Sam Darnold
-
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
-
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
We’ve got too many holes to draft 2 “top tier” QBs. At least that’s what’s on Dorsey’s mind. I could see him drafting a mid-late round guy like Mike White, Kyle Lauletta, or Logan Woodside and stashing him on the practice squad for a year. But I’d be shocked if we take a second QB in the first or second rd
-
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
We’ve got too many holes to draft 2 “top tier” QBs. At least that’s what’s on Dorsey’s mind. I could see him drafting a mid-late round guy like Mike White, Kyle Lauletta, or Logan Woodside and stashing him on the practice squad for a year. But I’d be shocked if we take a second QB in the first or second rd
We’ve got too many holes to draft 2 “top tier” QBs. At least that’s what’s on Dorsey’s mind. I could see him drafting a mid-late round guy like Mike White, Kyle Lauletta, or Logan Woodside and stashing him on the practice squad for a year. But I’d be shocked if we take a second QB in the first or second rd
Drafting two quarterbacks would be the dumbest move in the NFL draft history, what a way to miss on #1 and 4.
I'd rather see them draft -0- and look at it next year......but I doubt that will happen.
-
We’ve got too many holes to draft 2 “top tier” QBs. At least that’s what’s on Dorsey’s mind. I could see him drafting a mid-late round guy like Mike White, Kyle Lauletta, or Logan Woodside and stashing him on the practice squad for a year. But I’d be shocked if we take a second QB in the first or second rd
Drafting two quarterbacks would be the dumbest move in the NFL draft history, what a way to miss on #1 and 4.
I'd rather see them draft -0- and look at it next year......but I doubt that will happen.
Drafting two quarterbacks would be the dumbest move in the NFL draft history, what a way to miss on #1 and 4.
I'd rather see them draft -0- and look at it next year......but I doubt that will happen.
It's like you want this team to average .5 wins a season forever, mjp.
-
It's like you want this team to average .5 wins a season forever, mjp.
Dag nabbit you youngsters don't know crap about football. (too ghool?) Hey I've waited 54 years since I saw the last championship.
Actually I don't see any near franchise quarterback material in this draft I'd go any number of other combinations and trade up for a late R1 or use the R2 picks for a project quarterback and go with the two recent adds. But that's just me.
They aren't a quarterback away from competitive football......yet. GO BROWNS 2019.
-
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
If we do take two quarterbacks, I think it will be at #1, and it will be later in the first round (if we trade up a tad) or with #33. I seriously doubt we'd go QB at 1 and 4, but I COULD see us grabbing one Lamar Jackson if he is available later in the first. I sincerely believe our interest in Lamar Jackson is real. Now, I don't think it's "#1 real" like some crazy writers recently said, but I KNOW Hue Jackson loves read-option wrinkles, and nobody runs that formation like Lamar. Even as a rookie, Lamar would let you create a small package of plays that revolve around the shotgun, read-option formation. Even if it's one formation that has 3-5 variations, it's still enough to warrant the opposing defensive coordinator spending some time preparing for it. Can you imagine getting inside the red zone and then trotting out Lamar Jackson? Perhaps not the red zone, but more like inside the 10. He'd be a nightmare. And it'd be a great way to get him just a little experience on a weekly basis.
Do I think we'll do it? Not really. But think about this....if we make a trade with Buffalo and move down to 12 and 22 (after presumably taking a QB at 1), then it's possible Lamar plops into our laps at 22. We could theoretically draft a QB at 1, take a CB/S at 12, Lamar at 22, and then play around with the other picks Buffalo would most certainly give up to move up to 4. That would give us the flexibility to move back into the first round to basically guarantee we'd get the RB of our choice (other than Saquon, obviously).
i like the way you think: trade down and nab another QB with the #22 pick! drafting QBs at #22 is a Browns tradition, and Lamar at #22 would fit perfectly.
-
I've said it before... I can honestly see taking QBs at 1 and 4. If the mission, the main mission if to find our future franchise QB and the right remaining QB presents himself at #4, I'd do it.
The "too many holes" argument doesn't carry weight with me because as long as QB is one of those holes, then the rest don't matter.
And when you additionally consider that we aren't going to fill all the holes in this draft anyway... what does one more matter?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
I've said it before... I can honestly see taking QBs at 1 and 4. If the mission, the main mission if to find our future franchise QB and the right remaining QB presents himself at #4, I'd do it.
The "too many holes" argument doesn't carry weight with me because as long as QB is one of those holes, then the rest don't matter.
And when you additionally consider that we aren't going to fill all the holes in this draft anyway... what does one more matter?
I've said it before... I can honestly see taking QBs at 1 and 4. If the mission, the main mission if to find our future franchise QB and the right remaining QB presents himself at #4, I'd do it.
The "too many holes" argument doesn't carry weight with me because as long as QB is one of those holes, then the rest don't matter.
And when you additionally consider that we aren't going to fill all the holes in this draft anyway... what does one more matter?
I agree that a possible franchise quarterback would be fantastic especially with the #1 and/or #4 picks which they may not have in 2019 I just don't see any of the top 4 or 5 as worthy of a top pick -but- since the BROWNS can not get a true blue chip FA quarterback they must go ahead and pick one and hope he develops into a starter in the coming year(s).
And yes they definitely have holes but also have some near unprecedented draft pick positions to get some starters in the coming year.
So far their offseason moves have been very encouraging.
-
I've said it before... I can honestly see taking QBs at 1 and 4. If the mission, the main mission if to find our future franchise QB and the right remaining QB presents himself at #4, I'd do it.
The "too many holes" argument doesn't carry weight with me because as long as QB is one of those holes, then the rest don't matter.
And when you additionally consider that we aren't going to fill all the holes in this draft anyway... what does one more matter?
I agree that a possible franchise quarterback would be fantastic especially with the #1 and/or #4 picks which they may not have in 2019 I just don't see any of the top 4 or 5 as worthy of a top pick -but- since the BROWNS can not get a true blue chip FA quarterback they must go ahead and pick one and hope he develops into a starter in the coming year(s).
And yes they definitely have holes but also have some near unprecedented draft pick positions to get some starters in the coming year.
So far their offseason moves have been very encouraging.
but- since the BROWNS can not get a true blue chip FA quarterback they must go ahead and pick one and hope he develops into a starter in the coming year(s).
Not hard to read that as a two-pick endorsement.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Not hard to read that as a two-pick endorsement.
Tim Couch was a blue chip Prospect.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
With a team thrown together of hasbeens and reprobates.
-
As soon as Tyrod went down (he will) then both the QB's taken at #1 and #4 would be chopped and changed quarter after quarter by the moron we have at HC.
The only reason we should take two QB's is if the Browns are bored of ruining just one rookie QB and want to make it two.
-
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
Sam Darnold is going to be good. Josh Allen is going to be great, or be a bust. I still hope we take Darnold. Although the Patriots apparently love Darnold, and are looking to sell the farm + Gronk to us for that first pick
-
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
I sincerely hope all the Allen talk is a heavy blanket of smoke...
Sam Darnold is going to be good. Josh Allen is going to be great, or be a bust. I still hope we take Darnold. Although the Patriots apparently love Darnold, and are looking to sell the farm + Gronk to us for that first pick
Bust? Did you say BUST? That's what I'm afraid of LoB. That Josh may have the highest ceiling, he also has the lowest floor- by far. Regarding the Pats moving to #1, no way Jose. #4? Two firsts, two seconds this year, and throw in a couple future firsts, I might be interested.
-
Jeff RisdonVerified account @JeffRisdon
I spent 5 of the last 7 days in Cleveland, banging on sources old and new in and around the Browns. Other than one individual who I don't know well enough to trust, everyone says it's Darnold.
6:04 PM - 7 Apr 2018
I sincerely hope all the Allen talk is a heavy blanket of smoke...
Sam Darnold is going to be good. Josh Allen is going to be great, or be a bust. I still hope we take Darnold. Although the Patriots apparently love Darnold, and are looking to sell the farm + Gronk to us for that first pick
Bust? Did you say BUST? That's what I'm afraid of LoB. That Josh may have the highest ceiling, he also has the lowest floor- by far. Regarding the Pats moving to #1, no way Jose. #4? Two firsts, two seconds this year, and throw in a couple future firsts, I might be interested.
I sincerely hope all the Allen talk is a heavy blanket of smoke...
Bust? Did you say BUST? That's what I'm afraid of LoB. That Josh may have the highest ceiling, he also has the lowest floor- by far. Regarding the Pats moving to #1, no way Jose. #4? Two firsts, two seconds this year, and throw in a couple future firsts, I might be interested.
If the Patriots want Darnold, the 4th pick has no value to them. Darnold won’t be there at 4. If this offer is true, Dorsey has to decide if it’s worth giving up QB 1 for QB. 1A or 1B.
Keep in mind that all 4 QBs are graded across the board very high and are all considered to very likely be franchise QBs. Highest graded QB class in a long time. So at 4, we’re guaranteed to get one of them
-
Tim Couch was a blue chip Prospect.
WSS
Well Donovan McNabb was!
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login