Superbowl Traditions?
-
Seven actually.....he appeared in 11 title games.
11?
-
Seven actually.....he appeared in 11 title games.
11?
11?
Actually 10 winning 7. . 46/47/48/49/50/51/52/53/54/55. I was thinking that he was also in the 1957 title game, but he was not. Milt Plum and Tommy O'Connell share time in that game. Not sure which one started.....neither played worth shite.
Passing, Rushing, & Receiving
Passing Rushing Receiving Fumbles Player Tm Cmp Att Yds TD Int Sk Yds Lng Rate Att Yds TD Lng Rec Yds TD Lng Fmb FL Milt Plum CLE 5 12 51 0 2 0 0 18 14.9 3 46 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Tommy O'Connell CLE 4 8 61 0 2 0 0 19 35.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
11?
Actually 10 winning 7. . 46/47/48/49/50/51/52/53/54/55. I was thinking that he was also in the 1957 title game, but he was not. Milt Plum and Tommy O'Connell share time in that game. Not sure which one started.....neither played worth shite.
Passing, Rushing, & Receiving
Passing Rushing Receiving Fumbles Player Tm Cmp Att Yds TD Int Sk Yds Lng Rate Att Yds TD Lng Rec Yds TD Lng Fmb FL Milt Plum CLE 5 12 51 0 2 0 0 18 14.9 3 46 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Tommy O'Connell CLE 4 8 61 0 2 0 0 19 35.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Actually 10 winning 7. . 46/47/48/49/50/51/52/53/54/55. I was thinking that he was also in the 1957 title game, but he was not. Milt Plum and Tommy O'Connell share time in that game. Not sure which one started.....neither played worth shite.
Passing, Rushing, & Receiving
Passing Rushing Receiving Fumbles Player Tm Cmp Att Yds TD Int Sk Yds Lng Rate Att Yds TD Lng Rec Yds TD Lng Fmb FL Milt Plum CLE 5 12 51 0 2 0 0 18 14.9 3 46 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Tommy O'Connell CLE 4 8 61 0 2 0 0 19 35.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oh good - I thought I had lost my mind or something!
-
Actually 10 winning 7. . 46/47/48/49/50/51/52/53/54/55. I was thinking that he was also in the 1957 title game, but he was not. Milt Plum and Tommy O'Connell share time in that game. Not sure which one started.....neither played worth shite.
Passing, Rushing, & Receiving
Passing Rushing Receiving Fumbles Player Tm Cmp Att Yds TD Int Sk Yds Lng Rate Att Yds TD Lng Rec Yds TD Lng Fmb FL Milt Plum CLE 5 12 51 0 2 0 0 18 14.9 3 46 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 Tommy O'Connell CLE 4 8 61 0 2 0 0 19 35.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oh good - I thought I had lost my mind or something!
Oh good - I thought I had lost my mind or something!
-
Give it time you will.
-
Give it time you will.
-
The '57 game was a massacre...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
The '57 game was a massacre...
The Lions have absolutely owned the Browns since they entered the NFL to today. Weird, considering how mediocre they've been for almost that entire time period post-1950s
-
The Lions have absolutely owned the Browns since they entered the NFL to today. Weird, considering how mediocre they've been for almost that entire time period post-1950s
Yes, very weird. As I have noted previously....it was never the Steelers that became the Browns primary rivalry until like the late 60s. It was always the Lions....based on meeting up in 4 NFL title games. Beyond that, as the crow flies, Cleveland and Detroit are actually closer than Cleveland and Pittsburgh from a geographical standpoint. Driving miles is a bit longer due to the necessity of going around the west end of Lake Erie...but that WAS the rivalry.. The Browns move to the AFC put a dagger in the heart of that rivalry.
-
The Lions have absolutely owned the Browns since they entered the NFL to today. Weird, considering how mediocre they've been for almost that entire time period post-1950s
Yes, very weird. As I have noted previously....it was never the Steelers that became the Browns primary rivalry until like the late 60s. It was always the Lions....based on meeting up in 4 NFL title games. Beyond that, as the crow flies, Cleveland and Detroit are actually closer than Cleveland and Pittsburgh from a geographical standpoint. Driving miles is a bit longer due to the necessity of going around the west end of Lake Erie...but that WAS the rivalry.. The Browns move to the AFC put a dagger in the heart of that rivalry.
Yes, very weird. As I have noted previously....it was never the Steelers that became the Browns primary rivalry until like the late 60s. It was always the Lions....based on meeting up in 4 NFL title games. Beyond that, as the crow flies, Cleveland and Detroit are actually closer than Cleveland and Pittsburgh from a geographical standpoint. Driving miles is a bit longer due to the necessity of going around the west end of Lake Erie...but that WAS the rivalry.. The Browns move to the AFC put a dagger in the heart of that rivalry.
Also the NY Giants, had a good rivalry from the get-go in 1950 with them into the early 60s...
It's probably a good thing the Browns aren't in the NFC North considering their track record with the Lions AND the Packers.
-
a/k/a a computer monitor...
I remember my first color TV was a 21 inch Sony and I thought it was Shmucking huge.
-
I remember my first color TV was a 21 inch Sony and I thought it was Shmucking huge.
In my apartment while going to school a used B&W 19" piece o junk. In my first house after graduation a Magnavox 21" color set we played PONG on......big stuff!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login