Skip to content

Russians charged over US 2016 election tampering

Political Discussion
98 15 2.1k
  • @texasag1969 said:

    No cal. She ain't the prez.

    No she wasn’t the Prez, but she was a high ranking government official that benefited financially from a deal with the Russians.

    If you can look past that, but continue to rail against Trump your political bias is showing.

    @canton-dawg said:

    No she wasn’t the Prez, but she was a high ranking government official that benefited financially from a deal with the Russians.

    If you can look past that, but continue to rail against Trump your political bias is showing.

    Just to address that and get back to the present.

    Uranium One merits it's own special counsel as a separate issue. Prosecute all the bastards who've dipped into Russian pockets. 

    Now go back to the MOST PRESSING ISSUE: We're in a war with 'em with a president who is paralyzed for whatever the reason.

  • Funny how the hatred of our great President Trump clouds the eyes of the Progressives to anything negative about crooked Hillary, Obama, etc.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Funny how the hatred of our great President Trump clouds the eyes of the Progressives to anything negative about crooked Hillary, Obama, etc.

    Did my answer above address that well enough? Go after anyone who slept with the bastards for money.

    EDIT: Watergate had one major lesson: Follow the money. Apply it to all of them regardless of party affiliation.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Funny how the hatred of our great President Trump clouds the eyes of the Progressives to anything negative about crooked Hillary, Obama, etc.

    Did my answer above address that well enough? Go after anyone who slept with the bastards for money.

    EDIT: Watergate had one major lesson: Follow the money. Apply it to all of them regardless of party affiliation.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Did my answer above address that well enough? Go after anyone who slept with the bastards for money.

    But that doesn't look like it's the goal of the investigation does it? I mean really it's pretty obvious she did. And even though it's pretty vague what the accusations are against the Russians as far as interfering ( which clearly involves both parties) goes has anyone heard a specific charge? 

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Did my answer above address that well enough? Go after anyone who slept with the bastards for money.

    But that doesn't look like it's the goal of the investigation does it? I mean really it's pretty obvious she did. And even though it's pretty vague what the accusations are against the Russians as far as interfering ( which clearly involves both parties) goes has anyone heard a specific charge? 

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But that doesn't look like it's the goal of the investigation does it? I mean really it's pretty obvious she did. And even though it's pretty vague what the accusations are against the Russians as far as interfering ( which clearly involves both parties) goes has anyone heard a specific charge? 

    WSS

    That was not part of the scope of his charge. That is also why I said Uranium One merits it's own special counsel IMO.

    But the priority is saving this democracy from the more imminent and present threat of continued Russian operations against us. Only one man can assure that is happening and if he can't do it because of his own involvement, throw him out.

  • Anyone know where Tour went off too?  Haven't seen a post from him in awhile.  

  • @westside-steve said:

    But that doesn't look like it's the goal of the investigation does it? I mean really it's pretty obvious she did. And even though it's pretty vague what the accusations are against the Russians as far as interfering ( which clearly involves both parties) goes has anyone heard a specific charge? 

    WSS

    That was not part of the scope of his charge. That is also why I said Uranium One merits it's own special counsel IMO.

    But the priority is saving this democracy from the more imminent and present threat of continued Russian operations against us. Only one man can assure that is happening and if he can't do it because of his own involvement, throw him out.

    @texasag1969 said:

    That was not part of the scope of his charge. That is also why I said Uranium One merits it's own special counsel IMO.

    But the priority is saving this democracy from the more imminent and present threat of continued Russian operations against us. Only one man can assure that is happening and if he can't do it because of his own involvement, throw him out.

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    That was not part of the scope of his charge. That is also why I said Uranium One merits it's own special counsel IMO.

    But the priority is saving this democracy from the more imminent and present threat of continued Russian operations against us. Only one man can assure that is happening and if he can't do it because of his own involvement, throw him out.

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

    It does not just go back to pre-election. That's the whole point. Only Trump is claiming that now. The best is yet to come. Popcorn goes up in value as this thing unfolds. Folks need to start watching more than Foxnews if you want any inkling of what's about to happen.

    EDIT: And the longer Trump goes without punishing the Russians, the more it looks like collusion and obstruction of justice. Eventually I suspect that is where Mueller takes this.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    That was not part of the scope of his charge. That is also why I said Uranium One merits it's own special counsel IMO.

    But the priority is saving this democracy from the more imminent and present threat of continued Russian operations against us. Only one man can assure that is happening and if he can't do it because of his own involvement, throw him out.

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

    8EE92219-ED90-4A81-9C4E-6C931E7CC328.jpeg

  • @westside-steve said:

    But if it goes back to pre-election the president was not Donald Trump. By your logic someone else would be responsible and deserving of punishment, right?

    WSS

    It does not just go back to pre-election. That's the whole point. Only Trump is claiming that now. The best is yet to come. Popcorn goes up in value as this thing unfolds. Folks need to start watching more than Foxnews if you want any inkling of what's about to happen.

    EDIT: And the longer Trump goes without punishing the Russians, the more it looks like collusion and obstruction of justice. Eventually I suspect that is where Mueller takes this.

    @texasag1969 said:

    It does not just go back to pre-election. That's the whole point. Only Trump is claiming that now. The best is yet to come. Popcorn goes up in value as this thing unfolds. Folks need to start watching more than Foxnews if you want any inkling of what's about to happen.

    EDIT: And the longer Trump goes without punishing the Russians, the more it looks like collusion and obstruction of justice. Eventually I suspect that is where Mueller takes this.

    dream on. Three years from now it will be "they are going to get Trump because he won the election yet"

    truth, the mueller indictments are proof that the whole Trump collusion thing is a witch hunt fake.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/02/17/new-mueller-indictment-completely-undermines-liberal-trump-russia-collusion-narrative-heres-how

  • @texasag1969 said:

    It does not just go back to pre-election. That's the whole point. Only Trump is claiming that now. The best is yet to come. Popcorn goes up in value as this thing unfolds. Folks need to start watching more than Foxnews if you want any inkling of what's about to happen.

    EDIT: And the longer Trump goes without punishing the Russians, the more it looks like collusion and obstruction of justice. Eventually I suspect that is where Mueller takes this.

    dream on. Three years from now it will be "they are going to get Trump because he won the election yet"

    truth, the mueller indictments are proof that the whole Trump collusion thing is a witch hunt fake.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/02/17/new-mueller-indictment-completely-undermines-liberal-trump-russia-collusion-narrative-heres-how

    @calfoxwc said:

    dream on. Three years from now it will be "they are going to get Trump because he won the election yet"

    truth, the mueller indictments are proof that the whole Trump collusion thing is a witch hunt fake.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/02/17/new-mueller-indictment-completely-undermines-liberal-trump-russia-collusion-narrative-heres-how

    Already buying the "switch" I see from Russian interference is a hoax to collusion is a hoax. Exactly what I expected from a Trumpette unable to see his boyfriend clearly. Read the whole damn thing and "dream on".

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/read-muellers-full-indictment-13-russians-charged-election-meddling-191048683.html

  • WAR?  we are at WAR ?  with RUSSIA?

    didnt the 1980's call and ask for their foreign policy back?

    no?

    ruope.jpg

  • This is all going nowhere.  Just a diversion from Hillary and to manipulate the lefties.

  • Russians trying to meddle is completely different from Trump colluding with Russia—the mainstream media is trying to conflate the two.

  • Fake News, Drain the Swap, MAGA, Obamao, Hitlery....... the Trumpettes pivot once again.  This investigation is far from over but if narrative played out during the Obama Administration Cal, DieHard and Fair would have broken the internet with outrage.

  • Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, suit and text

  • I guess it’s okay when the U.S. interfered in other countries elections.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-17/former-cia-chief-admits-us-meddling-foreign-elections-their-own-good

  • @canton-dawg said:

    I guess it’s okay when the U.S. interfered in other countries elections.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-17/former-cia-chief-admits-us-meddling-foreign-elections-their-own-good

    It's not okay, it's fantastic.  If a country is able to sway the direction of another to their benefit without war that is great.  The problem is when you are the country being lead around by your nose.  Frightening all the patriots in here not more outraged with one of our main rivals affecting the outcome of our presidential election.  Republican jesus, Reagan, is turning over in his grave.  If this happened in 1982 we may have gone to war, at minimum Republicans would have been losing their schit.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    I guess it’s okay when the U.S. interfered in other countries elections.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-17/former-cia-chief-admits-us-meddling-foreign-elections-their-own-good

    It's not okay, it's fantastic.  If a country is able to sway the direction of another to their benefit without war that is great.  The problem is when you are the country being lead around by your nose.  Frightening all the patriots in here not more outraged with one of our main rivals affecting the outcome of our presidential election.  Republican jesus, Reagan, is turning over in his grave.  If this happened in 1982 we may have gone to war, at minimum Republicans would have been losing their schit.

    @baconhound said:

    It's not okay, it's fantastic.  If a country is able to sway the direction of another to their benefit without war that is great.  The problem is when you are the country being lead around by your nose.  Frightening all the patriots in here not more outraged with one of our main rivals affecting the outcome of our presidential election.  Republican jesus, Reagan, is turning over in his grave.  If this happened in 1982 we may have gone to war, at minimum Republicans would have been losing their schit.

    They are too busy crabbing backwards with their dear leader. As each new revelation occurs as the Mueller investigation unfolds, expect more backwards crabbing from this indefensible president whose latest tweet aims again at the FBI for spending too much time on Russia and not preventing the shooting. 

    https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2018-02-18/trump-accuses-fbi-of-spending-too-much-time-on-russia-probe

    Benedict Arnold feels better in his grave every day.

  • @baconhound said:

    It's not okay, it's fantastic.  If a country is able to sway the direction of another to their benefit without war that is great.  The problem is when you are the country being lead around by your nose.  Frightening all the patriots in here not more outraged with one of our main rivals affecting the outcome of our presidential election.  Republican jesus, Reagan, is turning over in his grave.  If this happened in 1982 we may have gone to war, at minimum Republicans would have been losing their schit.

    They are too busy crabbing backwards with their dear leader. As each new revelation occurs as the Mueller investigation unfolds, expect more backwards crabbing from this indefensible president whose latest tweet aims again at the FBI for spending too much time on Russia and not preventing the shooting. 

    https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2018-02-18/trump-accuses-fbi-of-spending-too-much-time-on-russia-probe

    Benedict Arnold feels better in his grave every day.

    @texasag1969 said:

    They are too busy crabbing backwards with their dear leader. As each new revelation occurs as the Mueller investigation unfolds, expect more backwards crabbing from this indefensible president whose latest tweet aims again at the FBI for spending too much time on Russia and not preventing the shooting. 

    https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2018-02-18/trump-accuses-fbi-of-spending-too-much-time-on-russia-probe

    Benedict Arnold feels better in his grave every day.

    Image may contain: one or more people and text

  • @calfoxwc said:

    dream on. Three years from now it will be "they are going to get Trump because he won the election yet"

    truth, the mueller indictments are proof that the whole Trump collusion thing is a witch hunt fake.

    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/02/17/new-mueller-indictment-completely-undermines-liberal-trump-russia-collusion-narrative-heres-how

    Already buying the "switch" I see from Russian interference is a hoax to collusion is a hoax. Exactly what I expected from a Trumpette unable to see his boyfriend clearly. Read the whole damn thing and "dream on".

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/read-muellers-full-indictment-13-russians-charged-election-meddling-191048683.html

    @texasag1969 said:

    Already buying the "switch" I see from Russian interference is a hoax to collusion is a hoax. Exactly what I expected from a Trumpette unable to see his boyfriend clearly. Read the whole damn thing and "dream on".

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/read-muellers-full-indictment-13-russians-charged-election-meddling-191048683.html

    that makes no sense. The russians supported both sides - they were trying to get hell raised in the election,

    and screw up our entire electoral process. There WAS ATTEMPTED INTERFERENCE, there was NO COLLUSION, except by your democrats. You want it to be collusion so badly, you don't seem to read any article at all - you just interpret it as you want it to be.