Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Tyrod to Landry is not exciting

Tyrod to Landry is not exciting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
32 Posts 21 Posters 2.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Pat MahomoP Pat Mahomo

    A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

    Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

    hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 20k Posts
    • 5k Reputation
    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @pat-mahomo said:

    A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

    Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

    Sorry one of the Mods (not me) messes with screen names- (especially Steeler fans) I've told him several times to knock it off but he persists...   You're more than welcome to post here. 

    Sure Taylor and Landry are "just" upgrades. Landry happens to be a massive one compared to everything we've had lately save the unreliable Gordon. But when you go 1-15 and then 0-16 getting to 8-8 is Nirvana.  We had arguably the worst qb in the league last year, so average is looking good for a change. 

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Pat MahomoP Pat Mahomo

      A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

      Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

      Zombo Z
      • 8k Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @pat-mahomo said:

      A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

      Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

      Actually, you talked about us "featuring" Landry. Seems you are the one that forgot that he was a possession receiver ... and that he would be lined up opposite of Josh Gordon.

      Zombo

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • S SD_Tom

        @nickers said:

        Tom.. He fails at the two most important characteristics a QB thrives on.. Reading defenses and Accuracy.. He had those same issues at ND.. The kid is a total fraud at the QB position.. He should go play shooting guard for somebody.. Because I'll bet money he's out of football in 2 years.

        I wasn't a fan of him ever.  I thought Davis Webb was a way better mid rd gamble than Kizer.  

        I don't think he'll ever be good,  but I'm saying Hue did him no favors whatsoever.  Passing 40+ times a game? Awesome plan

        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @sd_tom said:

        I wasn't a fan of him ever.  I thought Davis Webb was a way better mid rd gamble than Kizer.  

        I don't think he'll ever be good,  but I'm saying Hue did him no favors whatsoever.  Passing 40+ times a game? Awesome plan

        Yep, so did I.  Unfortunately we haven't seen Davis Webb lighting it up either. So far.

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Bob806 Bob806B Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 5k Posts
          • 2k Reputation
          Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
          #24

          This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

          http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

          Karlis Missed
          The GipperT runyon27R 2 Replies Last reply
          👍
          Quote Reply
          • Pat MahomoP Pat Mahomo

            A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

            Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

            The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
            • 57k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
            #25

            @pat-mahomo said:

            A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR. 

            And we...at least I said:  No Shite Sherlock.   Your next sentence says it all:

            I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, which a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

            Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

            Do you blame them?

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Bob806B Bob806

              This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

              http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #26

              @bob806 said:

              This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

              http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

              This guy has no clue really.   No clue about how bad the QB situation here was compared to what they had....and apparently no clue that we are not counting on Taylor to take us to the promised land. 

              Taylor is not expected to be Moses.....maybe more a bit like Aaron.

              Mark OM Bob806B 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Bob806B Bob806

                This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

                http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

                runyon27 runyon27R Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                • 713 Posts
                • 180 Reputation
                runyon27R runyon27 wrote on last edited by
                #27

                @bob806 said:

                This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

                http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

                Ha ha that was good and I can see that happening, I think people just need to realize he isn't the permanent QB so expect some missed plays etc and remind yourself he is only temporary.

                1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • The GipperT The Gipper

                  @bob806 said:

                  This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

                  http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

                  This guy has no clue really.   No clue about how bad the QB situation here was compared to what they had....and apparently no clue that we are not counting on Taylor to take us to the promised land. 

                  Taylor is not expected to be Moses.....maybe more a bit like Aaron.

                  Mark O Mark OM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 6k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  @the-gipper said:

                  This guy has no clue really.   No clue about how bad the QB situation here was compared to what they had....and apparently no clue that we are not counting on Taylor to take us to the promised land. 

                  Taylor is not expected to be Moses.....maybe more a bit like Aaron.

                  Clearly people in Buffalo forgot what Taylors replacement did in one half against the Chargers.   6 interceptions in one half of football.   Obviously they now need to draft or pay for a replacement as a FA.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Pat MahomoP Pat Mahomo

                    A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

                    Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

                    The Cysko Kid T Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                    • 15k Posts
                    • 2k Reputation
                    T The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by The Cysko Kid
                    #29

                    @pat-mahomo said:

                    A few of you are really taking my comments hard.  I said this is an UPGRADE.  A lot of people here posting about these moves like Tyrod Taylor and Jarvis Landry are about to be the next Montana to Rice.  I'm simply pointing out Jarvis is a possesion WR.  I am not saying Cleveland didn't need someone like him.  He is an UPGRADE.  Tyrod Taylor isn't an especially good QB.  He won't turn the ball over much though, wich a young growing team will benefit from when he plays.  Safe passer throwing to good possesion WR is an UPGRADE....it is not an exciting combo.  My point is, these moves are good moves if they are in tandem with bigger moves to improve...IF these ARE the moves to improve, the Browns will continue to be the Browns.

                    Second....my screen name is supposed to be Pat Mahomer, but the admins here saw fit to change it to Pat Mahomo.  

                    Nobody is treating it like that. 

                    The fact that, as bad as the browns have been, you expect them to pick up Aaron Rodgers through trades is baffling. We would have gotten burned in free agency for sure and the trade we made, though unspectacular, was a smart trade to improve the team in realistic ways. 

                    Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Pat MahomoP Pat Mahomo

                      The Browns had to use the capital they have sooner or later, but a QB who isn't especially accurate, who has 3 seasons of film to study, leading one of the worst passing offenses year to year, throwing to a WR who is probalby the best short yardage possesion WR in the NFL, isn't going to be exciting......again, coming off of 1-31, these moves seem to be an upgrade, and surely Tyrod isn't the only QB there will be.  I am sure he is a bridge.....at least he better be...Tyrod to Landry isn't really that much better than Kizer to Gordon.  

                      The moves show the team is prepared to be aggressive and make moves to change......but still need to get a franchise QB in this draft at pick 1....everything else is just window dressing.

                      mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                      • 18k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      @pat-mahomo said:

                      A. ..Tyrod to Landry isn't really that much better than Kizer to Gordon.  

                      B. The moves show the team is prepared to be aggressive and make moves to change......but still need to get a franchise QB in this draft at pick 1....everything else is just window dressing.

                      "Interesting" thread?

                      A. How would you know this on two very different quarterbacks and recievers?

                      B. What if there are NO franchise quarterbacks in this draft, it does NOT happen every year in fact it can go years without a true franchise guy. I see a bunch of guys with varying amount of flaws along with good points. Results in 2 to 5 years there.

                      GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • The GipperT The Gipper

                        @bob806 said:

                        This is a pretty funny take from a Buffalo reporter on Tyrod.....

                        http://www.wgr550.com/articles/opinion/dear-browns-fans

                        This guy has no clue really.   No clue about how bad the QB situation here was compared to what they had....and apparently no clue that we are not counting on Taylor to take us to the promised land. 

                        Taylor is not expected to be Moses.....maybe more a bit like Aaron.

                        Bob806 Bob806B Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 5k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        @the-gipper said:

                        This guy has no clue really.   No clue about how bad the QB situation here was compared to what they had....and apparently no clue that we are not counting on Taylor to take us to the promised land. 

                        Taylor is not expected to be Moses.....maybe more a bit like Aaron.

                        I think it's more tongue-in-cheek to we Browns fans, at least that's how I read it.

                        The author sounds like a Browns Boarder lol.

                        Karlis Missed
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • WarriorsRpussies WarriorsRpussiesW Dedicated Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 358 Posts
                          • 113 Reputation
                          WarriorsRpussiesW WarriorsRpussies wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          I'll take bored and fundamentals over 0-16 anyday.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Theme
                          • System
                          • Light
                          • Dark
                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Forums
                          • Recent
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Donate