Sounds, uh, great.
-
It's not who gets fired. It's about who you hire.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
Ya...like now...lol
-
It's not who gets fired. It's about who you hire.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
They will be if you positive post enough! They will have to believe!
-
It's not who gets fired. It's about who you hire.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
-
As with sharpshooting anything ever.. I wish more people both on this forum and apparently in Berea worked to the following slogan: Don't oppose, propose.
This means that simply saying "That's wrong rawr!" isn't enough.. if you want to assert something's wrong, you must propose and defend your personal alternative.
I don't know why LaCanfora has a job when every article he writes appears to be gaslighting .. this move [if true] would be entirely ridiculous
-
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
Completely on point bro. Hue might just not be the right coach for us. He might not be right for "moneyball" or "sashi's process". It's ignorant to think 1-23 is the best record we could possible have. Hell, if you or I coached the team, we'd only be one game worse in the worst case scenario
. Jeff Fisher was a smart guy. The Rams are killing it this year now that they got rid of him. The Rams were 4-12 and he was shitcanned. You have to produce in the NFL to keep your job, except on the Cleveland Browns. I'm hoping we have the right guys in the office now, but i'm definitely not positive about that.
-
Yes it is. And whoever we hire if we fire this regime will be NOT GOOD.
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
-
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
The Rams were 4-12 last year
-
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
The Rams were 4-12 last year
The Rams were 4-12 last year
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
-
The Rams were 4-12 last year
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
Definitely not. And the Browns couldn't possibly find a better coach than Hue.
-
The Rams were 4-12 last year
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
Yes, they were a loaded 4-12. You probably attribute the Cowboys turnaround from 2015 to 16 to the fact that they hired a new ball boy or something too.
The Rams were 4-12 last year
Yeah, they had bad coaches. That was clearly evident because their team showed its talent despite the record. My point is and has been that you have no idea how good or bad our coaches are because we don't yet have experienced talent.
-
Apparently a loaded 4-12. Casey Kasem started a lot of games for them and when Goff started at the end of the season he looked as lost as any rookie QB ever has. The turn around has nothing to do with a whole new coaching staff allegedly.
Yes, they were a loaded 4-12. You probably attribute the Cowboys turnaround from 2015 to 16 to the fact that they hired a new ball boy or something too.
The Rams were 4-12 last year
Yeah, they had bad coaches. That was clearly evident because their team showed its talent despite the record. My point is and has been that you have no idea how good or bad our coaches are because we don't yet have experienced talent.
My point is and has been that you have no idea how good or bad our coaches are because we don't yet have experienced talent.
weak argument. we've lost 4 games by the number 12 combined. Herm Edwards said that, you know, one of the guys you said doesn't do "research" on the Browns or understand Sashi's brilliant equation of a process. I guess Sashi is too smart and more of a football guy than Herm is. If Hue was a better coach, we would've won at least one of those four games.
Only a weak coach would lose ALL of them
-
That's what most Rams fans here in SoCal pissed and moaned about this past off season after they hired Sean McVay.
As I've said multiple times...... Great coaches are not great coaches until they're great coaches. As well as...... We don't have to hire a coach that everyone has heard of - I see you there Sean McVay and Doug Pederson, we simply have to hire the right coach.
Can Hue still be that right coach? I'm saying yes - possibly, maybe... if he's willing to hire an OC and give him complete and total control of the offense...... but can or will he?
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
I hear ya, there’s just no comparison between the two situations. The Rams have been and are loaded.
Why is that?
-
With Haslam selling out essentially to Warren Buffet, it is no surprise that the family may become more involved.....considering that the Browns WILL now basically be that family's business.
So...perhaps think of it this way: The Haslam's are like the Rooney family. The older generation didn't do so well with that team......for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
(and yes...I am sure you can find examples of where the younger generation has come along and been as bad or worse as the older generation....can you say 4 generations of Bidwill's with the Cards). But....there is some chance.
So...perhaps think of it this way: The Haslam's are like the Rooney family. The older generation didn't do so well with that team......for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
Not exactly. Art Rooney turned the reins over to Dan after the Steelers had won their first Super Bowl.
The seeds of the dynasty were already planted before Dan took over...the familiar names...Bradshaw, Greene, Lambert, Ham, Franco, Greenwood, Blount, Webster, Swann were on the roster.
Mike Webster was a rookie back up, and Lynn Swann was relegated to special teams.
-
So...perhaps think of it this way: The Haslam's are like the Rooney family. The older generation didn't do so well with that team......for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
Not exactly. Art Rooney turned the reins over to Dan after the Steelers had won their first Super Bowl.
The seeds of the dynasty were already planted before Dan took over...the familiar names...Bradshaw, Greene, Lambert, Ham, Franco, Greenwood, Blount, Webster, Swann were on the roster.
Mike Webster was a rookie back up, and Lynn Swann was relegated to special teams.
Not exactly. Art Rooney turned the reins over to Dan after the Steelers had won their first Super Bowl.
The seeds of the dynasty were already planted before Dan took over...the familiar names...Bradshaw, Greene, Lambert, Ham, Franco, Greenwood, Blount, Webster, Swann were on the roster.
Mike Webster was a rookie back up, and Lynn Swann was relegated to special teams.
I suspect Dan was heavily involved in bringing in those names....even if he hadn't "taken over" yet. . I assume he was groomed to take over and had a long affiliation with the team before doing so. I mean, Dan wasn't the prodigal son who had been lost in the wilderness for years, and all of a sudden comes back to town and says "Hi Dad....give me control of your team".
-
Not exactly. Art Rooney turned the reins over to Dan after the Steelers had won their first Super Bowl.
The seeds of the dynasty were already planted before Dan took over...the familiar names...Bradshaw, Greene, Lambert, Ham, Franco, Greenwood, Blount, Webster, Swann were on the roster.
Mike Webster was a rookie back up, and Lynn Swann was relegated to special teams.
I suspect Dan was heavily involved in bringing in those names....even if he hadn't "taken over" yet. . I assume he was groomed to take over and had a long affiliation with the team before doing so. I mean, Dan wasn't the prodigal son who had been lost in the wilderness for years, and all of a sudden comes back to town and says "Hi Dad....give me control of your team".
I suspect Dan was heavily involved in bringing in those names....even if he hadn't "taken over" yet. . I assume he was groomed to take over and had a long affiliation with the team before doing so. I mean, Dan wasn't the prodigal son who had been lost in the wilderness for years, and all of a sudden comes back to town and says "Hi Dad....give me control of your team".
No argument with any of that, its just that your statement can be easily be interpreted as Dan creating a dynasty AFTER he took over.
for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
-
I suspect Dan was heavily involved in bringing in those names....even if he hadn't "taken over" yet. . I assume he was groomed to take over and had a long affiliation with the team before doing so. I mean, Dan wasn't the prodigal son who had been lost in the wilderness for years, and all of a sudden comes back to town and says "Hi Dad....give me control of your team".
No argument with any of that, its just that your statement can be easily be interpreted as Dan creating a dynasty AFTER he took over.
for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
No argument with any of that, its just that your statement can be easily be interpreted as Dan creating a dynasty AFTER he took over.
for 40 years they sucked under Art Rooney....but then the younger generation...Dan Rooney...took over...and they became a dynasty.
Well...it may still be accurate in a couple of senses.....I mean...what constituted "taking over"? Dan may have de facto "taken over" a few years before it was official.
And, even by your own recollection of things.....Art was only in charge for one of those titles. One or two titles does not a dynasty make. If Dan was in charger for the next 3, then, semantically....the Steelers did not become a dynasty until after he took over. Fair to say?
-
My point is and has been that you have no idea how good or bad our coaches are because we don't yet have experienced talent.
weak argument. we've lost 4 games by the number 12 combined. Herm Edwards said that, you know, one of the guys you said doesn't do "research" on the Browns or understand Sashi's brilliant equation of a process. I guess Sashi is too smart and more of a football guy than Herm is. If Hue was a better coach, we would've won at least one of those four games.
Only a weak coach would lose ALL of them
weak argument. we've lost 4 games by the number 12 combined. Herm Edwards said that, you know, one of the guys you said doesn't do "research" on the Browns or understand Sashi's brilliant equation of a process. I guess Sashi is too smart and more of a football guy than Herm is. If Hue was a better coach, we would've won at least one of those four games.
Only a weak coach would lose ALL of them
Hue Jackson is in way, way, over his head. Nice guy, but really he is a Division 1 AA caliber talent. The sooner Haslam pulls the lever of the Sloan Valve, the better.
-
My point is and has been that you have no idea how good or bad our coaches are because we don't yet have experienced talent.
weak argument. we've lost 4 games by the number 12 combined. Herm Edwards said that, you know, one of the guys you said doesn't do "research" on the Browns or understand Sashi's brilliant equation of a process. I guess Sashi is too smart and more of a football guy than Herm is. If Hue was a better coach, we would've won at least one of those four games.
Only a weak coach would lose ALL of them
weak argument. we've lost 4 games by the number 12 combined. Herm Edwards said that, you know, one of the guys you said doesn't do "research" on the Browns or understand Sashi's brilliant equation of a process. I guess Sashi is too smart and more of a football guy than Herm is. If Hue was a better coach, we would've won at least one of those four games.
Only a weak coach would lose ALL of them
So we're really close to breaking through? Yet you want to demote Sashi right? Please explain.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login