Skip to content

2018 Mock Drafts

The Browns Board
343 39 16.8k
  • @orion said:

    ...the thing is, QB's coming out of college are usually not prepared to play NFL football.

    Many times mechanics need to be tweaked on the rookie QB's.

    "Usually" means that some are prepared.

    You don't take a QB #1 overall who needs his mechanics "tweaked".

    I'm trying to think of an NFL starter whose mechanics were flawed coming out of college. Anyone?

    @tour2ma said:

    "Usually" means that some are prepared.

    You don't take a QB #1 overall who needs his mechanics "tweaked".

    I'm trying to think of an NFL starter whose mechanics were flawed coming out of college. Anyone?

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

  • @tour2ma said:

    "Usually" means that some are prepared.

    You don't take a QB #1 overall who needs his mechanics "tweaked".

    I'm trying to think of an NFL starter whose mechanics were flawed coming out of college. Anyone?

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    @mjp28 said:

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.  Unfortunately, injuries to his shoulder and elbow lowered his release even further to the extent it seemed like way too many passes were getting batted down.  It pretty much ended his tenure as starter.  It was nice to see him learn from a veteran (Danielson) the year Mack and Byner both rushed for over a 1000 yards apiece. Bernie ended up starting more than half his rookie year in 85, which was very sensible considering where this team was in 1984. Lindy Infante arrived in 1986; and the excitement of the Kardiac Kids returned.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.  I heard a former NFL scout on Tampa radio saying he thinks Lamar Jackson is way too conditioned to run as soon as he sees his first target of the progressions covered. It's been practiced and perfected to the extent it's practically an instinctive reaction to pressure.   He reminds me of a Blaine Gabbert with more fast twitchies.

  • Taking away the needs of a team  who would you say are the best 5 players in this draft irrespective of position ?

  • Taking away the needs of a team  who would you say are the best 5 players in this draft irrespective of position ?

    @darren15 said:

    Taking away the needs of a team  who would you say are the best 5 players in this draft irrespective of position ?

    Good question; but there's still a couple important All Star Games, Indy Combines and College Pro Days days that could put today's list into a blender.

  • I love how every QB prospect in this draft is a "sit and learn" prospect... except one.

    I'll take "the one."

    @tour2ma said:

    I love how every QB prospect in this draft is a "sit and learn" prospect... except one.

    I'll take "the one."

    I'm really concerned about Joe Thomas returning. I think he probably WANTS to, but he's not coming back unless he's confident he can play at a high level (obviously he didn't TELL me this, just a hunch). The injury he suffered was actually one of the worst ones because of the time and training it requires to come back from. He can't work out much of his upper body, and when he finally IS able to strengthen his injured arm, he's going to be starting from close to zero as I understand (from a tricep standpoint anyway). Building up that muscle is going to take a long time, and I'm not sure when he can even begin to do it. Just looking at Joe tells me he's lost about 25 pounds, and I'm officially worried about his return. Again, I think the desire is there, but a torn triceps is no joke. As many of you probably know, the triceps is a much larger muscle group than the biceps, and it's pivotal in "pushing" and bracing actions...something extremely important for OL. 

    I seriously feel that Joe Thomas believes in Hue Jackson, and I especially think he's dying to play with someone like Alex Smith (or comparable veteran) at QB. Heck, Joe openly talked about wanting Drew Brees on the Browns and said he wouldn't be surprised if Drew played for another team because he hasn't signed an extension with the Saints yet, and many veteran qb's switch teams at the end of their careers. Now I can't see THAT happening, but I would have to think that one of the overriding factors an older, veteran qb considers is the strength of a team's OL, and ours is pretty good. Again, it's a zillion to one it happens, but fun to dream about! 

  • Joe Thomas is weighing up if we can win a game next season then if he feels we can he might return and retire right after the win whatever week it is then he can say he went out on a high 🙂

  • @mjp28 said:

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.  Unfortunately, injuries to his shoulder and elbow lowered his release even further to the extent it seemed like way too many passes were getting batted down.  It pretty much ended his tenure as starter.  It was nice to see him learn from a veteran (Danielson) the year Mack and Byner both rushed for over a 1000 yards apiece. Bernie ended up starting more than half his rookie year in 85, which was very sensible considering where this team was in 1984. Lindy Infante arrived in 1986; and the excitement of the Kardiac Kids returned.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.  I heard a former NFL scout on Tampa radio saying he thinks Lamar Jackson is way too conditioned to run as soon as he sees his first target of the progressions covered. It's been practiced and perfected to the extent it's practically an instinctive reaction to pressure.   He reminds me of a Blaine Gabbert with more fast twitchies.

    @flugel said:

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.  Unfortunately, injuries to his shoulder and elbow lowered his release even further to the extent it seemed like way too many passes were getting batted down.  It pretty much ended his tenure as starter.  It was nice to see him learn from a veteran (Danielson) the year Mack and both both rushed for over a 1000 yards apiece. Bernie ended up starting more than half his rookie year in 85, which was very sensible considering where this team was in 1984. Lindy Infante arrived in 1986; and the excitement of the Kardiac Kids returned.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.  I heard a former NFL scout on Tampa radio saying he thinks Lamar Jackson is way too conditioned to run as soon as he sees his first target of the progressions covered. It's been practiced and perfected to the extent it's practically an instinctive reaction to pressure.   He reminds me of a Blaine Gabbert with more fast twitchies.

    Bernie also won a National Championship at the U and played several years there while Mark Tressman was there.

    He (and maybe more Model) basically snookered him away from everyone else to go to his team the BROWNS where they had an established OL (I heard once they hadn't drafted an OL in 10 years back during that era), Mack & Byner behind him, a really good receiving corp, a good defense.......did I leave anything out?

    Kosar & Kizer both have 5 letters and begin with K, that's about it. 

  • @flugel said:

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.  Unfortunately, injuries to his shoulder and elbow lowered his release even further to the extent it seemed like way too many passes were getting batted down.  It pretty much ended his tenure as starter.  It was nice to see him learn from a veteran (Danielson) the year Mack and both both rushed for over a 1000 yards apiece. Bernie ended up starting more than half his rookie year in 85, which was very sensible considering where this team was in 1984. Lindy Infante arrived in 1986; and the excitement of the Kardiac Kids returned.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.  I heard a former NFL scout on Tampa radio saying he thinks Lamar Jackson is way too conditioned to run as soon as he sees his first target of the progressions covered. It's been practiced and perfected to the extent it's practically an instinctive reaction to pressure.   He reminds me of a Blaine Gabbert with more fast twitchies.

    Bernie also won a National Championship at the U and played several years there while Mark Tressman was there.

    He (and maybe more Model) basically snookered him away from everyone else to go to his team the BROWNS where they had an established OL (I heard once they hadn't drafted an OL in 10 years back during that era), Mack & Byner behind him, a really good receiving corp, a good defense.......did I leave anything out?

    Kosar & Kizer both have 5 letters and begin with K, that's about it. 

    @mjp28 said:

    Bernie also won a National Championship at the U and played several years there while Mark Tressman was there.

    He (and maybe more Model) basically snookered him away from everyone else to go to his team the BROWNS where they had an established OL (I heard once they hadn't drafted an OL in 10 years back during that era), Mack & Byner behind him, a really good receiving corp, a good defense.......did I leave anything out?

    Kosar & Kizer both have 5 letters and begin with K, that's about it. 

    The moves to get Kosar were primarily engineered by Ernie Accorsi I believe.  Art would not have had the acumen to make those moves.

  • Even if Thomas returns for his 12th season, the Browns should use one of their five picks in Rounds 1 and 2 to draft his eventual replacement.

  • @tour2ma said:

    "Usually" means that some are prepared.

    You don't take a QB #1 overall who needs his mechanics "tweaked".

    I'm trying to think of an NFL starter whose mechanics were flawed coming out of college. Anyone?

    Almost every QB out of college needs their footwork, or weight transfer, or where the hold the ball while in the pocket, or something tweaked.  Bernie had to come over the top more out of college.

    Apparently Joe Thomas wants Drew Brees to come on over.  (how cute)  -  Who can blame him for wanting a QB to play at a high lever Right Now?!

    We're in this endless loop of wondering who our starting QB will be next year, thing.  (Please get me the top rated QB with the best mechanics with pick #1......tall drink of water, preferably)   -  After that, we need a free safety, WR, CB, RB, OT....one of those should be there for us at #4.  Then we go to the top of round two with a couple more chances to attach the list of FS, WR, CB, RB, OT.  Maybe something like last year happens and we wind up back into round 1 for a third pick

    I have FS very high on my draft list because I hate that we play Peppers out in the Hinterlands because of our lack of a FS.  But all else equal, if an offensive player is available...draft offense...our offense cannot be allowed to be horrible any more!

    Still waiting for a name...

    @orion said:

    Almost every QB out of college needs their footwork, or weight transfer, or where the hold the ball while in the pocket, or something tweaked.  Bernie had to come over the top more out of college.

    Bernie raised his release point? Flug disagrees... and so do I.

    @mjp28 said:

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    So... 2 QBs overcame flaws, which is not the same as corrected them.

    How'd that footwork clean up go for Sanchez and Gabbert?

    Decision-making? Just a non-specific catch-all phrase for any QB with turnover issues.

    @flugel said:

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.

    Pretty much bad anything, Flugs.

    I remember when we drafted Couch and Chris Palmer said, '... all we have to do is clean up his mechanics a little bit." And I said, "Oh sh!t..."

  • Still waiting for a name...

    @orion said:

    Almost every QB out of college needs their footwork, or weight transfer, or where the hold the ball while in the pocket, or something tweaked.  Bernie had to come over the top more out of college.

    Bernie raised his release point? Flug disagrees... and so do I.

    @mjp28 said:

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    So... 2 QBs overcame flaws, which is not the same as corrected them.

    How'd that footwork clean up go for Sanchez and Gabbert?

    Decision-making? Just a non-specific catch-all phrase for any QB with turnover issues.

    @flugel said:

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.

    Pretty much bad anything, Flugs.

    I remember when we drafted Couch and Chris Palmer said, '... all we have to do is clean up his mechanics a little bit." And I said, "Oh sh!t..."

    @tour2ma said:

    Bernie raised his release point? Flug disagrees... and so do I.

    @mjp28 said:

    Nope, He never lost his ability to sling it around a DLineman.

  • Still waiting for a name...

    @orion said:

    Almost every QB out of college needs their footwork, or weight transfer, or where the hold the ball while in the pocket, or something tweaked.  Bernie had to come over the top more out of college.

    Bernie raised his release point? Flug disagrees... and so do I.

    @mjp28 said:

    I remembered this FWIW RIvers and Stafford, found Sanchez and Gabbert also. I believe good quarterback gurus can help. Now #1 quarterbacks? 

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1402977-breaking-down-phillip-rivers-matthew-stafford-nfls-most-mechanically-flawed

    The good news about mechanical flaws is that they can be corrected, and in some cases—like Rivers and Stafford—quarterbacks can overcome their flaws on their way to being highly productive franchise quarterbacks.

    For Sanchez and Gabbert, the arm talent is there; they just have to clean up their footwork and decision-making.

    So... 2 QBs overcame flaws, which is not the same as corrected them.

    How'd that footwork clean up go for Sanchez and Gabbert?

    Decision-making? Just a non-specific catch-all phrase for any QB with turnover issues.

    @flugel said:

    Kosar didn't do too bad either.  I'm glad our coaches never tried to Dr Frankenstein away his unique delivery.

    IMO, cleaning up bad footwork that was practiced and perfected for the length of time starting in college makes NFL intervention almost unrealistic.

    Pretty much bad anything, Flugs.

    I remember when we drafted Couch and Chris Palmer said, '... all we have to do is clean up his mechanics a little bit." And I said, "Oh sh!t..."

    @tour2ma said:

    Still waiting for a name...

    Any Tackle not from Florida State Uckiversity😛 Edit--got a name for ya..watching Shrine Bowl, worked for steelers with Villa so.., am watching this Brett Toth from Army playing LT..He's signed up for Senior Bowl also..Ox strong, ranked 5th in run block, check,check at second level..no pass pro issues, yet..  

  • We talk about next years team and next year's draft at the end of November. We (me especially) have to post ridiculous topics because there is nothing to talk about Browns-wise.

    I'll tell you the real fukced up thing about being a Browns fan................When the biggest names of free agency come available, we speculate, imagine, hope, and analyze, BUT........we never acquire top veteran talent. Why even talk about Cousins,or Garrapolo? The Browns are never going to be in play for these type players. They cause us to not be $60 million under the cap, and THAT is what gives Haslam a tossed salad.

    Really, this franchise sucks big black ghetto Dik. 

  • 🥷

  • This thread is two months late.😆

  • Draft talk started in September 2017 for the April 2018 draft. Pro football season lasts about 2 or 3 weeks around here anymore. Thanks Jimmy!

  • Really, this franchise sucks big black ghetto Dik.

    You have a lot of personal up close knowledge on that subject?

  • @gumby73 said:

    https://nflspinzone.com/2018/01/22/cleveland-browns-7-round-2018-mock-draft-vol-4/  There's a new Baker in Town..😮

    I guess anyone can work at NFL Spin zone. Even a guy who huffs gasoline.

  • We talk about next years team and next year's draft at the end of November. We (me especially) have to post ridiculous topics because there is nothing to talk about Browns-wise.

    I'll tell you the real fukced up thing about being a Browns fan................When the biggest names of free agency come available, we speculate, imagine, hope, and analyze, BUT........we never acquire top veteran talent. Why even talk about Cousins,or Garrapolo? The Browns are never going to be in play for these type players. They cause us to not be $60 million under the cap, and THAT is what gives Haslam a tossed salad.

    Really, this franchise sucks big black ghetto Dik. 

    @ghoolie said:

    We talk about next years team and next year's draft at the end of November. We (me especially) have to post ridiculous topics because there is nothing to talk about Browns-wise.

    I'll tell you the real fukced up thing about being a Browns fan................When the biggest names of free agency come available, we speculate, imagine, hope, and analyze, BUT........we never acquire top veteran talent. Why even talk about Cousins,or Garrapolo? The Browns are never going to be in play for these type players. They cause us to not be $60 million under the cap, and THAT is what gives Haslam a tossed salad.

    Really, this franchise sucks big black ghetto Dik. 

    whats worse is draft season we all look at the top players who we could draft and they do the opposite