Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Saquon Barkley Combine Bound

Saquon Barkley Combine Bound

Locked The Browns Board
341 31 10.4k 1
  • hoortaH hoorta

    @poeticg said:

    I feel you but I have hope we take Barkley #1. I have hope because Dorsey was pretty adamant that the last FO didn't get real players. Barkley IS the definition of a REAL PLAYER. My hope is that Dorsey is at least as smart as me and can see the forest for the trees. You take that guy six days a week and 30-40 times on Sunday.

    25-30 carries and 10 receptions.  

    Dorsey also has a history of not drafting running backs high. Really Po, it's gotten to the point- you can post all the videos you want to, and no one is going to bother looking at them anymore. You're wasting your time, the horse was beaten to death in the previous thread. . 

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on
    #302

    @hoorta said:

    Dorsey also has a history of not drafting running backs high. Really Po, it's gotten to the point- you can post all the videos you want to, and no one is going to bother looking at them anymore. You're wasting your time, the horse was beaten to death in the previous thread. . 

    I stopped reading a long time ago.   I'lll scan through just to see the responses to his nonsense because those can be funny but otherwise this is all just a waste of time.

  • Mark OM Mark O

    @hoorta said:

    Dorsey also has a history of not drafting running backs high. Really Po, it's gotten to the point- you can post all the videos you want to, and no one is going to bother looking at them anymore. You're wasting your time, the horse was beaten to death in the previous thread. . 

    I stopped reading a long time ago.   I'lll scan through just to see the responses to his nonsense because those can be funny but otherwise this is all just a waste of time.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #303

    @mark-o said:

    I stopped reading a long time ago.   I'lll scan through just to see the responses to his nonsense because those can be funny but otherwise this is all just a waste of time.

    Yes.....a video appropriate for this thread:

  • PoeticGP PoeticG

    @dutch-oven said:

    The Giants are an intelligent, well-run franchise.

    Intelligent, well-run franchises don't pass on the replacement for their 37 year old QB for a RB with a top 5 pick. Especially franchises who rarely ever find themselves this high in the draft.

    My reply to your comment is for you to watch the video. Toward the end you'll get the answer you're looking for. Justification. 

    S SkippinTurtles wrote on
    #304

    @poeticg said:

    My reply to your comment is for you to watch the video. Toward the end you'll get the answer you're looking for. Justification. 

    This team need to do something drastic.  Take a QB at #1 and #4 unless Barkley is there at #4.  The QB competition needs to be wide-a$$ open.  Kizer blows.

  • PoeticGP PoeticG

    Film Room Session. Come, learn with me 🙂 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #305

    @poeticg said:

    Film Room Session. Come, learn with me 🙂 

    I learned he has another fan boy. Anything in that video (I wasted 10 minutes looking at it) has already been rehashed around 10 times. 

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #306

    Another 13 pages of PoG Suckson Barkley thread? 

    You know...doing too much pole smoking like Po does may not be all that great for his health.

    24324d1222893757-i-guess-you-would-call-

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on
    #307

    Po be's pole dancing over Suckson Barkley:

    poledancing.jpg

  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on
    #308

    Seems like I do at least know as much as Mel Kiper. He's got Barkley going to the Giants #2... 

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #309

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    mjp28M hoortaH 2 Replies
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on
    #310

    @dutch-oven said:

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    Oh god I hope the BROWNS brass don't put any stock into that drivel.

    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
    Dutch OvenD 1 Reply
    😂
  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on
    #311

    Here's the first video Nike's released.

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
  • mjp28M mjp28

    @dutch-oven said:

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    Oh god I hope the BROWNS brass don't put any stock into that drivel.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #312

    @mjp28 said:

    Oh god I hope the BROWNS brass don't put any stock into that drivel.

    It's just sad to see Kiper slipping into senility right before our eyes....  

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    @mjp28 said:

    Oh god I hope the BROWNS brass don't put any stock into that drivel.

    It's just sad to see Kiper slipping into senility right before our eyes....  

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on
    #313

    @dutch-oven said:

    It's just sad to see Kiper slipping into senility right before our eyes....  

    I was never a Kiper fan anyways.   I much prefer the NFL network gang of scouts/draft experts.

    Dutch OvenD gumby73G mjp28M 3 Replies
  • Mark OM Mark O

    @dutch-oven said:

    It's just sad to see Kiper slipping into senility right before our eyes....  

    I was never a Kiper fan anyways.   I much prefer the NFL network gang of scouts/draft experts.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #314

    @mark-o said:

    I was never a Kiper fan anyways.   I much prefer the NFL network gang of scouts/draft experts.

    I like McShay strictly based on his ability to bust Vampire Kiper's balls. 

  • Mark OM Mark O

    @dutch-oven said:

    It's just sad to see Kiper slipping into senility right before our eyes....  

    I was never a Kiper fan anyways.   I much prefer the NFL network gang of scouts/draft experts.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on
    #315

    @mark-o said:

    I was never a Kiper fan anyways. 

    He's a Ravens homo. I liked Kiper.. till the day Kiper told the world that Cam Erving could play every OL Position..Than we were dumb enough to try it..  

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on
    #316

    @dutch-oven said:

    Didn't Kiper have the Browns taking Josh Allen #1 in his first mock?

    And has Allen #1 in his second mock too... 🙁  (unless you're Cal) Comparing him to Matt Stafford? Don't think so Mel. I knew Mayfield would start moving up the boards fast.   

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #317

    Josh Allen, #1 overall would be a very Cleveland Browns thing to do. 

    You don't go a generation without winning a playoff game by accident. 

  • tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #318

    13 pages in this thread and nobody has brought up that I charted RB 1's in a Hue offense (going back to Oakland) average on 14cpg.  

    My personal belief on Barkley aside - whomever would advocate for him being a top 5 pick...  can you justify the Browns taking him knowing how criminally underused running backs are under our current HC?

    Dutch OvenD 1 Reply
  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on
    #319

    What amount of touches did Crowell get? Then add in Dukes touches, and their combined catches and you'll get the answer. 

    I'll check it out. 

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
  • PoeticGP PoeticG

    What amount of touches did Crowell get? Then add in Dukes touches, and their combined catches and you'll get the answer. 

    I'll check it out. 

    PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on
    #320

    @poeticg said:

    What amount of touches did Crowell get? Then add in Dukes touches, and their combined catches and you'll get the answer. 

    I'll check it out. 

    Crowell - 191 attempts. Duke - 81 attempts. 

    Let's round it up some to imagine an offense actually moving the chains consistently. Let's say 333 carries. 

    Receiving

    Crowell - 28 catches. Duke - 74 catches. So add in another 120 catches. 

    333 carries and 120 catches. Roughly 453 touches. Is that the answer you were looking for? 

    We can break that down per game 453 divided by 16 games(not counting the post season) to around 28 touches per game... although It think it could amount to more, I guess it would depend on what the defenses decide to do. 

    The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
    Gunz41G 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    13 pages in this thread and nobody has brought up that I charted RB 1's in a Hue offense (going back to Oakland) average on 14cpg.  

    My personal belief on Barkley aside - whomever would advocate for him being a top 5 pick...  can you justify the Browns taking him knowing how criminally underused running backs are under our current HC?

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on
    #321

    @tiamat63 said:

    13 pages in this thread and nobody has brought up that I charted RB 1's in a Hue offense (going back to Oakland) average on 14cpg.  

    My personal belief on Barkley aside - whomever would advocate for him being a top 5 pick...  can you justify the Browns taking him knowing how criminally underused running backs are under our current HC?

    The same thought process should be used regarding Josh Allen... How can anyone justify this organization taking a QB who even supporters admit needs to sit for a season or two, when rushing QBs onto the field has been what this team (sans Brady Quinn) has done time after time?

Log in to reply