Landry is Ours
-
-
Gordon on one side, Landry in the slot, and coleman on the other side. That's a pretty good core. i can see the WR meeting room now, "Corey, just run a go route or a skinny post...we will handle the rest..." as Gordon and landry giggle away
Gordon on one side, Landry in the slot, and coleman on the other side. That's a pretty good core. i can see the WR meeting room now, "Corey, just run a go route or a skinny post...we will handle the rest..." as Gordon and landry giggle away
Add Kirk to this mix nd it could be quite a show to watch. NE always has a bunch of this kind of receivers.
-
Landry
Gordon
Coleman
Higgins
And others .......... is WR a need in the draft now ?
Well can't really trust that Gordon is a Brown two years from now, and Coleman hasn't shown much, so yes .. but not a Top 4 pick need.
This is a great pick-up,Ā just what we needed. Gordon will be getting open now and Coleman can move to the slot.
Add Barkley and Cousins....
Hell, Barkley, Sam Bradford and our choice of qbĀ at #4 ...
Zombo
Zombo said:
Well can't really trust that Gordon is a Brown two years from now, and Coleman hasn't shown much, so yes .. but not a Top 4 pick need.
This is a great pick-up,Ā just what we needed. Gordon will be getting open now and Coleman can move to the slot.
Add Barkley and Cousins....
Hell, Barkley, Sam Bradford and our choice of qbĀ at #4 ...
Zombo
Well Z, I have to apologize. AĀ bunch of us were up in arms when we traded Andy Lee to the Panthers for a 4th round pick.Ā Don't think there'd be much grief around here trading Lee and a future 7th for Jarvis Landry.Ā

-
Not looking at what we exchanged, I like this trade. And it makes a lot of sense with the Taylor trade and the offensive players we have.
Our best assets in offense are Johnson, a promising pair of TEs and Gordon. All of them can work the middle in short-intermediate throws, being Gordon (and maybe Njoku) the only deep threats in the roster. Adding Landry makes us not rely on a doubtful Coleman and leaves Gordon as a deep threat. Also, Landry has some entity to take a lot of attention from Gordon.
We add Taylor, who's not fantastic but can run an easy 1-2 read offense and run for some yards, and next we see is a short passing offense, that tries to keep possesion at the same time that can throw deep at times.Ā
Now we need a RB that can mantain a big workload and gain yards after contact.Ā
Good news: this doesn't look like an offense Hue would run, so let's hope Haley is in charge and can work on his own.
-
Hate the picks weāve given up. Duke Johnson can do anything Landry can do. Ā
Landry the first WR in NFL history to have 100 receptions and less than 1000 yards. And he doesnāt score TDās.Ā
This is ugly.Ā
-
Just read we essentially have Landry as a one year rental because if he doesnāt produce we let him walk and will get our pick back via compensatory picks.Ā
Thatās made me feel better.Ā
-
Just read we essentially have Landry as a one year rental because if he doesnāt produce we let him walk and will get our pick back via compensatory picks.Ā
Thatās made me feel better.Ā
Just read we essentially have Landry as a one year rental because if he doesnāt produce we let him walk and will get our pick back via compensatory picks.Ā
Thatās made me feel better.Ā
You got a link for that bit of info about the compensatory pick? I poked around and couldnāt find it.
-
Hate the picks weāve given up. Duke Johnson can do anything Landry can do. Ā
Landry the first WR in NFL history to have 100 receptions and less than 1000 yards. And he doesnāt score TDās.Ā
This is ugly.Ā
Hate the picks weāve given up. Duke Johnson can do anything Landry can do. Ā
Landry the first WR in NFL history to have 100 receptions and less than 1000 yards. And he doesnāt score TDās.Ā
This is ugly.Ā
If Sashi had done this you would be touting his genius. Also Duke =\= Landry. I know you just understand the numbers but Landry getting that many catches but with a limited amount of yards has a lotĀ to do with play design, protection, Ā and who is throwing the ball.Ā
But we all know Sashi would have traded a third for fourĀ 7th rounders and a half eaten sandwich. Right now he is trading his Mercedes for three Honda Civics that donāt have engines.
-
Zombo said:
Well can't really trust that Gordon is a Brown two years from now, and Coleman hasn't shown much, so yes .. but not a Top 4 pick need.
This is a great pick-up,Ā just what we needed. Gordon will be getting open now and Coleman can move to the slot.
Add Barkley and Cousins....
Hell, Barkley, Sam Bradford and our choice of qbĀ at #4 ...
Zombo
Well Z, I have to apologize. AĀ bunch of us were up in arms when we traded Andy Lee to the Panthers for a 4th round pick.Ā Don't think there'd be much grief around here trading Lee and a future 7th for Jarvis Landry.Ā

-
Sashi would of been against this trade as Landry didn't attend Harvard
-
-
Hate the picks weāve given up. Duke Johnson can do anything Landry can do. Ā
Landry the first WR in NFL history to have 100 receptions and less than 1000 yards. And he doesnāt score TDās.Ā
This is ugly.Ā
If Sashi had done this you would be touting his genius. Also Duke =\= Landry. I know you just understand the numbers but Landry getting that many catches but with a limited amount of yards has a lotĀ to do with play design, protection, Ā and who is throwing the ball.Ā
But we all know Sashi would have traded a third for fourĀ 7th rounders and a half eaten sandwich. Right now he is trading his Mercedes for three Honda Civics that donāt have engines.
But we all know Sashi would have traded a third for fourĀ 7th rounders and a half eaten sandwich.
Or Jamie Collins
-
We already have a Sashi disciple comparing Landry to Duke haha.
You canāt have a conversation without being an pooper about it. I have my opinions and you have yours. Iāll get on with my day without being angry at someone over the Internet for disagreeing with me.Ā
-
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-reportedly-acquire-jarvis-landry-by-trading-a-2018-and-2019-pick-to-dolphins/Ā reception by direction chart that fits Tyrod..Todd Haley got some new toys..
-
-
We already have a Sashi disciple comparing Landry to Duke haha.
You canāt have a conversation without being an pooper about it. I have my opinions and you have yours. Iāll get on with my day without being angry at someone over the Internet for disagreeing with me.Ā
You canāt have a conversation without being an pooper about it. I have my opinions and you have yours. Iāll get on with my day without being angry at someone over the Internet for disagreeing with me.Ā
You are comparing Jarvis Landry to Duke Johnson just so you can have a reason to have a raw a.ss about Dorsey making a good move. Yes, I will bust your stones about that.
I donāt mind you at all but the post Sashi moping and bagging on the new regime is dumb. I gave Sashi time until it became clear that he was inept.
-
But we all know Sashi would have traded a third for fourĀ 7th rounders and a half eaten sandwich.
Or Jamie Collins
Or Jamie Collins
One decent trade coupled with loads of trading out of talent.
-
You canāt have a conversation without being an pooper about it. I have my opinions and you have yours. Iāll get on with my day without being angry at someone over the Internet for disagreeing with me.Ā
You are comparing Jarvis Landry to Duke Johnson just so you can have a reason to have a raw a.ss about Dorsey making a good move. Yes, I will bust your stones about that.
I donāt mind you at all but the post Sashi moping and bagging on the new regime is dumb. I gave Sashi time until it became clear that he was inept.
You are comparing Jarvis Landry to Duke Johnson just so you can have a reason to have a raw a.ss about Dorsey making a good move. Yes, I will bust your stones about that.
I donāt mind you at all but the post Sashi moping and bagging on the new regime is dumb. I gave Sashi time until it became clear that he was inept.
No itās because Duke is a good slot receiver who was second only to Keenan Allen in YAC on third down.Ā
Youre assuming itās about Sashi just so you can ābust my stonesāĀ
-
In the first minute of the video āthis wonāt be about what he does on the field but what he looks like on paper...ā. I could stop it there.Ā
-
You are comparing Jarvis Landry to Duke Johnson just so you can have a reason to have a raw a.ss about Dorsey making a good move. Yes, I will bust your stones about that.
I donāt mind you at all but the post Sashi moping and bagging on the new regime is dumb. I gave Sashi time until it became clear that he was inept.
No itās because Duke is a good slot receiver who was second only to Keenan Allen in YAC on third down.Ā
Youre assuming itās about Sashi just so you can ābust my stonesāĀ
No itās because Duke is a good slot receiver who was second only to Keenan Allen in YAC on third down.Ā
Youre assuming itās about Sashi just so you can ābust my stonesāĀ
How many first downs did Duke generate on 3rd downs? Landry generates first downs on over 50% his catches.Ā
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login