Exactly when did "everyone" here climb onto the Chubb train? And why?
-
Plus this...
Ryan HannableVerified account @RyanHannable
According to
@TonyPauline, Bill Belichick told a number of people at NC State's pro day today how impressed he was by DE Bradley Chubb.12:27 PM - 19 Mar 2018Plus this...
Ryan HannableVerified account @RyanHannable
According to
@TonyPauline, Bill Belichick told a number of people at NC State's pro day today how impressed he was by DE Bradley Chubb.12:27 PM - 19 Mar 2018You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
-
I like Chubb’s hands, strength and motor. He’s relentless, doesn’t move backwards and has that killer instict I like to see in d lineman. The fact that he plays a premium position and adds a lot of flexibility and depth to a very important position is why he’s my pick at 4. If the Browns get a good package to move down, so be it, but if they’re picking at 4, I don’t see anyone better than Chubb.
Itd be nice to play Denver against buffalo and move down to 5, pick up an extra pick or 2 and still get Bradley Chubb.
-
I like Chubb’s hands, strength and motor. He’s relentless, doesn’t move backwards and has that killer instict I like to see in d lineman. The fact that he plays a premium position and adds a lot of flexibility and depth to a very important position is why he’s my pick at 4. If the Browns get a good package to move down, so be it, but if they’re picking at 4, I don’t see anyone better than Chubb.
Itd be nice to play Denver against buffalo and move down to 5, pick up an extra pick or 2 and still get Bradley Chubb.
Itd be nice to play Denver against buffalo and move down to 5, pick up an extra pick or 2 and still get Bradley Chubb.
You're evil. - But I like it.
Draft value chart shows only 100 points value to move from 5 to 4. That would be their pick #99. Maybe we could wrangle their 71st pick but I highly doubt we get their pick #40.
-
Itd be nice to play Denver against buffalo and move down to 5, pick up an extra pick or 2 and still get Bradley Chubb.
You're evil. - But I like it.
Draft value chart shows only 100 points value to move from 5 to 4. That would be their pick #99. Maybe we could wrangle their 71st pick but I highly doubt we get their pick #40.
You're evil. - But I like it.
Draft value chart shows only 100 points value to move from 5 to 4. That would be their pick #99. Maybe we could wrangle their 71st pick but I highly doubt we get their pick #40.
Quarterback premium.
Based on the draft value chart the Colts should only have had to give up this years second and third to move up from #6 to #3. It cost them two seconds and a future second.
-
Plus this...
Ryan HannableVerified account @RyanHannable
According to
@TonyPauline, Bill Belichick told a number of people at NC State's pro day today how impressed he was by DE Bradley Chubb.12:27 PM - 19 Mar 2018You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
Agree... Denver would have to defend the pick from BUF so it would cost them at least their second because you know BUF will throw the kitchen sink, two #1's and at least a #2 at us.
Then the decision becomes do we like Chubb (or Barkley or Minkah) enough to pass up the added haul BUF would pony up.
Of course all this is predicated upon Denver and at least one more team wanting the last QB(s) standing at #4. Really makes me hope that NYG does go Barky at #3 (sorry, Po).
You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
Not really...
While I won't kick the dog if we take Chubb at #4 (unless I find out later we passed on a big deal with BUF). I'd like him or any other prospect better at #5 with Denver's 2nd and change in our pocket.
But primarily I'm still about trading down the #4 with BUF to see if I can land Ward at #12 and Vander Esch at #22.
BTW... I do not own a dog.
-
He can go blow himself for all I care. He would be yet another monumental waste of a first-round draft pick. THe Browns have no skilled players. That is why they went 0 - 16. Chubb, like the homosexual Zumba poosy we drafted last year, will make no difference in the Browns w-l ratio. but then again, we really don't give a schidt about wins, do we?
IN DORKEY WE TRUST........................... IN DORKEY WE TRUST.................
idiots.
The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL -
Agree... Denver would have to defend the pick from BUF so it would cost them at least their second because you know BUF will throw the kitchen sink, two #1's and at least a #2 at us.
Then the decision becomes do we like Chubb (or Barkley or Minkah) enough to pass up the added haul BUF would pony up.
Of course all this is predicated upon Denver and at least one more team wanting the last QB(s) standing at #4. Really makes me hope that NYG does go Barky at #3 (sorry, Po).
You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
Not really...
While I won't kick the dog if we take Chubb at #4 (unless I find out later we passed on a big deal with BUF). I'd like him or any other prospect better at #5 with Denver's 2nd and change in our pocket.
But primarily I'm still about trading down the #4 with BUF to see if I can land Ward at #12 and Vander Esch at #22.
BTW... I do not own a dog.
But primarily I'm still about trading down the #4 with BUF to see if I can land Ward at #12 and Vander Esch at #22.
The problem with that scenario is that I am not so sure Ward will still be there @ #12. But if we really want him more than Chubb, Fitz or cough, choke the dog Barkley, just take him @ #4.
-
I live in Tally and went to FSU, so I can tell you first hand how much of a problem Chubb was both during the passing and running game. To me, that's supreme value for a high pick. A guy who is beyond solid in both phases of defense, doesn't have to come off the field, and is completely solid OFF the field. Admittedly, my Noles had a terrible line and a freshman, skinny QB, but Chubb was everywhere. He also has the frame to add another 10-15 pounds pretty easily, and at that point you're talking about a 6'4, 280+ pound wrecking ball with above average athleticism and heavy hands. He certainly checks a lot of boxes, and has the potential to be an impact player right away. That's what I want out of my #4 pick. We go QB #1, and there's a real chance we don't see that guy this year (which is fine). We take Chubb at 4 and we can see him a whole lot. Our offense obviously sucked buttjuice last year, but don't forget just how awful our defense was, and especially, how bad we were at generating pressure when we needed it.
Oh, and speaking of having the frame for additional muscle, lord knows how big Myles Garrett will be this season as he gets older and has another year of weight room. Don't forget how young he is, and it wouldn't surprise me to hear that Garrett added another 10+ pounds of "good weight". I doubt it would affect his speed at all, and he'd be over 6'4 and around 285ish. Yeesh.
-
From the people who voted, most would rather take Minkah or Barkley ahead of Chubb. http://thebrownsboard.com/topic/49472-poll-if-you-could-only-pick-one/
Just added one to the Minkah tally. Not my top FS or CB, but his versatility to play either at a high level has added value as we sort things out in our revamped 2ndary.
My appreciation of Chubb mirrors what I said when I watched his tape - he isn't elite at any one thing 'YET'. But is one of the more complete edge defenders I've seen in a while. Hand usage, bend, an inside move, stacking/shed, gap discipline, motor, balance, angles, quickness and power. To me he is the perfect compliment to MG. Is he the specimen Myles is? - No. But then again there are probably only a few humans on the entire planet with that kind of physical skill set. Bradley flashes the little things, the technical things that only need to be refined and attacked with continuous improvement. It's not like drafting Mingo based on him being an athlete then asking him to play the position while trying to learn and utilize on the fly. I don't picture that being an issue here. I see BG as being one of the "safest" picks in this draft. Right up there with Ridley in that mold, I just feel he'll make a quality pro from day 1.
Couple questions:
- Are you echoing my "floor/ceiling" theme in my above prior post?
- Is "safest" the same as warranted? If the Bills came calling waiving their two #1's can you pass on Chubb for that deal? If you stay at #4 with only QBs off the board at 1 thru 3, is Chubb your pick? If not, where is he in your board order at #4?
Just added one to the Minkah tally. Not my top FS or CB, but his versatility to play either at a high level has added value as we sort things out in our revamped 2ndary.
Couple questions:
- Are you echoing my "floor/ceiling" theme in my above prior post?
- Is "safest" the same as warranted? If the Bills came calling waiving their two #1's can you pass on Chubb for that deal? If you stay at #4 with only QBs off the board at 1 thru 3, is Chubb your pick? If not, where is he in your board order at #4?
Apologies for the late response... things have been chaotic on my end.
I wonder how redundant it would be to draft Minkah? I also see a bit of how Peppers was deployed similar to him. He played a great deal of snaps as that star/viper/rover defender. Not unlike Randall whom we just traded for who I presume will be seeing majority of the snaps as the deep centerfielder he played in 'Zona? The difference between back in the single high is something Randall has experience with including the NFL level. Might be another adjustment period there with Fitz... Just thinking out loud here. I'm off track.
Anywho, to answer your questions.
I'm not necessarily echoing your theme of floor/ceiling and here is why - technically proficient and kinetic awareness. I think we can agree in the 2014 draft that Clowney was arguably the best athlete drafted regardless of position. The kid is a true freak and has few equals on this planet. For all that athletic ability and raw talent, Kahlil Mack ended up being the superior player. Not that Mack doesn't have athletic gifts himself, he most surely does. But Kahlil had the the little things already displayed while at Buffalo and continued to build on them in Oakland. I almost see the MG/Chubb thing as similar. Does Myles have the greater ceiling? Yes, yes he does. But that is (right now) ONLY because of his physical gifts. As we know, simply being blessed athletically doesn't make you the better player. I believe Bradley could step in and better every bit as effective because of the focus on details he has received. The combination of hand usage and footwork aligning with his counter move is something Garrett never really showed in college. Then again, he never had too.
I don't agree that Bradley has maxed out physically though. He's 21.. still several years of growth, professional conditioning and coaching to be had. My love of adding a premium ED is that this pass rush no longer hinges on MG's health. At which point (god forbid) something were to happen to Myles, you wouldn't see coach Williams panic and develop game plans where he blitzes himself into trouble. Every great defense has two players on the field that can collapse the pocket be it interior or edge. I also wouldn't feel comfortable with Jackson or Ward at 4... so naturally this was the best way I believe to address defensive issues.
Point taken on the safest/warranted. Do I see Chubb as the next Mack? No, I do not. I see him as a quality ED in a similar mold to Everson Griffen. That being said, would I entertain Buffalo if they came at me with their 2 firsts? Probably. Because Griffin is a great DE. But I value quality AND quantity. Would I take two good players with fringe probowl potential over one great player that will see a couple probowl nods his away? Maybe, given this team needs a large infusion of talent. I haven't constructed the rest of my 1st/2nd round board to make the determination yet but I'm working on it and will have it done in the next week or two. My heart leans towards No at the moment. I know I want DB and pass rush addressed and I'm looking at where to start. However if we stay at 4 and Chubb is there? Yes, he is most certainly my pick. Quarterback and effecting the quarter back are the two priorities in the NFL. As I said, I see no DB worth that value, Minkah will need time to adjust to his new primary role in the NFL, no dominant ID and no Julio Jones this draft. Bradley is my 2nd favorite player right behind Rosen.
-
Plus this...
Ryan HannableVerified account @RyanHannable
According to
@TonyPauline, Bill Belichick told a number of people at NC State's pro day today how impressed he was by DE Bradley Chubb.12:27 PM - 19 Mar 2018You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
You starting to get on the Chubb train Tour?
Was watching NFLN last night and Jeremiah ranked his top EDs coming out of college from the last few years. #1 Myles Garrett (sorry Ghoolie the toolie), then Clowney, Bosa, and Mack. Has Chubb at #5. MHO? Plenty good enough to take him at #4 overall. As Tia just pointed out- if Garrett's ankles turn balky again- it's not the disaster it would be otherwise.
We've also seen- if you can generate an effective pass rush with only your front 4, it will make William's job a lot easier. Opens the door for some of those blitz packages, and sure helps the defensive backs when they don't have to cover WRs indefinitely, because the opposing QB has enough time to order carryout waiting for his guys to break open.
-
He can go blow himself for all I care. He would be yet another monumental waste of a first-round draft pick. THe Browns have no skilled players. That is why they went 0 - 16. Chubb, like the homosexual Zumba poosy we drafted last year, will make no difference in the Browns w-l ratio. but then again, we really don't give a schidt about wins, do we?
IN DORKEY WE TRUST........................... IN DORKEY WE TRUST.................
idiots.
He can go blow himself for all I care. He would be yet another monumental waste of a first-round draft pick. The Browns have no skilled players. That is why they went 0 - 16. Chubb, like the homosexual Zumba poosy we drafted last year, will make no difference in the Browns w-l ratio. but then again, we really don't give a schidt about wins, do we?
IN DORKEY WE TRUST........................... IN DORKEY WE TRUST.................
idiots.
We go get the best WR in free agency, get a QB that's the 5X better than Kizer. Gordon stays off the wacky tobacky he's one of the best WRs in the game. Carlos Hyde was 62 yards short of being in the top 10 in rushing last year. So go shove it we have no skilled players going into 2018, and we haven't even drafted yet.
Another premium edge rusher happens to be a skilled position. Eagles won the Super Bowl because the defense forced Brady into a game deciding fumble.
So go ahead be a dork, and keep pumping that Zumba Dancing Barkley- who can't run inside. When NFL teams prevent him from running outside, he's going to be worthless. All it will take is a defender to crack him in the knee when he dances, and it's Bo Jackson time. Jim Brown he ain't. Not even as good as Adrian Peterson.
Ready to take your Paxton Lynch poster down yet? He's about done. The Broncos brought in Keenum, and are drafting a QB.
-
I like to judge and select players that are the most ahead of the next players at their position. I don't think anyone in this draft is close to Chubb coming off the edge. Most of the other positions have several players each of whom could be rated the best or close. Just the thought of having 2 studs, one on each side, chasing every QB around would be great to watch. Plus I like Guise for RB, or the USC kid. And Derwin at safety, or Reid would be nice. Several CBs will be good once they learn the pro game. Easy to get a CB this year at top of 2nd. Don't wait any longer than that on a CB though.
In the 2nd round I would go OT, CB, and WR. Then call it a day.
-
But primarily I'm still about trading down the #4 with BUF to see if I can land Ward at #12 and Vander Esch at #22.
The problem with that scenario is that I am not so sure Ward will still be there @ #12. But if we really want him more than Chubb, Fitz or cough, choke the dog Barkley, just take him @ #4.
The problem with that scenario is that I am not so sure Ward will still be there @ #12. But if we really want him more than Chubb, Fitz or cough, choke the dog Barkley, just take him @ #4.
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
I'm not necessarily echoing your theme of floor/ceiling and here is why - technically proficient and kinetic awareness. I think we can agree in the 2014 draft that Clowney was arguably the best athlete drafted regardless of position. The kid is a true freak and has few equals on this planet. For all that athletic ability and raw talent, Kahlil Mack ended up being the superior player. Not that Mack doesn't have athletic gifts himself, he most surely does. But Kahlil had the the little things already displayed while at Buffalo and continued to build on them in Oakland. I almost see the MG/Chubb thing as similar. Does Myles have the greater ceiling? Yes, yes he does. But that is (right now) ONLY because of his physical gifts. As we know, simply being blessed athletically doesn't make you the better player. I believe Bradley could step in and better every bit as effective because of the focus on details he has received. The combination of hand usage and footwork aligning with his counter move is something Garrett never really showed in college. Then again, he never had too.
I don't agree that Bradley has maxed out physically though. He's 21.. still several years of growth, professional conditioning and coaching to be had. My love of adding a premium ED is that this pass rush no longer hinges on MG's health. At which point (god forbid) something were to happen to Myles, you wouldn't see coach Williams panic and develop game plans where he blitzes himself into trouble. Every great defense has two players on the field that can collapse the pocket be it interior or edge. I also wouldn't feel comfortable with Jackson or Ward at 4... so naturally this was the best way I believe to address defensive issues.
Thanks...
The Mack/Clowney parallel is interesting, but is it appropriate? If you compare their Combines... Mack measured out as the bigger freak, albeit 10 or 15 lb lighter. And my take was he arrived with superior tech to boot. Once he shifted to DE Mack exploded on the scene. Since then he has backslid a little. Whereas Clowney, once passed his early ailments, has been coming on bit by bit as his technique has developed.
When I see Garrett, I can see Clowney. But when I see Chubb, I do not see Mack... and I don't see growth.
That said... not sure why the conversation turned to include Erectile Dysfunction...
Ready to take your Paxton Lynch poster down yet?
Couldn't if he tried... it's cum-stuck to the wall...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Darnold at 1 I think by now ever knows he’s the best. And at two it’s Chubb or fitz. The question is a guy that could be a dominant db safety or cornerback. Or another dominant pass rusher opposite Garrett. It’s really a coin flip. But I feel that the pass rusher will help the d backfield as hole because there is another pass rusher already there. But fitz is really good too. Idk I guess heads or tales.
-
The problem with that scenario is that I am not so sure Ward will still be there @ #12. But if we really want him more than Chubb, Fitz or cough, choke the dog Barkley, just take him @ #4.
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
I'm not necessarily echoing your theme of floor/ceiling and here is why - technically proficient and kinetic awareness. I think we can agree in the 2014 draft that Clowney was arguably the best athlete drafted regardless of position. The kid is a true freak and has few equals on this planet. For all that athletic ability and raw talent, Kahlil Mack ended up being the superior player. Not that Mack doesn't have athletic gifts himself, he most surely does. But Kahlil had the the little things already displayed while at Buffalo and continued to build on them in Oakland. I almost see the MG/Chubb thing as similar. Does Myles have the greater ceiling? Yes, yes he does. But that is (right now) ONLY because of his physical gifts. As we know, simply being blessed athletically doesn't make you the better player. I believe Bradley could step in and better every bit as effective because of the focus on details he has received. The combination of hand usage and footwork aligning with his counter move is something Garrett never really showed in college. Then again, he never had too.
I don't agree that Bradley has maxed out physically though. He's 21.. still several years of growth, professional conditioning and coaching to be had. My love of adding a premium ED is that this pass rush no longer hinges on MG's health. At which point (god forbid) something were to happen to Myles, you wouldn't see coach Williams panic and develop game plans where he blitzes himself into trouble. Every great defense has two players on the field that can collapse the pocket be it interior or edge. I also wouldn't feel comfortable with Jackson or Ward at 4... so naturally this was the best way I believe to address defensive issues.
Thanks...
The Mack/Clowney parallel is interesting, but is it appropriate? If you compare their Combines... Mack measured out as the bigger freak, albeit 10 or 15 lb lighter. And my take was he arrived with superior tech to boot. Once he shifted to DE Mack exploded on the scene. Since then he has backslid a little. Whereas Clowney, once passed his early ailments, has been coming on bit by bit as his technique has developed.
When I see Garrett, I can see Clowney. But when I see Chubb, I do not see Mack... and I don't see growth.
That said... not sure why the conversation turned to include Erectile Dysfunction...
Ready to take your Paxton Lynch poster down yet?
Couldn't if he tried... it's cum-stuck to the wall...
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
Thanks...
The Mack/Clowney parallel is interesting, but is it appropriate? If you compare their Combines... Mack measured out as the bigger freak, albeit 10 or 15 lb lighter. And my take was he arrived with superior tech to boot. Once he shifted to DE Mack exploded on the scene. Since then he has backslid a little. Whereas Clowney, once passed his early ailments, has been coming on bit by bit as his technique has developed.
When I see Garrett, I can see Clowney. But when I see Chubb, I do not see Mack... and I don't see growth.
That said... not sure why the conversation turned to include Erectile Dysfunction...
Couldn't if he tried... it's cum-stuck to the wall...
Ha! The ED bit caught me pretty good.
Not my finest anology or comparison but I was just bringing up clowney vs Mack has the raw athlete vs athlete + more refind player.
I feel pretty strongly about the the Chubb to Everson Griffen comparison. That is who I see when I watch him.
Edit: worth remembering clowney is a few inches taller than Mack and some of the drills like 3 cone they were very comparable on given the height difference "working against" the former. Either way i think you get the point I'm trying to make.
-
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
Thanks...
The Mack/Clowney parallel is interesting, but is it appropriate? If you compare their Combines... Mack measured out as the bigger freak, albeit 10 or 15 lb lighter. And my take was he arrived with superior tech to boot. Once he shifted to DE Mack exploded on the scene. Since then he has backslid a little. Whereas Clowney, once passed his early ailments, has been coming on bit by bit as his technique has developed.
When I see Garrett, I can see Clowney. But when I see Chubb, I do not see Mack... and I don't see growth.
That said... not sure why the conversation turned to include Erectile Dysfunction...
Couldn't if he tried... it's cum-stuck to the wall...
Ha! The ED bit caught me pretty good.
Not my finest anology or comparison but I was just bringing up clowney vs Mack has the raw athlete vs athlete + more refind player.
I feel pretty strongly about the the Chubb to Everson Griffen comparison. That is who I see when I watch him.
Edit: worth remembering clowney is a few inches taller than Mack and some of the drills like 3 cone they were very comparable on given the height difference "working against" the former. Either way i think you get the point I'm trying to make.
-
The problem with that scenario is that I am not so sure Ward will still be there @ #12. But if we really want him more than Chubb, Fitz or cough, choke the dog Barkley, just take him @ #4.
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
I'm not necessarily echoing your theme of floor/ceiling and here is why - technically proficient and kinetic awareness. I think we can agree in the 2014 draft that Clowney was arguably the best athlete drafted regardless of position. The kid is a true freak and has few equals on this planet. For all that athletic ability and raw talent, Kahlil Mack ended up being the superior player. Not that Mack doesn't have athletic gifts himself, he most surely does. But Kahlil had the the little things already displayed while at Buffalo and continued to build on them in Oakland. I almost see the MG/Chubb thing as similar. Does Myles have the greater ceiling? Yes, yes he does. But that is (right now) ONLY because of his physical gifts. As we know, simply being blessed athletically doesn't make you the better player. I believe Bradley could step in and better every bit as effective because of the focus on details he has received. The combination of hand usage and footwork aligning with his counter move is something Garrett never really showed in college. Then again, he never had too.
I don't agree that Bradley has maxed out physically though. He's 21.. still several years of growth, professional conditioning and coaching to be had. My love of adding a premium ED is that this pass rush no longer hinges on MG's health. At which point (god forbid) something were to happen to Myles, you wouldn't see coach Williams panic and develop game plans where he blitzes himself into trouble. Every great defense has two players on the field that can collapse the pocket be it interior or edge. I also wouldn't feel comfortable with Jackson or Ward at 4... so naturally this was the best way I believe to address defensive issues.
Thanks...
The Mack/Clowney parallel is interesting, but is it appropriate? If you compare their Combines... Mack measured out as the bigger freak, albeit 10 or 15 lb lighter. And my take was he arrived with superior tech to boot. Once he shifted to DE Mack exploded on the scene. Since then he has backslid a little. Whereas Clowney, once passed his early ailments, has been coming on bit by bit as his technique has developed.
When I see Garrett, I can see Clowney. But when I see Chubb, I do not see Mack... and I don't see growth.
That said... not sure why the conversation turned to include Erectile Dysfunction...
Ready to take your Paxton Lynch poster down yet?
Couldn't if he tried... it's cum-stuck to the wall...
Ward might not be there at 12... Vander Esch might not be there at 22... but they might be...
As for Ward getting in the mix at #4, I think he's there.
Here's an exercise for you...Try looking at Chubb or Fitz at #4 vs. another option of #12, #22, a 2nd and a 3rd is on the table. Do they still look as good to you?
Well you know me by now. Give Garrett a rushing fool to go with him and we may have the makings of a Denver D. There just are not any other pass rushers this year like there were last year that might provide that kind of double trouble for opposing QBs. And so far we have not gotten one through FA. Now if that trade down assures me of Sony Michel and Christian Kirk...........................well maybe I would have to tell Garrett to suck it up for another year.
-
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/0ap3000000821423/Nick-Chubb-squats-600-pounds
yep, I'm still on the Chubb train. rb, that is. and still runs a 4.53 forty.
WATCH: Nick Chubb and Sony Michel run 40-yard dash at NFL combine
Mar 2, 2018 - Running Back U is well represented at the NFL combine. Former Georgia stars Nick Chubb and Sony Michel are going through all of their on-field drills in front of NFL scouts, coaches and executives at the combine in Indianapolis on Friday. The legendary Bulldogs duo has completed the first of two runs in ...
-
I like them both but there is just something special about Michel that got him that 7.9 ypc this year. When I watched them running against the same team Michel just seemed to be on a different level. Now the proviso is that Chubb is still not quite up to where he was before injury, so there is a better than even chance he continues to regain that form. I'd be far happier with either one of them in the second than Barkley @ 1 or 4.
-
I like them both but there is just something special about Michel that got him that 7.9 ypc this year. When I watched them running against the same team Michel just seemed to be on a different level. Now the proviso is that Chubb is still not quite up to where he was before injury, so there is a better than even chance he continues to regain that form. I'd be far happier with either one of them in the second than Barkley @ 1 or 4.
I like them both but there is just something special about Michel that got him that 7.9 ypc this year. When I watched them running against the same team Michel just seemed to be on a different level. Now the proviso is that Chubb is still not quite up to where he was before injury, so there is a better than even chance he continues to regain that form. I'd be far happier with either one of them in the second than Barkley @ 1 or 4.
Getting Michel in the same rotation with Hyde and Duke would be fantastic. But hell, I would like Nick Chubb, Guice, Freeman, Penny, or Scarborough as well. Just please no Barkley at 4.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login