Skip to content

Barkley at #1?

Locked The Browns Board
499 53 13.9k 1
  • Lol, this chowder head thinks that Tyrod Taylor will keep the Browns from drafting a QB, probably why he only gets 100 votes when he puts up a poll. 

  • Lol, this chowder head thinks that Tyrod Taylor will keep the Browns from drafting a QB, probably why he only gets 100 votes when he puts up a poll. 

    @roycerolls said:

    Lol, this chowder head thinks that Tyrod Taylor will keep the Browns from drafting a QB, probably why he only gets 100 votes when he puts up a poll. 

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

  • @roycerolls said:

    Lol, this chowder head thinks that Tyrod Taylor will keep the Browns from drafting a QB, probably why he only gets 100 votes when he puts up a poll. 

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    It's a dual role.😁

  • TaKe RuNiNgBaCk aT 1

    Mod Edit: Thanks, but Po won't listen to reason....  

  • @roycerolls said:

    Lol, this chowder head thinks that Tyrod Taylor will keep the Browns from drafting a QB, probably why he only gets 100 votes when he puts up a poll. 

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just thought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just thought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

    @roycerolls said:

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just bought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

    My bad. My point still stands.

  • Top 10 Player Groupings

    1.  4 Top QBs

    2.  Top 5 talent:  Chubb, DE - Fitzpatrick, S/CB

    4.  Picks 6-10:  Ward, CB - Edmunds, LB - Vea, DT - Nelson, OG

    5.  Picks 10-12:  Smith, LB- James, S - Ridley, WR

    6.  Picks 13-15:  Evans, LB - Brown, OT - Jackson, CB - McGlinchey, OT

    7.  Mid 1st Picks:    Landry, OLB - Payne, DT - Davenport, DE - Hughes, CB - Hurst, DT

    8.  Later 1st Rounders:  Williams, OT - O'Neill, OT - Kirk, WR - Guise, RB - Michel, RB - Price, C/OG - Green, DE, - Sutton, WR, Wynn, C/OG

    9.  Late 1st-Top 2nd:  Hubbard, DE - Jackson, CB - Alexander, CB - Hernandez,  OG, - Bryan, DT - Jackson, QB - Esch, LB - Jones, RB - Oliver, CB - Rankin, OT - Davis, CB - Chubb, RB - Key, DE/LB

    10.  The Rest Depending on Need

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    PoG is a troll or a tard. No in between.

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just thought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

    @roycerolls said:

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just thought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

    I stopped wasting my time after the first minute. If he thinks us picking up Taylor is a good reason to not draft a QB at #1, that's pretty lame. 

    I'd happily flip picks with the Giants moving down to #2 if they'll guarantee us they're taking Saquon. (Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way).   

  • @jrb12711 said:

    If he did make to #4, I'm all about it. I'd be extremely surprised if he made it that far though. Although not outside the realm of possibility picks 1, 2 and 3 go QB.

    I’d take Barkley at 33 or 35.  

    @roycerolls said:

    I’d take Barkley at 33 or 35.  

    He will be gone before 15

  • @roycerolls said:

    I was actually referring to the guy in the video PoG posted, I didn’t quote it, but he wasn’t trolling, he just thought he was giving good analysis, but it wasn’t good, not at all. 

    I stopped wasting my time after the first minute. If he thinks us picking up Taylor is a good reason to not draft a QB at #1, that's pretty lame. 

    I'd happily flip picks with the Giants moving down to #2 if they'll guarantee us they're taking Saquon. (Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way).   

    @hoorta said:

    I stopped wasting my time after the first minute. If he thinks us picking up Taylor is a good reason to not draft a QB at #1, that's pretty lame. 

    I'd happily flip picks with the Giants moving down to #2 if they'll guarantee us they're taking Saquon. (Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way).   

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

  • Zero chance this happens after trading Kizer (it was never happening anyway but whatever) and with the Bills getting as high up as they can, possibly ending at #2 or #3.

    This thread can be closed 😉

  • @hoorta said:

    I stopped wasting my time after the first minute. If he thinks us picking up Taylor is a good reason to not draft a QB at #1, that's pretty lame. 

    I'd happily flip picks with the Giants moving down to #2 if they'll guarantee us they're taking Saquon. (Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way).   

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    All they have to do is get back to the 5-6 win range and theyre safe. That can easily be done while grooming the future franchise QB and running the ball with duke and pretty much any rb off the street. No need to belay finding the future of the franchise to get yet another "once in a generation back" 

    (Pretty sure I heard that same kinda line about Trent Richardson some years back including PoG falling in love)

  • @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    All they have to do is get back to the 5-6 win range and theyre safe. That can easily be done while grooming the future franchise QB and running the ball with duke and pretty much any rb off the street. No need to belay finding the future of the franchise to get yet another "once in a generation back" 

    (Pretty sure I heard that same kinda line about Trent Richardson some years back including PoG falling in love)

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    All they have to do is get back to the 5-6 win range and theyre safe. That can easily be done while grooming the future franchise QB and running the ball with duke and pretty much any rb off the street. No need to belay finding the future of the franchise to get yet another "once in a generation back" 

    (Pretty sure I heard that same kinda line about Trent Richardson some years back including PoG falling in love)

    Exactly...  There are enough RB's in this draft and its likely that one or more of them will be just as good as Barkely.

  • @hoorta said:

    I stopped wasting my time after the first minute. If he thinks us picking up Taylor is a good reason to not draft a QB at #1, that's pretty lame. 

    I'd happily flip picks with the Giants moving down to #2 if they'll guarantee us they're taking Saquon. (Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way).   

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

  • @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    @roycerolls said:

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    lets see how FA plays out first.

  • I don't want a "fast turnaround"... that's what 07 was.  

    I was sustainable results with players that aren't flash-in-the pan.  

    RB average lifespan is 5 years in the NFL.  By the time the Brownies could be consistently relavent Barkley would be on the back 9 of his career. 

    Solid pass.  

  • @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    All they have to do is get back to the 5-6 win range and theyre safe. That can easily be done while grooming the future franchise QB and running the ball with duke and pretty much any rb off the street. No need to belay finding the future of the franchise to get yet another "once in a generation back" 

    (Pretty sure I heard that same kinda line about Trent Richardson some years back including PoG falling in love)

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    All they have to do is get back to the 5-6 win range and theyre safe. That can easily be done while grooming the future franchise QB and running the ball with duke and pretty much any rb off the street. No need to belay finding the future of the franchise to get yet another "once in a generation back" 

    (Pretty sure I heard that same kinda line about Trent Richardson some years back including PoG falling in love)

    I've said that "once in a generation back" happens around every other year of late. Elliott, Fournette. Now Barkley. I'll bet Boo another $20 Sony Michel will have at least 90% of the production of Saquon. 

    BTW, the Browns are in serious talks extending Duke Johnson.  Hint, hint. Why would we extend a third down pass catching specialist  RB,  If we're hot on draftng Barkley? 

  • @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    @roycerolls said:

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    Let me get on this too! I'm with Rolls...

  • @boo-fagley said:

    I'm back on Barkley at 1.

    Why? Dorsey and Hue are in win now mode. Hue does not win and win big he is gone.Barkley is the fastest turn around guy and the drafted QB is not going play because Taylor was not acquired to sit.

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    @roycerolls said:

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    My logical brain says that is a great deal. My other brain says I want odds on that one, 2:1? 3:1? 😳

  • @roycerolls said:

    I’ll bet you $20 browns don’t take Barkley at 1.  

    My logical brain says that is a great deal. My other brain says I want odds on that one, 2:1? 3:1? 😳

    @mjp28 said:

    My logical brain says that is a great deal. My other brain says I want odds on that one, 2:1? 3:1? 😳

    I upped the ante on another thread.

    I've offered PoG a $100 bet on Barkley being selected #1 overall by the Browns.