Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Carlos Hyde is a Brown

Carlos Hyde is a Brown

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
102 Posts 33 Posters 3.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 4k Posts
    • 918 Reputation
    L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

    LogicIsForSquaresL darren15D Z 3 Replies Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • L LondonBrown

      Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

      LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 10k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
      #4

      @londonbrown said:

      Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

      He is currently crying and sliding one foot on to a window sill.

      darren15D 1 Reply Last reply
      😂
      Quote Reply
      • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 10k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I like this move. They could draft a guy later and go into the season with Hyde, Duke, and mid round pick.

        Z 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • L LondonBrown

          Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

          darren15 darren15D Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 4k Posts
          • 959 Reputation
          darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by
          #6

          @londonbrown said:

          Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

          Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

          LogicIsForSquaresL OsirisO runyon27R The GipperT hoortaH 5 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

            @londonbrown said:

            Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

            He is currently crying and sliding one foot on to a window sill.

            darren15 darren15D Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 4k Posts
            • 959 Reputation
            darren15D darren15 wrote on last edited by darren15
            #7

            @logicisforsquares said:

            He is currently crying and sliding one foot on to a window sill.

            Someone send Ghoolie  round to talk him down............actually come to think of it  better not ...

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • darren15D darren15

              @londonbrown said:

              Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

              Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

              LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 10k Posts
              • 2k Reputation
              LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
              #8

              @darren15 said:

              Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

              The team still needs DBs and another pass rusher. If Chubb is there, I could see them making that pick.

              1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                • 18k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Wow this isn't your grandpa's 2017 Cleveland Browns team anymore. 😮

                GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                B 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • darren15D darren15

                  @londonbrown said:

                  Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

                  Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

                  Osiris OsirisO Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 125 Reputation
                  OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by Osiris
                  #10

                  @darren15 said:

                  Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

                  Probably means we are drafting Fitzpatrick or Chubb at 4. Trading out/down is possible, too, but this team really needs to add some blue-chip talent, so I'd prefer they stay put or at least in the top 10. That said, my guess, pick 4 is going to become extremely valuable because picks 1, 2, and 3 could very well go QB. Everyone talks about 4 QBs being first-rounders (Rosen, Mayfield, Darnold, Allen). With a run on QB, that's going to leave just 1 top-tier QB left, we could have a bidding war for that #4 pick.

                  Isn't Carlos Hyde a very similar back to Crowell?

                  "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta
                  LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                  ❤
                  Quote Reply
                  • OsirisO Osiris

                    @darren15 said:

                    Probably means we are trading out of 4 with The Bills for 12 and 22

                    Probably means we are drafting Fitzpatrick or Chubb at 4. Trading out/down is possible, too, but this team really needs to add some blue-chip talent, so I'd prefer they stay put or at least in the top 10. That said, my guess, pick 4 is going to become extremely valuable because picks 1, 2, and 3 could very well go QB. Everyone talks about 4 QBs being first-rounders (Rosen, Mayfield, Darnold, Allen). With a run on QB, that's going to leave just 1 top-tier QB left, we could have a bidding war for that #4 pick.

                    Isn't Carlos Hyde a very similar back to Crowell?

                    LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 10k Posts
                    • 2k Reputation
                    LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    @osiris said:

                    Probably means we are drafting Fitzpatrick or Chubb.

                    Isn't Carlos Hyde a very similar back to Crowell?

                    Hyde is a thumper and doesn't get tripped by ghosts. 

                    OsirisO 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                      @osiris said:

                      Probably means we are drafting Fitzpatrick or Chubb.

                      Isn't Carlos Hyde a very similar back to Crowell?

                      Hyde is a thumper and doesn't get tripped by ghosts. 

                      Osiris OsirisO Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 125 Reputation
                      OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @logicisforsquares said:

                      Hyde is a thumper and doesn't get tripped by ghosts. 

                      Ah, yep. That drove me nuts with Crowell. Good upgrade then. Wonder if they might still take an RB with 2nd or 3rd round pick.

                      "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta
                      LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 5k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        I like this move, and it's smart and sensible.  

                        Now, as far as the draft goes, I have this terrible feeling that it's not going to go like ANYBODY thinks.  I have these fears that we're going to get cute and screw it all up.  Forgive me for my paranoia, but it's not paranoia if it always happens.  In fact, I'd literally bet money that we're trading at least one of our first rounders.  

                        And I'm already mad about it. 

                        OsirisO 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • OsirisO Osiris

                          @logicisforsquares said:

                          Hyde is a thumper and doesn't get tripped by ghosts. 

                          Ah, yep. That drove me nuts with Crowell. Good upgrade then. Wonder if they might still take an RB with 2nd or 3rd round pick.

                          LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 10k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          @osiris said:

                          Ah, yep. That drove me nuts with Crowell. Good upgrade then. Wonder if they might still take an RB with 2nd or 3rd round pick.

                          I am guessing yeah just because Hyde is 27. Getting one of the 2nd round or mid round RBs would be advisable. A Hyde, Michel, Duke rotation would be nice.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 4k Posts
                            • 918 Reputation
                            L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Why be mad about it, that #4 pick is going to be worth a shitload to somebody and if they're willing to overpay why not move back a little. 

                            That's smart.

                            jiggins7919J 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • L LondonBrown

                              Why be mad about it, that #4 pick is going to be worth a shitload to somebody and if they're willing to overpay why not move back a little. 

                              That's smart.

                              jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 5k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              @londonbrown said:

                              Why be mad about it, that #4 pick is going to be worth a shitload to somebody and if they're willing to overpay why not move back a little. 

                              That's smart.

                              Fair point.  Let me clarify.  "I'm already mad about moving too far back and missing out on the best players of the draft."

                              If we trade back, but not TOO far, I can live with it.  Oh, and if we trade back without drafting our QB first, I'll literally go insane.  

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                                @londonbrown said:

                                Why be mad about it, that #4 pick is going to be worth a shitload to somebody and if they're willing to overpay why not move back a little. 

                                That's smart.

                                Fair point.  Let me clarify.  "I'm already mad about moving too far back and missing out on the best players of the draft."

                                If we trade back, but not TOO far, I can live with it.  Oh, and if we trade back without drafting our QB first, I'll literally go insane.  

                                LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 4k Posts
                                • 918 Reputation
                                L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                @jiggins7919 said:

                                Fair point.  Let me clarify.  "I'm already mad about moving too far back and missing out on the best players of the draft."

                                If we trade back, but not TOO far, I can live with it.  Oh, and if we trade back without drafting our QB first, I'll literally go insane.  

                                Your sanity is safe we are drafting a QB at #1 don’t worry. 

                                I’d be happy to go where the bills are now and take Harold Landry if we don’t take Barkley at #4 

                                LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

                                  I like this move, and it's smart and sensible.  

                                  Now, as far as the draft goes, I have this terrible feeling that it's not going to go like ANYBODY thinks.  I have these fears that we're going to get cute and screw it all up.  Forgive me for my paranoia, but it's not paranoia if it always happens.  In fact, I'd literally bet money that we're trading at least one of our first rounders.  

                                  And I'm already mad about it. 

                                  Osiris OsirisO Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 2k Posts
                                  • 125 Reputation
                                  OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @jiggins7919 said:

                                  I like this move, and it's smart and sensible.  

                                  Now, as far as the draft goes, I have this terrible feeling that it's not going to go like ANYBODY thinks.  I have these fears that we're going to get cute and screw it all up.  Forgive me for my paranoia, but it's not paranoia if it always happens.  In fact, I'd literally bet money that we're trading at least one of our first rounders.  

                                  And I'm already mad about it. 

                                  We have a completely different front office now, so I wouldn't expect the #1 pick to be traded. That #4 pick is going to be nearly as valuable as the #1 pick because it is likely their will be a run on QBs, leaving just 1 top-tier QB of the 4 when pick 4 rolls around.  Possible teams that would want to pick a QB: Dolphins at 11, Redskins at 13, Cardinals at 15, Chargers at 17,  Bills at 21. If it's the Bills, they will have to give a boatload up to the Browns to move up that high.

                                  "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta
                                  jiggins7919J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  👍
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • L LondonBrown

                                    Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

                                    Zombo Z
                                    • 8k Posts
                                    • 0 Reputation
                                    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @londonbrown said:

                                    Someone go round and check on PoG because we know what this means (if we didn’t already) 

                                    Lol ... Yes, this ends the Barkley speculation... definitely a QB at 1, BPA at 4.

                                    Zombo

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • 7moses7 7 Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 1k Posts
                                      • 248 Reputation
                                      7 7moses7 wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      Put #34 on Hyde’s back and bring back the player he was at Ohio State . Good move by this FO , now tell Joe Thomas to make a decision and move forward 

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                        I like this move. They could draft a guy later and go into the season with Hyde, Duke, and mid round pick.

                                        Zombo Z
                                        • 8k Posts
                                        • 0 Reputation
                                        Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @logicisforsquares said:

                                        I like this move. They could draft a guy later and go into the season with Hyde, Duke, and mid round pick.

                                        Hyde and Duke compliment each other her well.

                                        Mr. Inside and Mr. Outside.

                                        Z

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • L LondonBrown

                                          @jiggins7919 said:

                                          Fair point.  Let me clarify.  "I'm already mad about moving too far back and missing out on the best players of the draft."

                                          If we trade back, but not TOO far, I can live with it.  Oh, and if we trade back without drafting our QB first, I'll literally go insane.  

                                          Your sanity is safe we are drafting a QB at #1 don’t worry. 

                                          I’d be happy to go where the bills are now and take Harold Landry if we don’t take Barkley at #4 

                                          LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 10k Posts
                                          • 2k Reputation
                                          LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @londonbrown said:

                                          Your sanity is safe we are drafting a QB at #1 don’t worry. 

                                          I’d be happy to go where the bills are now and take Harold Landry if we don’t take Barkley at #4 

                                          I could definitely be into that. A CB somewhere in the first would be swell. Getting the bills two first round picks plus some would make that possible. 

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate