile. This seasons a wash. We're gonna have new DE's next year anyway. No way williams agrees to nas, og or orchard starting opposite garrett next year
-
Nasibb nor Shelton scratched the score-sheet.Burgess,Taylor,McCourty,Kirksey,Ogbah all led in tackles at 4.5. Naz & Orch had a tough-day despite Myles playing time. We held the ball 34mins our D played 26 mins. Us 22 1st downs..Jets 14..On your Offense at that point Huie..
-
Didn't watch today. How'd he look?
War, I think you played? I played TE at Toledo as a failed walk on after ankle sprains & am still looking at tape. But if I tell you coming off a high ankle sprain your going to play somewhere before half. Than sit Half. than were going to stick you back in, Oh lets say about 11:10 of 4th how tight is your ankle again?In 4th quarter at 11:18 Naz goes down.At 11:10-11:02 Myles stays home makes play to sidelines limping.Stays on at 10:50.On still hopping at 10:12.At 9:35 Myles attemps a slow spin on a TE,Myles comes off & Naz returns for rest of game from 8:35. next play 1st & 10 TD Kerse..(still looking last appearance in 1st half but Kwan Williams exit comes to mind) Also see Odel did not make it thru whole game either.got to get a run in,look later
But if I tell you coming off a high ankle sprain your going to play somewhere before half. Than sit Half. than were going to stick you back in, Oh lets say about 11:10 of 4th how tight is your ankle again?In 4th quarter at 11:18 Naz goes down.At 11:10-11:02 Myles stays home makes play to sidelines limping.Stays on at 10:50.On still hopping at 10:12.At 9:35 Myles attemps a slow spin on a TE,Myles comes off & Naz returns for rest of game from 8:35.
I'm betting he sits next week I could not understand why they didn't keep that leg warmed up on a stationary bike unless the reason was he was done until Nassib had to leave the game.
I've had and played on "low" ankle sprains. I couldn't keep them "loose". Best I could do is ice them between series to minimize the swelling, and pain which got to be pretty serious as a game wore on. Swelling under a tape job is no fun.
Is a high sprain different?
I didnt see where it was horribly bothering him, i think its just sore. He might sit next week and then get another 10-15 snaps the following week. We'd be doing the right thing by throttling him up then down for awhile. This seasons a wash. We're gonna have new DE's next year anyway. No way williams agrees to nas, og or orchard starting opposite garrett next year
Early, no, but as gum was saying, late when he filled in for Nassib, he was limping badly between plays... and I don't care if it's the best blocking TE in the world, a healthy MG eats that Jet TE alive. He was unable to test him despite retaining a quick first-step.
As for DEs... I thought Og played well again. Until we see multiple games of Myles opposite Og and Nassib, I do not see us prioritizing Edge DEs in the Draft. FA? Maybe...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
But if I tell you coming off a high ankle sprain your going to play somewhere before half. Than sit Half. than were going to stick you back in, Oh lets say about 11:10 of 4th how tight is your ankle again?In 4th quarter at 11:18 Naz goes down.At 11:10-11:02 Myles stays home makes play to sidelines limping.Stays on at 10:50.On still hopping at 10:12.At 9:35 Myles attemps a slow spin on a TE,Myles comes off & Naz returns for rest of game from 8:35.
I'm betting he sits next week I could not understand why they didn't keep that leg warmed up on a stationary bike unless the reason was he was done until Nassib had to leave the game.
I've had and played on "low" ankle sprains. I couldn't keep them "loose". Best I could do is ice them between series to minimize the swelling, and pain which got to be pretty serious as a game wore on. Swelling under a tape job is no fun.
Is a high sprain different?
I didnt see where it was horribly bothering him, i think its just sore. He might sit next week and then get another 10-15 snaps the following week. We'd be doing the right thing by throttling him up then down for awhile. This seasons a wash. We're gonna have new DE's next year anyway. No way williams agrees to nas, og or orchard starting opposite garrett next year
Early, no, but as gum was saying, late when he filled in for Nassib, he was limping badly between plays... and I don't care if it's the best blocking TE in the world, a healthy MG eats that Jet TE alive. He was unable to test him despite retaining a quick first-step.
As for DEs... I thought Og played well again. Until we see multiple games of Myles opposite Og and Nassib, I do not see us prioritizing Edge DEs in the Draft. FA? Maybe...
I've had and played on "low" ankle sprains. I couldn't keep them "loose". Best I could do is ice them between series to minimize the swelling, and pain which got to be pretty serious as a game wore on. Swelling under a tape job is no fun.
Is a high sprain different?
Early, no, but as gum was saying, late when he filled in for Nassib, he was limping badly between plays... and I don't care if it's the best blocking TE in the world, a healthy MG eats that Jet TE alive. He was unable to test him despite retaining a quick first-step.
As for DEs... I thought Og played well again. Until we see multiple games of Myles opposite Og and Nassib, I do not see us prioritizing Edge DEs in the Draft. FA? Maybe...
Og was below meciocre as usual. I agree we have too many needs to draft a DE high again, but yes in FA we absolutely need a seasoned vet ippisite garrett. As of right now ansah is the only guy i see on next years FA list that i give a Shmuck about but whi knows someone else could come free.
i wouldnt be adverse to packaging up ogbah with other players for an established guy.
-
But if I tell you coming off a high ankle sprain your going to play somewhere before half. Than sit Half. than were going to stick you back in, Oh lets say about 11:10 of 4th how tight is your ankle again?In 4th quarter at 11:18 Naz goes down.At 11:10-11:02 Myles stays home makes play to sidelines limping.Stays on at 10:50.On still hopping at 10:12.At 9:35 Myles attemps a slow spin on a TE,Myles comes off & Naz returns for rest of game from 8:35.
I'm betting he sits next week I could not understand why they didn't keep that leg warmed up on a stationary bike unless the reason was he was done until Nassib had to leave the game.
I've had and played on "low" ankle sprains. I couldn't keep them "loose". Best I could do is ice them between series to minimize the swelling, and pain which got to be pretty serious as a game wore on. Swelling under a tape job is no fun.
Is a high sprain different?
I didnt see where it was horribly bothering him, i think its just sore. He might sit next week and then get another 10-15 snaps the following week. We'd be doing the right thing by throttling him up then down for awhile. This seasons a wash. We're gonna have new DE's next year anyway. No way williams agrees to nas, og or orchard starting opposite garrett next year
Early, no, but as gum was saying, late when he filled in for Nassib, he was limping badly between plays... and I don't care if it's the best blocking TE in the world, a healthy MG eats that Jet TE alive. He was unable to test him despite retaining a quick first-step.
As for DEs... I thought Og played well again. Until we see multiple games of Myles opposite Og and Nassib, I do not see us prioritizing Edge DEs in the Draft. FA? Maybe...
I've had and played on "low" ankle sprains. I couldn't keep them "loose". Best I could do is ice them between series to minimize the swelling, and pain which got to be pretty serious as a game wore on. Swelling under a tape job is no fun.
Is a high sprain different?
not sure this will load T, NOPE.. but, Your totally correct on the taping T. And that's the real problem with the High sprain. I preferred the tape to be somewhat snug for support but when swelling continues the pain to nerve tissue is ridiculous.So to answer your question. Your right on the icing it.. till ya play on it..as you said. High or low the pain & swelling is no differences but the length of time of healing High is weeks longer. Could be 2, Could be extra 4. Myles 2nd sack came in 2qrt. was his last play till 4th qrt. which I can only assume Myles was re-taped at halftime? or not & done..The correct Myles plan imo would have been 1st half only knowing not to risk it after Half due to swelling tightness. Telling that to a -4 game loss Myles (with 2 sacks smelling the trifecta) might have been a different story in a winnable game when Naz went down? EDIT-- Clev. your way off base on your hater Ogbah..The Kat has stayed pretty much injury free every down in 20 NFL Games leading us in OL tackles..That's not a guy you bundle in a trade anywhere..It's Naz & Orchard job to beat Ogbah off his position..The competition level at team DE position is what will make this team better.Push equals close the gap for your playing time at position. And right now that same problem is all over on both sides of the ball in key positions..
-
Draft is BPA and if that says edge rusher - so be it.
I want this team to have an identity and if that means having a top 3 dline, then I'm perfectly ok with it.
-
Garrett is the only #1 overall defensive pick going back to 1982 to record 2 sacks in his first game despite limited play.
-
Garrett is the only #1 overall defensive pick going back to 1982 to record 2 sacks in his first game despite limited play.
Garrett is the only #1 overall defensive pick going back to 1982 to record 2 sacks in his first game despite limited play.
yeah but by the fourth qtr the bulls were running loose in the china shop again. He was not ready to go out there and will probably be out even longer now.
-
Just for perspective, dude gets two sacks within 10 snaps playing hurt, nowhere near 100%. Do our other DE's have that many sacks in 5 Shmucking games? If that doesnt enlighten some of u dumbasses as to our talent gap i dont know what other pie chart is needed to illustrate how Retarded we are at trading down
Just for perspective, dude gets two sacks within 10 snaps playing hurt, nowhere near 100%. Do our other DE's have that many sacks in 5 Shmucking games? If that doesnt enlighten some of u dumbasses as to our talent gap i dont know what other pie chart is needed to illustrate how Retarded we are at trading down
The sacks were not impressive. He broke through a NO BLOCK and barely hit the QB on sack 1, and sack two the QB happened to run in front of him. Garrett sucks gopher dikc.
-
Just for perspective, dude gets two sacks within 10 snaps playing hurt, nowhere near 100%. Do our other DE's have that many sacks in 5 Shmucking games? If that doesnt enlighten some of u dumbasses as to our talent gap i dont know what other pie chart is needed to illustrate how Retarded we are at trading down
The sacks were not impressive. He broke through a NO BLOCK and barely hit the QB on sack 1, and sack two the QB happened to run in front of him. Garrett sucks gopher dikc.
The sacks were not impressive. He broke through a NO BLOCK and barely hit the QB on sack 1, and sack two the QB happened to run in front of him. Garrett sucks gopher dikc.
No no, i know exactly what i saw...u dont. Ill give you that you know some stuff about some other things, but you have "zero" eye for front 7 mechanics. On a bad ankle garrett ghosted undrneath the guard and center and steamrolled mccown, made them look silly..like they didnt oniw the ball gad been hiked yet.
Ob the 2nd sack garett ripped around the corner but because of that ankle he couldnt lean in like he was during preseason..tried to go around the corner more or less completely vertical. So his initial rush didnt go anywhere but when mccown tried to step up and spill out garrett immediately spun back to the inside and lunged at mccown from behind. Its not the most imoressive sack ever but mccown didnt run into him and for a guy with a clearly bum ankle its a heck of a hustle play. Dont argue with me about how the sacks transpired.
The latger point id like to make to u is why cant u just say man, that kid showed some heart. He showed more heart in ~10 snaps then our other DE's gave in 4-5 games. Im not calling this kid the answer to our prayers, he may have a decent game here or there but flame out...time will tell.
i just cant understand why you cant just say "meh, not bad kid". All the things you claimed about this kids heart and work ethic, which we are all dubious on in the first place....at least for one game has been proven null. So just own it for one game, just say "maybe i was wrong about the kid but we'll see, time will tell". Thats a fair statement. I stead ur trying to make Sheet up because it appears you want garrett to be a failure, and that i cant understand even if u are just trolling. Good trolling needs to have competent foundation from which to launch trolls. If the kid keeps playing alright and figuring out ways to be productive even while not at 100%.....than ur trolls come off as something else.
-
The sacks were not impressive. He broke through a NO BLOCK and barely hit the QB on sack 1, and sack two the QB happened to run in front of him. Garrett sucks gopher dikc.
No no, i know exactly what i saw...u dont. Ill give you that you know some stuff about some other things, but you have "zero" eye for front 7 mechanics. On a bad ankle garrett ghosted undrneath the guard and center and steamrolled mccown, made them look silly..like they didnt oniw the ball gad been hiked yet.
Ob the 2nd sack garett ripped around the corner but because of that ankle he couldnt lean in like he was during preseason..tried to go around the corner more or less completely vertical. So his initial rush didnt go anywhere but when mccown tried to step up and spill out garrett immediately spun back to the inside and lunged at mccown from behind. Its not the most imoressive sack ever but mccown didnt run into him and for a guy with a clearly bum ankle its a heck of a hustle play. Dont argue with me about how the sacks transpired.
The latger point id like to make to u is why cant u just say man, that kid showed some heart. He showed more heart in ~10 snaps then our other DE's gave in 4-5 games. Im not calling this kid the answer to our prayers, he may have a decent game here or there but flame out...time will tell.
i just cant understand why you cant just say "meh, not bad kid". All the things you claimed about this kids heart and work ethic, which we are all dubious on in the first place....at least for one game has been proven null. So just own it for one game, just say "maybe i was wrong about the kid but we'll see, time will tell". Thats a fair statement. I stead ur trying to make Sheet up because it appears you want garrett to be a failure, and that i cant understand even if u are just trolling. Good trolling needs to have competent foundation from which to launch trolls. If the kid keeps playing alright and figuring out ways to be productive even while not at 100%.....than ur trolls come off as something else.
No no, i know exactly what i saw...u dont. Ill give you that you know some stuff about some other things, but you have "zero" eye for front 7 mechanics. On a bad ankle garrett ghosted undrneath the guard and center and steamrolled mccown, made them look silly..like they didnt oniw the ball gad been hiked yet.
Ob the 2nd sack garett ripped around the corner but because of that ankle he couldnt lean in like he was during preseason..tried to go around the corner more or less completely vertical. So his initial rush didnt go anywhere but when mccown tried to step up and spill out garrett immediately spun back to the inside and lunged at mccown from behind. Its not the most imoressive sack ever but mccown didnt run into him and for a guy with a clearly bum ankle its a heck of a hustle play. Dont argue with me about how the sacks transpired.
The latger point id like to make to u is why cant u just say man, that kid showed some heart. He showed more heart in ~10 snaps then our other DE's gave in 4-5 games. Im not calling this kid the answer to our prayers, he may have a decent game here or there but flame out...time will tell.
i just cant understand why you cant just say "meh, not bad kid". All the things you claimed about this kids heart and work ethic, which we are all dubious on in the first place....at least for one game has been proven null. So just own it for one game, just say "maybe i was wrong about the kid but we'll see, time will tell". Thats a fair statement. I stead ur trying to make Sheet up because it appears you want garrett to be a failure, and that i cant understand even if u are just trolling. Good trolling needs to have competent foundation from which to launch trolls. If the kid keeps playing alright and figuring out ways to be productive even while not at 100%.....than ur trolls come off as something else.
He's been calling him 2 tackle Texas since forever. The least he can do is now is call him 2 sack Texas. Do that every game and who cares what Dr. G thinks.
-
And Dr. G's big rookie pick just threw a pick against Minn with 2:20 to go. Shall we call him 2 turnover Trubiski?
-
Draft is BPA and if that says edge rusher - so be it.
I want this team to have an identity and if that means having a top 3 dline, then I'm perfectly ok with it.
Draft is BPA and if that says edge rusher - so be it.
I want this team to have an identity and if that means having a top 3 dline, then I'm perfectly ok with it.
U know im a def honk, but those wr's tho.....and if this qb play continues as is? I cant justify taking an edge rusher again unless its another freak in garrets category. Id much rather us bring in a vet DE who's long got his finger wet in this league.<---- Ansah.
-
And Dr. G's big rookie pick just threw a pick against Minn with 2:20 to go. Shall we call him 2 turnover Trubiski?
And Dr. G's big rookie pick just threw a pick against Minn with 2:20 to go. Shall we call him 2 turnover Trubiski?
Uh oh, trubs shitting the bed?
-
And Dr. G's big rookie pick just threw a pick against Minn with 2:20 to go. Shall we call him 2 turnover Trubiski?
Uh oh, trubs shitting the bed?
Uh oh, trubs shitting the bed?
Yep-they hit the FG so by Dr. G's logic this makes 2 turnover Trubisky a shitty pick and a bust.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login