Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Tyrod Taylor and Lamar Jackson

Tyrod Taylor and Lamar Jackson

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
8 Posts 6 Posters 661 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Adoug319 A One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 325 Posts
    • 46 Reputation
    A Adoug319 wrote on last edited by Adoug319
    #1

    Here me out.. Perhaps the best way to improve this team would be a little different than most would do it.

    Key FA signings:

    Tyrod Taylor, QB (A Good, not great QB. Won’t put the team on his back, but can win games and certainly won’t lose them. Rarely turns the ball over, only 4 INTs on the year. And got his team to the playoffs for the first time in 17 years. Wouldn’t that be nice?)

    Malcolm Butler, CB (We’re all familiar with his game-clinching interception in the Super Bowl, but he has turned into a pretty solid corner for the best team in the NFL. Would be a good signing to add to our weak CB group.)

    Terrelle Pryor, WR (Taking emotion out of it, would be a nice signing. He already knows Hue’s system and had 1,000 yds receiving with Cody Kessler throwing him the ball. Sign him, would add depth to our receiving room)

    Demarcus Lawrence, DE (Is a FA this year, played well in Dallas, pairing him across Myles Garrett would be scary.)

    Draft:

    1. Saquon Barkley, RB (Arguably the best player in the draft. Is an elite talent, and scouts are calling him a once in a generation RB. Has all the vision, athleticism, and pass catching ability in the world. Needed to improve his blocking, and did. Could be our Le’Veon Bell paired with Duke Johnson.)

    2. Minkah Fitzpatrick, FS (Again, arguably the best player in the draft. Probably the most sure-fire perennial pro bowl player in this draft. Obviously nothing is guaranteed, but this is about as sure as it gets. Minkah at FS, with Peppers at SS? Would be a thing of beauty.

    3. Trade up ( anywhere from 7-12?) for Lamar Jackson, QB (We have too many draft picks. With all the young players on the team, there’s no way we’re drafting 12 players or whatever it is. Jackson’s college production speaks for itself. Easily the most athletic QB in the draft, has the arm strength to make all of the throws, but needs to work on his mechanics. Has a narrow base a lot of times, which effects his accuracy. 1-2 years behind Tyrod Taylor would give him time to adjust.)

    Now all of a sudden we have a QB who has proven capable of winning and taking his team to the playoffs. A solid CB to add to our group of youth. Another good DE to pair across from Garrett. And of course the infamous Pryor who had 1,000 in Hue Jackson’s system, without Josh Gordon.

    And in the draft, we get arguably the two best players in Barkley and Fitzpatrick, in addition to the QB with arguably the best upside, who will have time to sit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 23k Posts
      • 6k Reputation
      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I would argue that if you are not taking a QB with either of those first picks, you'd be better off taking Fitz 1st and Barkley 2nd if you insist it has to be those two. More likely that would be the order of the take, especially if the 2 in between are QB deprived. Fitz would be the more tempting to other teams IMO for exactly the reason you predict, most likely to be All-pro.

      A R 2 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • T TexasAg1969

        I would argue that if you are not taking a QB with either of those first picks, you'd be better off taking Fitz 1st and Barkley 2nd if you insist it has to be those two. More likely that would be the order of the take, especially if the 2 in between are QB deprived. Fitz would be the more tempting to other teams IMO for exactly the reason you predict, most likely to be All-pro.

        Adoug319 A One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 325 Posts
        • 46 Reputation
        A Adoug319 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @texasag1969 said:

        I would argue that if you are not taking a QB with either of those first picks, you'd be better off taking Fitz 1st and Barkley 2nd if you insist it has to be those two. More likely that would be the order of the take, especially if the 2 in between are QB deprived. Fitz would be the more tempting to other teams IMO for exactly the reason you predict, most likely to be All-pro.

        It’s tough because you don’t know what these teams are thinking, you’re right they’re both players teams want. The reason I went Barkley 1 and Minkah 4 is because the Colts have said they want an Edgerrin James, so they would probably take Barkley

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
          • 30k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
          #4

          The draft order should be determined by how unique the top player at each position is in the class, i.e., who separates himself the most from the field. While I don't know the DB class well, I can't see that player being Barkley.

          Otherwise...

          • Taylor is under contract through 2018.
          • Butler is interesting, but Trumaine Johnson won't be tagged again.
          • Pryor isn't a bad choice, but there a a ton of good, more accomplished WRs hitting UFA this off-season.
          • Lawrence would be a really good get, but I can't see him leaving DAL.
          "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
          gumby73G 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • T TexasAg1969

            I would argue that if you are not taking a QB with either of those first picks, you'd be better off taking Fitz 1st and Barkley 2nd if you insist it has to be those two. More likely that would be the order of the take, especially if the 2 in between are QB deprived. Fitz would be the more tempting to other teams IMO for exactly the reason you predict, most likely to be All-pro.

            RoyceRolls R
            • 1k Posts
            • 345 Reputation
            R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @texasag1969 said:

            I would argue that if you are not taking a QB with either of those first picks, you'd be better off taking Fitz 1st and Barkley 2nd if you insist it has to be those two. More likely that would be the order of the take, especially if the 2 in between are QB deprived. Fitz would be the more tempting to other teams IMO for exactly the reason you predict, most likely to be All-pro.

            To take it a step further, if there’s no QB being drafted at 1, trade down. Barkley is a beast, but there are a lot of very talented running backs coming out this year. The last thing the browns need to do is follow up 0-16 by being the first team to draft a rb at #1 overall in over 20 years, especially in a class with guys like Guice, Chubb, Love etc. History tells us that one of those second/third tier guys will perform almost as well or better than Barkley while cutting out the risk of using #1 overall on the position most likely to be injured.

            1 Reply Last reply
            👍
            Quote Reply
            • Tour2maT Tour2ma

              The draft order should be determined by how unique the top player at each position is in the class, i.e., who separates himself the most from the field. While I don't know the DB class well, I can't see that player being Barkley.

              Otherwise...

              • Taylor is under contract through 2018.
              • Butler is interesting, but Trumaine Johnson won't be tagged again.
              • Pryor isn't a bad choice, but there a a ton of good, more accomplished WRs hitting UFA this off-season.
              • Lawrence would be a really good get, but I can't see him leaving DAL.
              gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 11k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
              #6

              @tour2ma said:

              The draft order should be determined by how unique the top player at each position is in the class, i.e., who separates himself the most from the field, I can't see that player being Barkley.

              Agree. Barkley is ranked 28th in rushing yards this season behind 4 Qb's..This RB draft class should be stacked at 6 guys deep that won't separate much going pro..who had K.Hunt rushing over Joe Mixon? nobody,well maybe Dorsey😄

              Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • SkippinTurtles S Conversation Starter Dedicated First Post Collaborator One Year In Week One Done One Month Later
                • 436 Posts
                • 49 Reputation
                S SkippinTurtles wrote on last edited by SkippinTurtles
                #7

                Barkley is this drafts Myles Garrett.  A blue-chip position prototype.  Barkley is a full-sized Eric Metcalf.  A healthy Fred Taylor?  The next Marshall Faulk or Edgerrin James (we see you picking at #3 Colts).  Take him at #1 and don't look back.  Take Lamar Jackson at #4 and the backfield now has some serious athleticism and potential.  Throw in Josh Gordon and the next Triplets are born.

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • S SkippinTurtles

                  Barkley is this drafts Myles Garrett.  A blue-chip position prototype.  Barkley is a full-sized Eric Metcalf.  A healthy Fred Taylor?  The next Marshall Faulk or Edgerrin James (we see you picking at #3 Colts).  Take him at #1 and don't look back.  Take Lamar Jackson at #4 and the backfield now has some serious athleticism and potential.  Throw in Josh Gordon and the next Triplets are born.

                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 23k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @skippinturtles said:

                  Barkley is this drafts Myles Garrett.  A blue-chip position prototype.  Barkley is a full-sized Eric Metcalf.  A healthy Fred Taylor?  The next Marshall Faulk or Edgerrin James (we see you picking at #3 Colts).  Take him at #1 and don't look back.  Take Lamar Jackson at #4 and the backfield now has some serious athleticism and potential.  Throw in Josh Gordon and the next Triplets are born.

                  OMG-Please don't be Dorsey.😉

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  Theme
                  • System
                  • Light
                  • Dark
                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Forums
                  • Recent
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Donate