Monday Morning QB...
-
You guys forget Philly's missed XP and then their failed 2 point conversion?
No, I hadn't, just was clarified. But that 2 point conversion isn't special teams
No, I hadn't, just was clarified. But that 2 point conversion isn't special teams
Isn't it? Do they consider a 2 pt. try an offensive play....or a special teams play? Just curious.
-
Isn't it? Do they consider a 2 pt. try an offensive play....or a special teams play? Just curious.
It doesn't count in stats, but your offense is out there.
-
Isn't it? Do they consider a 2 pt. try an offensive play....or a special teams play? Just curious.
It doesn't count in stats, but your offense is out there.
It doesn't count in stats, but your offense is out there.
Does it count in Special Teams stats? I assume they keep those, no?
-
Does it count in Special Teams stats? I assume they keep those, no?
No. Only special teams stats thst would be kept is kicking and returning. The yardage from a 2 pt play isn't factored into anything
-
Does it count in Special Teams stats? I assume they keep those, no?
No. Only special teams stats thst would be kept is kicking and returning. The yardage from a 2 pt play isn't factored into anything
No. Only special teams stats thst would be kept is kicking and returning. The yardage from a 2 pt play isn't factored into anything
OK....Except, of course...most importantly...the score!!🥷
-
OK....Except, of course...most importantly...the score!!🥷
Neither is the yardage on an EP kick.
-
You guys forget Philly's missed XP and then their failed 2 point conversion?
Failed 2 point and the uncalled PI?
-
The irony of the QB thing is it was a QB that contemplated retirement 2 years ago (Foles) against a 40 year old QB (Brady) who performed his way to a League MVP honor. The guy who got supported better by his Defense and his STs - got the 8 point victory. Having a HC with the grapefruits in groin to go for it inside his own 50 on 4th down and go for a TD instead of a FG at the 1 put an adorable tuxedo on Foles' Cindafeller story!
Having a HC with the grapefruits in groin to go for it inside his own 50 on 4th down and go for a TD instead of a FG at the 1 put an adorable tuxedo on Foles' Cindafeller story!
I think this is the most underreported storyline... I think we have a new HC-Sheriff in town and his name is Pederson.
The Eagles were very well prepared... at least the equal of the Pats in this regard. Not something we've said about many Pat opponents in recent years. One key seemed to be matching up Jenkins on the Pat RBs to minimize their impact in the Pat passing attack. One other, the extensive use of the RPO, was not news, but was key.
Other misc. musings...
- Nice to see my original Darkhorse QB come in from the cold... and...
- It doesn't hurt that Foles also gave my "Don't anoint Wentz just yet" stance a significant boost.
- I don't know if the low number of penalties was due to the quality of the teams or a league decision to have the Refs swallow their whistles, but overall it was a welcome change. There were a couple egregious holds let go (one on Kelce early in particular), but still overall... welcome. They let the players play.
- Great no call on the Eagles KO of Cooks. Clearly a runner... also...
- As much as I agree on the review decision on Ertz's go-ahead TD, I can't help but believe that were he blasted by a Safety as he launched for the GL a "Defenseless Receiver flag" would have been thrown.
- On the other hand not overturning Clements TD non-catch was one of the worst reviews of the season.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Having a HC with the grapefruits in groin to go for it inside his own 50 on 4th down and go for a TD instead of a FG at the 1 put an adorable tuxedo on Foles' Cindafeller story!
I think this is the most underreported storyline... I think we have a new HC-Sheriff in town and his name is Pederson.
The Eagles were very well prepared... at least the equal of the Pats in this regard. Not something we've said about many Pat opponents in recent years. One key seemed to be matching up Jenkins on the Pat RBs to minimize their impact in the Pat passing attack. One other, the extensive use of the RPO, was not news, but was key.
Other misc. musings...
- Nice to see my original Darkhorse QB come in from the cold... and...
- It doesn't hurt that Foles also gave my "Don't anoint Wentz just yet" stance a significant boost.
- I don't know if the low number of penalties was due to the quality of the teams or a league decision to have the Refs swallow their whistles, but overall it was a welcome change. There were a couple egregious holds let go (one on Kelce early in particular), but still overall... welcome. They let the players play.
- Great no call on the Eagles KO of Cooks. Clearly a runner... also...
- As much as I agree on the review decision on Ertz's go-ahead TD, I can't help but believe that were he blasted by a Safety as he launched for the GL a "Defenseless Receiver flag" would have been thrown.
- On the other hand not overturning Clements TD non-catch was one of the worst reviews of the season.
I think this is the most underreported storyline... I think we have a new HC-Sheriff in town and his name is Pederson.
The Eagles were very well prepared... at least the equal of the Pats in this regard. Not something we've said about many Pat opponents in recent years. One key seemed to be matching up Jenkins on the Pat RBs to minimize their impact in the Pat passing attack. One other, the extensive use of the RPO, was not news, but was key.
Other misc. musings...
- Nice to see my original Darkhorse QB come in from the cold... and...
- It doesn't hurt that Foles also gave my "Don't anoint Wentz just yet" stance a significant boost.
- I don't know if the low number of penalties was due to the quality of the teams or a league decision to have the Refs swallow their whistles, but overall it was a welcome change. There were a couple egregious holds let go (one on Kelce early in particular), but still overall... welcome. They let the players play.
- Great no call on the Eagles KO of Cooks. Clearly a runner... also...
- As much as I agree on the review decision on Ertz's go-ahead TD, I can't help but believe that were he blasted by a Safety as he launched for the GL a "Defenseless Receiver flag" would have been thrown.
- On the other hand not overturning Clements TD non-catch was one of the worst reviews of the season.
Cooks had obviously turned into a runner, but helmet to helmet is still a penalty. It's just called differently. The announcers said it wrong as well
-
I think this is the most underreported storyline... I think we have a new HC-Sheriff in town and his name is Pederson.
The Eagles were very well prepared... at least the equal of the Pats in this regard. Not something we've said about many Pat opponents in recent years. One key seemed to be matching up Jenkins on the Pat RBs to minimize their impact in the Pat passing attack. One other, the extensive use of the RPO, was not news, but was key.
Other misc. musings...
- Nice to see my original Darkhorse QB come in from the cold... and...
- It doesn't hurt that Foles also gave my "Don't anoint Wentz just yet" stance a significant boost.
- I don't know if the low number of penalties was due to the quality of the teams or a league decision to have the Refs swallow their whistles, but overall it was a welcome change. There were a couple egregious holds let go (one on Kelce early in particular), but still overall... welcome. They let the players play.
- Great no call on the Eagles KO of Cooks. Clearly a runner... also...
- As much as I agree on the review decision on Ertz's go-ahead TD, I can't help but believe that were he blasted by a Safety as he launched for the GL a "Defenseless Receiver flag" would have been thrown.
- On the other hand not overturning Clements TD non-catch was one of the worst reviews of the season.
Cooks had obviously turned into a runner, but helmet to helmet is still a penalty. It's just called differently. The announcers said it wrong as well
Cooks had obviously turned into a runner, but helmet to helmet is still a penalty. It's just called differently. The announcers said it wrong as well
Fell under the exception to the rule... as apparently does every contact to and by a runner. Has it ever been called?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Fell under the exception to the rule... as apparently does every contact to and by a runner. Has it ever been called?
I'm not understanding your question. What I am saying is there is hit to a defenseless player and then can be helmet to helmet contact on someone who has established as a runner. And sure it has been called
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login