Ideal Draft Pick (at this point)
-
I would like a good size qb who has played with midgit receivers and has thrown it with pin point accuracy.
I would like a good size qb who has played with midgit receivers and has thrown it with pin point accuracy.
makes sense..Look at Luke Falk at Wash.St. roster? one 6'3 with a 6'4 the rest go 5'8 to 5'11..a bunch..not a great OL either..PC rate%-was close to a ridiculous 70% till lately..
-
Barkley just took a 97 yard kickoff back for a TD today~ Nice
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
-
Those 21 carries for 44 yards were nice too. He would be a horrible pick.
Overrated. Iowa shut him down too. Dobbins is a better workhorse rb imo. I was big in barkley but not anymore.
Not worth a #1 pick.
-
Those 21 carries for 44 yards were nice too. He would be a horrible pick.
Overrated. Iowa shut him down too. Dobbins is a better workhorse rb imo. I was big in barkley but not anymore.
Not worth a #1 pick.
-
Let's cut out the cowpoop Browns.
You guys are finishing either with the #1 or #2 overall pick. When you're on the clock, hand in the card with the best available QB written on it.
-
Those 21 carries for 44 yards were nice too. He would be a horrible pick.
Overrated. Iowa shut him down too. Dobbins is a better workhorse rb imo. I was big in barkley but not anymore.
Not worth a #1 pick.
-
Barkley just took a 97 yard kickoff back for a TD today~ Nice
Who needs Barkley......
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/trent-richardson-runs-wild-cfl-162544602.html
Trent Richardson runs wild in the CFL
Trent Richardson has arrived, in Canada.
Richardson, the former Alabama star turned Browns and Colts bust, had a huge game in the Canadian Football League on Friday night, carrying 20 times for 127 yards and two touchdowns in leading the Saskatchewan Roughriders to a 37-12 win over the Montreal Alouettes. Richardson signed with the CFL because he wanted to show that he’s in shape and capable of playing at a high level, and he said after the game he thinks he’s done just that.
“It just pays off from hard work being in the Warehouse down in Birmingham, ” Richardson told TSN. “You know, fighting for my kids and fighting for myself.”
Richardson’s 127 yards were more than he ever had in an NFL game, and the most he’s had in any football game since he ran for 203 yards against Auburn in 2011. Saskatchewan is 3-1 since signing Richardson and has now clinched a spot in the playoffs.
-
@boo-fagley said:
Best QB.
This is the draft to do it. I like Josh Allen, but there are so many good QBs in this draft. The Browns can be the Steelers with Ben looking to retire. Then the rabbit will have the gun.
Josh Allen? Just no. I watched his game against a very poor NM team and he is not even as good as Hogan or Kessler, just taller/bigger. If we pick him then just add him to the t-shirt as another failed Browns pick @ QB. Not the first time I've seen him and he is just not NFL 1st team material IMO.
Also watched Rosen and Darnold. To bad if Sam doesn't come out. He looked better this week than I've seen in brief views this season. Rosen has no defense so hard to judge how he would be with a real defense where he is not required to carry the team every play. I've seen him before and he's a better pick than Allen by far.
Have not watched the Louisville QB so he's on my radar for later in the season.
-
I'm against taking any HB high in the first, unless that's literally the only thing you're missing.
-
Barkley isn't the back that Zeke or Fournette is. Sorry, but he's not as explosive, powerful nor has the catching ability the media claims.
Bobbled and had another drop on two open catches last week against UM alone.
-
Those 21 carries for 44 yards were nice too. He would be a horrible pick.
I agree we shouldnt take a rb high, but barkley is a stud. I just wouldnt take any rb high. If you actually watched the tOSU game he was literally getting hit right when he took the handoff. Complete domination by psu o-line. Whenever he has a little space it's clear he is the best rb in college football by far. Scouts see that, which is he he will be a high pick(but again we shouldnt take him...not because hes not great but because we shouldnt take a rb)
-
Arden Key
-
Those 21 carries for 44 yards were nice too. He would be a horrible pick.
I agree we shouldnt take a rb high, but barkley is a stud. I just wouldnt take any rb high. If you actually watched the tOSU game he was literally getting hit right when he took the handoff. Complete domination by psu o-line. Whenever he has a little space it's clear he is the best rb in college football by far. Scouts see that, which is he he will be a high pick(but again we shouldnt take him...not because hes not great but because we shouldnt take a rb)
I agree we shouldnt take a rb high, but barkley is a stud. I just wouldnt take any rb high. If you actually watched the tOSU game he was literally getting hit right when he took the handoff. Complete domination by psu o-line. Whenever he has a little space it's clear he is the best rb in college football by far. Scouts see that, which is he he will be a high pick(but again we shouldnt take him...not because hes not great but because we shouldnt take a rb)
I'll let you blame the OL for a game or two a year (like Fournette against Alabama). But you don't get to use that excuse against teams like Indiana, Pitt, etc.
I'm glad everyone is coming around to the truth here.
-
I agree we shouldnt take a rb high, but barkley is a stud. I just wouldnt take any rb high. If you actually watched the tOSU game he was literally getting hit right when he took the handoff. Complete domination by psu o-line. Whenever he has a little space it's clear he is the best rb in college football by far. Scouts see that, which is he he will be a high pick(but again we shouldnt take him...not because hes not great but because we shouldnt take a rb)
I'll let you blame the OL for a game or two a year (like Fournette against Alabama). But you don't get to use that excuse against teams like Indiana, Pitt, etc.
I'm glad everyone is coming around to the truth here.
I'll let you blame the OL for a game or two a year (like Fournette against Alabama). But you don't get to use that excuse against teams like Indiana, Pitt, etc.
I'm glad everyone is coming around to the truth here.
ummm...they arent. He's still one of the top people on everyone's board for a reason. So enjoy continuing to talk to yourself and convince yourself of something here.
-
The pick has to be a QB.
It really does.
Enough with being cute. Target your QB and get him. Then get him some WRs. The Browns cannot go into next season with the absolute nonsense they have collectively at the WR position.
The Browns have five picks in the first two rounds. There's a good chance they won't have to trade up to get a QB, so they should be able to use all of them. Get your QB, get a WR, get a LT to replace Thomas (now or eventually), etc...
-
The pick has to be a QB.
It really does.
Enough with being cute. Target your QB and get him. Then get him some WRs. The Browns cannot go into next season with the absolute nonsense they have collectively at the WR position.
The Browns have five picks in the first two rounds. There's a good chance they won't have to trade up to get a QB, so they should be able to use all of them. Get your QB, get a WR, get a LT to replace Thomas (now or eventually), etc...
It really does.
Enough with being cute. Target your QB and get him. Then get him some WRs. The Browns cannot go into next season with the absolute nonsense they have collectively at the WR position.
The Browns have five picks in the first two rounds. There's a good chance they won't have to trade up to get a QB, so they should be able to use all of them. Get your QB, get a WR, get a LT to replace Thomas (now or eventually), etc...
It's really hard to trade up farther then the #1 pick that they're likely to have anyways. So they'll have the pick of the bunch.
-
It really does.
Enough with being cute. Target your QB and get him. Then get him some WRs. The Browns cannot go into next season with the absolute nonsense they have collectively at the WR position.
The Browns have five picks in the first two rounds. There's a good chance they won't have to trade up to get a QB, so they should be able to use all of them. Get your QB, get a WR, get a LT to replace Thomas (now or eventually), etc...
It's really hard to trade up farther then the #1 pick that they're likely to have anyways. So they'll have the pick of the bunch.
It's really hard to trade up farther then the #1 pick that they're likely to have anyways. So they'll have the pick of the bunch.
Haha... I'm starting to wonder if San Fran will ever win a game too. Then it becomes a battle of strength of schedules
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login