The memo
-
-
I'll give the Trumpette's points for being steadfast in their defense of the Donald but not for loyalty. Bannon was a big reason Trump got elected. He was that crafty "outsider" and at the same time a friggin' scumbag but hey now that he isn't of use to the Donald we can all agree he is a scumbag.
That's funny!
-
-
I don't think anyone is disputing the contents of the memo. I'd wager some have issue with a partisan "memo" being treated as unreacted fact.
LOL! If that is the summary then it is obviously a flawed, partisan document. Another lie of omission and "creative" evaluation.
-
-
I don't think anyone is disputing the contents of the memo. I'd wager some have issue with a partisan "memo" being treated as unreacted fact.
LOL! If that is the summary then it is obviously a flawed, partisan document. Another lie of omission and "creative" evaluation.
LOL! If that is the summary then it is obviously a flawed, partisan document. Another lie of omission and "creative" evaluation.
Remember when Trump said he was being wiretapped and the Dems thought he was full of sh!t?
Looks like he was right once again.
-
leave it to the leftists to complain that the FBI had become "partisan"
as if the politicisation of the agency by the same had turned on them
so sorry sally.
but like obama said, git in the back seat
-
I don't think anyone is disputing the contents of the memo. I'd wager some have issue with a partisan "memo" being treated as unreacted fact.
LOL! If that is the summary then it is obviously a flawed, partisan document. Another lie of omission and "creative" evaluation.
LOL! If that is the summary then it is obviously a flawed, partisan document. Another lie of omission and "creative" evaluation.
When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit..
-
leave it to the leftists to complain that the FBI had become "partisan"
as if the politicisation of the agency by the same had turned on them
so sorry sally.
but like obama said, git in the back seat
leave it to the leftists to complain that the FBI had become "partisan"
as if the politicisation of the agency by the same had turned on them
so sorry sally.
but like obama said, git in the back seat
Leave to those who have lost their moral compass to accept a lie because it agrees with them. The lie is that the FBI along with all those Republicans like Comey on have been out to get Trump. And yet the Dems blame Comey for siding with Trump by reopening the Clinton investigation just before the election. Somehow the Liar in Chief forgot that and then decided that the FBI was actually out to get him despite liking the fact that Comey's actions helped him get elected. So what is it that the Liar in Chief is hiding that he is so desperate to create that second lie? It's the f'n investigation. He knows what there is to be found. And anyone supporting him helps him continue by accepting two thoughts at once that are contradictory.
-
bs. they were out to get him - that's a fact. it isn't the entire fbi - it's the obamao deep state loyalists in our gov.Comey had NO CHOICE but to open the investigation on clinton - but did it early enough to end it just in time to say she was completely innocent of all charges. Said memo to that effect, was drawn up before the investigation ever began.
The help higgardly, ruin Trump fix was in. Now, who helped dirty comey write that memo about higgardly being "investigated"?the disgraced peter strzok, that's who. who "interviewed" higgardly NOT UNDER OATH, haha, ?
Liberals hate links - unless they don't have facts in them.
-
leave it to the leftists to complain that the FBI had become "partisan"
as if the politicisation of the agency by the same had turned on them
so sorry sally.
but like obama said, git in the back seat
Leave to those who have lost their moral compass to accept a lie because it agrees with them. The lie is that the FBI along with all those Republicans like Comey on have been out to get Trump. And yet the Dems blame Comey for siding with Trump by reopening the Clinton investigation just before the election. Somehow the Liar in Chief forgot that and then decided that the FBI was actually out to get him despite liking the fact that Comey's actions helped him get elected. So what is it that the Liar in Chief is hiding that he is so desperate to create that second lie? It's the f'n investigation. He knows what there is to be found. And anyone supporting him helps him continue by accepting two thoughts at once that are contradictory.
Leave to those who have lost their moral compass to accept a lie because it agrees with them. The lie is that the FBI along with all those Republicans like Comey on have been out to get Trump. And yet the Dems blame Comey for siding with Trump by reopening the Clinton investigation just before the election. Somehow the Liar in Chief forgot that and then decided that the FBI was actually out to get him despite liking the fact that Comey's actions helped him get elected. So what is it that the Liar in Chief is hiding that he is so desperate to create that second lie? It's the f'n investigation. He knows what there is to be found. And anyone supporting him helps him continue by accepting two thoughts at once that are contradictory.
what lie? so the last year and some change is all just a misunderstanding?
seems like the lie you speak of is the last card in the deck of deceit you guys deploy!
and what moral compass as being out in the open or hidden in back rooms away from the public?
as if the refreshing transparency of a flawed individual can rise above the moral indignation of liberal hypocrisy?
Like Durbin and Shumer never listened to Patrick Leahey swear in the senate chambers... give me a break
and how convenient that the dems turn on comey for his unexplainable 11th hour interference with hrc campaign
when we all can see the futile spin aka damage control that they presented us with then and now with the memo!
you just gotta face it - it dont look good for you guys
-
Leave to those who have lost their moral compass to accept a lie because it agrees with them. The lie is that the FBI along with all those Republicans like Comey on have been out to get Trump. And yet the Dems blame Comey for siding with Trump by reopening the Clinton investigation just before the election. Somehow the Liar in Chief forgot that and then decided that the FBI was actually out to get him despite liking the fact that Comey's actions helped him get elected. So what is it that the Liar in Chief is hiding that he is so desperate to create that second lie? It's the f'n investigation. He knows what there is to be found. And anyone supporting him helps him continue by accepting two thoughts at once that are contradictory.
what lie? so the last year and some change is all just a misunderstanding?
seems like the lie you speak of is the last card in the deck of deceit you guys deploy!
and what moral compass as being out in the open or hidden in back rooms away from the public?
as if the refreshing transparency of a flawed individual can rise above the moral indignation of liberal hypocrisy?
Like Durbin and Shumer never listened to Patrick Leahey swear in the senate chambers... give me a break
and how convenient that the dems turn on comey for his unexplainable 11th hour interference with hrc campaign
when we all can see the futile spin aka damage control that they presented us with then and now with the memo!
you just gotta face it - it dont look good for you guys
what lie? so the last year and some change is all just a misunderstanding?
seems like the lie you speak of is the last card in the deck of deceit you guys deploy!
and what moral compass as being out in the open or hidden in back rooms away from the public?
as if the refreshing transparency of a flawed individual can rise above the moral indignation of liberal hypocrisy?
Like Durbin and Shumer never listened to Patrick Leahey swear in the senate chambers... give me a break
and how convenient that the dems turn on comey for his unexplainable 11th hour interference with hrc campaign
when we all can see the futile spin aka damage control that they presented us with then and now with the memo!
you just gotta face it - it dont look good for you guys
Here is the bottom line for me for anyone who is looking at what is going on from either side.
Start with your own moral compass. Examine it in depth (what is it, where did it come from, is it there for you to use on all occasions, etc.?) and decide for yourselves whether it is able to function well in looking at all people involved. Does it get put on hold just because you like what you are hearing from one more than another? Does it stay to true north for you at all times? When it comes to taking one person's word over another, where does it point to? And what happens when you hear two contradictory thoughts from the same source?
That's my point. Use your own moral compass and apply it without losing sight of the basis from which you view all things. Forget whether or not you like to hear someone agree with you. Ask yourself rather do they always pass the smell test from your own moral compass.
And one more time for those who keep writing off what I say, I am not "you guys". I am a conservative guy with a Goldwater upbringing who has and always will be an independent thinker. The basis of my thinking always starts from my own moral compass of integrity which comes from both of my parents up through multiple generations. If I give you my word it only requires looking me in the eye. There are very few politicians from either side that pass my standards. The Clintons and the Trump/Nunes couple are tied for the bottom.
-
And yet you voted for Hillary Clinton?
-
-
"There was collusion after all, you bet. The collusion was between the Comey FBI, the Obama Justice Department and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
"There was collusion after all, you bet. The collusion was between the Comey FBI, the Obama Justice Department and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
this is EXACTLY true. I believe, now, that this whole fake investigation of phoney Trump collusion is the democratic deep state KGB way of covering their butts - say the other country/party is guilty of something, because you need to keep the fact that it is actually YOU that did it.....a secret.
Like north korea saying we are guilty of being a country that violates civil rights of people. It's emotional manipulation - a warped, completely corrupt psychological defense mechanism.
-
And yet you voted for Hillary Clinton?
And yet you voted for Hillary Clinton?
How many times have I explained that in this state you could not write in who you want, but could only vote for him or Hillarity? In the past we could do write-ins and when McCain ran he got my vote. I saw Trump as a total Russian sellout and a dangerous, ignorant man when it came to foreign policy. And anyone the Russians so clearly wanted was they person I would vote against in a forced choice situation. I have never ended my animosity to anything Russian or anyone siding with them through a wink and a nod. I trust them about as far as I can throw the Chinese. We would have been far better off with Lindsey Graham this time around.
-
And yet you voted for Hillary Clinton?
How many times have I explained that in this state you could not write in who you want, but could only vote for him or Hillarity? In the past we could do write-ins and when McCain ran he got my vote. I saw Trump as a total Russian sellout and a dangerous, ignorant man when it came to foreign policy. And anyone the Russians so clearly wanted was they person I would vote against in a forced choice situation. I have never ended my animosity to anything Russian or anyone siding with them through a wink and a nod. I trust them about as far as I can throw the Chinese. We would have been far better off with Lindsey Graham this time around.
How many times have I explained that in this state you could not write in who you want, but could only vote for him or Hillarity? In the past we could do write-ins and when McCain ran he got my vote. I saw Trump as a total Russian sellout and a dangerous, ignorant man when it came to foreign policy. And anyone the Russians so clearly wanted was they person I would vote against in a forced choice situation. I have never ended my animosity to anything Russian or anyone siding with them through a wink and a nod. I trust them about as far as I can throw the Chinese. We would have been far better off with Lindsey Graham this time around.
Write-in ballots are accepted in the state of Texas if a candidate has registered himself for that purpose. Was there no one registered in Texas? I actually don't know. I could probably look it up.
WSS
-
Here we go. So you like Hillary better than all 13 of these guys. Fair enough.
http://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/tx-will-only-count-these-13-write-in-candidates
WSS
-
Here we go. So you like Hillary better than all 13 of these guys. Fair enough.
http://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/tx-will-only-count-these-13-write-in-candidates
WSS
Here we go. So you like Hillary better than all 13 of these guys. Fair enough.
http://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/tx-will-only-count-these-13-write-in-candidates
WSS
See what I mean? You see anyone there? I didn't and they sure did not advertise you could write in on the electronic ballot that I could recall.
EDIT: When I looked for write ins I did not know ahead of time that you could not longer just write in who you wanted, but only one of those 13 whom I knew nothing about. It was not made clear ahead of the voting that you would be constrained to those 13. Obviously my guy McCain was not there. That is who I wanted to write in.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login