Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. This is Hue Jackson.. Nuff Said!

This is Hue Jackson.. Nuff Said!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
39 Posts 17 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W wargograw

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I personally like that there is no evidence of improvement on offense. But it is all in the process of trying to lose as many games as possible with the worst, possibly historically bad, red zone offense.

    There's certainly not enough improvement. But I think the OL's made strides such that once we have better WR and QB play, things should fire up pretty quickly. And that's what the next draft is for, if the whiners such as yourself can wait that long. 

    LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 10k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @wargograw said:

    There's certainly not enough improvement. But I think the OL's made strides such that once we have better WR and QB play, things should fire up pretty quickly. And that's what the next draft is for, if the whiners such as yourself can wait that long. 

    We have heinous WR play because the gaggle of WRs that Sashi drafted all fell flat. So why should anyone feel confident that the current front office can pick the right talent? They basically used the shotgun method and still didn't find an average WR by accident. This has been my issue this year and it will likely be a problem next year unless Sashi and Co. bring someone in who can evaluate talent. They may do a great job at bringing in lots of swings at the ball but they need to actually get some regular hits.

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    Quote Reply
    • W wargograw

      Let’s get the one about most of our fans where things are looking up—hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.—and the guy wants to ditch the family and move to Vegas because they’re not millionaires yet. 

      DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
      • 28k Posts
      • 6k Reputation
      DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
      #20

      @wargograw said:

      Let’s get the one about most of our fans where things are looking up—hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.—and the guy wants to ditch the family and move to Vegas because they’re not millionaires yet. 

      Image result for judge judy gif

      "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
      1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 5k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
        #21

        Did anyone talk about Hue's decision to decline that penalty on 3rd down, when it made it 4th and 1 for the Titans in our territory?  If you take the penalty, you give the offense a chance to pick up the first, but you also move them back 15 yards.  That would've made the FG MUCH longer, right?  And who knows, if you get a sack on 3rd down, they might be out of FG range all together.  The decision didn't ultimately hurt us too badly, as we still held them to 3 points, but I didn't get the decision, and I don't understand the logic there.  

        LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

          Did anyone talk about Hue's decision to decline that penalty on 3rd down, when it made it 4th and 1 for the Titans in our territory?  If you take the penalty, you give the offense a chance to pick up the first, but you also move them back 15 yards.  That would've made the FG MUCH longer, right?  And who knows, if you get a sack on 3rd down, they might be out of FG range all together.  The decision didn't ultimately hurt us too badly, as we still held them to 3 points, but I didn't get the decision, and I don't understand the logic there.  

          LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 10k Posts
          • 2k Reputation
          LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
          #22

          @jiggins7919 said:

          Did anyone talk about Hue's decision to decline that penalty on 3rd down, when it made it 4th and 1 for the Titans in our territory?  If you take the penalty, you give the offense a chance to pick up the first, but you also move them back 15 yards.  That would've made the FG MUCH longer, right?  And who knows, if you get a sack on 3rd down, they might be out of FG range all together.  The decision didn't ultimately hurt us too badly, as we still held them to 3 points, but I didn't get the decision, and I don't understand the logic there.  

          Just another Hue brain fart that contributes to the 1-22.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • domcucch1994 D
            • 747 Posts
            • 110 Reputation
            D domcucch1994 wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Hue Jackson should have pleaded for Mr. Moneyball to take Carson Wentz..

            End of discussion..

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

              @wargograw said:

              There's certainly not enough improvement. But I think the OL's made strides such that once we have better WR and QB play, things should fire up pretty quickly. And that's what the next draft is for, if the whiners such as yourself can wait that long. 

              We have heinous WR play because the gaggle of WRs that Sashi drafted all fell flat. So why should anyone feel confident that the current front office can pick the right talent? They basically used the shotgun method and still didn't find an average WR by accident. This has been my issue this year and it will likely be a problem next year unless Sashi and Co. bring someone in who can evaluate talent. They may do a great job at bringing in lots of swings at the ball but they need to actually get some regular hits.

              wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 5k Posts
              • 363 Reputation
              W wargograw wrote on last edited by
              #24

              @logicisforsquares said:

              We have heinous WR play because the gaggle of WRs that Sashi drafted all fell flat. So why should anyone feel confident that the current front office can pick the right talent? They basically used the shotgun method and still didn't find an average WR by accident. This has been my issue this year and it will likely be a problem next year unless Sashi and Co. bring someone in who can evaluate talent. They may do a great job at bringing in lots of swings at the ball but they need to actually get some regular hits.

              And they’ve hit on plenty of others. So scrap the whole FO because they missed out on 4 guys? Think man. 

              @jiggins7919 said:

              Did anyone talk about Hue's decision to decline that penalty on 3rd down, when it made it 4th and 1 for the Titans in our territory?  If you take the penalty, you give the offense a chance to pick up the first, but you also move them back 15 yards.  That would've made the FG MUCH longer, right?  And who knows, if you get a sack on 3rd down, they might be out of FG range all together.  The decision didn't ultimately hurt us too badly, as we still held them to 3 points, but I didn't get the decision, and I don't understand the logic there.  

              Nope. No one’s mentioned that all week....

              LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • W wargograw

                @logicisforsquares said:

                We have heinous WR play because the gaggle of WRs that Sashi drafted all fell flat. So why should anyone feel confident that the current front office can pick the right talent? They basically used the shotgun method and still didn't find an average WR by accident. This has been my issue this year and it will likely be a problem next year unless Sashi and Co. bring someone in who can evaluate talent. They may do a great job at bringing in lots of swings at the ball but they need to actually get some regular hits.

                And they’ve hit on plenty of others. So scrap the whole FO because they missed out on 4 guys? Think man. 

                @jiggins7919 said:

                Did anyone talk about Hue's decision to decline that penalty on 3rd down, when it made it 4th and 1 for the Titans in our territory?  If you take the penalty, you give the offense a chance to pick up the first, but you also move them back 15 yards.  That would've made the FG MUCH longer, right?  And who knows, if you get a sack on 3rd down, they might be out of FG range all together.  The decision didn't ultimately hurt us too badly, as we still held them to 3 points, but I didn't get the decision, and I don't understand the logic there.  

                Nope. No one’s mentioned that all week....

                LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 10k Posts
                • 2k Reputation
                LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                #25

                @wargograw said:

                And they’ve hit on plenty of others. So scrap the whole FO because they missed out on 4 guys? Think man. 

                In one draft. 4 picks flushed. DeValve and Kindred aren’t  setting the world on fire either. The jury is still out on the 2017 draft.

                I like the approach of putting together picks but they need to get someone in the FO who can ID the talent.

                W 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • W wargograw

                  @dutch-oven said:

                  That's a hilariously false analogy. 

                  The Browns today would be a guy with a wife who can't leave the house because she weighs 500lbs, a third shift job at the local convenience store, and a kid who has graduated from meth to heroin.

                  My analogy's quite clear actually. 

                  Our fans-our fans

                  Things are looking up-the team is getting better

                  hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.-evidence of things getting better

                  the guy-our fans

                  ditch the family and move to Vegas-get rid of the regime

                  millionaires-winning a bunch of games

                  Yours is pretty poor, on the other hand. What exactly are the Browns trying to leave? 

                  hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 20k Posts
                  • 5k Reputation
                  hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @wargograw said:

                  My analogy's quite clear actually. 

                  Our fans-our fans

                  Things are looking up-the team is getting better

                  hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.-evidence of things getting better

                  the guy-our fans

                  ditch the family and move to Vegas-get rid of the regime

                  millionaires-winning a bunch of games

                  Yours is pretty poor, on the other hand. What exactly are the Browns trying to leave? 

                  Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                  W Mark OM 2 Replies Last reply
                  👍
                  Quote Reply
                  • hoortaH hoorta

                    @wargograw said:

                    My analogy's quite clear actually. 

                    Our fans-our fans

                    Things are looking up-the team is getting better

                    hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.-evidence of things getting better

                    the guy-our fans

                    ditch the family and move to Vegas-get rid of the regime

                    millionaires-winning a bunch of games

                    Yours is pretty poor, on the other hand. What exactly are the Browns trying to leave? 

                    Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                    wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 5k Posts
                    • 363 Reputation
                    W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    @hoorta said:

                    Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                    Good luck thinking it'll get fixed by just scrapping everyone

                    hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                      @wargograw said:

                      And they’ve hit on plenty of others. So scrap the whole FO because they missed out on 4 guys? Think man. 

                      In one draft. 4 picks flushed. DeValve and Kindred aren’t  setting the world on fire either. The jury is still out on the 2017 draft.

                      I like the approach of putting together picks but they need to get someone in the FO who can ID the talent.

                      wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 5k Posts
                      • 363 Reputation
                      W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @logicisforsquares said:

                      In one draft. 4 picks flushed. DeValve and Kindred aren’t  setting the world on fire either. The jury is still out on the 2017 draft.

                      I like the approach of putting together picks but they need to get someone in the FO who can ID the talent.

                      Are you really this upset about a bunch of 4th+ rounders? You say "4 picks flushed." But we wouldn't have all those picks if not for the smarts of this FO. People want to have their cake and eat it too. 

                      Devalve is producing more than his draft spot would indicate. Kindred's out of position but I'd say is pretty solid, especially, again, for a 4th rounder. 

                      We've gotten solid production out of 5 of our first 6 picks from 2016. Kindred and Devalve are solid too. Drango hasn't played enough yet to make a proper evaluation, but we're about to find out. Then you factor in the Taylor and Collins trades. Bringing in Boddy-Calhoun. At a minimum, we got solid depth out of that draft, we just need another really high level player or two to emerge (in addition to Shon Coleman). 

                      In 2017 Myles looks great. Njoku looks like what we drafted him to be. Ogunjobi's killing it, and the rest we have yet to really see. 

                      LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • W wargograw

                        @logicisforsquares said:

                        In one draft. 4 picks flushed. DeValve and Kindred aren’t  setting the world on fire either. The jury is still out on the 2017 draft.

                        I like the approach of putting together picks but they need to get someone in the FO who can ID the talent.

                        Are you really this upset about a bunch of 4th+ rounders? You say "4 picks flushed." But we wouldn't have all those picks if not for the smarts of this FO. People want to have their cake and eat it too. 

                        Devalve is producing more than his draft spot would indicate. Kindred's out of position but I'd say is pretty solid, especially, again, for a 4th rounder. 

                        We've gotten solid production out of 5 of our first 6 picks from 2016. Kindred and Devalve are solid too. Drango hasn't played enough yet to make a proper evaluation, but we're about to find out. Then you factor in the Taylor and Collins trades. Bringing in Boddy-Calhoun. At a minimum, we got solid depth out of that draft, we just need another really high level player or two to emerge (in addition to Shon Coleman). 

                        In 2017 Myles looks great. Njoku looks like what we drafted him to be. Ogunjobi's killing it, and the rest we have yet to really see. 

                        LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 10k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        @wargograw said:

                        Are you really this upset about a bunch of 4th+ rounders? You say "4 picks flushed." But we wouldn't have all those picks if not for the smarts of this FO. People want to have their cake and eat it too. 

                        I already said I liked the approach of getting those picks. I do not like that they basically took 4 picks, even if they are middle round picks, and did nothing with them. 

                        Like I said earlier, jury is still out on 2017. If Myles can stay on the field, great. He is very talented. If he is constantly injured, that could end up being a wasted pick. We shall see.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 23k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          Myles would have wanted to go with the team to London even if still on protocol.

                          https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/oct/05/palaeontology-museums-uk

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                            • 30k Posts
                            • 6k Reputation
                            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            True... but flying with a concussion is a no-no...

                            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            👍
                            Quote Reply
                            • hoortaH hoorta

                              @wargograw said:

                              My analogy's quite clear actually. 

                              Our fans-our fans

                              Things are looking up-the team is getting better

                              hot wife, promotion at work, healthy kid, etc.-evidence of things getting better

                              the guy-our fans

                              ditch the family and move to Vegas-get rid of the regime

                              millionaires-winning a bunch of games

                              Yours is pretty poor, on the other hand. What exactly are the Browns trying to leave? 

                              Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                              Mark O Mark OM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 6k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              @hoorta said:

                              Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                              I'm not sure it even looks better statistically.   Just remember the first 7 games last year and how close we game to winning several of those first 7.   Compare that to this year, how many games have we been close to winning.   I count 2.   Tennessee and Pittsburgh week 1.    The rest have been blowouts.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • W wargograw

                                @hoorta said:

                                Last year 0-7. This year 0-7. Statistically better probably. Not showing up in the win column though. Worst in the NFL in +\- turnover ratio, second in the league in penalties. Until that gets fixed, we're not going to win many games. 

                                Good luck thinking it'll get fixed by just scrapping everyone

                                hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 20k Posts
                                • 5k Reputation
                                hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                @wargograw said:

                                Good luck thinking it'll get fixed by just scrapping everyone

                                Where did I say that? Don't know if they'll keep Hue around though. His many shortcomings this year have been well documented. Go ahead and believe everything is just wonderful in Browns Land. 0-7 is what I see.

                                LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                                  True... but flying with a concussion is a no-no...

                                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 23k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @tour2ma said:

                                  True... but flying with a concussion is a no-no...

                                  He was cleared to fly but not to play.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • hoortaH hoorta

                                    @wargograw said:

                                    Good luck thinking it'll get fixed by just scrapping everyone

                                    Where did I say that? Don't know if they'll keep Hue around though. His many shortcomings this year have been well documented. Go ahead and believe everything is just wonderful in Browns Land. 0-7 is what I see.

                                    LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 10k Posts
                                    • 2k Reputation
                                    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @hoorta said:

                                    Where did I say that? Don't know if they'll keep Hue around though. His many shortcomings this year have been well documented. Go ahead and believe everything is just wonderful in Browns Land. 0-7 is what I see.

                                    'You are what your record says you are."- Parcells

                                    hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                      @hoorta said:

                                      Where did I say that? Don't know if they'll keep Hue around though. His many shortcomings this year have been well documented. Go ahead and believe everything is just wonderful in Browns Land. 0-7 is what I see.

                                      'You are what your record says you are."- Parcells

                                      hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 20k Posts
                                      • 5k Reputation
                                      hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @logicisforsquares said:

                                      'You are what your record says you are."- Parcells

                                      And every power ranking says with a 0-7 record, we're the worst team in the NFL. Our 0-7 is worse than the 49ers 0-7. Improvement would be moving up to #28 or so, and actually winning a game. 

                                      D BoneD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • hoortaH hoorta

                                        @logicisforsquares said:

                                        'You are what your record says you are."- Parcells

                                        And every power ranking says with a 0-7 record, we're the worst team in the NFL. Our 0-7 is worse than the 49ers 0-7. Improvement would be moving up to #28 or so, and actually winning a game. 

                                        D Bone D BoneD Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 8k Posts
                                        • 3k Reputation
                                        D BoneD D Bone wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @hoorta said:

                                        Improvement would be moving up to #28 or so, and actually winning a game. 

                                        Ahhhh....... one can only dream. 

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        👍
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • ElkDawg E
                                          • 39 Posts
                                          • 6 Reputation
                                          E ElkDawg wrote on last edited by ElkDawg
                                          #38

                                          I need to go out and get myself some big black frames (cheap sunglasses) if I'm gonna continue to watch this Sheet show......

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate