Skip to content

what I'd like to see from this organization going forward....

The Browns Board
37 18 980
  • @browns149 said:

    The last 2 teams to trade up to get their Qb have the 2 best records in the league. 

    We trade down to avoid drafting a top Qb. And we are 1-26

    Fire everyone

    Houston & Chicago?

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by Browns149
    #27

    @baconhound said:

    Houston & Chicago?

    Sorry I should’ve said in the 2016 draft

    Not to mention the Browns trading down so Houston could take Watson

    our FO is afraid to take a Qb high, because they know they have ZERO clue on what a good Qb is

    they just keep taking QBs later so they won’t have to worry about that guy sucking

  • @baconhound said:

    Houston & Chicago?

    Sorry I should’ve said in the 2016 draft

    Not to mention the Browns trading down so Houston could take Watson

    our FO is afraid to take a Qb high, because they know they have ZERO clue on what a good Qb is

    they just keep taking QBs later so they won’t have to worry about that guy sucking

    B BaconHound wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @browns149 said:

    Sorry I should’ve said in the 2016 draft

    Not to mention the Browns trading down so Houston could take Watson

    our FO is afraid to take a Qb high, because they know they have ZERO clue on what a good Qb is

    they just keep taking QBs later so they won’t have to worry about that guy sucking

    I agree 2016 looks bad right now and I'm not a fan of this front office but this is the make or break year for me on the front office.  If they don't draft a QB or sign a Cousins type free agent, they should go.  If they do draft a QB they should suffer the same fate as the QB.

  • @browns149 said:

    Sorry I should’ve said in the 2016 draft

    Not to mention the Browns trading down so Houston could take Watson

    our FO is afraid to take a Qb high, because they know they have ZERO clue on what a good Qb is

    they just keep taking QBs later so they won’t have to worry about that guy sucking

    I agree 2016 looks bad right now and I'm not a fan of this front office but this is the make or break year for me on the front office.  If they don't draft a QB or sign a Cousins type free agent, they should go.  If they do draft a QB they should suffer the same fate as the QB.

    Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @baconhound said:

    I agree 2016 looks bad right now and I'm not a fan of this front office but this is the make or break year for me on the front office.  If they don't draft a QB or sign a Cousins type free agent, they should go.  If they do draft a QB they should suffer the same fate as the QB.

    The problem is they should have done it 2 years ago

    Sashi said he learned from his mistakes. But yet he traded down AGAIN and passed on a good Qb last year

    I sure as hell don’t trust him to pick the correct guy 1st in this upcoming draft. 

    The guy has had 3 chances to get us a good Qb.  And he has failed all 3 times

    If it was my team, I sure would not let him try that pick again 

  • @browns149 said:

    Sorry I should’ve said in the 2016 draft

    Not to mention the Browns trading down so Houston could take Watson

    our FO is afraid to take a Qb high, because they know they have ZERO clue on what a good Qb is

    they just keep taking QBs later so they won’t have to worry about that guy sucking

    I agree 2016 looks bad right now and I'm not a fan of this front office but this is the make or break year for me on the front office.  If they don't draft a QB or sign a Cousins type free agent, they should go.  If they do draft a QB they should suffer the same fate as the QB.

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @baconhound said:

    I agree 2016 looks bad right now and I'm not a fan of this front office but this is the make or break year for me on the front office.  If they don't draft a QB or sign a Cousins type free agent, they should go.  If they do draft a QB they should suffer the same fate as the QB.

    Well, reading your last sentence says it all. If you deplete a team, you don't draft a QB because he hasn't many chances to look any good, and a first round QB who underperforms usually gets the FO fired or at least in a bad spot to begin with.

    That's why I understand that they decided to focus on the rest of the roster to draft high a QB in year 3 or 4, when the cast around the QB (both on defense and offense) would look better. Being this a QB-full draft makes it even more reasonable drafting a QB in 2nd round with your 4th pick in 2017. If he works, you're a genius, if he doesn't, well, he's a 4th pick in middle of the second round.

    Ironically, I think that Kizer is not the main reason for the last 3-4 losses, and he has improved his game (though he was playing like Sheet in the beginning of the season). 

    Anyway, I hope they finally make an aggresive move in the QB position this offseason (draft and FA). 

  • W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #31

    I was actually kind of Happy if the 49ers get the number one pick they already have a quarterback. Then it occurred to me that they might just trade that away.

    WSS

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
    #32

    We could trade the pick and get nine more meh players for one franchise QB. Our FO .....unlimited stupidity 

  • I was actually kind of Happy if the 49ers get the number one pick they already have a quarterback. Then it occurred to me that they might just trade that away.

    WSS

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @westside-steve said:

    I was actually kind of Happy if the 49ers get the number one pick they already have a quarterback. Then it occurred to me that they might just trade that away.

    WSS

    Happened the same to me

  • @westside-steve said:

    I was actually kind of Happy if the 49ers get the number one pick they already have a quarterback. Then it occurred to me that they might just trade that away.

    WSS

    Happened the same to me

    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @nero said:

    Happened the same to me

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

  • @nero said:

    Happened the same to me

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
    #35

    @westside-steve said:

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    Our team is up for that challenge and trying really hard.

  • @nero said:

    Happened the same to me

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @westside-steve said:

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    That'll be a no brainer fer shure

  • @nero said:

    Happened the same to me

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    stillmotionS stillmotion wrote on last edited by
    #37

    @westside-steve said:

    So all we have to do is suck worse than the Niners. I think we can do it!

    WSS

    49ers have Jimmy G