Chris Hubbard is a Brown
-
Let's hope today's focus on multiple O lineman isn't the prequel to JT retiring tomorrow.
If they are pushing for solder I think that's exactly what is going to happen.
-
-
Hubbard is rock solid. He filled in for Gilbert when Gilbert was out. We knew we weren't going to be able to afford him as he played his way out of a back up role and he's not going to start over Gilbert. I think the Browns overpaid a little BUT he's very, very solid. It's a great signing for the Browns and you all have money to burn. I will also be shocked if there is a competition. He will win the starting job easily.
Edit: he's also position versatile. He can play the whole way across the line. He's likely going to be a stud for the Browns. Take care of the big boy.
Hubbard is rock solid. He filled in for Gilbert when Gilbert was out. We knew we weren't going to be able to afford him as he played his way out of a back up role and he's not going to start over Gilbert. I think the Browns overpaid a little BUT he's very, very solid. It's a great signing for the Browns and you all have money to burn. I will also be shocked if there is a competition. He will win the starting job easily.
Edit: he's also position versatile. He can play the whole way across the line. He's likely going to be a stud for the Browns. Take care of the big boy.
Well....if they keep Shon Coleman....there likely will be a competition for the RT job. Even if Hubbard does not win that competition...he still applies the depth we need along the OL because of what you say: his versatility and ability to play across the whole line.
-
Hubbard was a good signing. Didn't see it mentioned that he can play both OT spots at a decent level. That's valuable versatility.
Stephenson's signing mystifies me. It ranks right up there with McQuistan's...
Solder is going to cost far more than he is, or ever will be, worth. Hopefully that won't be our problem.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Hubbard was a good signing. Didn't see it mentioned that he can play both OT spots at a decent level. That's valuable versatility.
Stephenson's signing mystifies me. It ranks right up there with McQuistan's...
Solder is going to cost far more than he is, or ever will be, worth. Hopefully that won't be our problem.
Hubbard was a good signing. Didn't see it mentioned that he can play both OT spots at a decent level. That's valuable versatility.
Stephenson's signing mystifies me. It ranks right up there with McQuistan's...
Solder is going to cost far more than he is, or ever will be, worth. Hopefully that won't be our problem.
Giants got him for like 62 mill.
-
Hubbard was a good signing. Didn't see it mentioned that he can play both OT spots at a decent level. That's valuable versatility.
Stephenson's signing mystifies me. It ranks right up there with McQuistan's...
Solder is going to cost far more than he is, or ever will be, worth. Hopefully that won't be our problem.
Giants got him for like 62 mill.
Giants got him for like 62 mill.
Why is it lately this all sounds like dealing with used cars?
" I've got this low mileage beauty for only 62 mil." New NFL math.
-
Welcome to Cleveland. Our new LT, I guess.
-
Yes the OT cupboard was bare so we signed Hubbard
-
Hubbard is rock solid. He filled in for Gilbert when Gilbert was out. We knew we weren't going to be able to afford him as he played his way out of a back up role and he's not going to start over Gilbert. I think the Browns overpaid a little BUT he's very, very solid. It's a great signing for the Browns and you all have money to burn. I will also be shocked if there is a competition. He will win the starting job easily.
Edit: he's also position versatile. He can play the whole way across the line. He's likely going to be a stud for the Browns. Take care of the big boy.
Well....if they keep Shon Coleman....there likely will be a competition for the RT job. Even if Hubbard does not win that competition...he still applies the depth we need along the OL because of what you say: his versatility and ability to play across the whole line.
Well....if they keep Shon Coleman....there likely will be a competition for the RT job. Even if Hubbard does not win that competition...he still applies the depth we need along the OL because of what you say: his versatility and ability to play across the whole line.
My point was Hubbard is better than Coleman and he will win the job easily.
-
Well....if they keep Shon Coleman....there likely will be a competition for the RT job. Even if Hubbard does not win that competition...he still applies the depth we need along the OL because of what you say: his versatility and ability to play across the whole line.
My point was Hubbard is better than Coleman and he will win the job easily.
My point was Hubbard is better than Coleman and he will win the job easily.
Well....maybe. I am certainly NOT taking your word for it when it comes to a matter of talent evaluation. Nevertheless.... At this point though....unless there is someone else.....Hubbard may be slated for LT. Has he played LT? Any good at it?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login